Template:Short description Template:Title language
Template:Violence against women
{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}Template:Efn ('right of the lord'), also known as {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}Template:Efn ('right of the first night'), sometimes referred to as prima nocta,Template:Efn was a supposed legal right in medieval Europe, allowing feudal lords to have sexual relations with any female subject, particularly on her wedding night. There are many references to the alleged custom throughout the centuries.
TerminologyEdit
The French expression {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} translates as "right of the lord", but modern French usage prefers {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ({{#invoke:IPA|main}}, from {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, 'leg') or, more commonly, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ({{#invoke:IPA|main}}, from {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, 'thigh').Template:Cn
The term is often used synonymously with {{#invoke:Lang|lang}},<ref>Template:OED</ref> Latin for "right of the first night".
Ancient timesEdit
The Greek historian Herodotus mentions a similar custom among the Adyrmachidae in ancient Libya: "They are also the only tribe with whom the custom obtains of bringing all women about to become brides before the king, that he may choose such as are agreeable to him."<ref>Herodotus, iv.168 (Wikisource text)</ref>
When the plebeians of the Etruscan city of Volsinii rebelled against the aristocrats in 280 BC, "They took their wives for themselves and placed the daughters of the nobles under the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, while all their former masters on whom they could lay hands were tortured to death."<ref>Von Vacano, Otto-Wilhelm, The Etruscans in the Ancient World, at 164 (Indiana University Press)(Template:ISBN).</ref>
It is also mentioned in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Ketubot 3b תיבעל להגמון (tibael lehegmon), regarding a decree imposed on the Jewish community by a Syrian-Greek ruler, in which all Jewish brides were taken before their wedding.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Middle AgesEdit
EuropeEdit
The medieval marriage fine or merchet has sometimes been interpreted as a payment for the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} to be waived.<ref name="fibri.de">The jus primae noctis as a male power display: A review of historic sources with evolutionary interpretation Template:Webarchive by Jörg Wettlaufer - Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol 21, Nr. 2 (2000): 111-123. See also: Jörg Wettlaufer. Das Herrenrecht der Ersten Nacht, Hochzeit, Herrschaft und Heiratszins im Mittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit. Campus Hist. Studien, Bd. 27, 1999, pp. 150-161.</ref> Alternatively, it has been interpreted as compensation to the lord for the young women leaving his lands.Template:Sfn Encyclopædia Britannica states that the evidence indicates it was a monetary tax related to vassal marriages, since a considerable number of seigneurial rights revolved around marriage.<ref name="auto"/>
A similar payment to church authorities has also been interpreted as relating to the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. However, according to British scholar W. D. Howarth, the Catholic Church at some times prohibited consummation of a marriage on the first night. The payment was for an indulgence from the church to waive this prohibition.Template:Sfn
In the Wooing of Emer in Irish mythology the King Conchobar has the droit du seigneur over all marriages of his subjects. He is afraid of Cú Chulainn's reaction if he exercises it in this case, but is equally afraid of losing his authority if he does not. The druid Cathbad suggests a solution: Conchobar sleeps with Emer on the night of the wedding, but Cathbad sleeps between them.<ref>Thomas Kinsella, The Táin, Oxford University Press, 1969, Template:ISBN, pp. 25–39</ref>
The biography of Gerald of Aurillac written by Odo of Cluny (879–942) gives an account of the young nobleman demanding to rape one of his serfs, only to have the act averted by a miracle, sending Gerald on the road to sainthood. American historian Vern Bullough suggested that this illustrates that such behaviour was commonplace in the period, and that the "legend [of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}] reflected the reality".Template:Sfn
In the 14th-century French epic poem {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, a tyrannical lord claims the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} unless he receives part of the bride's dowry.<ref name="fibri.de"/>
The only Medieval legal document to mention this practice is Article 9 of Ferdinand II of Aragon's {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in 1486, in which the king forbids lords from sleeping with a new bride of a peasant. However, this Article does not suggest that such a right actually existed, as Article 9 lists various abuses that do not derive from any earlier seignorial rights. Furthermore, in an earlier draft document related to the Sentencia, the Catalan lords replied that they doubted that any lord had actually demanded such a practice.Template:Sfn
Post-medieval referencesEdit
EuropeEdit
BalticsEdit
Personal memoirs from early 19th-century Western Estonia claim widespread use of the rule of first night; whether it was a fully legal right is not elaborated.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
EnglandEdit
