Manichaeism

Manichaeism (Template:IPAc-en;<ref>Template:OED</ref> in Template:Langx Template:Transliteration; Template:Zh) is a practically extinct former major world religion,<ref name="ReferenceC">R. van den Broek, Wouter J. Hanegraaff Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times. SUNY Press, 1998 Template:ISBN p. 37</ref> founded in the 3rd century CE by the Parthian<ref>Yarshater, Ehsan The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 3 (2), The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.</ref> prophet Mani (216–274 CE), in the Sasanian Empire.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Manichaeism teaches an elaborate dualistic cosmology describing the struggle between a good, spiritual world of light, and an evil, material world of darkness.<ref>Template:Iranica</ref> Through an ongoing process that takes place in human history, light is gradually removed from the world of matter and returned to the world of light, whence it came. Mani's teaching was intended to "combine",<ref name="Turner-1993">Template:Cite book</ref> succeed, and surpass the teachings of Platonism,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Marcionism,<ref name="Turner-1993" /> Hellenistic and Rabbinic Judaism, Gnostic movements, Ancient Greek religion, Babylonian and other Mesopotamian religions,<ref>Widengren, Geo Mesopotamian elements in Manichaeism (King and Saviour II): Studies in Manichaean, Mandaean, and Syrian-gnostic religion, Lundequistska bokhandeln, 1946.</ref> and mystery cults.<ref name="Hopkins-2001">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Arendzen-1910-1">Arendzen, John (1 October 1910). "Manichæism Template:Webarchive". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.</ref> It reveres Mani as the final prophet after Zoroaster, the Buddha, and Jesus.

Manichaeism was quickly successful and spread far through Aramaic-speaking regions.<ref name="BeDuhnMirecki2007">Template:Cite book</ref> It thrived between the third and seventh centuries, and at its height was one of the most widespread religions in the world. Manichaean churches and scriptures existed as far east as China and as far west as the Roman Empire.<ref>Andrew Welburn, Mani, the Angel and the Column of Glory: An Anthology of Manichaean Texts (Edinburgh: Floris Books, 1998), p. 68</ref> Before the spread of Islam, it was briefly the main rival to early Christianity in the competition to replace classical polytheism. Under the Roman Dominate, Manichaeism was persecuted by the Roman state and was eventually stamped out in the Roman Empire.<ref name="ReferenceC"/>

Manichaeism survived longer in the east than it did in the west. The religion was present in West Asia into the Abbasid Caliphate period in the 10th century. It was also present in China despite increasingly strict proscriptions under the Tang dynasty and was the official religion of the Uyghur Khaganate until its collapse in 830. It experienced a resurgence under the Mongol Yuan dynasty during the 13th and 14th centuries but was subsequently banned by the Chinese emperors, and Manichaeism there became subsumed into Buddhism and Taoism.<ref name="Clarence, 2021">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Some historic Manichaean sites still exist in China, including the temple of Cao'an in Jinjiang, Fujian, and the religion may have influenced later movements in Europe, including Paulicianism, Bogomilism, and Catharism.

While most of Manichaeism's original writings have been lost, numerous translations and fragmentary texts have survived.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

An adherent of Manichaeism is called a Manichaean, Manichean, or Manichee.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

History

Life of Mani

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

File:Manicheans.jpg

Manichaean priests, writing at their desks. Eighth or ninth century manuscript from Gaochang, Tarim Basin, China.

File:Birth of Mani.jpg

Yuan Chinese silk painting Mani's Birth

Mani was an Iranian<ref>Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians: their religious beliefs and practices, Routledge, 2001. p. 111: "He was Iranian, of noble Parthian blood ..."</ref><ref>Warwick Ball, Rome in the East: the transformation of an empire, Routledge, 2001. p. 437: "Manichaeism was a syncretic religion, proclaimed by the Iranian Prophet Mani ...</ref>Template:Efn born in 216 CE in or near Ctesiphon (now al-Mada'in, Iraq) in the Parthian Empire. According to the Cologne Mani-Codex,<ref name="Mani-Kodex">L. Koenen and C. Römer, eds., Der Kölner Mani-Kodex. Über das Werden seines Leibes. Kritische Edition, (Abhandlung der Reinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Papyrologica Coloniensia 14) (Opladen, Germany) 1988.</ref> Mani's parents were members of the Jewish Christian Gnostic sect known as the Elcesaites.<ref name="Sundermann-2009a">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Mani composed seven works, six of which were written in the late-Aramaic Syriac language. The seventh, the Shabuhragan,<ref name="Shabuhragan">Middle Persian Sources: D. N. MacKenzie, Mani's Šābuhragān, pt. 1 (text and translation), BSOAS 42/3, 1979, pp. 500–34, pt. 2 (glossary and plates), BSOAS 43/2, 1980, pp. 288–310.</ref> was written by Mani in Middle Persian and presented by him to Sasanian emperor Shapur I. Although there is no proof Shapur I was a Manichaean, he tolerated the spread of Manichaeism and refrained from persecuting it within his empire's boundaries.<ref>Welburn (1998), pp. 67–68</ref>

According to one tradition, Mani invented the unique version of the Syriac script known as the Manichaean alphabet<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> that was used in all of the Manichaean works written within the Sasanian Empire, whether they were in Syriac or Middle Persian, as well as most of the works written within the Uyghur Khaganate. The primary language of Babylon (and the administrative and cultural language of the Empire) at that time was Eastern Middle Aramaic, which included three main dialects: Jewish Babylonian Aramaic (the language of the Babylonian Talmud), Mandaean (the language of Mandaeism), and Syriac, which was the language of Mani as well as the Syriac Christians.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

File:Shahname - Mani death (cropped).jpg

A 14th-century illustration of the execution of Mani

While Manichaeism was spreading, existing religions such as Zoroastrianism were still prevalent, and Christianity was gaining social and political influence. Although having fewer adherents, Manichaeism won the support of many high-ranking political figures. With the assistance of the Sasanian Empire, Mani began missionary expeditions. After failing to win the favour of the next generation of Persian royalty and incurring the disapproval of the Zoroastrian clergy, Mani is reported to have died in prison awaiting execution by the Persian emperor Bahram I. The date of his death is estimated at 276–277 CE.

Influences

File:Sermon on Mani's Teaching of Salvation. Cathayan Manichaean silk painting, 13th-century.jpg

Sermon on Mani's Teaching of Salvation, 13th-century Chinese Manichaean silk painting

Mani believed that the teachings of Buddha, Zoroaster,<ref name="Harari-2015">Template:Cite book</ref> and Jesus were incomplete, and that his revelations were for the entire world, calling his teachings the "Religion of Light". Manichaean writings indicate that Mani received revelations when he was twelve years old and again when he was 24, and over this period, he grew dissatisfied with the Elcesaites, the Jewish Christian Gnostic sect he was born into.<ref name="Reeves1996">Template:Cite book</ref> Some researchers also point to an important Jain influence on Mani as extreme degrees of asceticism and some specific features of Jain doctrine made the influence of Mahāvīra's religious community more plausible than even the Buddha.<ref>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> Fynes (1996) argues that various Jain influences, particularly ideas on the existence of plant souls, were transmitted from Western Kshatrapa territories to Mesopotamia and then integrated into Manichaean beliefs.<ref name="FynesRCC">Template:Cite journal</ref>

Mani wore colorful clothing abnormal for the time that reminded some Romans of a stereotypical Persian magus or warlord, earning him ire from the Greco-Roman world because of it.<ref name="Coyle2009">Template:Cite book</ref>

Mani taught how the soul of a righteous individual returns to Paradise upon dying, but "the soul of the person who persisted in things of the flesh – fornication, procreation, possessions, cultivation, harvesting, eating of meat, drinking of wine – is condemned to rebirth in a succession of bodies."<ref name="EB-2023">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Mani began preaching at an early age and was possibly influenced by contemporary Babylonian-Aramaic movements such as Mandaeism, Aramaic translations of Jewish apocalyptic works similar to those found at Qumran (e.g., the Book of Enoch literature), and by the Syriac dualist-Gnostic writer Bardaisan (who lived a generation before Mani). With the discovery of the Mani-Codex, it also became clear that he was raised in the Jewish Christian sect of the Elcasaites and possibly influenced by their writings.Template:Citation needed

According to biographies preserved by ibn al-Nadim and the Persian polymath al-Biruni, Mani received a revelation as a youth from a spirit, whom he would later call his "Twin" (Template:Langx Template:Ipa, from which is also derived the Greek name of Thomas the Apostle, Didymus; the "twin"), Syzygos (Template:Langx "spouse, partner", in the Cologne Mani-Codex), "Double," "Protective Angel," or "Divine Self." This spirit taught him wisdom that he then developed into a religion. It was his "Twin" who brought Mani to self-realization. Mani claimed to be the Paraclete of the Truth promised by Jesus in the New Testament.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

File:Jesus as a Manichaean Prophet, 13th century.jpg

Manichaean Painting of the Buddha Jesus depicts Jesus Christ as a Manichaean prophet. The figure can be identified as a representation of Jesus Christ by the small gold cross that sits on the red lotus throne in His left hand.

Manichaeism's views on Jesus are described by historians: Template:Poemquote

Augustine of Hippo also noted that Mani declared himself to be an "apostle of Jesus Christ".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Manichaean tradition is also noted to have claimed that Mani was the reincarnation of religious figures from previous eras such as the Buddha, Krishna, and Zoroaster in addition to Jesus himself.

