METRORail

METRORail is the Template:Convert<ref name=milestones>Template:Cite press release</ref> light rail system in Houston, Texas (United States). In Template:American transit ridership, the system had a ridership of Template:American transit ridership, or about Template:American transit ridership per weekday as of Template:American transit ridership. METRORail ranks as the second most-traveled light rail system in the Southern United States and the 10th most-traveled light rail system in the United States, and has the highest ridership per mile for light rail systems in the Southern US.<ref name="apta.com">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> METRORail is operated by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO).

History

Predecessors

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} The first streetcar service was a mule-drawn railcar operated by the Houston City Railroad Company along McKinney Street in 1868.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp Because the company chose a bad street alignment, the nascent line foundered after just weeks in service.<ref name=Fuglaar>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Rp<ref name=Baron>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Rp It was succeeded by the Houston City Street Railway (HCSR), which was founded in 1870 and began revenue operation in 1874 with routes following busy merchant districts along Congress Avenue and Main Street, the latter of which ran to one of the first sites of the Texas State Fair;<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp the area was subsequently developed and is now Midtown, Houston.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> A competing service, the Bayou City Street Railway, was started in 1883 with a single route along Texas Avenue, but it was purchased and folded into HCSR later that year.<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp A new competitor, also named Bayou City Street Railway, was founded in 1889; the new Bayou City was purchased and consolidated into HCSR in 1890 by Oscar Carter, who also announced plans to electrify the system.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp

By 1892, electrification of the existing streetcar lines was complete and extensions began past the immediate downtown/central Houston area (within a Template:Cvt radius of the Harris County Courthouse), including the Houston Heights suburb, which was developed by Carter and required streetcar service due to its distance from central Houston.<ref name=Fuglaar/>Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp HCSR was acquired by the Houston Electric Company in 1901, which was managed by Stone & Webster and continued to expand the service,<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp including the start of interurban service to Galveston provided by the affiliated Galveston–Houston Electric Railway<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp in 1911.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp However, the popularity of privately-owned automobiles began to displace demand for streetcar service and the system stopped expanding after 1927.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp Several streetcar lines were converted to conventional bus lines in 1936, and the right-of-way for the Interurban was sold in 1940, later being reused for the Gulf Freeway.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp<ref name=Baron />Template:Rp The last streetcar completed its run early in the morning of June 9, 1940, and the rails were later removed and scrapped during World War II.<ref name=Fuglaar />Template:Rp

A 'sample' monorail line was built in Houston in 1955;<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> the Trailblazer operated over a Template:Cvt line at Arrowhead Park with a peak speed of Template:Cvt, starting on February 18, 1956. The monorail ceased operation in September of that year<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and subsequently was moved to Fair Park in Dallas for the Texas State Fair, where it continued to run until 1964.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

False starts

Rapid Transit Lines, the successor to HCSR and Houston Electric, proposed a rapid transit system as a long-range project under the 1971 "Transit Action Program" (TAP), developed by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, largely laid out along the radial spokes centered in the Inner Loop, tracing the city's major freeways.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref><ref>Template:Cite report</ref><ref name=Shelton-2014>Template:Cite news</ref> TAP would be implemented in two stages. In Stage 1, Template:Cvt of rapid transit routes would be built, including fixed rail lines serving the southwest, west, and northeast parts of Houston (with a downtown subway), and three bus-exclusive lanes along the North, Gulf, and South freeways.<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp Stage 1 was planned to complete in the 1970s at an estimated cost of $800 million.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp Under Stage 2, scheduled for completion before 1990, the Stage 1 rail lines would be extended and two more would be added, bringing the total system to Template:Cvt.<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp TAP would have been the technical basis for the proposed Houston Area Rapid Transit Authority (HARTA), but a referendum to form HARTA was "soundly defeated" in 1973.<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The city of Houston purchased Rapid Transit Lines in April 1974 for $5.3 million and renamed it the Houston Transit System ("HouTran").<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp

File:Southwest-Westpark Figure II-27 (Heavy Rail) alignment.png

Proposed alignment of the Southwest/Westpark corridor, Heavy Rail alternative including subway under Fannin

Houston formed the Office of Public Transportation in January 1975 to plan the region's public transportation system, and began working on an update of TAP.<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp After METRO was formed in 1978/79, an initial Phase I alternatives analysis identified multiple potential transit corridors, and under Phase II, proposed in 1980, the "Southwest/Westpark" corridor (along what is now the Westpark Tollway) was prioritized for further study.<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp The proposed Southwest/Westpark corridor would have run Template:Cvt, generally parallel to the Southwest Freeway, with equal lengths west and east of the West Inner Loop. The planned route would run from downtown Houston along Main Street to approximately Elgin, and west from Elgin to West Belt along existing public and rail rights-of-way.<ref name="S/WC-80">Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp Service options that could be operated along the corridor included a dedicated busway on an elevated structure (carrying 203,500 daily riders at an estimated capital construction cost of $878 million),<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp an elevated light rail system (213,400 daily passengers; $1.297 billion),<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp a light rail subway (226,800 daily; $1.572 billion),<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp or a grade-separated heavy rail system with subway through the central business district (223,700 daily, $1.366 billion).<ref name="S/WC-80" />Template:Rp At the time, it was estimated that 9.5 million person-trips were made per day in Harris County; of those, 98.7% were taken using private vehicles.<ref name=HRRT-83>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp

METRO updated its 1980 Southwest/Westpark corridor proposal and extended the eastern terminus north by Template:Cvt, combining it with the proposed North corridor as the "Houston Rail Rapid Transit Project"; the extended line now ran north past I-10 and the North Inner Loop to Crosstimbers.<ref name=HRRT-83 />Template:Rp The design called for Template:Cvt of elevated tracks, Template:Cvt of subway, and Template:Cvt at-grade.<ref name=HRRT-83 />Template:Rp The system would have 17 passenger stations (eight aerial, six at-grade, and three subway), and included a new railyard/maintenance facility at Cavalcade.<ref name=HRRT-83 />Template:Rp The 1983 proposal was rejected by Houston voters via referendum.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="cnn20040101">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="soc.hfac.uh.edu">Template:Cite news</ref> Light voter turnout was blamed for the defeat of the $2.35 billion proposal, which included the purchase of approximately 400 new buses and construction of a Template:Cvt heavy rail system.<ref name=Shelton-2014 /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The capital cost of the rail system alone was estimated at $1.436 billion, including 130 new rail vehicles.<ref name=HRRT-83 />Template:Rp

In the wake of the 1983 defeat, METRO began work on a regional transit plan, integrating inputs from city, county, and state governments and developing three options for implementation: A (bus routes only), B (light rail loop and radial bus routes), or C (light rail with supplemental bus routes); after approximately 250 meetings were held in 1984 and 1985, citizens overwhelmingly supported Option C, with planned light rail service to operate along Main Street within the inner loop (I-610).<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Longtime Houston Mayor Kathryn Whitmire appointed Bob Lanier to chair METRO in 1988;<ref name=TXM-91>Template:Cite magazine</ref>Template:Rp Lanier shepherded a voter referendum that year which passed, approving the Phase 2 Regional Mobility Plan which included Template:Convert of fixed guideway transit.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Under the 1988 referendum, METRO would devote Template:Frac of its sales tax revenue on roads, Template:Frac on improving bus service, and the remaining Template:Frac on developing the fixed guideway plans,<ref name=Chron-2004>Template:Cite news</ref> but Lanier showed reluctance to follow through on developing plans for a fixed guideway, questioning the projected ridership numbers, and Whitmire fired him in late December 1989.<ref name=TXM-91 />Template:Rp<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Incensed, Lanier released a memorandum attacking the mayor's rail transit plans, and Whitmire responded by holding a press conference on Lanier's front lawn during his annual Christmas party.<ref name=TXM-91 />Template:Rp

Houston was the largest city in the United States without a rail system after the 1990 opening of the now A Line in Los Angeles. After issuing an RFP in July 1990, METRO received five proposals for the design and development of the fixed guideway system.<ref name=Whitmire-91>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp In March 1991, METRO approved a plan to develop a monorail system similar to the one operating at Walt Disney World in Orlando at an estimated cost of $1.27 billion, operating along the extended Southwest/Westpark corridor between the Houston Galleria and downtown Houston.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The proposed monorail system would operate with an initial Template:Cvt segment servicing western residential regions west of downtown to Beltway 8 (Sam Houston Tollway), with construction planned to start in 1993 and revenue service to begin by 1998. Future planned expansions included one leg that would connect downtown with the Texas Medical Center and Astrodome to the south, and another leg connecting downtown to Texas Southern University and the University of Houston.<ref name=Whitmire-91 />Template:Rp In 1991, U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay removed $65 million in federal funding for the rail line and after Lanier was elected mayor of Houston in 1992, defeating Whitmire, the plan was stopped.<ref name="soc.hfac.uh.edu" /> Lanier's election was seen as a second referendum on the monorail plan; the funding was diverted to road projects and police patrols instead.<ref name=Chron-2004 />

Main Street Line

After these setbacks, Houston drew up a rail plan without federal subsidies<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and published it in 1997 as the Houston METRO 2020 Regional Transit Plan.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp The Houston city council approved the light rail project in November 2000 and set a January 25, 2001 date for a groundbreaking ceremony, but councilmember Rob Todd filed a lawsuit opposing construction, claiming the METRO organization was a "private business" and subject to Houston City Charter provisions requiring a public vote on business use of its streets;<ref name=PRR-010207>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="lightrailnow.org">Template:Cite news</ref> the ceremony was cancelled following a temporary restraining order, issued by Judge Tony Lindsay on January 18.<ref name=Chron-010126 /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Todd was joined as co-plaintiff by Allan Vogel, one of 1,100 residents who signed a petition seeking a public vote on the light rail plan.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Judge Lindsay later recused herself from the case due to her personal ties to Todd and her husband's public opposition to METRO. She was succeeded by District Judge John P. Devine,<ref name=Chron-010126>Template:Cite news</ref> who issued an injunction on February 2, halting work on the light rail project and holding up contract awards.<ref name=PRR-010207 /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> A second lawsuit was filed by four property owners.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

