Template:Short description Template:Redirect-several Template:Use dmy dates
Template:Behavioural influences
BrainwashingTemplate:Efn is the controversial idea that the human mind can be altered or controlled against a person's will by manipulative psychological techniques.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Brainwashing is said to reduce its subject's ability to think critically or independently, to allow the introduction of new, unwanted thoughts and ideas into their minds,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> as well as to change their attitudes, values, and beliefs.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
The term "brainwashing" was first used in English by Edward Hunter in 1950 to describe how the Chinese government appeared to make people cooperate with them during the Korean War. Research into the concept also looked at Nazi Germany and present-day North Korea, at some criminal cases in the United States, and at the actions of human traffickers. Scientific and legal debate followed, as well as media attention, about the possibility of brainwashing being a factor when lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) was used,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> or in the induction of people into groups which are considered to be cults.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Brainwashing has become a common theme in popular culture especially in war stories, thrillers, and science fiction stories.<ref name="O'Brien, Terry 2005">Template:Cite book Template:ISBN?</ref> In casual speech, "brainwashing" and its verb form, "brainwash", are used figuratively to describe the use of propaganda to sway public opinion.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
China and the Korean WarEdit
Template:See also The Chinese term Template:Translit (Template:Lang-zh Template:Lit)<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> was originally used by early 20th century Chinese intellectuals to refer to "modernizing" one's way of thinking.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The term was later used to describe the coercive persuasion used under the Maoist government in China, which aimed to transform "reactionary" people into "right-thinking" members of the new Chinese social system.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The term punned on the Taoist custom of "cleansing/washing the heart/mind" (Template:Lang-zh) before conducting ceremonies or entering holy places.Template:Efn
The earliest known English-language usage of the word "brainwashing" in an article by a journalist Edward Hunter, in Miami News, published in 1950.<ref name="Crean">Template:Cite book</ref> Hunter was an anticommunist and worked for the CIA.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=MarksJohn1979>Template:Cite book</ref> Hunter and others used the Chinese term to explain why, during the Korean War (1950–1953), some American prisoners of war (POWs) cooperated with their Chinese captors, and even in a few cases defected to their side.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> British radio operator Robert W. Ford<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> and British army Colonel James Carne also claimed that the Chinese subjected them to brainwashing techniques during their imprisonment.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
The U.S. military and government laid charges of brainwashing in an effort to undermine confessions made by POWs to war crimes, including biological warfare.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> After Chinese radio broadcasts claimed to quote Frank Schwable, Chief of Staff of the First Marine Air Wing admitting to participating in germ warfare, United Nations commander General Mark W. Clark asserted: "Whether these statements ever passed the lips of these unfortunate men is doubtful. If they did, however, too familiar are the mind-annihilating methods of these Communists in extorting whatever words they want ... The men themselves are not to blame, and they have my deepest sympathy for having been used in this abominable way."<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
Beginning in 1953, Robert Jay Lifton interviewed American servicemen who had been POWs during the Korean War as well as priests, students, and teachers who had been held in prison in China after 1951. In addition to interviews with 25 Americans and Europeans, Lifton interviewed 15 Chinese citizens who had fled after having been subjected to indoctrination in Chinese universities. (Lifton's 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China, was based on this research.)<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Lifton found that when the POWs returned to the United States their thinking soon returned to normal, contrary to the popular image of "brainwashing."<ref name="Home_by_Ship">Template:Cite journal</ref>
In 1956, after reexamining the concept of brainwashing following the Korean War, the U.S. Army published a report entitled Communist Interrogation, Indoctrination, and Exploitation of Prisoners of War, which called brainwashing a "popular misconception". The report concludes that "exhaustive research of several government agencies failed to reveal even one conclusively documented case of 'brainwashing' of an American prisoner of war in Korea."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Legal cases and the "brainwashing defense"Edit