Academics note that much of what is known about Manichaeism comes from later 10th- and 11th-century Muslim historians like al-Biruni and ibn al-Nadim in his al-Fihrist; the latter "ascribed to Mani the claim to be the Seal of the Prophets."<ref name="Sundermann-EIranica-2012">Template:Iranica</ref> However, given the Islamic milieu of Arabia and Persia at the time, it stands to reason that Manichaens would regularly assert in their evangelism that Mani, not Muhammad, was the "Seal of the Prophets".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> In reality, for Mani the metaphorical expression "Seal of Prophets" is not a reference to his finality in a long succession of prophets as it is used in Islam, but rather as final to his followers (who testify or attest to his message as a "seal").<ref>C. Colpe, "Das Siegel der Propheten: historische Beziehungen zwischen Judentum, Judenchristentum, Heidentum und frühem Islam", Arbeiten zur neutestamentlichen Theologie und Zeitgeschichte, 3 (Berlin: Institut Kirche und Judentum, 1990), 227–243.</ref><ref>G. G. Stroumsa, The Making of the Abrahamic Religions in Late Antiquity, Oxford Studies in the Abrahamic Religions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 68.</ref>

File:ManichaeanElectaeKocho10thCentury.jpg

10th century Manichaean Electae in Gaochang (Khocho), China

Other sources of Mani's scripture were the Aramaic originals of the Book of Enoch, 2 Enoch, and an otherwise unknown section of the Book of Enoch entitled The Book of Giants. Mani quoted the latter directly and expanded upon it, becoming one of the six original Syriac writings of the Manichaean Church. Besides short references by non-Manichaean authors through the centuries, no original sources of The Book of Giants (which is actually part six of the Book of Enoch) were available until the 20th century.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Scattered fragments of both the original Aramaic Book of Giants (which were analyzed and published by Józef Milik in 1976)<ref>J. T. Milik, ed. and trans., The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.</ref> and the Manichaean version of the same name (analyzed and published by Walter Bruno Henning in 1943)<ref name="Henning">In: Henning, W. B., The Book of Giants, BSOAS, Vol. XI, Part 1, 1943, pp. 52–74.</ref> were discovered along with the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Judaean desert in the 20th century and the Manichaean writings of the Uyghur Manichaean kingdom in Turpan. Henning wrote in his analysis of them:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

By comparing the cosmology of the books of Enoch to the Book of Giants, as well as the description of the Manichaean myth, scholars have observed that the Manichaean cosmology can be described as being based, in part, on the description of the cosmology developed in detail within the Enochic literature.<ref>Reeves, John C. Jewish Lore in Manichaean Cosmogony: Studies in the Book of Giants Traditions (1992)</ref> This literature describes the being that the prophets saw in their ascent to Heaven as a king who sits on a throne at the highest of the heavens. In the Manichaean description, this being, the "Great King of Honor", becomes a deity who guards the entrance to the World of Light placed at the seventh of ten heavens.<ref>See Henning, A Sogdian Fragment of the Manichaean Cosmogony, BSOAS, 1948</ref> In the Aramaic Book of Enoch, the Qumran writings, overall, and in the original Syriac section of Manichaean scriptures quoted by Theodore bar Konai,<ref name="Konai"/> he is called malkā rabbā d-iqārā ("the Great King of Honor").Template:Citation needed

Mani was also influenced by writings of the gnostic Bardaisan (154–222 CE), who, like Mani, wrote in Syriac and presented a dualistic interpretation of the world in terms of light and darkness in combination with elements from Christianity.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Mani was heavily inspired by Iranian Zoroastrian theology.<ref name="Harari-2015" />

File:Akshobya in His Eastern Paradise with Cross of Light.jpg

Akshobhya in the abhirati with the Cross of Light, a symbol of Manichaeism

Noting Mani's travels to the Kushan Empire (several religious paintings in Bamyan are attributed to him) at the beginning of his proselytizing career, Richard Foltz postulates Buddhist influences in Manichaeism:

Buddhist influences were significant in the formation of Mani's religious thought. The transmigration of souls became a Manichaean belief, and the quadripartite structure of the Manichaean community, divided between male and female monks (the "elect") and lay followers (the "hearers") who supported them, appears to be based on that of the Buddhist sangha.<ref>Richard Foltz, Religions of the Silk Road, Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition, 2010, p. 71 Template:ISBN</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

The Kushan monk Lokakṣema began translating Pure Land Buddhist texts into Chinese in the century prior to Mani arriving there. The Chinese texts of Manichaeism are full of uniquely Buddhist terms taken directly from these Chinese Pure Land scriptures, including the term "pure land" (Template:Zh) itself.<ref>Peter Bryder, The Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism: A Study of Chinese Manichaean Terminology, 1985.</ref> However, the central object of veneration in Pure Land Buddhism, Amitābha, the Buddha of Infinite Light, does not appear in Chinese Manichaeism and seems to have been replaced by another deity.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Spread

Roman Empire

File:Spread of Manicheanism.png

A map of the spread of Manichaeism (300–500). World History Atlas, Dorling Kindersly.

Manichaeism reached Rome through the apostle Psattiq in 280, who was also in Egypt in 244 and 251. It flourished in the Faiyum in 290.

Manichaean monasteries existed in Rome in 312 during the time of Pope Miltiades.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

In 291, persecution arose in the Sasanian Empire with the murder of the apostle Sisin by Emperor Bahram II and the slaughter of many Manichaeans. Then, in 302, the first official reaction and legislation against Manichaeism from the Roman state was issued under Diocletian. In an official edict called the De Maleficiis et Manichaeis compiled in the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum and addressed to the proconsul of Africa, Diocletian wrote:

We have heard that the Manichaeans [...] have set up new and hitherto unheard-of sects in opposition to the older creeds so that they might cast out the doctrines vouchsafed to us in the past by the divine favour for the benefit of their own depraved doctrine. They have sprung forth very recently like new and unexpected monstrosities among the race of the Persians – a nation still hostile to us – and have made their way into our empire, where they are committing many outrages, disturbing the tranquility of our people and even inflicting grave damage to the civic communities. We have cause to fear that with the passage of time they will endeavour, as usually happens, to infect the modest and tranquil of an innocent nature with the damnable customs and perverse laws of the Persians as with the poison of a malignant (serpent) ... We order that the authors and leaders of these sects be subjected to severe punishment, and, together with their abominable writings, burnt in the flames. We direct their followers, if they continue recalcitrant, shall suffer capital punishment, and their goods be forfeited to the imperial treasury. And if those who have gone over to that hitherto unheard-of, scandalous and wholly infamous creed, or to that of the Persians, are persons who hold public office, or are of any rank or of superior social status, you will see to it that their estates are confiscated and the offenders sent to the (quarry) at Phaeno or the mines at Proconnesus. And in order that this plague of iniquity shall be completely extirpated from this our most happy age, let your devotion hasten to carry out our orders and commands.<ref>Iain Gardner and Samuel N. C. Lieu, eds., Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 117–18.</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

By 354, Hilary of Poitiers wrote that Manichaeism was a significant force in Roman Gaul. In 381, Christians requested Theodosius I to strip Manichaeans of their civil rights. Starting in 382, the emperor issued a series of edicts to suppress Manichaeism and punish its followers.<ref>Lieu, Samuel (1992) Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China 2d edition, pp. 145–148</ref>

File:Tiffany Window of St Augustine - Lightner Museum.jpg

Augustine of Hippo was once a Manichaean.

Augustine of Hippo (354–430) converted to Christianity from Manichaeism in the year 387. This was shortly after the Roman emperor Theodosius I issued a decree of death for all Manichaean monks in 382 and shortly before he declared Christianity the only legitimate religion for the Roman Empire in 391. Due to the heavy persecution, the religion almost disappeared from Western Europe in the fifth century and from the eastern portion of the empire in the sixth century.<ref name="Wendy"/>

According to his Confessions, after nine or ten years of adhering to the Manichaean faith as a member of the group of "hearers", Augustine of Hippo became a Christian and potent adversary of Manichaeism (which he expressed in writing against his Manichaean opponent Faustus of Mileve), seeing their beliefs that knowledge was the key to salvation as too passive and unable to affect any change in one's life.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

I still thought that it is not we who sin but some other nature that sins within us. It flattered my pride to think that I incurred no guilt and, when I did wrong, not to confess it ... I preferred to excuse myself and blame this unknown thing which was in me but was not part of me. The truth, of course, was that it was all my own self, and my own impiety had divided me against myself. My sin was all the more incurable because I did not think myself a sinner.<ref>Confessions, Book V, Section 10.</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Some modern scholars have suggested that Manichaean ways of thinking influenced the development of some of Augustine's ideas, such as the nature of good and evil, the idea of hell, the separation of groups into elect, hearers, and sinners, and the hostility to the flesh and sexual activity, and his dualistic theology.<ref>A. Adam, Das Fortwirken des Manichäismus bei Augustin. In: ZKG (69) 1958, S. 1–25.</ref>

File:Augustine Confessiones.jpg

A 13th-century manuscript from Augustine's book VII of Confessions criticizing Manichaeism

Central Asia

File:Amitâbha in His Western Paradise with Indians, Tibetians and Central Asians, Symbols - Sun and Cross.jpg

Amitābha in his Western Paradise with Indians, Tibetans, and Central Asians, with two symbols of Manichaeism: Sun and Cross