The injunction issued by Judge Devine in Todd's lawsuit was reversed on appeal on March 9, 2001.<ref name="lightrailnow.org" /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Ground was broken on the original Template:Convert, 16-station portion of the Main Street (now Red) Line on March 13, 2001.<ref name="chron20010314" /> The Texas Supreme Court upheld the appellate court ruling on June 28.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> That November, voters approved Proposition 1, which allowed the light rail project to continue, but required public referendums for future extensions, and rejected Proposition 3, which would have initiated a public referendum on continuing the initial project.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

File:Metrohouston-metrorailmap.svg

Initial Red Line segment (as opened Jan 1, 2004)

The initial segment runs between UH–Downtown (northern terminus) and Fannin South (southern terminus).<ref name="chron20010314">Template:Cite news</ref> The opening of METRORail, which took place on January 1, 2004, came 64 years after the previous streetcar system had been shut down.<ref name="chron20040101">Template:Cite news</ref> At the time, two extensions to the north and east were already in planning, and a concept was advanced for a third extension west.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

The cost of the initial segment was $324 million.<ref name="ReferenceA">Template:Cite news</ref> Tom DeLay strongly opposed construction of the METRORail line and twice blocked federal funding for the system in the United States House of Representatives.<ref name="cnn20040101" /> Thus the Metrorail was built without any federal funding until November 2011 when a $900 million grant was approved for expansions, under an executive order issued by President Barack Obama.<ref name="ktrk20111128">Template:Cite news</ref>

In spite of the opposition of some groups to the Metrorail, surveys conducted by Stephen Klineberg and Rice University have shown consistent increases in support of rail transport and decreases in support for bigger and better roads/highways in the Houston metropolitan area in recent years.<ref name="houstontomorrow1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="esciencenews1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Klineberg considers these changes a "paradigm shift" or "sea change" on attitudes towards mass transit.<ref name="houstontomorrow1" /><ref name="esciencenews1" /><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Phase II

METRORail Phase II was included as part of the METRO Solutions Transit System Plan (aka Metro Solutions Plan or 2025 Regional Transit Plan) that was placed before voters on the November 4, 2003 ballot. Phase II included six proposed light rail segments to complement and extend the Main Street line, then under construction.<ref name=Res.2003-93>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

2003 METRORail Phase II expansion plan<ref name=Res.2003-93 />

Name	Length	Stations	Termini		Status
North Hardy	Template:Cvt	4	UH-Downtown	Northline	Opened Template:Dts as Main Street Line extension
Southeast	Template:Cvt	13	Downtown	Palm Center	Truncated line opened Template:Dts as Southeast Line
Harrisburg	Template:Cvt	4	Dowling	Gulfgate Center	Truncated line opened Template:Dts as East End Line
Westpark	Template:Cvt	4	Hillcroft T.C.	Wheeler T.C.	Reconfigured as one segment of a planned METRORapid BRT line.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation	CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Uptown/West Loop	Template:Cvt	7	Bellaire	Northwest T.C.	Reconfigured as BRT; truncated line opened Template:Dts as Silver Line<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
Inner Katy	Template:Cvt	6	Northwest T.C.	Downtown	Proposed right-of-way removed during widening of Katy Freeway.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Reconfigured as BRT.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Voters approved the $1.23 billion Phase II expansion of the as-yet unopened system, including four new lines.<ref name="chron20140620">Template:Cite news</ref> Critics of the system opposed METRO for spending public funds for "educational advertisements" about the proposed system, which critics claimed promote the referendum.<ref name="TTM1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Critics further claimed that the main political action committee (PAC) supporting the bond had a conflict of interest because it received over US$100,000 in contributions from contractors and equipment suppliers for METRORail who stood to gain financially from its expansion.<ref name="TTM1" /> By 2004, Rep. DeLay was hailing the leadership team at METRO for both its "vision for a mobile Houston region, and the kind of open minds and flexible management style it will take to realize that vision", adding that "[METRO] are holding a forum to look at all forms of technology and how those technologies fit into the mobility in Houston"; at least one observer noted that DeLay was advocating for "innovative rail solutions", not light rail.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2004, an alternatives analysis selected a shorter route for the Southeast Corridor.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp

The North and Southeast corridors received their records of decision from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in July 2008.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Construction began in July 2009 on the Template:Convert North/Red Line Extension (North Corridor), including nine stations from UH–Downtown to the Northline Transit Center Station. The Template:Convert Purple Line (Southeast Corridor), with ten stations, and the Template:Convert Green Line, with nine stations, also began construction in July 2009.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> According to the project schedules, the Red Line Extension would enter revenue service by 2013<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and the Green Line by 2014.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> However, METRO announced on September 9, 2010 that the opening dates for the Red Line Extension, Purple and Green lines had been pushed back to 2014<ref name="fox delay">Template:Cite news</ref> and by September 2014, the start date had slipped back to April 4, 2015.<ref name="ReferenceB" />

In November 2009, METRO applied for a $900 million grant from the Federal Transit Administration to fund future construction. Allegations were made that METRO lied about the income from their sales tax revenue to allow them to gain $900 million in federal funds for all five planned rail expansions.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> However, city officials found no such attempt by METRO to mislead them,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> but the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) continued to withhold its approval for the money until further figures can be examined.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> On December 8, 2011, the FTA finally announced the award. The award of $900 million was broken into two $450 million grants from the New Starts transit program, to fund construction of the Red Line Extension and Purple lines.<ref name="rail.co">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> METRO offered the public a chance to name stations on its expansion lines.<ref name="chron20110707">Light rail stations closer to getting names. Houston Chronicle (July 7, 2011). Retrieved on 2013-08-15.</ref>

Part of the funding allocated by the FTA under its New Starts program for the North, Southeast, and University Corridor projects included up to Template:US$ million to expand the LRV fleet to 104 vehicles and replace the existing 19 LRVs on the Red Line.<ref name=FTA-2010 />Template:Rp METRO selected a public-private partnership model for the North and Southeast corridors, where the contracted firm would be responsible for vehicle procurement and operation and maintenance of those lines, and entered a contract with Washington Group International (WGI); METRO/WGI issued a request for proposals for 103 firm new vehicles and an option of up to 75 additional vehicles on August 31, 2007.<ref name=FTA-2010 />Template:Rp Although the FTA reminded METRO about federal procurement rules on multiple occasions, METRO told prospective bidders that Buy America rules did not apply (presumably because the RFP was issued by the private contractor) and awarded a contract to CAF on March 4, 2009.<ref name=FTA-2010 />Template:Rp Later that month, METRO requested a Buy America waiver for two pilot vehicles which would be assembled by CAF in Spain; the FTA denied the waiver request, stating that CAF had signed a certificate of compliance with Buy America requirements.<ref name=FTA-2010 />Template:Rp METRO proceeded to use local funds to pursue the pilot vehicle procurement, and the FTA opened an investigation in April 2010.<ref name=FTA-2010 />Template:Rp Ultimately, the CAF contract was canceled and Template:Frac of the Template:US$ million contract was refunded to METRO.<ref name=Chron-2011 />

File:Houston METRORail with extensions (minus).svg

Consolidated map of proposed expansions, including Phase II lines as updated in 2010 and METRONext planned extensions. Proposed METRONext extension of Red Line to Sugar Land truncated.

The North/Red Line extension opened on December 21, 2013 (ahead of its projected early 2014 opening),<ref name="chron20131221" /> increasing the line to its current total of Template:Convert and 24 stations.<ref name="chron20130523">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="chron20131221">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="Houston-facts">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Central Station was added to the Red Line to provide transfers to/from the Purple and Green lines.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

After numerous delays, all but two stations on the eastern end of the Green Line opened on May 23, 2015,<ref name="ReferenceB">Template:Cite news</ref> while Cesar Chavez/67th Street and Magnolia Park <ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> entered service on January 11, 2017 after the construction of an overpass.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Both the Purple and Green lines, together costing $1.3 billion, share a track segment in downtown, then run east and diverge.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Cancellations and BRT conversions

Plans for the Inner Katy rail line (east of Loop 610) under the METRO Solutions Plan (2003) conflicted with existing plans to widen the Katy Freeway west of Loop 610 to Texas State Highway 6. A Major Investment Study for the Katy Freeway Expansion was started in 1994 and approved in October 1997; the draft and final environmental impact statements were completed by August 30, 2002.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp In preparation, TxDOT purchased a portion of the right-of-way for the old Katy Railroad from Union Pacific (UP) in 1992 for $78 million,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and the UP was scheduled to begin track removal in the last half of 1997. In all, Template:Cvt of track were removed from Katy/Fort Bend Road in Brookshire to Canal Street in Houston.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The adopted alternative for the expanded freeway called for an at-grade roadway with a total right-of-way width of Template:Cvt; in each direction, there would be two managed lanes closest to the center, flanked by four main lanes, up to two auxiliary lanes, and three frontage road lanes.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp That year, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between TxDOT, METRO, and Harris County, which identified requirements for the managed lanes, including prioritization of METRO buses and an option to convert those lanes to light rail transit in the future.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp The Gulf Coast Institute criticized the contradictions between TxDOT, which selected the managed lanes over rail due to insufficient projected transit demand, and METRO's Solutions Plan, which noted that a Katy line could "offer the potential for sizeable transit volume".<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp By 2005, the Inner Katy corridor had been dropped from METRO Solutions.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

METRO began negotiations with Southern Pacific (SP) to acquire the tracks and right-of-way alongside the Eastex Freeway that were formerly owned by the San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railroad and a conceptual agreement was reached in December 1992; METRO would re-use the line for commuter rail service.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> However, after METRO decided to purchase a subset of the original agreement at a fraction of the agreed-upon price, SP sued and the a settlement was reached in 1997, with METRO purchasing Template:Cvt for $72 million. Shortly after the purchase was completed, business interests pressured METRO into selling a portion of the right-of-way to the Harris County Toll Road Authority, which was eventually developed into the Westpark Tollway.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp By 2006, a proposed revised corridor along Richmond was drawing opposition from local business owners and Texas Rep. Martha Wong, who advocated for a route along Westpark instead.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> In August 2010, a budget shortfall of $49 million was announced by METRO, which halted progress on the University Line. The line had received a final Federal Record of Decision letter from the FTA in July<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> but METRO had not announced a construction schedule or funding plan.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Since then, BRT service has been proposed along the corridor instead.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

METRO published the "Uptown-West Loop Planning Study" in 2004, which was a proposed light rail line along Post Oak Boulevard and West Inner Loop, connecting new stations at Bellaire (at the junction with U.S. Route 59) and Northwest Transit Center (at the junction with I-10). In the alternatives analysis, bus rapid transit (BRT) service was considered and dismissed as an alternative to light rail, due to the reduced capacity of BRT vehicles and the strong community preference for rail.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref>Template:Rp Due to lack of funds, it was announced in early 2013 that the Uptown Line (now Silver Line) will be constructed initially as a bus rapid transit (BRT) line. The design will feature the ability to easily convert the line to light rail in the future. This will allow the line to be functional as early as 2017.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Following METRO's 2010 annual audit, the agency decided to cancel the Burnett Plaza project. $41 million was spent on the initial design of the proposed intermodal terminal.<ref name=Chron-2011>Template:Cite news</ref> This was part of a $168 million asset liquidation. The price of the land $21 million is valued separately.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> $61 million of the liquidation was listed as "unrealized assets", including charges for redundant design contractors and changes.<ref name=Chron-2011 />

Future plans

METRO put the METRONext Moving Forward Plan before Houston area voters in November 2019; voters approved the $3.5 billion bond by a margin of nearly two-to-one.

As of May 2025, significant changes have occurred in Houston's public transit plans, particularly concerning the METRONext initiative and its associated projects.

University Corridor BRT The University Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project, initially a key component of the METRONext plan, has been indefinitely shelved. This decision follows METRO's shift in focus towards the MetroNow initiative, which emphasizes immediate service improvements over large-scale infrastructure projects. Chairperson Elizabeth González Brock highlighted the need to prioritize safety, cleanliness, reliability, and accessibility before pursuing new projects.

Consequently, METRO has opted not to proceed with the federal grant application for the University Corridor BRT, citing financial constraints and the need to maintain operational integrity. However, this was not part of the community supported plan, voted overwhelmingly by voters.

Hobby Airport Rail Extensions Plans to extend the METRORail system to William P. Hobby Airport have also been affected. Initially, both the Green and Purple lines were proposed for extension to the airport. However, METRO has now decided to pursue only one light rail line to Hobby Airport, scaling back the previous plans. This decision reflects a broader trend of prioritizing immediate service improvements over large-scale infrastructure projects.

Sources: Community Impact fly2houston.com METRO Houston Chronicle Houston Chronicle

Red Line North Extension The extension of the Red Line northward remains a part of METRO's long-term plans. The project is included in the METRONext Moving Forward Plan, which outlines proposed investments in the METRORail system to serve more people and places. The extension aims to connect the existing Red Line to a new multimodal center at the North Shepherd Park & Ride, facilitating connections to METRORapid, the Regional Express Network, and local bus routes. This has also been removed from the Metro Now plan. Sources: METRo Houston Chronicle

Public Response and Future Prospects The recent changes in METRO's transit plans have sparked criticism from various stakeholders. Community advocates argue that the scaling back of projects undermines efforts to improve public transit and address environmental justice concerns. Residents are concerned projects they voted for are not being completed and the bonds are being redirected to other projects that were not approved and did not receive public input

Elected officials have expressed disappointment, stating that the decisions may hinder the city's commitment to equitable development and sustainable transportation. Sources: Houston Chronicle METRO

While the University Corridor BRT project and the dual rail lines to Hobby Airport are currently on hold, METRO has indicated that it remains eligible to reapply for federal funding in the future if the financial viability of these projects improves. In the meantime, the agency is focusing on smaller-scale projects, such as the Gulfton Transit and Revitalization Project, which align with the MetroNow initiative's goals.

The situation highlights ongoing debates over urban transit development, fiscal responsibility, and community engagement in Houston. Houston’s are left questioning where is the money from the bonds that they approved being diverted to. As of now there are no clear answers.

<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Bonds issued will be used to extend existing light rail service. The Red Line will be expanded North to the North Shepherd park & ride, and both the Green and Purple lines will be expanded east and south to William P Hobby Airport, and west to the Houston Municipal Courthouse.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Rp

A long extension or possible commuter rail line from Fannin South to Sugar Land and beyond has been studied since 2004. The route would parallel U.S. 90A in the existing right-of-way used by the Glidden subdivision owned by UP.<ref>Template:Cite report</ref> In 2011, the Southwest Rail Corridor was proposed to connect Fannin South and Missouri City. This was not constructed, but the METRONext plan includes a similar route extended to Sugar Land which it describes as a "future METRORail potential partnership."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Operations

The light rail lines operate all 7 days of the week. They begin operations at 3:30 a.m. weekdays and 4:30 a.m. weekends and end service at 12:30 a.m. Monday through Thursday nights, 2:45 a.m. Friday and Saturday nights and, 12:30 a.m. Sunday nights. Scheduled train frequency varies from 6 minutes during the day to 20 minutes off-peak.

The light rail lines can handle three-minute headways during peak hours<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and have a design capacity of 8,000 people/hour in each direction while using two-car trains with such a headway.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The scheduled time for an end-to-end trip through the entire Template:Convert Red Line<ref name="Houston-facts" /> is on average 55 minutes.<ref name=riderguide>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Tracks on all three lines are usually in dedicated right-of-way in the center of the street; however, the southbound tracks between the Wheeler and Museum-District stations run along the left side.<ref name="world.nycsubway.org">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The downtown Houston tracks along Capitol and Rusk streets run along the south side of the streets. Furthermore, these light rail trains run in mixed traffic, sharing a lane with buses and other vehicles — often being their turn lane.

METRORail operations are controlled from Houston TranStar, a traffic and emergency management center for the city and surrounding region.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /> Trains have priority signalling at intersections except for six stations near the medical center and downtown.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /><ref name="Vassilakos">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> At prioritized intersections, traffic lights for road traffic in all directions turn red when a train approaches.<ref name="Vassilakos" />

Route and infrastructure

Line	Distance	Route	Status
Template:Ric	Template:Convert<ref name="METRO-facts">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation	CitationClass=web }}</ref>	Fannin South to Northline Transit Center	Opened January 1, 2004
Template:Ric	Template:Convert<ref name="METRO-facts" />	Smith Street in Downtown Houston to Palm Center	Opened May 23, 2015
Template:Ric	Template:Convert<ref name="METRO-facts" />	Smith Street in Downtown Houston to Magnolia Park Transit Center	Opened May 23, 2015

Red (Main Street) Line

The Red Line is a Template:Convert<ref name="METRO-facts" /> double-tracked, Template:Track gauge line with 24 stations<ref name=riderguide /> approximately Template:Convert apart, running from Template:Nowrap to the Northline Transit Center Station. Almost the entire route is at grade and on city streets. The original 2004 portion from Fannin South to UH-Downtown is entirely at ground-level and at-grade with street traffic. However, on the North/Red Line Extension (from UH-Downtown to Northline Transit Center two small portions are elevated: the Burnett Transit Center station<ref name="houston.culturemap.com">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and a small section of track between Melbourne/North Lindale and Northline Transit Center on Fulton Street.<ref>Archived at GhostarchiveTemplate:Cbignore and the Wayback MachineTemplate:Cbignore: Template:Cite AV mediaTemplate:Cbignore</ref> Power is supplied at 600–750 volts DC from overhead wires, with nine substations (for the original 2004 portion).<ref name="railway-technology.com">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The line follows Main Street for eight stations from UH–Downtown to Wheeler station, then follows Fannin Street for the remainder of the original route until Fannin South. Northbound trains run on San Jacinto Street (rather than Fannin) for a small section of the route between the Wheeler and Museum District stations. The North/Red Extension runs along North Main Street until just after Quitman Near Northside, then turns onto Boundary Street until just before Fulton/North Central, and then runs along Fulton Street until Northline Transit Center.<ref name=Drivers-Guide>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Significant businesses and institutions along the Red Line route include the University of Houston–Downtown, Houston's restaurant district near Preston Station, the Downtown Transit Center, Houston's museum district, Rice University, Memorial Hermann Hospital, the Texas Medical Center and NRG Stadium.

A park & ride parking lot is available at one station: Fannin South.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It has approximately 1,200 parking spaces.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /> Parking fees included a daily rate of $3 and a monthly hangtag contract of $40. The Burnett Transit Center was designed to have a park and ride facility next to the Casa de Amigos Health Center; it was scheduled to open in late 2014,<ref name="houston.culturemap.com" /> but the project was canceled in 2011 and scaled back to a multimodal stop.<ref name=Chron-2011 />

For the original 2004 portion of the Red Line, the architectural firm Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville, of Houston, was in charge of the final architectural/engineering design and design support, with a $2.3 million contract.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /> However, all stations south of Burnett Transit Center were designed by the Houston office of St. Louis-based architectural firm Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum.<ref>http://www.hok.com/cfm/ProjectDetailArchive.cfm?Tag=Planning&projectID=63&TagList=Mobility%5EPlanning%5EUnited%20States%5ETransportation Template:Dead link</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Rp All stations are of similar design—Template:Convert long and partially covered by glass roofs. Station length was constrained by the distance between crosswalks in downtown city blocks; station platforms are low-floor and Template:Convert high.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /> The line includes a Template:Cvt bridge along Main Street which separates the double-track main line and a third pocket track from UP's line and three streets.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> A yard and a maintenance facility for the Red Line is connected by loop track to the south of the Fannin South station.<ref name="world.nycsubway.org" />

File:Houston Metro Rail 2015-01-28 Northline Transit Center.JPG

Houston MetroRail Cars at Northline Transit Center on Fulton near Crosstimbers (January 2015)

The right-of-way and the stations for the original 2004 line were built by three contractors for approximately $115 million: Texas Sterling Construction Co. of Houston, Bencon Management of Houston and Beers Construction Co. of Atlanta.<ref name="lightrailnow.org" /> The line construction was divided into five sections, with a resident engineer for each section, to speed up construction.<ref name="railway-technology.com" />

Purple (Southeast) and Green (East End) Lines

The Template:Convert, 10-station Purple Line, and seven stations of the Template:Convert, 9-station Green Line opened on May 23, 2015.<ref>Template:Cite press release</ref> The final two stations of the Green Line opened on January 11, 2017.<ref>Template:Cite press release</ref> A storage yard/inspection facility is located off of Harrisburg and Clifton.

Fares

The standard fare for the rail lines is $1.25 for both cash and METRO Q Card riders; $3 for a Day Pass. A discount fare is available for qualified MetroQ Fare Card riders [those who are seniors 65-69, disabled, Medicare cardholders or full-time students (elementary, high school and university)]; the discounted fare is $0.60 for cash or $1.50 for a Day Pass. All discount riders must show ID (except for elementary and high school students).<ref name="ridemetro.org">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Free rides to METRO buses are available with the MetroQ Fare Card only, for 3 hours in any direction.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Paper transfers from buses were accepted from July 2015 to March 2016 on a trial basis boarded for free: before noon good until 15:00, after it to end of service day. The MetroQ Fare Card holders can earn "Rider Rewards" of 5 free trips for every 50 paid trips.<ref name="ridemetro.org" /> Tickets and cards are purchased from machines at the stations. No charge applies to Texans/Dash/Dynamo home game days with game ticket, nor to seniors over 70 or to children under 5 who ride with an adult (limit 3).

Fare collection, like most light rail systems in the United States, is based on a proof-of-payment system: METRO's fare inspectors randomly check tickets and cards aboard trains. Failure to pay the fare is a Class C Misdemeanor and is subject to a fine of up to $500. Consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited on the train platform and subject to the same fine as a Class C Misdemeanor.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Ridership

In the first year of METRORail, daily ridership, though increasing from 12,102 in January to 32,941 in October, tapered off slightly in the last two months of the year, and "fell short of the 35,000 goal transit officials had set" in early 2004, according to the Houston Chronicle.<ref name="chron20050117">Template:Cite news</ref> The line reached 75 million boardings in December 2011, four years ahead of schedule,<ref name="chron20110225">Template:Cite news</ref> but throughout that year, ridership numbers remained flat or showed small decreases.<ref name="chron20110422">Template:Cite news</ref> By 2012, average weekday ridership was 36,250.<ref name="Monthly Ridership Report">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The North/Red Line Extension exceeded ridership projections by 62% in the first month of operation, averaging 4,200 weekday boardings in January 2014; this was 1,600 more boardings than projected for the extension through September 30, 2014 (the end of the METRORail's fiscal year).<ref name="rm20140212">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Notable records in ridership have occurred on the following dates:<ref name="hbj20070228">Template:Cite news</ref>

• February 1, 2004: 64,005 passengers rode the METRORail to Super Bowl XXXVIII
• February 23, 2004: 54,193 passenger boardings were recorded, the highest weekday at the time
• February 27, 2007: 56,388 passengers were recorded the day of the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo
• March 15, 2012: 70,611 passengers were recorded; many of whom attended the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo and a performance by The Band Perry after the rodeo at the Reliant Park sports complex.<ref name="chron20120315">Template:Cite news</ref>
• March 19, 2014: 76,925 passengers were recorded due in part to the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo.<ref name="chron20140321">Template:Cite news</ref>
• February 4, 2017: 109,500 passenger boardings were recorded during Super Bowl LI
• November 4, 2017: 125,000 passenger boardings were recorded the day of the Houston Astros World Series victory parade and rally held in Downtown.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Rolling stock

METRO currently operates three generations of light rail vehicles. All of them are double-articulated, 70% low-floor vehicles with four low-platform doors per side to provide level boarding.

Series	Builder	Model	In service	Fleet numbers	Years of service	Lines used	Image
H1	Siemens	S70	18	101–118	2004–present	Template:Ric	File:METRORail 4.jpg
H2			19	201–219	2012–present		File:Houston Red Line arrives at Fannin South station in Houston Texas in January, 2014.png
H3	CAF USA	Urbos LRV	39	301–339	2015–present	Template:Ric Template:Ric Template:Ric	File:Houston CAF LRV on Harrisburg Blvd at Wayside Drive, Feb 2017.jpg
H4	Siemens	S700Template:Efn	14	(401–414)	2022–present	Template:Ric

H1 series

The original fleet of 18 vehicles was built by Siemens Transportation Systems in Sacramento, California; the $117.9 million contract for Siemens included the light rail infrastructure (traction power, signals, and communication systems) and an initial order of 15 light rail vehicles.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="lightrailnow.org" /> Three additional vehicles were ordered in 2002.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> 101 to 115 were delivered in 2003 and 116 to 118 in 2004, for the opening of the first stage of the Red Line.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Designated by the manufacturer as S70 and based roughly on earlier vehicles built for Portland's MAX Light Rail system, each vehicle is Template:Convert long and has a top speed of Template:Convert.<ref name="smartplanet.com">Nusca, Andrew. (April 6, 2011) Siemens lands $83 million contract for light rail in Houston. SmartPlanet. Retrieved on 2013-08-15.</ref> They have a capacity of 72 seated and approximately 169 standing passengers, or a total capacity of around 241 per car.<ref name="railway-technology.com" /><ref name="S70 Light Rail Vehicle">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> This approximately 250-person capacity has been reached on certain Super Bowl weekends.<ref name="lightrailnow">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The H1 series cars are distinguishable by their streamlined cab ends and rectangular headlamps, with the electronic destination sign (which have been modified to indicate the line with a colored square) mounted directly in front of the cab rather than above it. They are normally used only on the Red Line and can be operated as single cars or in trains of two cars coupled together, though two-car trains have become the norm due to increasing ridership and the arrival of the H2 series.