The concept of brainwashing has been raised in defense of criminal charges. The 1969 to 1971 case of Charles Manson, who was said to have brainwashed his followers to commit murder and other crimes, brought the issue to renewed public attention.<ref>Minds on Trial: Great Cases in Law and Psychology, by Charles Patrick Ewing, Joseph T. McCann pp. 34–36</ref><ref>Shifting the Blame: How Victimization Became a Criminal Defense, Saundra Davis Westervelt, Rutgers University Press, 1998. p. 158</ref>
In 1974, Patty Hearst, a member of the wealthy Hearst family, when 19 years old was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army, a left-wing militant organization. After several weeks of captivity, she agreed to join the group and took part in their activities. In 1975, she was arrested and charged with bank robbery and the use of a gun in committing a felony. Her attorney, F. Lee Bailey, argued in her trial that she should not be held responsible for her actions since her treatment by her captors was the equivalent of the alleged brainwashing of Korean War POWs (see also Diminished responsibility).<ref name="Regreligion">Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe, James T. Richardson, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, p. 518 Template:ISBN?</ref> Bailey developed his case in conjunction with psychiatrist Louis Jolyon West and psychologist Margaret Singer. They had both studied the experiences of Korean War POWs. (In 1996, Singer published her theories in her best-selling book Cults in Our Midst.<ref name="refocus.org">Cults in Our Midst: The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace Template:Webarchive, Margaret Thaler Singer, Jossey-Bass, publisher, 2003, Template:ISBN</ref><ref name="clarke">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>) Despite this defense, Hearst was found guilty.<ref name="Regreligion" />
In 1990, Steven Fishman, who was a member of the Church of Scientology, was charged with mail fraud for conducting a scheme to sue large corporations via conspiring with minority stockholders in shareholder class action lawsuits. Fishman's attorneys notified the court that they intended to rely on an insanity defense, using the theories of brainwashing and the expert witnesses of Singer and Richard Ofshe to claim that the Church of Scientology had practiced brainwashing on him, which left him unsuitable to make independent decisions. The court ruled that the use of brainwashing theories is inadmissible in expert witnesses, citing the Frye standard, which states that scientific theories utilized by expert witnesses must be generally accepted in their respective fields.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Since then, United States courts have consistently rejected testimony about mind control or brainwashing on the grounds that these theories are not part of accepted science under the Frye standard.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
In 2003, the brainwashing defense was used unsuccessfully in defense of Lee Boyd Malvo, who was charged with murder for his part in the D.C. sniper attacks.<ref>Mental Condition Defences and the Criminal Justice System: Perspectives from Law and Medicine, Ben Livings, Alan Reed, Nicola Wake, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, p. 98 Template:ISBN?</ref><ref name="Oldenburg">Oldenburg, Don (21 November 2003). "Stressed to Kill: The Defense of Brainwashing; Sniper Suspect's Claim Triggers More Debate" Template:Webarchive, The Washington Post, reproduced in Defence Brief, issue 269, published by Steven Skurka & Associates</ref> Allegations of brainwashing have also been raised by plaintiffs in child custody cases.<ref>Warshak, R. A. (2010). Divorce Poison: How to Protect Your Family from Bad-mouthing and Brainwashing. New York: Harper Collins.</ref><ref>Richardson, James T. Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004, p. 16, Template:ISBN.</ref>
Thomas Andrew Green, in his 2014 book Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought, argues that the brainwashing defense undermines the law's fundamental premise of free will.<ref>Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought, Thomas Andrew Green, Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 391 Template:ISBN?</ref><ref>LaFave's Criminal Law, 5th (Hornbook Series), Wayne LaFave, West Academic, 18 March 2010, pp. 208–210 Template:ISBN?</ref> In 2003, forensic psychologist Dick Anthony said that "no reasonable person would question that there are situations where people can be influenced against their best interests, but those arguments are evaluated based on fact, not bogus expert testimony."<ref name="Oldenburg" />
Anti-cult movementEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}
.jpg){kind=link}
In the 1970s and 1980s, the anti-cult movement applied the concept of brainwashing to explain religious conversions to some new religious movements (NRMs) and other groups that they considered cults.<ref name="BromleyEncy">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Barker, Eileen: New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1989.</ref> News media reports tended to accept their view<ref name="Wright">Template:Cite journal</ref> and social scientists sympathetic to the anti-cult movement, who were usually psychologists, revised models of brainwashing.<ref name="BromleyEncy" /> While some psychologists were receptive to the concept, most sociologists were skeptical of its ability to explain conversion.<ref name="BarkerAReview">Template:Cite journal</ref> Some critics of Mormonism have accused it of brainwashing.<ref name="Helfrich 2021 p. 15">Template:Cite book</ref>