In Shakespeare's play Henry VI, Part 2 (Template:Circa) the rebel Jack Cade proclaims: "there shall not a maid be married, but she shall pay to me her maidenhead ere they have it".<ref>Template:Cite work</ref> According to the French scholar Alain Boureau, Cade was demanding the payment of merchet, not the right of first night,Template:Sfn. Howarth states that Cade's payment was simply the lord's compensation for a serf who departed to get married, and had no connection with any sexual "right" to maidens.Template:Sfn
The English lexicographer Thomas Blount claimed in his {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} of 1679 that the "right" had previously existed as a medieval custom of some English manors, but had been commuted into payment of money. However, Howarth points out that there is no evidence that Blount's theory actually reflected the medieval situation.Template:Sfn
The Curiosities of Literature (1823) by the British writer Isaac D'Israeli claimed the practice had been widespread across Europe.Template:Sfn
FranceEdit
_-001.jpg){kind=link}
The supposed right was mentioned in 1556 in the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} of the French lawyer and author Jean Papon.Template:Sfn Papon's account was vague about attributing where this practice is said to have occurred.Template:Sfn The French writer Antoine du Verdier also commented on it in 1577, saying that he had been told that such a right had once existed in Scotland.Template:Sfn
The French philosopher Montesquieu referred to the practice in The Spirit of the Laws (1748), saying that it had been enforced in France over three nights, although this was a misinterpretation of the actual medieval practice whereby consummation of marriage was forbidden for the first or first three nights of a marriage, unless waived by buying an indulgence from a bishop or abbot.Template:Sfn
Voltaire mentioned the practice in his {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, published in 1764.Template:Sfn He wrote the five-act comedy {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> in 1762, although it was not performed until 1779, after his death. This play was the first time the term {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was used.Template:Sfn
In 19th-century France, a number of writers made other claims about the supposed power of the overlords during the Ancien Régime, such as the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (right of ravage; providing to the lord the right to devastate fields of his own domain), and the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (right of lounging; it was said that a lord had the right to disembowel his serfs to warm his feet in).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
The Holy Roman EmpireEdit
In Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro, which premiered in 1786 with a libretto by Lorenzo Da Ponte, the comic plot revolves around the successful efforts of the young bride and groom, Susanna and Figaro, to block the efforts of the unfaithful Count Almaviva to seduce Susanna. To achieve his aim, the frustrated Count threatens to reinstitute {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. It was based on a play of the same title by Pierre Beaumarchais.Template:Sfn
NetherlandsEdit
The {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ("Acts of the Saints"), published from 1643 onwards, mentions the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} in the hagiographies of St Margaret and St Forannan.Template:Sfn
ScotlandEdit
In 1527, the Scottish historian Hector Boece wrote that the "right" had existed in Scotland until abolished by Malcolm III (Template:Abbr 1058–93) under the influence of his wife, Margaret (later St Margaret of Scotland). The payment of merchet was instituted in its place.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Boece attributed the law to a legendary king, Ewen or Evenus III.Template:Sfn The modern French scholar Alain Boureau says that Boece probably invented King Ewen, but he views this as mythology, not as a polemic against medieval barbarism.Template:Sfn
Other Scottish scholars of his era quoted Boece with approval, including John Lesley (1578), George Buchanan (1582), and Habbakuk Bisset (1626).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The historical existence of the custom in Scotland was also accepted in Scottish legal works such as James Balfour's Practicks (Template:Circa), John Skene's {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (1597), and Thomas Craig's {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (1603).Template:Sfn The English scholar Henry Spelman stated in his Glossary (1664) that the custom had existed in Scotland, but not in England.Template:Sfn The English jurist William Blackstone cited Boece's statement in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), while similarly noting that the custom had never existed in England.<ref>Commentaries on the Laws of England, volume 1, book 1, chapter 6, p. 83.</ref> In 1776, the Scottish jurist David Dalrymple disputed the existence of the custom, arguing Boece's account was purely legendary, but his position was often seen as based on Scottish patriotism.Template:Sfn However, according to the Scottish legal scholar David Maxwell Walker, instances have been recorded of the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} being claimed up to the 18th century.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Walker concluded that it is possible that the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} existed as a custom in Scotland, dependent on the attitude of the king, and survived longer in remote regions.Template:Sfn