H2 series

For expansion of the METRORail system, METRO turned to CAF USA, with a total order of 105 cars placed in May 2010.<ref name="S70 Light Rail Vehicle, Houston">Template:Cite news</ref> A subsequent investigation by the Federal Transit Administration determined the procurement violated the Buy America Act,<ref name=FTA-2010>Template:Cite report</ref> and the Template:US$ million order was cancelled in February 2011.<ref name=Chron-2011 /> CAF gave a partial refund of Template:US$ million, which METRO applied to the purchase of what would become the H2 series cars.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

In the spring of 2011, METRO purchased a further 19 Siemens S70 vehicles (the same model as its original 18), citing the need to accommodate ridership that was 4 years ahead of expectations and to get cars more quickly.<ref name="chron20110225" /> These cars were options under a contract for Utah Transit Authority's TRAX system, which METRO purchased for $83 million after UTA decided not to exercise its options.<ref name="smartplanet.com" /><ref>Template:Cite press release</ref> As with the previous H1 generation, these new cars were built in Florin, California,<ref name="smartplanet.com" /> but they differ slightly from the cars Utah received in detail, including having more air-conditioning units.<ref name="chron20110225" /> They were delivered in October 2012 and entered service that December.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

The H2 series cars are shorter than the H1 series, at Template:Convert in length, accommodate slightly fewer passengers (60 seated, 225 maximum), and have a lower maximum speed of Template:Cvt.<ref name=S70-H2>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Rp Externally, the H2 series are distinguishable by their flatter cab ends and circular headlamps, with the electronic destination sign (which use colored dots to indicate the line) conventionally mounted above the cab. Like the H1 series, they are normally used only on the Red Line and can be operated as single cars or in two-car trains. The H1 and H2 series are electrically compatible and can operate together in the same train.

H3 series

In September 2011, METRO approved the purchase of 39 vehicles from CAF upon receipt of a new proposal compliant with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and "Buy America" guidelines.<ref name="metro-magazine1">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="ridemetro1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The first six of these cars were delivered in January 2015<ref>Template:Cite news Template:Subscription required</ref> and entered service shortly afterwards.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

The H3 series cars, built in Elmira, New York<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and based on the CAF Urbos platform used in cities across Europe and Asia, are similar in size and capacity to the H1 series with a length of Template:Cvt and accommodating a maximum of 242 passengers (64 seated),<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> but are distinguishable by their boxier design and framed window panes. They are in operation on all three METRORail lines and can couple to form two-car trains; however, the H3 series is electrically incompatible with the older types and cannot operate with them in the same train.

H4 series

In February 2019, METRO ordered 14 additional Siemens S700 vehicles (H4), with interior modifications designed to improve passenger flow compared to the agency's prior H1 and H2 series S70s.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite press release</ref> These vehicles result from the reassignment of options from Minneapolis–Saint Paul Metro Transit in May 2018. Metro Transit previously had signed a contract with Siemens to deliver 27 low floor S70 LRVs with options for up to 50 additional vehicles in 2016.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> These new vehicles would be used for the Southwest LRT (Green Line) and Bottineau LRT (Blue Line) extension projects; subsequently, Metro Transit determined they would only need 27 vehicles for Southwest and 28 vehicles for Bottineau, leaving 22 options unexercised, and METRO requested the transfer of 14 of those options in 2018.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Siemens re-designated the S70, as originally ordered with modifications in the center section per Metro Transit's needs for passenger flow, to the S700 in 2020.<ref name="taut-2020sep">Template:Cite news</ref> They entered into service on 15 December 2022.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Incidents and crashes

For a full year before the Metrorail system's opening, a program to prepare drivers to share Houston streets with the Metrorail trains was conducted, consisting of driver safety classes, community forums and public service announcements.<ref name="Howlett">Template:Cite news</ref> By August, the system averaged six crashes per month, 20 times worse than the national average for light rail systems. The high rate of incidents gave rise to local derogatory nicknames among detractors such as the "Wham Bam tram" and "Danger Train."<ref name="st20040811">Template:Cite news</ref> METRO has consistently blamed driver error as the cause of the high collision rate and the transit agency's police department regularly tickets motorists who cross paths with the train. An independent panel of transportation experts at Texas A&M University issued a report in 2004 finding no fundamental flaws with the Metrorail system, although this report did recommend minor adjustments to signal timing and signage.<ref name="chron20040309">Template:Cite news</ref>

The 100th accident, as defined by METRO, occurred on August 10, 2005. In the judgement of METRO police, only two of these were the fault of the train operator. Most crashes resulted from drivers turning into the trains or running red lights. Following the Texas A&M report, METRO implemented four-way red lights at some crossings and other safety measures which led to a 75% reduction in incidents per train mile even as service ramped up.<ref name="chron20050810">Template:Cite news</ref> Critics have also noted the fact that the system is at-grade, while supporters contend that lack of federal funding due to political opposition made construction of a grade separated rail line unfeasible.<ref name="st20040811" /> Sociology and urban studies professor Stephen Klineberg argues that the high rate of crashes in Houston is attributable to the high rate of automobile driving and low rate of walking in Houston.<ref name="Howlett" />

See also

• List of METRORail stations
• Light rail in the United States
• List of United States light rail systems by ridership
• Light rail in North America
• List of tram and light rail transit systems

External links

• GO METRORail
• METRORail – Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County
• Houston Metro Rail Development – interactive Facebook page (unofficial)