Philip Zimbardo defined mind control as "the process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition or behavioral outcomes."<ref name="Zimbardo 2002">Template:Cite journal</ref> He suggested that any human being is susceptible to such manipulation.<ref name="Zimbardo 1997 14">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Benjamin Zablocki, late professor of sociology at Rutgers University said that the number of people who attest to brainwashing in interviews (performed in accordance with guidelines of the National Institute of Mental Health and National Science Foundation) is too large to result from anything other than a genuine phenomenon.<ref name="zablocki-p194-201">Template:Cite book</ref> He said that in the two most prestigious journals dedicated to the sociology of religion there have been no articles "supporting the brainwashing perspective," while over one hundred such articles have been published in other journals "marginal to the field."<ref name="Zablocki1998">Template:Cite journal</ref> He concluded that the concept of brainwashing had been blacklisted.<ref name="Zablocki1997">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Zablocki1998" /><ref>Phil Zuckerman. Invitation to the Sociology of Religion. Psychology Press, 24 July 2003 p. 28 Template:ISBN?</ref>
Eileen Barker criticized the concept of brainwashing because it functioned to justify costly interventions such as deprogramming or exit counseling.<ref name="Rusher">Review, William Rusher, National Review, 19 December 1986.</ref> She has also criticized some mental health professionals, including Singer, for accepting expert witness jobs in court cases involving NRMs.<ref name="BarkerJoke">Template:Cite journal</ref> Barker's 1984 book, The Making of a Moonie: Choice or Brainwashing?,<ref>Eileen Barker, The Making of a Moonie: Choice or Brainwashing?, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, United Kingdom, Template:ISBN.</ref> describes the religious conversion process to the Unification Church (whose members are sometimes informally referred to as Moonies), which had been one of the best-known groups said to practice brainwashing.<ref name="Barker2012">Moon's death marks end of an era Template:Webarchive, Eileen Barker, CNN, 3 September 2012, Although Moon is likely to be remembered for all these things—mass weddings, accusations of brainwashing, political intrigue and enormous wealth—he should also be remembered as creating what was arguably one of the most comprehensive and innovative theologies embraced by a new religion of the period.</ref><ref name="usatoday2012-09-02a">Template:Cite news</ref> Barker spent close to seven years studying Unification Church members and wrote that she rejects the "brainwashing" theory because it does not explain why many people attended a recruitment meeting and did not become members nor why so many members voluntarily disaffiliate or leave groups.<ref name="Rusher" /><ref>New Religious Movements – Some Problems of Definition George Chryssides, Diskus, 1997.</ref><ref>The Market for Martyrs Template:Webarchive, Laurence Iannaccone, George Mason University, 2006, "One of the most comprehensive and influential studies was The Making of a Moonie: Choice or Brainwashing? by Eileen Barker (1984). Barker could find no evidence that Moonie recruits were ever kidnapped, confined, or coerced. Participants at Moonie retreats were not deprived of sleep; the lectures were not "trance-inducing" and there was not much chanting, no drugs or alcohol, and little that could be termed a "frenzy" or "ecstatic" experience. People were free to leave, and leave they did. Barker's extensive enumerations showed that among the recruits who went so far as to attend two-day retreats (claimed to be Moonie's most effective means of "brainwashing"), fewer than 25% joined the group for more than a week, and only 5% remained full-time members one year later. And, of course, most contacts dropped out before attending a retreat. Of all those who visited a Moonie center at least once, not one in two hundred remained in the movement two years later. With failure rates exceeding 99.5%, it comes as no surprise that full-time Moonie membership in the U.S. never exceeded a few thousand. And this was one of the most successful New Religious Movements of the era!"</ref><ref>Oakes, Len "By far the best study of the conversion process is Eileen Barker's The Making of a Moonie [...]" from Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities, 1997, Template:ISBN</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
James Richardson said that if the new religious movements had access to powerful brainwashing techniques, one would expect that they would have high growth rates, yet in fact, most have not had notable success in recruiting or retaining members.<ref name="Richardson1985">Template:Cite journal</ref> For this and other reasons, sociologists of religion including David Bromley and Anson Shupe consider the idea that "cults" are brainwashing American youth to be implausible.<ref name="brain_wash">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Thomas Robbins, Massimo Introvigne, Lorne Dawson, Gordon Melton, Marc Galanter, and Saul Levine, amongst other scholars researching NRMs, have argued and established to the satisfaction of courts, relevant professional associations and scientific communities that there exists no generally accepted scientific theory, based upon methodologically sound research, that supports the concept of brainwashing.<ref>Richardson, James T. 2009. "Religion and The Law" in The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Peter Clarke. (ed) Oxford Handbooks Online. p. 426</ref>