After their travels in Scotland in 1773, Samuel Johnson and James Boswell documented the custom of the payment of merchet, linking it with the "right of first night". They paralleled it with that custom of Borough English, suggesting that the English custom favored the youngest son because the paternity of the eldest son was doubtful.Template:Sfn Sir Walter Scott mentioned the custom in his historical Scottish novel, The Fair Maid of Perth (1828).Template:Sfn
SpainEdit
The Spanish novel {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ("The Travails of Persiles and Sigismunda", 1617) by Miguel de Cervantes contains an episode where a bride and groom escape a barbaric marriage custom in Ireland. According to the British scholar W.D. Howarth, Cervantes was inspired by Peruvian marriage ceremonies and what is described is different from the classic version of the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} as it involves multiple virgins. However, Cervantes' story was a source for the English play The Custom of the Country, written by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger and published in 1647. The play has the classic version of the "right of first night" with money payment as an alternative. According to Howarth, this suggests that {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} was a familiar notion to people at that time, which he traces back to Boece.Template:Sfn
AfricaEdit
In modern times, Zaire's president Mobutu Sese Seko appropriated the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} when traveling around the country, where local chiefs offered him virgins.<ref name=dvr>Template:Cite book</ref>
North AmericaEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}
The term has also been used to describe the sexual exploitation of slaves in the United States.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
AsiaEdit
As late as the 19th century, some Kurdish chieftains in Anatolia raped Armenian brides on their wedding night (part of what was then known as the Template:Transliteration or Template:Transliteration system).<ref>Barsoumian, Hagop. "The Eastern Question and the Tanzimat Era" in The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times, Volume II: Foreign Dominion to Statehood: The Fifteenth Century to the Twentieth Century, ed. Richard G. Hovannisian. New York: St. Martin's Press, p. 200. Template:ISBN.</ref><ref>Astourian, Stepan. "The Silence of the Land: Agrarian Relations, Ethnicity, and Power", in A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire, eds. R.G. Suny, Fatma Müge Göçek, and Norman Naimark. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 60.</ref>
OceaniaEdit
In the Hawaiian Islands, the privilege for chiefs was often observed, according to "Sexual Behavior in Pre Contact Hawai'i" by Milton Diamond.<ref>(Revista Española del Pacifico. 2004. 16: 37-58)</ref> A young girl's parents viewed the coupling with favor.<ref>(Pukui, Haertig, and Lee, 1972, p. 91; Sahlins, 1985, p. 24)</ref> This is because the girl might conceive the chief's child and be allowed to keep it.
Debate in the 19th and 20th centuriesEdit
Scholars in the 19th and 20th centuries gave the historical basis of the "right of first night" a good deal of attention.Template:Sfn Historians David M. Walker and Hector McKechnie wrote that the right might have existed in medieval Europe,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn but other historians have concluded that it is a myth, and that all references to it are from later periods.Template:Sfn<ref name="auto">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Over time, the Encyclopædia Britannica and the Larousse encyclopedias dramatically changed their opinion on the topic, moving from acceptance to rejection of the historical veracity of the idea.Template:Sfn French writer Louis Veuillot wrote a book in 1854 disputing its existence.Template:Sfn After an exhaustive historical study, German jurist Karl Schmidt concluded in 1881 that it was a scholarly misconception.Template:Sfn After Schmidt, many of those who believed in the existence of the custom based their opinions on anthropological studies of tribal societies, though according to W. D. Howarth, this was a misguided argument because of the disparity between the tribal societies and medieval European society.Template:Sfn
In The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State in 1884, socialist Friedrich Engels argued it was real and had an anthropological origin.<ref>Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, 1884, pp 28, 72-73.</ref> In 1910, the Celtic scholar Whitley Stokes said that the existence of the practice was "evidenced though not proved" to have existed in Ireland.<ref>Stokes, Whitley. "Tidings of Conchobar Mac Nessa". Ériu, vol. 4, 1910, pp. 18–38</ref> In 1930, Scottish legal scholar Hector McKechnie concluded, based on historical evidence, that the practice had existed in Scotland in early times.Template:Sfn Italian scholar Paolo Mantegazza, in his 1935 book The Sexual Relations of Mankind, said that while not a law, it was most likely a binding custom.Template:Sfn
See alsoEdit
- Childwite
- Cuckoldry
- Non-paternity event
- Royal bastard
- Virgin cleansing myth, a belief that having sex with a virgin girl can cure certain diseases (notably AIDS) or otherwise conveys power to the man
Explanatory notesEdit
ReferencesEdit
CitationsEdit
Works citedEdit
- Template:Cite book Translation of: Le droit de cuissage: La fabrication d'un mythe (XIIIe–XXe siècle), Albin Michel
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal