File:Biconical antenna.png
A truncated biconical antenna showing the typical "mace head" shape

In radio systems, a biconical antenna is a broad-bandwidth antenna made of two roughly conical conductive objects, nearly touching at their points.<ref name=ZZ07>Template:Cite book</ref>

Biconical antennas are broadband dipole antennas, typically exhibiting a bandwidth of three octaves or more. A common subtype is the bowtie antenna, essentially a flattened version of the biconical design which is often used for short-range UHF television reception. These are also sometimes referred to as butterfly antennas.<ref name=AntTheo-BowTie>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Sir Arthur Lodge is the inventor of the biconical antenna.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite patent Template:Webarchive</ref>

File:Schwarzbeck RE 1790.jpg
Omnidirectional biconical antenna

PropertiesEdit

The biconical antenna has a broad bandwidth because it is an example of a traveling wave structure; the analysis for a theoretical infinite antenna resembles that of a transmission line. For an infinite antenna, the characteristic impedance at the point of connection is a function of the cone angle only and is independent of the frequency.

Practical antennas have finite length and a definite resonant frequency.<ref name=ZZ07/> A simple conical monopole antenna is a wire approximation of the solid biconical antenna and has increased bandwidth (over a simple monopole).

ApplicationsEdit

File:SBA 9113 (side view).jpg
Small biconical microwave antennas (up: 1–18 GHz, down: 0.5–3 GHz)

Biconical (or "bicon") antennas are often used in electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing either for immunity testing, or emissions testing.

File:Butterfly television antenna.jpg
DIY butterfly antenna, a flattened version of a biconical<ref name=AntTheo-BowTie/>

Advantages and drawbacksEdit

While the bicon is very broadband, it exhibits poor transmitting efficiency at frequencies at the low end of its range, resulting in low field strengths when compared to the input power. Log periodic dipole arrays, Yagi–Uda antennas, and reverberation chambers have shown to achieve much higher field strengths for the power input than a simple biconical antenna in an anechoic chamber.

However, when the goal is to fully characterize a modulated or impulse signal, rather than merely measuring peak and average spectrum energy content, a reverberation chamber is a poor choice for a test environment.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project

  • {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

  • {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Antenna Types Template:Authority control