In 1999, forensic psychologist Dick Anthony criticized another adherent to this view, Jean-Marie Abgrall, for allegedly employing a pseudoscientific approach and lacking any evidence that anyone's worldview was substantially changed by these coercive methods. He claimed that the concept and the fear surrounding it was used as a tool for the anti-cult movement to rationalize the persecution of minority religious groups.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Additionally, Anthony, in the book Misunderstanding Cults, argues that the term "brainwashing" has such sensationalist connotations that its use is detrimental to any further scientific inquiry.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In 2016, Israeli anthropologist of religion and fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute Adam Klin-Oron said about then proposed "anti-cult" legislation:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
In the 1980s there was a wave of 'brainwashing' claims, and then parliaments around the world examined the issue, courts around the world examined the issue, and reached a clear ruling: That there is no such thing as cults…that the people making these claims are often not experts on the issue. And in the end courts, including in Israel, rejected expert witnesses who claimed there is "brainwashing."<ref>[1] Template:Webarchive, Times of Israel</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries}}
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Scientific researchEdit
Research by the U.S. governmentEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}
For 20 years, starting in the early 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. Department of Defense conducted secret research, including Project MKUltra, in an attempt to develop practical brainwashing techniques. These experiments ranged "from electroshock therapy to high doses of LSD".<ref name=":0">Template:Cite news</ref>
The director Sidney Gottlieb and his team were apparently able to "blast away the existing mind" of a human being by using torture techniques;<ref name=":0" /> however, reprogramming, in terms of finding "a way to insert a new mind into that resulting void",<ref name=":0" /> was not so successful.<ref name="Anthony">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} "MKUltra, began in 1950 and was motivated largely in response to alleged Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean uses of mind-control techniques on U.S. prisoners of war in Korea."</ref>
Controversial psychiatrist Colin A. Ross claims that the CIA was successful in creating programmable so-called "Manchurian Candidates" even at the time.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The CIA experiments using various psychedelic drugs such as LSD and Mescaline drew from previous Nazi human experimentation.<ref>The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control: By John Marks. P 93 (c)1979 by John Marks Published by Times Books Template:ISBN</ref>
In 1979, John D. Marks wrote in his book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate that until the MKUltra program was effectively terminated in 1963, the agency's researchers had found no reliable way to brainwash another person, as all experiments at some stage always ended in either amnesia or catatonia, making any operational use impossible.<ref name="MarksJohn1979" />
A bipartisan Senate Armed Services Committee report, released in part in December 2008 and in full in April 2009, reported that U.S. military trainers who came to Guantánamo Bay in December 2002 had based an interrogation class on a chart copied from a 1957 Air Force study of "Chinese Communist" brainwashing techniques used to elicit false confessions from American POWs during the Korean War. The report showed how the Secretary of Defense's 2002 authorization of the aggressive techniques at Guantánamo led to their use in Afghanistan and in Iraq, including at Abu Ghraib.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
American Psychological Association Task ForceEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}
In 1983, the American Psychological Association (APA) asked Singer to chair a task force called the APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Techniques of Persuasion and Control (DIMPAC) to investigate whether brainwashing or coercive persuasion did indeed control cults members. The Task Force concluded that:<ref>Template:Cite report</ref> <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
Cults and large group awareness trainings have generated considerable controversy because of their widespread use of deceptive and indirect techniques of persuasion and control. These techniques can compromise individual freedom, and their use has resulted in serious harm to thousands of individuals and families. This report reviews the literature on this subject, proposes a new way of conceptualizing influence techniques, explores the ethical ramifications of deceptive and indirect techniques of persuasion and control, and makes recommendations addressing the problems described in the report.