Some Sogdians in Central Asia believed in the religion.<ref>从信仰摩尼教看漠北回纥Template:Dead link</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Uyghur khagan Boku Tekin (759–780) converted to the religion in 763 after a three-day discussion with its preachers,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>TM276 Uygurca_Alttuerkisch_Qedimi Uygurche/TT 2.pdf Türkische Turfan-Texte. ~Template:Dead link</ref> the Babylonian headquarters sent high-rank clerics to Uyghur, and Manichaeism remained the state religion for about a century before the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840.Template:Citation needed

South Siberia

After the defeat of the Uighur Khaganate by the Yenisei Kyrgyz, Manichaeism spread north to the Khakass-Minusinsk depression. Archaeological excavations in the Uybat valley revealed the existence of a Manichaean center there, which included 6 temples and 5 sanctuaries of the elements, and architecturally it was similar to the Sogdian structures in Tuva and Xinjiang. In the 1970s, a Manichaean temple that existed in the 8th-10th centuries was excavated 90 km from the Uybat center in the Puyur-sukh valley. L.R Kyzlasov interpreted these finds as evidence of the adoption of Manichaeism as an official religion in the Kyrgyz Kaganate. Few Khakass Manichaean epitaphs confirm this version; the Manichaean script also influenced the Yenisei runic script at a late stage of its development. South Siberian Manichaeism existed before the Mongol conquest. Later, it influenced the formation of the culture of the Sayano-Altai Turks (Altaians, Khakas, Tuvans), as well as the Khants, Selkups, Kets and Evenks. This influence affected the everyday beliefs of the indigenous peoples and the lexical composition of their languages.<ref>http://e-lib.gasu.ru/da/archive/2000/05/10.html</ref>

China

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} In the east it spread along trade routes as far as Chang'an, the capital of Tang China.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="S.N.C.L.">Template:Cite book</ref>

After the Tang dynasty, some Manichaean groups participated in peasant movements. Many rebel leaders used religion to mobilize followers. In Song and Yuan China, remnants of Manichaeism continued to leave a legacy contributing to sects such as the Red Turbans. During the Song dynasty, the Manichaeans were derogatorily referred by the Chinese as Chīcài shìmó (Template:Zh, meaning that they "abstain from meat and worship demons").<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Xisha2011">Template:Cite book</ref>

An account in Fozu Tongji, an important historiography of Buddhism in China compiled by Buddhist scholars during 1258–1269, says that the Manichaeans worshipped the "White Buddha" and their leader wore a violet headgear, while the followers wore white costumes. Many Manichaeans took part in rebellions against the Song government and were eventually quelled. After that, all governments were suppressive against Manichaeism and its followers, and the religion was banned in Ming China in 1370.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Xisha2011"/> While it had long been thought that Manichaeism arrived in China only at the end of the seventh century, a recentTemplate:When archaeological discovery demonstrated that it was already known there in the second half of the 6th century.<ref name="La Vaissiere">Étienne de la Vaissière, "Mani en Chine au VIe siècle", Journal asiatique, 293–1 (2005): 357–378.</ref>

The nomadic Uyghur Khaganate lasted for less than a century (744–840) in the southern Siberian steppe, with the fortified city of Ordu-Baliq on the Upper Orkhon River as its capital.<ref name="CA, ABC-CLIO">Template:Cite book</ref> Before the end of the year (763), Manichaeism was declared the official religion of the Uyghur state. Boku Tekin banned all the shamanistic rituals that had previously been in use. His subjects likely accepted his decision. That much results from a report that the proclamation of Manichaeism as the state religion was met with enthusiasm in Ordu-Baliq. In an inscription in which the Kaghan speaks for himself, he promised the Manichaen high priests (the "Elect") that if they gave orders, he would promptly follow them and respond to their requests. An incomplete manuscript found in the Turfan Oasis gives Boku Tekin the title of zahag-i Mani ("Emanation of Mani" or "Descendant of Mani"), a title of majestic prestige among the Manichaeans of Central Asia.

Nonetheless, and despite the apparently willing conversion of the Uyghurs to Manichaeanism, traces and signs of the previous shamanistic practices persisted. For instance, in 765, only two years after the official conversion, during a military campaign in China, the Uyghur troops called forth magicians to perform a number of specific rituals. Manichaean Uyghurs continued to treat with great respect a sacred forest in Otuken.<ref name="CA, ABC-CLIO"/> The conversion to Manichaeism led to an explosion of manuscript production in the Tarim Basin and Gansu (the region between the Tibetan and the Huangtu plateaus), which lasted well into the early 11th century. In 840, the Uyghur Khaganate collapsed under the attacks of the Yenisei Kyrgyz, and the new Uyghur state of Qocho was established with a capital in the city of Qocho.

Al-Jahiz (776–868 or 869) believed that the peaceful lifestyle that Manicheism brought to the Uyghurs was responsible for their later lack of military skills and eventual decline. This, however, is contradicted by the political and military consequences of the conversion. After the migration of the Uyghurs to Turfan in the ninth century, the nobility maintained Manichaean beliefs for a while before converting to Buddhism. Traces of Manicheism among the Uyghurs in Turfan may be detected in fragments of Uyghur Manichaean manuscripts. In fact, Manicheism continued to rival the influence of Buddhism among the Uyghurs until the 13th century. The Mongols gave the final blow to the Manichaeism among the Uyghurs.<ref name="CA, ABC-CLIO"/>

Tibet

Manichaeism spread to Tibet during the Tibetan Empire. There was a serious attempt made to introduce the religion to the Tibetans as the text Criteria of the Authentic Scriptures (a text attributed to the Tibetan Emperor Trisong Detsen) makes a great effort to attack Manichaeism by stating that Mani was a heretic who engaged in religious syncretism into a deviating and inauthentic form.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Iran

Manichaeans in Iran tried to assimilate their religion along with Islam in the Muslim caliphates.<ref name="Andrew">Template:Cite book</ref> Relatively little is known about the religion during the first century of Islamic rule. During the early caliphates, Manichaeism attracted many followers. It had a significant appeal among Muslim society, especially among the elites. A part of Manichaeism that specifically appealed to the Sasanians was the Manichaean gods' names. The names Mani had assigned to the gods of his religion show identification with those of the Zoroastrian pantheon, even though some divine beings he incorporates are non-Iranian. For example, Jesus, Adam, and Eve were named Xradesahr, Gehmurd, and Murdiyanag. Because of these familiar names, Manichaeism did not feel completely foreign to the Zoroastrians.<ref name="Hutter-1993">Template:Cite journal</ref> Due to the appeal of its teachings, many Sasanians adopted the ideas of its theology and some even became dualists.

Not only were the citizens of the Sasanian Empire intrigued by Manichaeism, but so was the ruler at the time of its introduction, Sabuhr l. As the Denkard reports, Sabuhr, the first King of Kings, was very well-known for gaining and seeking knowledge of any kind. Because of this, Mani knew that Sabuhr would lend an ear to his teachings and accept him. Mani had explicitly stated while introducing his teachings to Sabuhr, that his religion should be seen as a reform of Zarathrusta's ancient teachings.<ref name="Hutter-1993" /> This was of great fascination to the king, for it perfectly fit Sabuhr's dream of creating a large empire that incorporated all people and their different creeds. Thus, Manichaeism became widespread and flourished throughout the Sasanian Empire for thirty years. An apologia for Manichaeism ascribed to ibn al-Muqaffa' defended its phantasmagorical cosmogony and attacked the fideism of Islam and other monotheistic religions. The Manichaeans had sufficient structure to have a head of their community.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Tolerance toward Manichaeism decreased after the death of Sabuhr I. His son, Ohrmazd, who became king, still allowed for Manichaeism in the empire, but he also greatly trusted the Zoroastrian priest, Kirdir. After Ohrmazd's short reign, his oldest brother, Wahram I, became king. Wahram I held Kirdir in high esteem, and he also had many different religious ideals than Ohrmazd and his father, Sabuhr I. Due to the influence of Kirdir, Zoroastrianism was strengthened throughout the empire, which in turn caused Manichaeism to be diminished. Wahram sentenced Mani to prison, and he died there.<ref name="Hutter-1993" />

Arab world

That Manicheism went further on to the Arabian peninsula, up to the Hejaz and Mecca, where it could have possibly contributed to the formation of the doctrine of Islam, cannot be proven in pre-Islamic Arabia <ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and there was no existence of Manichaeism in the Hejaz.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Under the eighth-century Abbasid Caliphate, Arabic {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} and the adjectival term {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} could denote many different things,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> but it seems to have primarily—or at least initially—signified a follower of Manichaeism; however its true meaning is not known.<ref name="Zaman1997">Template:Citation</ref> From the ninth century, it is reported that Caliph al-Ma'mun tolerated a community of Manichaeans.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

During the early Abbasid period, the Manichaeans underwent persecution. The third Abbasid caliph, al-Mahdi, persecuted the Manichaeans, establishing an inquisition against dualists who, if found guilty of heresy, refused to renounce their beliefs, were executed. Their persecution was ended in the 780s by Harun al-Rashid.<ref name="Christine">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Irfan Shahîd, Byzantium and the Arabs in the fourth century, 1984, p. 425.</ref> During the reign of the Caliph al-Muqtadir, many Manichaeans fled from Mesopotamia to Khorasan in fear of persecution, and the base of the religion was later shifted to Samarkand.<ref name="Wendy"/><ref name="Jacques"/>

Bactria

The first appearance of Manichaeism in Bactria was actually during Mani's lifetime. While he never physically traveled there, he did send a disciple by the name of Mar Ammo to spread his word. Mani "called (upon) Mar Ammo, the teacher, who knew the Parthian language and script, and was well acquainted with lords and ladies and with many nobles in those places..."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Mar Ammo indeed did travel to the old Parthian lands of eastern Iran, which bordered Bactria. A translation of Persian texts states the following from the perspective of Mar Ammo: "They had arrived at the watch post of Kushān (Bactria), then the spirit of the border of the eastern province appeared in the shape of a girl, and he (the spirit) asked me 'Ammo what do you intend? From where have you come?' I said, 'I am a believer, a disciple of Mani, the Apostle.' That spirit said 'I do not receive you. Return from where you have come.'"