{{#if:|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries}}
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}On 11 May 1987, the APA's Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) rejected the DIMPAC report because the report "lacks the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA imprimatur" and concluded that "after much consideration, BSERP does not believe that we have sufficient information available to guide us in taking a position on this issue."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Other areas and studiesEdit
Joost Meerloo, a Dutch psychiatrist, was an early proponent of the concept of brainwashing. "Menticide" is a neologism he coined meaning "killing of the mind". Meerloo's view was influenced by his experiences during the German occupation of his country during the Second World War and his work with the Dutch government and the American military in the interrogation of accused Nazi war criminals. He later emigrated to the United States and taught at Columbia University.<ref>The Oxford Handbook of Propaganda Studies, Jonathan Auerbach, Russ Castronovo, Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 114 Template:ISBN?</ref> His best-selling 1956 book, The Rape of the Mind, concludes by saying:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
The modern techniques of brainwashing and menticide—those perversions of psychology—can bring almost any man into submission and surrender. Many of the victims of thought control, brainwashing, and menticide that we have talked about were strong men whose minds and wills were broken and degraded. But although the totalitarians use their knowledge of the mind for vicious and unscrupulous purposes, our democratic society can and must use its knowledge to help man to grow, to guard his freedom, and to understand himself.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref> {{#if:|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries}}
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Russian historian Daniel Romanovsky, who interviewed survivors and eyewitnesses in the 1970s, reported on what he called "Nazi brainwashing" of the people of Belarus by the occupying Germans during the Second World War, which took place through both mass propaganda and intense re-education, especially in schools. Romanovsky noted that very soon, most people had adopted the Nazi view that the Jews were an inferior race and were closely tied to the Soviet government, views that had not been at all common before the German occupation.<ref>Nazi Europe and the Final Solution, David Bankier, Israel Gutman, Berghahn Books, 2009, pp. 282–285.</ref><ref>Gray Zones: Ambiguity and Compromise in the Holocaust and its Aftermath, Jonathan Petropoulos, John Roth, Berghahn Books, 2005, p. 209 Template:ISBN?</ref><ref>The Minsk Ghetto 1941–1943: Jewish Resistance and Soviet Internationalism, Barbara Epstein, University of California Press, 2008, p. 295 Template:ISBN?</ref><ref>Bringing the Dark Past to Light: The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe, John-Paul Himka, Joanna Beata Michlic, University of Nebraska Press, 2013, pp. 74, 78 Template:ISBN?</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>*Template:Citation
Italy has had controversy over the concept of plagio, a crime consisting in an absolute psychological—and eventually physical—domination of a person. The effect is said to be the annihilation of the subject's freedom and self-determination and the consequent negation of his or her personality. The crime of plagio has rarely been prosecuted in Italy, and only one person was ever convicted. In 1981, an Italian court found that the concept is imprecise, lacks coherence and is liable to arbitrary application.<ref>Alessandro Usai Profili penali dei condizionamenti mentali, Milano, 1996 Template:ISBN. Template:Page needed</ref>
Recent scientific book publications in the field of the mental disorder "dissociative identity disorder" (DID) mention torture-based brainwashing by criminal networks and malevolent actors as a deliberate means to create multiple "programmable" personalities in a person to exploit this individual for sexual and financial reasons.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Alayarian, A. (2018). Trauma, Torture and Dissociation: A Psychoanalytic View. (n.p.): Taylor & Francis. Template:ISBN?</ref><ref>Schwartz, H. L. (2013). The Alchemy of Wolves and Sheep: A Relational Approach to Internalized Perpetration in Complex Trauma Survivors. US: Taylor & Francis. Template:ISBN?</ref> Earlier scientific debates in the 1980s and 1990s about torture-based ritual abuse in cults was known as "satanic ritual abuse," which was mainly viewed as a "moral panic."<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Brain-Washing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics published by the Church of Scientology in 1955 about brainwashing. L. Ron Hubbard authored the text and alleged it was the secret manual written by Lavrentiy Beria, the Soviet secret police chief, in 1936.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> When the FBI ignored him, Hubbard wrote again stating that Soviet agents had, on three occasions, attempted to hire him to work against the United States, and were upset about his refusal,<ref name="atack">Template:Cite book</ref> and that one agent specifically attacked him using electroshock as a weapon.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Kathleen Barry, co-founder of the United Nations NGO, the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW),<ref name="A Distinctive Style Article">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="On the Issues Article">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> prompted international awareness of human sex trafficking in her 1979 book Female Sexual Slavery.<ref name="Biography at The People Speak Radio">Biography at The People Speak Radio Template:Webarchive</ref> In his 1986 book Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths, Lewis Okun reported that: "Kathleen Barry shows in Female Sexual Slavery that forced female prostitution involves coercive control practices very similar to thought reform."<ref> Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths, Lewis Okun, SUNY Press, 1986, p. 133</ref> In their 1996 book, Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States, Rita Nakashima Brock and Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite report that the methods commonly used by pimps to control their victims "closely resemble the brainwashing techniques of terrorists and paranoid cults."<ref>Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States, Rita Nakashima Brock, Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, Fortress Press, 1996, p. 166</ref>
In his 2000 book, Destroying the World to Save It: Aum Shinrikyo, Apocalyptic Violence, and the New Global Terrorism, Robert Lifton applied his original ideas about thought reform to Aum Shinrikyo and the War on Terrorism, concluding that, in this context, thought reform was possible without violence or physical coercion. He also pointed out that in their efforts against terrorism, Western governments were also using some alleged mind control techniques.<ref>Destroying the World to Save It: Aum Shinrikyo, Apocalyptic Violence, and the New Global Terrorism, Owl Books, 2000. Template:ISBN?</ref>
In her 2004 popular science book, Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control, neuroscientist and physiologist Kathleen Taylor reviewed the history of mind control theories, as well as notable incidents. In it, she theorized that persons under the influence of brainwashing may have more rigid neurological pathways, and that can make it more difficult to rethink situations or to be able to later reorganize these pathways.<ref name="szimhart">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="hawkes">Template:Cite news</ref>
In 2006 Brainwash: The Secret History of Mind Control (Template:ISBN) is a non-fiction book published by Hodder & Stoughton about the evolution of brainwashing from its origins in the Cold War through to today's War on Terror.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The author, Dominic Streatfeild, uses formerly classified documentation and interviews from the CIA.<ref>The Intelligence Officer's Bookshelf</ref>
In popular cultureEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}
In George Orwell's 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the main character is subjected to imprisonment, isolation, and torture to conform his thoughts and emotions to the wishes of the rulers of the book's fictional future totalitarian society. The torturer representing the authorities says, "We make the brain perfect before we blow it out...Everyone is washed clean."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Orwell's vision influenced Hunter and is still reflected in the popular concept of brainwashing.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In the 1950s, some American films were made that featured brainwashing of POWs, including The Rack, The Bamboo Prison, Toward the Unknown, and The Fearmakers. Forbidden Area told the story of Soviet secret agents who had been brainwashed through classical conditioning by their own government so they wouldn't reveal their identities. In 1962, The Manchurian Candidate (based on the 1959 novel by Richard Condon) "put brainwashing front and center" by featuring a plot by the Soviet government to take over the United States by using a brainwashed sleeper agent for political assassination.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The concept of brainwashing became popularly associated with the research of Russian psychologist Ivan Pavlov, which mostly involved dogs as subjects.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In The Manchurian Candidate the head brainwasher is "Dr. Yen Lo, of the Pavlov Institute."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
The science fiction stories of Cordwainer Smith (pen name of Paul Myron Anthony Linebarger (1913–1966), a U.S. Army officer who specialized in military intelligence and psychological warfare during the Second World War and the Korean War) depict brainwashing to remove memories of traumatic events as a normal and benign part of future medical practice.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Brainwashing remains an important theme in science fiction. A subgenre is corporate mind control, in which a future society is run by one or more business corporations that dominate society, using advertising and mass media to control the population's thoughts and feelings.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Terry O'Brien commented: "Mind control is such a powerful image that if hypnotism did not exist, then something similar would have to have been invented: The plot device is too useful for any writer to ignore. The fear of mind control is equally as powerful an image."<ref name="O'Brien, Terry 2005"/>
See alsoEdit
Further readingEdit
- Template:Cite book; Reprinted, with a new preface: University of North Carolina Press, 1989 (Online at Internet Archive).
- Template:Cite book
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}