Despite the initial rejection Mar Ammo faced, the text records that Mani's spirit appeared to Mar Ammo and requested he persevere and read the chapter "The Collecting of the Gates" from The Treasure of the Living. Once he did so, the spirit returned, transformed, and said, "I am Bag Ard, the frontier guard of the Eastern Province. When I receive you, then the gate of the whole East will be opened in front of you." It seemed that this "border spirit" was a reference to the local Eastern Iranian goddess Ard-oxsho, who was prevalent in Bactria.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

File:Manichaean Diagram of the Universe (Detail 12).jpg

The four primary prophets of Manichaeism in the Manichaean Diagram of the Universe, from left to right: Mani, Zoroaster, Buddha and Jesus

Syncretism and translation

Manichaeism claimed to present the complete version of teachings that were corrupted and misinterpreted by the followers of Mani's predecessors Adam, Abraham, Noah,<ref name="Turner-1993" /> Zoroaster, the Buddha, and Jesus.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Accordingly, as it spread, it adapted deities from other religions into forms it could use for its scriptures. Its original Eastern Middle Aramaic texts already contained stories of Jesus.

As the faith moved eastward and its scriptures were translated into Iranian languages, the names of the Manichaean deities were often transformed into the names of Zoroastrian yazatas. Thus, Abbā ḏəRabbūṯā ("The Father of Greatness"), the highest Manichaean deity of Light, in Middle Persian texts might either be translated literally as pīd ī wuzurgīh or substituted with the name of the deity Zurwān.

Similarly, the Manichaean primordial figure Nāšā Qaḏmāyā ("The Original Man") was rendered Ohrmazd Bay after the Zoroastrian god Ohrmazd. This process continued in Manichaeism's meeting with Chinese Buddhism, during which, for example, the original Aramaic {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Template:Transliteration (the "call" from the World of Light to those seeking rescue from the World of Darkness) is identified in the Chinese-language scriptures with Guanyin (Template:Script or Avalokiteśvara in Sanskrit, literally, "watching/perceiving sounds [of the world]", the bodhisattva of Compassion).Template:Citation needed

Manichaeism influenced some early texts and traditions of proto-orthodox and other forms of early Christianity, as well as doing the same for branches of Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Islam.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Persecution and suppression

Template:See also Manichaeism was repressed by the Sasanian Empire.<ref name="Andrew"/> In 291, persecution arose in the Persian empire with the murder of the apostle Sisin by Bahram II and the slaughter of many Manichaeans. In 296, the Roman emperor Diocletian decreed all the Manichaean leaders to be burnt alive along with the Manichaean scriptures, and many Manichaeans in Europe and North Africa were killed. It was not until 372 with Valentinian I and Valens that Manichaeism was legislated against again.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Theodosius I issued a death decree for all Manichaean monks in 382.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The religion was vigorously attacked and persecuted by both the Christian Church and the Roman state, and the religion almost disappeared from western Europe in the fifth century and from the eastern portion of the empire in the sixth century.<ref name="Wendy">Template:Cite book</ref>

File:Conversion of Bögü Qaghan (759-780 CE) to Manicheism in 762 (detailed of Bögü Qaghan in a suit of armour, kneeling to a Manichean high priest).jpg

Conversion of Bögü Qaghan, third Khagan of the Uyghur Khaganate, to Manicheism in 762: detail of Bögü Qaghan in a suit of armour, kneeling to a Manichean high priest. 8th century Manichean manuscript (MIK III 4979)<ref name="RX577-578">Template:Cite book</ref>

In 732, Emperor Xuanzong of Tang banned any Chinese from converting to the religion, saying it was a heretic religion, confusing people by claiming to be Buddhism. However, the foreigners who followed the religion were allowed to practice it without punishment.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> After the fall of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840, which was the chief patron of Manichaeism (which was also the state religion of the Khaganate) in China, all Manichaean temples in China except in the two capitals and Taiyuan were closed down and never reopened since these temples were viewed as a symbol of foreign arrogance by the Chinese (see Cao'an). Even those that were allowed to remain open did not for long.<ref name="S.N.C.L."/>

The Manichaean temples were attacked by Chinese people who burned the images and idols of these temples. Manichaean priests were ordered to wear hanfu instead of traditional clothing, viewed as un-Chinese. In 843, Emperor Wuzong of Tang gave the order to kill all Manichaean clerics as part of the Huichang persecution of Buddhism, and over half died. They were made to look like Buddhists by the authorities; their heads were shaved, they were made to dress like Buddhist monks and then killed.<ref name="S.N.C.L."/>

Many Manichaeans took part in rebellions against the Song dynasty. They were quelled by Song China and were suppressed and persecuted by all successive governments before the Mongol Yuan dynasty. In 1370, the religion was banned through an edict of the Ming dynasty, whose Hongwu Emperor had a personal dislike for the religion.<ref name="S.N.C.L."/><ref name="Xisha2011"/><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Its core teaching influences many religious sects in China, including the White Lotus movement.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

According to Wendy Doniger, Manichaeism may have continued to exist in the Xinjiang region until the Mongol conquest in the 13th century.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Manicheans also suffered persecution for some time under the Abbasid Caliphate of Baghdad. In 780, the third Abbasid Caliph, al-Mahdi, started a campaign of inquisition against those who were "dualist heretics" or "Manichaeans" called the zindīq. He appointed a "master of the heretics" (Template:Langx {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), an official whose task was to pursue and investigate suspected dualists, who the Caliph then examined. Those found guilty who refused to recant their beliefs were executed.<ref name="Christine"/>

This persecution continued under his successor, Caliph al-Hadi, and continued for some time during the reign of Harun al-Rashid, who finally abolished it and ended it.<ref name="Christine"/> During the reign of the 18th Abbasid Caliph al-Muqtadir, many Manichaeans fled from Mesopotamia to Khorasan from fear of persecution by him and about 500 of them assembled in Samarkand. The base of the religion was later shifted to this city, which became their new Patriarchate.<ref name="Wendy"/><ref name="Jacques">Template:Cite book</ref>

Manichaean pamphlets were still in circulation in Greek in 9th-century Byzantine Constantinople, as the patriarch Photios summarizes and discusses one that he has read by Agapius in his Bibliotheca.

Later movements associated with Manichaeism

During the Middle Ages, several movements emerged that were collectively described as "Manichaean" by the Catholic Church and persecuted as Christian heresies through the establishment of the Inquisition in 1184.<ref>Stroumsa, Gedaliahu G., "Anti-Cathar Polemics and the Liber de duobus principiis", in B. Lewis and F. Niewöhner, eds., Religionsgespräche im Mittelalter (Wolfenbütteler Mittelalter-Studien, 4; Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1992), 169–183, p. 170</ref> They included the Cathar churches of Western Europe. Other groups sometimes referred to as "neo-Manichaean" were the Paulician movement, which arose in Armenia,<ref name="Fortescue-1911">Fortescue, Adrian (1 February 1911). "Paulicians Template:Webarchive". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.</ref> and the Bogomils in Bulgaria and Serbia.<ref name="Runciman"/> An example of this usage can be found in the published edition of the Latin Cathar text, the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Book of the Two Principles), which was described as "Neo-Manichaean" by its publishers.<ref>Dondaine, Antoine. O. P. Un traite neo-manicheen du XIIIe siecle: Le Liber de duobus principiis, suivi d'un fragment de rituel Cathare (Rome: Institutum Historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1939)</ref> As there is no presence of Manichaean mythology or church terminology in the writings of these groups, there has been some dispute among historians as to whether these groups were descendants of Manichaeism.<ref>Weber, Nicholas (1 March 1907). "Albigenses Template:Webarchive". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.</ref>

Manichaeism could have influenced the Bogomils, Paulicians, and Cathars. However, these groups left few records, and the link between them and Manichaeans is tenuous. Regardless of its accuracy, the charge of Manichaeism was leveled at them by contemporary orthodox opponents, who often tried to make contemporary heresies conform to those combatted by the church fathers.<ref name="Runciman"/>

Whether the dualism of the Paulicians, Bogomils, and Cathars and their belief that the world was created by a Satanic demiurge was due to influence from Manichaeism is impossible to determine. The Cathars apparently adopted the Manichaean principles of church organization. Priscillian and his followers may also have been influenced by Manichaeism. The Manichaeans preserved many apocryphal Christian works, such as the Acts of Thomas, that would otherwise have been lost.<ref name="Runciman">Runciman, Steven, The Medieval Manichee: a study of the Christian dualist heresy. Cambridge University Press, 1947.</ref>

Legacy in present-day

Some sites are preserved in Xinjiang, Zhejiang, and Fujian in China.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The Cao'an temple is the most widely known, and best preserved Manichaean building,<ref name="SNC Lieu" />Template:Rp though it later became associated with Buddhism.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Other temples in China associated with Manichaeism also exist, such as the Xuanzhen Temple, noted for its stele.

Some platforms on the internet and social media are trying to spread some of the teachings of Manichaeism. Some people are registered in these electronic sources, and some scholars and students in the field of religious studies and the arts continue to study Manichaeism.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Teachings and beliefs

File:Manichaean clergymen, Khocho, Ruin alpha, 10th-11th century AD, wall painting - Ethnological Museum, Berlin - DSC01743.JPG

Uyghur Manichaean clergymen, wall painting from the Khocho ruins, 10th/11th century CE. Located in the Museum für Asiatische Kunst, Humboldt Forum, Berlin.

File:Manichaean picture from cave 25 at Bezeklik Caves.jpg

Worship of the Tree of Life in the World of Light; a Manichaean picture from the Bezeklik Caves

General

Mani's teaching dealt with the origin of evil by addressing a theoretical part of the problem of evil: denying the omnipotence of God and instead postulating two opposite divine powers. Manichaean theology teaches a dualistic view of good and evil. A fundamental belief in Manichaeism is that the powerful, though not omnipotent, good power (God) was opposed by the eternal evil power (the devil). Humanity, the world, and the soul are seen as the by-product of the battle between God's proxy—Primal Man—and the devil.<ref name="Bevan, A. A. 1930">Bevan, A. A. (1930). "Manichaeism". Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Volume VIII Ed. James Hastings. London</ref>

The human person is seen as a battleground for these powers: the soul defines the person but is influenced by light and dark. This contention plays out over the world and the human body—neither the Earth nor the flesh were seen as intrinsically evil but instead possessed both light and dark portions. Natural phenomena such as rain were seen as the physical manifestation of this spiritual contention. Therefore, the Manichaean view explained the existence of evil by positing a flawed creation in the formation of which God took no part and which constituted instead the product of a battle by the devil against God.<ref name="Bevan, A. A. 1930"/>

Cosmogony

File:Yüen dynasty Manichaean diagram of the Universe.jpg

Manichaean Diagram of the Universe depicts the Manichaean cosmology.

Manichaeism presents an elaborate conflict between the spiritual world of light and the material world of darkness. The beings of both the world of darkness and the world of light have names. There are numerous sources for the details of the Manichaean beliefTemplate:Such as. TheseTemplate:Specify two portions of the scriptures are probably the closest thing to the original writings in their original languages that will ever be available. These are the Syriac quotation by the Church of the East Christian Theodore bar Konai in his 8th century Syriac scholion, the Ketba de-Skolion,<ref name="Konai"/> and the Middle Persian sections of Mani's Shabuhragan discovered at Turpan—a summary of Mani's teachings prepared for Shapur I.<ref name="Shabuhragan"/>

From these and other sourcesTemplate:Such as, it is possible to derive a near-complete description of the detailed Manichaean cosmogony.<ref>Jonas, Hans The Gnostic Religion, 1958, Ch. 9: Creation, World History, Salvation According to Mani.</ref> (A complete list of Manichaean deities is outlined below.) According to Mani,Template:Citation neededthe unfolding of the universe took place in three phases:

The First Creation

Originally, good and evil existed in two completely separate realms: one the World of Light (Template:Zh), ruled by the Father of Greatness together with his five Shekhinas (i.e., divine attributes of light), and the other the World of Darkness ruled by the King of Darkness. At a point in the distant past, the Kingdom of Darkness noticed the World of Light, coveted it, and attacked it. The Father of Greatness, in the first of three "calls" or "creations", called to the Mother of Life who sent her son, Original Man (Template:Langx), to battle with the attacking powers of Darkness, which included the Demon of Greed.

The Original Man was armed with five different shields of light (reflections of the five Shekhinahs), which he lost to the forces of Darkness in the ensuing battle—described as a kind of "bait" to trick the forces of Darkness, who greedily consume as much light as they can. When the Original Man awakened, he was trapped among the forces of Darkness.

The Second Creation

Then, the Father of Greatness began the Second Creation. He called to the Living SpiritTemplate:Specify, who then called to his sons and the Original Man, after which Call became a Manichaean deity proper. An answer—Answer became another Manichaean deity—then went out from the Original Man to the World of Light. Then, the Mother of Life, the Living Spirit, and his five sons began to create the universe from the bodies of the evil beings of the World of Darkness, together with the light they had swallowed. Ten heavens and eight earths were created, all consisting of various mixtures of the evil material beings from the World of Darkness and the swallowed light. The sun, moon, and stars were all created from light recovered from the World of Darkness. The waxing and waning of the moon are described as the "moon filling with light", which passed to the sun, then through the Milky Way, and eventually back to the World of Light.

The Third Creation

Great demons (called archons in bar-Konai's account) were hung over the heavens, and the Father of Greatness began the Third Creation. The light was recovered from the material bodies of the male and female evil beings and demons by causing them to become sexually aroused in greed toward beautiful images of the beings of light, such as the Third Messenger and the Virgins of Light. However, as soon as the light was expelled from their bodies and fell to the earth (some in the form of abortions—the source of fallen angels in the Manichaean myth), the evil beings continued to swallow up as much of it as they could to keep the light inside themselves. This resulted eventually in the evil beings swallowing vast quantities of light, copulating, and producing Adam and Eve. The Father of Greatness then sent Jesus the Splendour to awaken Adam and enlighten him to the true source of the light trapped in his material body. Adam and Eve, however, eventually copulated and produced more human beings, trapping the light in the bodies of humankind throughout human history. The appearance of the Prophet Mani was another attempt by the World of Light to reveal to humanity the true source of the spiritual light imprisoned within their material bodies.

{{#invoke:Gallery|gallery}}

Cosmology

In the sixth century, many Manichaeans saw the earth as "a rectangular parallelepiped enclosed by walls of crystal, above which three [sky] domes" existed, with the other two being above and larger than the first one and second one, respectively.<ref name="Gnostic">Template:Cite book</ref> These represented the "three heavens" in Chaldean religion.<ref name="Gnostic" />

Outline of the beings and events in the Manichaean mythology

Beginning with the time of its creation by Mani, the Manichaean religion has had a detailed description of deities and events that took place within the Manichaean scheme of the universe. In every language and region that Manichaeism spread to, these same deities reappear, whether it is in the original Syriac quoted by Theodore bar Konai,<ref name="Konai"/> or the Latin terminology given by Saint Augustine from Mani's Epistola Fundamenti, or the Persian and Chinese translations found as Manichaeism spread eastward. While the original Syriac retained the original description that Mani created, the transformation of the deities through other languages and cultures produced incarnations of the gods not implied in the original Syriac writings. Chinese translations are especially syncretic, borrowing and adapting terminology common in Chinese Buddhism.Template:Sfnp

The World of Light

• The Father of Greatness (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Template:Transliteration; Middle Persian: pīd ī wuzurgīh, or the Zoroastrian deity Zurwān; Parthian: Pidar wuzurgift, Pidar roshn; Template:Zh or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Template:Lit)
  • His Four Faces (Greek: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; Template:Zh)Template:Sfnp
    • Divinity (Middle Persian: yzd; Parthian: bg'; Template:Zh)
    • Light (Middle Persian and Parthian: rwšn; Template:Zh)
    • Power (Middle Persian: zwr; Parthian: z'wr'; Template:Zh)
    • Wisdom (Middle Persian: whyh; Parthian: jyryft; Template:Zh)
  • His Five Shekhinas (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} khamesh shkhinatei; Chinese: Template:Nowrap Template:Lit):<ref>Chart from: E. Waldschmidt and W. Lenz, Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus, Berlin, 1926, p 42.</ref>Template:Sfnp

Shekhina:	Reason	Mind	Intelligence	Thought	Understanding
Syriac	Template:Linktext hawnā	Template:Linktext maddeTemplate:Okinaā	Template:Linktext reyānā	Template:Linktext maḥšavṯɑ	Template:Linktext tarTemplate:Okinaiṯā
Parthian	bām	manohmēd	uš	andēšišn	parmānag
Chinese	Template:Nowrap Template:Grey	Template:Nowrap Template:Grey	Template:Nowrap Template:Grey	Template:Nowrap Template:Grey	Template:Nowrap Template:Grey
Turkic	qut	ög	köngül	saqinç	tuimaq
Greek	νοῦς (Nous)	ἔννοια (Ennoia)	φρόνησις (Phronēsis)	ἐνθύμησις (Enthymēsis)	λογισμός (Logismos)
Latin	mens	sensus	prudentia	intellectus	cogitatio

• The Great Spirit (Middle Persian: Waxsh zindag, Waxsh yozdahr; Latin: Spiritus Potens)

The first creation

• The Mother of Life (Template:Langx imā dəḥayyē; Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
• The First Man (Template:Langx Nāšā Qaḏmāyā; Template:Langx, the Zoroastrian god of light and goodness; Latin: Primus Homo)
  • First Enthymesis (Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
  • His five Sons (the five Light Elements; Template:Langx; Template:Langx; Template:Zh)Template:Sfnp
    • Ether (Template:Langx; Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
    • Wind (Parthian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
    • Light (Parthian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
    • Water (Parthian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
    • Fire (Parthian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh)
  • His sixth Son, the Answer-God (Template:Langx Template:Okinaanyā; Parthian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh Shì Zhì "The Power of Wisdom", a Chinese bodhisattva). The answer sent by the First Man to the Call from the World of Light.
• The Living Self (Parthian and Template:Langx, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; Template:Zh) The anima mundi made up of the five Light Elements, identical with the Suffering Jesus who is crucified in the world.

The second creation

• The Friend of the Lights (Template:Langx ḥaviv nehirē; Template:Zh)Template:Sfnp Calls to:
• The Great Builder (Template:Langx ban rabbā; Template:Zh) In charge of creating the new world that will separate the darkness from the light. He calls to:
• The Living Spirit (Template:Langx ruḥā ḥayyā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh; Template:Langx; Template:Langx). Acts as a demiurge, creating the structure of the material world.
  • His five Sons (Template:Langx ḥamšā benawhy; Template:Zh)
    • The Keeper of the Splendour (Template:Langx ṣfat ziwā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh). Holds up the ten heavens from above.
    • The King of Glory (Template:Langx mlex šuvḥā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh Dìzàng "Earth Treasury", a Chinese bodhisattva).
    • The Adamas of Light (Template:Langx adamus nuhrā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh). Fights with and overcomes an evil being in the image of the King of Darkness.
    • The Great King of Honour (Template:Langx malkā rabbā dikkārā; Dead Sea Scrolls Template:Langx malka raba de-ikara; Template:Langx; Template:Zh). A being that plays a central role in The Book of Enoch (originally written in Aramaic), as well as Mani's Syriac version of it, the Book of Giants. Sits in the seventh heaven of the ten heavens (corresponding to the celestial spheres, the first seven of which house the classical planets) and guards the entrance to the world of light. In the Syriac Aramaic account, the guarded entrance is called matarta (Template:Langx matarta).
    • Atlas (Template:Langx sebblā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh). Supports the eight worlds from below.
  • His sixth Son, the Call-God (Template:Langx qaryā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh Guanyin "watching/perceiving sounds [of the world]", the Chinese Bodhisattva of Compassion). Sent from the Living Spirit to awaken the First Man from his battle with the forces of darkness.

The third creation

• The Third Messenger (Template:Langx izgaddā; Template:Langx, Template:Langx; {{#invoke:Lang|lang}})
• Jesus the Splendour (Template:Langx IshoTemplate:Okina Ziwā; Template:Zh or {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Template:Lit). He was sent to awaken Adam and Eve to the source of the spiritual light trapped within their bodies.
• The Maiden of Light (Middle Persian and Template:Langx; Template:Zh, a phonetic loan from Middle Persian)
• The Twelve Virgins of Light (Template:Langx tratTemplate:Okinaesrā btultē; Template:Langx; Template:Zh).Template:EfnTemplate:Sfnp Reflected in the twelve constellations of the Zodiac.
• The Column of Glory (Template:Langx esṭun šuvḥā; Template:Langx; Template:Zh and {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, both phonetic from Template:Langx). Souls' path to the World of Light corresponds to the Milky Way.
• The Great Nous
  • His five Limbs (Template:Zh) (See "His Five Shekhinas" above.)
    • Reason
    • Mind
    • Intelligence
    • Thought
    • Understanding
• The Just Judge (Template:Langx; Template:Zh)Template:Sfnp
• The Last God

The World of Darkness

• The Prince of Darkness (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} mlex ḥešoxā; Middle Persian: Ahriman, the Zoroastrian supreme evil being)
  • His five evil kingdoms Evil counterparts of the five elements of light, the lowest being the kingdom of Darkness.
  • His son (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Ashaklun; Middle Persian: Az, from the Zoroastrian demon, Aži Dahāka)
  • His son's mate (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Nevro'el)
  • Their offspring – Adam and Eve (Middle Persian: Gehmurd and Murdiyanag)
• Giants (Fallen Angels, also Abortions): (Syriac: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} yaḥtē, "abortions" or "those that fell"; also: {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} Egrēgoroi, "Giants"). Related to the story of the fallen angels in the Book of Enoch (which Mani used extensively in The Book of Giants), and the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} nephilim described in Genesis (6:1–4).

The Manichaean Church

Organization

The Manichaean Church was divided into the Elect, who had taken upon themselves the vows of Manichaeism, and the Hearers, those who had not, but still participated in the Church. The Elect were forbidden to consume alcohol and meat, as well as to harvest crops or prepare food, due to Mani's claim that harvesting was a form of murder against plants. The Hearers would therefore commit the sin of preparing food, and would provide it to the Elect, who would in turn pray for the Hearers and cleanse them of these sins.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The terms for these divisions were already common since the days of early Christianity, however, it had a different meaning in Christianity. In Chinese writings, the Middle Persian and Parthian terms are transcribed phonetically (instead of being translated into Chinese).<ref>G. Haloun and W. B. Henning, The Compendium of the Doctrines and Styles of the Teaching of Mani, the Buddha of Light, Asia Major, 1952, pp. 184–212, p. 195.</ref> These were recorded by Augustine of Hippo.<ref name="Arendzen-1910-1"/>

• The Leader (Syriac: ܟܗܢܐ Template:Ipa; Parthian: yamag; Template:Zh), Mani's designated successor, seated as Patriarch at the head of the Church, originally in Ctesiphon, from the ninth century in Samarkand. Two notable leaders were Mār Sīsin (or Sisinnios), the first successor of Mani, and Abū Hilāl al-Dayhūri, an eighth-century leader.
• 12 Apostles (Latin: magistrī; Syriac: ܫܠܝܚܐ Template:Ipa; Middle Persian: možag; Template:Zh). Three of Mani's original apostles were Mār Pattī (Pattikios; Mani's father), Akouas and Mar Ammo.
• 72 Bishops (Latin: episcopī; Syriac: ܐܦܣܩܘܦܐ Template:Ipa; Middle Persian: aspasag, aftadan; Template:Zh or Template:Zh; see also: seventy disciples). One of Mani's original disciples who was specifically referred to as a bishop was Mār Addā.
• 360 Presbyters (Latin: presbyterī; Syriac: ܩܫܝܫܐ Template:Ipa; Middle Persian: mahistan; Template:Zh)
• The general body of the Elect (Latin: ēlēctī; Syriac: ܡܫܡܫܢܐ Template:Ipa; Middle Persian: ardawan or dēnāwar; Template:Zh or Template:Zh)
• The Hearers (Latin: audītōrēs; Syriac: ܫܡܘܥܐ Template:Ipa; Middle Persian: niyoshagan; Template:Zh)

Religious practices

Prayers

From Manichaean sources, Manichaeans observed daily prayers: four for the hearers or seven for the elect. The sources differ about the exact time of prayer. The Fihrist by al-Nadim appoints them afternoon, mid-afternoon, just after sunset, and at nightfall. Al-Biruni places the prayers at dawn, sunrise, noon, and dusk. The elect additionally prayed at mid-afternoon, half an hour after nightfall, and midnight. Al-Nadim's account of daily prayers is probably adjusted to coincide with the public prayers for the Muslims, while Al-Biruni's report may reflect an older tradition unaffected by Islam.<ref>J. van (Johannes) Oort, Jacob Albert van den Berg In Search of Truth. Augustine, Manichaeism and Other Gnosticism: Studies for Johannes Van Oort at Sixty BRILL, 2011 Template:ISBN p. 258</ref><ref>Jason BeDuhn New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress on Manichaeism, Organized by the International Association of Manichaean Studies BRILL, 2009 Template:ISBN p. 77</ref>

When Al-Nadim's account of daily prayers was the only detailed source available, there was a concern that Muslims only adopted these practices during the Abbasid Caliphate. However, it is clear that the Arabic text provided by Al-Nadim corresponds with the descriptions of Egyptian texts from the fourth century.<ref name="ReferenceA">Johannes van Oort Augustine and Manichaean Christianity: Selected Papers from the First South African Conference on Augustine of Hippo, University of Pretoria, 24–26 April 2012 BRILL, 01.08.2013 Template:ISBN p. 74</ref>

Every prayer started with an ablution with water or, if water was not available, with other substances comparable to ablution in Islam,<ref>Charles George Herbermann The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church, Band 9 Universal Knowledge Foundation, 1913 Digit. 16. Aug. 2006 p. 594</ref> and consisted of several blessings to the apostles and spirits. The prayer consisted of prostrating oneself to the ground and rising again twelve times during every prayer.<ref>New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress o p. 78</ref> During the day, Manichaeans turned towards the Sun and during the night towards the Moon. If the Moon is not visible at night, they turned towards the north.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>

Evident from Faustus of Mileve, Celestial bodies are not the subject of worship themselves but are "ships" carrying the light particles of the world to the supreme god, who cannot be seen, since he exists beyond time and space, and also the dwelling places for emanations of the supreme deity, such as Jesus the Splendour.<ref name="ReferenceB">Johannes van Oort Augustine and Manichaean Christianity: Selected Papers from the First South African Conference on Augustine of Hippo, University of Pretoria, 24–26 April 2012 BRILL, 01.08.2013 Template:ISBN p. 75</ref> According to the writings of Augustine of Hippo, ten prayers were performed, the first devoted to the Father of Greatness, and the following to lesser deities, spirits, and angels and finally towards the elect, to be freed from rebirth and pain and to attain peace in the realm of light.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Comparably, in the Uyghur confession, four prayers are directed to the supreme God (Äzrua), the God of the Sun and the Moon, and fivefold God and the buddhas.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>

Primary sources

File:Image of Buddha on a Manichaean Pictorial Roll.jpg

An image of the Buddha as one of the primary prophets on a Manichaean pictorial roll fragment from Chotscho, 10th century

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

Mani wrote seven books, which contained the teachings of the religion. Only scattered fragments and translations of the originals remain, most having been discovered in Egypt and Turkistan during the 20th century.<ref name="EB-2023" />

The original six Syriac writings are not preserved, although their Syriac names have been. There are also fragments and quotations from them. A long quotation, preserved by the eighth-century Nestorian Christian author Theodore Bar Konai,<ref name="Konai">Original Syriac in: Theodorus bar Konai, Liber Scholiorum, II, ed. A. Scher, Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium scrip. syri, 1912, pp. 311–8, Template:ISBN; English translation in: A.V.W. Jackson, Researches in Manichaeism, New York, 1932, pp. 222–54.</ref> shows that in the original Syriac Aramaic writings of Mani there was no influence of Iranian or Zoroastrian terms. The terms for the Manichaean deities in the original Syriac writings are in Aramaic. The adaptation of Manichaeism to the Zoroastrian religion appears to have begun in Mani's lifetime however, with his writing of the Middle Persian Shabuhragan, his book dedicated to the Sasanian emperor, Shapur I.<ref name="Shabuhragan"/>

In it, there are mentions of Zoroastrian divinities such as Ahura Mazda, Angra Mainyu, and Āz. Manichaeism is often presented as a Persian religion, mostly due to the vast number of Middle Persian, Parthian, and Sogdian (as well as Turkish) texts discovered by German researchers near Turpan in what is now Xinjiang, China, during the early 1900s. However, from the vantage point of its original Syriac descriptions (as quoted by Theodore Bar Khonai and outlined above), Manichaeism may be better described as a unique phenomenon of Aramaic Babylonia, occurring in proximity to two other new Aramaic religious phenomena, Talmudic Judaism and Mandaeism, which also appeared in Babylonia in roughly the third century.Template:Citation needed

The original, but now lost, six sacred books of Manichaeism were composed in Syriac Aramaic, and translated into other languages to help spread the religion. As they spread to the east, the Manichaean writings passed through Middle Persian, Parthian, Sogdian, Tocharian, and ultimately Uyghur and Chinese translations. As they spread to the west, they were translated into Greek, Coptic, and Latin. Most Manichaean texts survived only as Coptic and Medieval Chinese translations of their original, lost versions.Template:Sfnp

File:Jinjiang Cao'an 20120229-10.jpg

CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Henning describes how this translation process evolved and influenced the Manichaeans of Central Asia:

Beyond doubt, Sogdian was the national language of the Majority of clerics and propagandists of the Manichaean faith in Central Asia. Middle Persian (Pārsīg), and to a lesser degree, Parthian (Pahlavānīg), occupied the position held by Latin in the medieval church. The founder of Manichaeism had employed Syriac (his own language) as his medium, but conveniently he had written at least one book in Middle Persian, and it is likely that he himself had arranged for the translation of some or all of his numerous writings from Syriac into Middle Persian. Thus the Eastern Manichaeans found themselves entitled to dispense with the study of Mani's original writings, and to continue themselves to reading the Middle Persian edition; it presented small difficulty to them to acquire a good knowledge of the Middle Persian language, owing to its affinity with Sogdian.<ref>W. B. Henning, Sogdica, 1940, p. 11.</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Originally written in Syriac

• the Gospel of Mani (Syriac: ܐܘܢܓܠܝܘܢ {{#invoke:IPA|main}}; Template:Langx "good news, gospel"). Quotations from the first chapter were brought in Arabic by ibn al-Nadim, who lived in Baghdad at a time when there were still Manichaeans living there, in his 938 book, the Fihrist, a catalog of all written books known to him.
• The Treasure of Life
• The Treatise (Coptic: πραγματεία, pragmateia)
• Secrets
• The Book of Giants: Original fragments were discovered at Qumran (pre-Manichaean) and Turpan.
• Epistles: Augustine brings quotations, in Latin, from Mani's Fundamental Epistle in some of his anti-Manichaean works.
• Psalms and Prayers: A Coptic Manichaean Psalm Book, discovered in Egypt in the early 1900s, was edited and published by Charles Allberry from Manichaean manuscripts in the Chester Beatty collection and in the Berlin Academy, 1938–39.

Originally written in Middle Persian

• The Shabuhragan, dedicated to Shapur I: Original Middle Persian fragments were discovered at Turpan, quotations were brought in Arabic by al-Biruni.

Other books

• The Ardahang, the "Picture Book". In Iranian tradition, this was one of Mani's holy books that became remembered in later Persian history, and was also called Aržang, a Parthian word meaning "Worthy", and was beautified with paintings. Therefore, Iranians gave him the title of "The Painter".
• The Kephalaia of the Teacher ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), "Discourses", found in Coptic translation.
• On the Origin of His Body, the title of the Cologne Mani-Codex, a Greek translation of an Aramaic book that describes the early life of Mani.<ref name="Mani-Kodex"/>

Non-Manichaean works preserved by the Manichaean Church

• Portions of the Book of Enoch literature such as the Book of Giants
• Literature relating to the apostle Thomas (who by tradition went to India, and was also venerated in Syria), such as portions of the Syriac The Acts of Thomas, and the Psalms of Thomas. The Gospel of Thomas was also attributed to Manichaeans by Cyril of Jerusalem, a fourth-century Church Father.<ref>"Let none read the gospel according to Thomas, for it is the work, not of one of the twelve apostles, but of one of Mani's three wicked disciples."—Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechesis V (4th century)</ref>
• The legend of Barlaam and Josaphat passed from an Indian story about the Buddha, through a Manichaean version, before it transformed into the story of a Christian Saint in the west.

Later works

File:摩尼教文獻.jpg

摩尼教文獻 The Chinese Manichaean "Compendium"

File:Manichaean miniature image depicting two female musicians, from a Sogdian-language text.jpg

Two female musicians depicted in a Manichaean text

In later centuries, as Manichaeism passed through eastern Persian-speaking lands and arrived at the Uyghur Khaganate (回鶻帝國), and eventually the Uyghur kingdom of Turpan (destroyed around 1335), Middle Persian and Parthian prayers (āfrīwan or āfurišn) and the Parthian hymn-cycles (the Huwīdagmān and Angad Rōšnan created by Mar Ammo) were added to the Manichaean writings.<ref>See, for example, Template:Cite book</ref> A translation of a collection of these produced the Manichaean Chinese Hymnscroll (Template:Zh, which Lieu translates as "Hymns for the Lower Section [i.e. the Hearers] of the Manichaean Religion"Template:Sfn).

In addition to containing hymns attributed to Mani, it contains prayers attributed to Mani's earliest disciples, including Mār Zaku, Mār Ammo and Mār Sīsin. Another Chinese work is a complete translation of the Sermon of the Light Nous, presented as a discussion between Mani and his disciple Adda.<ref>"The Traité is, despite its title (Moni jiao cao jing, lit. "fragmentary [Mathews, no. 6689] Manichean scripture"), a long text in an excellent state of preservation, with only a few lines missing at the beginning. It was first fully published with a facsimile by Edouard Chavannes (q.v.) and Paul Pelliot in 1911 and is frequently known as Traité Pelliot. Their transcription (including typographical errors) was reproduced in the Chinese translation of the Buddhist Tripiṭaka (Taishō, no. 2141 B, LIV, pp. 1281a16-1286a29); that text was in turn reproduced with critical notes by Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer (1987b, pp. T. 81–86). A more accurate transcription was published by Chen Yuan in 1923 (pp. 531–44), and a new collation based on a reexamination of the original photographs of the manuscript has now been published by Lin Wu-shu (1987, pp. 217–29), with the photographs", Template:Iranica</ref>

Critical and polemic sources

Until discoveries in the 1900s of original sources, the only sources for Manichaeism were descriptions and quotations from non-Manichaean authors, either Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or Zoroastrian ones. While often criticizing Manichaeism, they also quoted directly from Manichaean scriptures. This enabled Isaac de Beausobre, writing in the 18th century, to create a comprehensive work on Manichaeism, relying solely on anti-Manichaean sources.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Thus quotations and descriptions in Greek and Arabic have long been known to scholars, as have the long quotations in Latin by Saint Augustine, and the extremely important quotation in Syriac by Theodore Bar Konai.Template:Citation needed

Patristic depictions of Mani and Manichaeism

Eusebius commented as follows:

The error of the Manichees, which commenced at this time.{{#if:In the mean time, also, that madman Manes, (Mani is of Persian or Semitic origin) as he was called, well agreeing with his name, for his demoniacal heresy, armed himself by the perversion of his reason, and at the instruction of Satan, to the destruction of many. He was a barbarian in his life, both in speech and conduct, but in his nature as one possessed and insane. Accordingly, he attempted to form himself into a Christ, and then also proclaimed himself to be the very paraclete and the Holy Spirit, and with all this was greatly puffed up with his madness. Then, as if he were Christ, he selected twelve disciples, the partners of his new religion, and after patching together false and ungodly doctrines, collected from a thousand heresies long since extinct, he swept them off like a deadly poison, from Persia, upon this part of the world. Hence the impious name of the Manichaeans spreading among many, even to the present day. Such then was the occasion of this knowledge, as it was falsely called, that sprouted up in these times.<ref>Eusebius. The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus, Bishop of Caesarea, Translated from the originals by Christian Frederick Cruse.1939. Ch. XXXI.</ref>|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Acta Archelai

An example of how inaccurate some of these accounts could be can be seen in the account of the origins of Manichaeism contained in the Acta Archelai. This was a Greek anti-Manichaean work written before 348, most well known in its Latin version, which was regarded as an accurate account of Manichaeism until refuted by Isaac de Beausobre in the 18th century:

In the time of the Apostles there lived a man named Scythianus, who is described as coming "from Scythia", and also as being "a Saracen by race" ("ex genere Saracenorum"). He settled in Egypt, where he became acquainted with "the wisdom of the Egyptians", and invented the religious system that was afterwards known as Manichaeism. Finally he emigrated to Palestine, and, when he died, his writings passed into the hands of his sole disciple, a certain Terebinthus. The latter betook himself to Babylonia, assumed the name of Budda, and endeavoured to propagate his master's teaching. But he, like Scythianus, gained only one disciple, who was an old woman. After a while he died, in consequence of a fall from the roof of a house, and the books that he had inherited from Scythianus became the property of the old woman, who, on her death, bequeathed them to a young man named Corbicius, who had been her slave. Corbicius thereupon changed his name to Manes, studied the writings of Scythianus, and began to teach the doctrines that they contained, with many additions of his own. He gained three disciples, named Thomas, Addas, and Hermas. About this time the son of the Persian king fell ill, and Manes undertook to cure him; the prince, however, died, whereupon Manes was thrown into prison. He succeeded in escaping, but eventually fell into the hands of the king, by whose order he was flayed, and his corpse was hung up at the city gate.

A. A. Bevan, who quoted this story, commented that it "has no claim to be considered historical".<ref>Bevan, A. A. (1930). "Manichaeism". Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Volume VIII. Ed. James Hastings. London.</ref>

View of Judaism in the Acta Archelai

According to Hegemonius' portrayal of Mani, the evil demiurge who created the world was the Jewish Yahweh. Hegemonius reports that Mani said,

"It is the Prince of Darkness who spoke with Moses, the Jews and their priests. Thus the Christians, the Jews, and the Pagans are involved in the same error when they worship this God. For he leads them astray in the lusts he taught them." He goes on to state: "Now, he who spoke with Moses, the Jews, and the priests he says is the archont of Darkness, and the Christians, Jews, and pagans (ethnic) are one and the same, as they revere the same god. For in his aspirations he seduces them, as he is not the god of truth. And so therefore all those who put their hope in the god who spoke with Moses and the prophets have (this in store for themselves, namely) to be bound with him, because they did not put their hope in the god of truth. For that one spoke with them (only) according to their own aspirations.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Central Asian and Iranian primary sources

In the early 1900s, original Manichaean writings started to come to light when German scholars led by Albert Grünwedel, and then by Albert von Le Coq, began excavating at Gaochang, the ancient site of the Manichaean Uyghur Kingdom near Turpan, in Chinese Turkestan (destroyed around 1300 CE). While most of the writings they uncovered were in very poor condition, there were still hundreds of pages of Manichaean scriptures, written in three Iranian languages (Middle Persian, Parthian, and Sogdian) and old Uyghur. These writings were taken back to Germany and were analyzed and published at the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, by Le Coq and others, such as Friedrich W. K. Müller and Walter Bruno Henning. While the vast majority of these writings were written in a version of the Syriac script known as Manichaean script, the German researchers, perhaps for lack of suitable fonts, published most of them using the Hebrew alphabet (which could easily be substituted for the 22 Syriac letters).Template:Citation needed

Perhaps the most comprehensive of these publications was {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} (Manichaean Dogma from Chinese and Iranian texts), by Ernst Waldschmidt and Wolfgang Lentz, published in Berlin in 1933.<ref>Waldschmidt, E., and Lentz, W., Manichäische Dogmatik aus chinesischen und iranischen Texten (SPAW 1933, No. 13)</ref> More than any other research work published before or since, this work printed, and then discussed, the original key Manichaean texts in the original scripts, and consists chiefly of sections from Chinese texts, and Middle Persian and Parthian texts transcribed with the Hebrew alphabet. After the Nazi Party gained power in Germany, the Manichaean writings continued to be published during the 1930s, but the publishers no longer used Hebrew letters, instead transliterating the texts into Latin letters.Template:Citation needed

Coptic primary sources

Additionally, in 1930, German researchers in Egypt found a large body of Manichaean works in Coptic. Though these were also damaged, hundreds of complete pages survived and, beginning in 1933, were analyzed and published in Berlin before World War II, by German scholars such as Hans Jakob Polotsky.<ref>Hans Jakob Polotsky and Karl Schmidt, Ein Mani-Fund in Ägypten, Original-Schriften des Mani und seiner Schüler. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften 1933.</ref> Some of these Coptic Manichaean writings were lost during the war.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Chinese primary sources

After the success of the German researchers, French scholars visited China and discovered what is perhaps the most complete set of Manichaean writings, written in Chinese. These three Chinese writings, all found at the Mogao Caves among the Dunhuang manuscripts, and all written before the 9th century, are today kept in London, Paris, and Beijing. Some of the scholars involved with their initial discovery and publication were Édouard Chavannes, Paul Pelliot, and Aurel Stein. The original studies and analyses of these writings, along with their translations, first appeared in French, English, and German, before and after World War II. The complete Chinese texts themselves were first published in Tokyo, Japan in 1927, in the Taishō Tripiṭaka, volume 54. While in the last thirty years or so they have been republished in both Germany (with a complete translation into German, alongside the 1927 Japanese edition),<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> and China, the Japanese publication remains the standard reference for the Chinese texts.Template:Citation needed

Greek life of Mani, Cologne codex

In Egypt, a small codex was found and became known through antique dealers in Cairo. It was purchased by the University of Cologne in 1969. Two of its scientists, Henrichs and Koenen, produced the first edition known since as the Cologne Mani-Codex, which was published in four articles in the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}. The ancient papyrus manuscript contained a Greek text describing the life of Mani. Thanks to this discovery, much more is known about the man who founded one of the most influential world religions of the past.<ref name="Sundermann-2011">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Figurative use

The terms "Manichaean" and "Manichaeism" are sometimes used figuratively as a synonym of the more general term "dualist" with respect to a philosophy, outlook, or world-view.<ref>Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> The terms are often used to suggest that the worldview in question simplistically reduces historical events to a struggle between good and evil. For example, Zbigniew Brzezinski used the phrase "Manichaean paranoia" in reference to U.S. president George W. Bush's worldview (in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, 14 March 2007); Brzezinski elaborated that he meant "the notion that he [Bush] is leading the forces of good against the 'Axis of evil.Template:' " Author and journalist Glenn Greenwald followed up on the theme in describing Bush in his book A Tragic Legacy (2007).

The term is frequently used by critics to describe the attitudes and foreign policies of the United States and its leaders.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Philosopher Frantz Fanon frequently invoked the concept of Manicheanism in his discussions of violence between colonizers and the colonized.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

In My Secret History, author Paul Theroux's protagonist defines the word Manichaean for the protagonist's son as "seeing that good and evil are mingled." Before explaining the word to his son, the protagonist mentions Joseph Conrad's short story "The Secret Sharer" at least twice in the book, the plot of which also examines the idea of the duality of good and evil.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

References

Works cited

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• La Vaissière, Etienne de, "Mani en Chine au VIe siècle", Journal Asiatique, 293–1, 2005, p. 357–378.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book

Further reading

• Baker-Brian, Nicholas J. (2011). Manichaeism: An Ancient Faith Rediscovered. London and New York. T&T Clark.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite conference
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book (Cahiers D'Orientalism XVI) 1988a
• Template:Cite book (Cahiers D'Orientalism XVI) 1988b.
• Grousset, Rene (1939), tr. Walford, Naomi (1970), The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers.Template:ISBN.
• Template:Cite book (Original Manichaean manuscripts found since 1902 in China, Egypt, Turkestan to be seen in the Museum of Indian Art in Berlin.)
• Heinrichs, Albert; Ludwig Koenen, Ein griechischer Mani-Kodex, 1970 (ed.) Der Kölner Mani-Codex ( P. Colon. Inv. nr. 4780), 1975–1982.
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book reprinted in two volumes bound as one
• Mani (216–276/7) and his 'biography': the Codex Manichaicus Coloniensis (CMC):
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Towers, Susanna (2019). Constructions of Gender in Late Antique Manichaean Cosmological Narrative. Brepols. Turnhout.
• Template:Cite journal

External links

Outside articles

• Catholic Encyclopedia – Manichæism Template:Webarchive public domain, published 1917.
• International Association of Manichaean Studies Template:Webarchive
• Manichaean and Christian Remains in Zayton (Quanzhou, South China) Template:Webarchive
• Religions of Iran: Manichaeism Template:Webarchive by I.J.S. Taraporewala
• 专题研究–摩尼教研究 Template:Webarchive
• 《光明皇帝》明尊教背景书(1) Template:Webarchive

Manichaean sources in English translation

• A summary of the Manichaean creation myth Template:Webarchive
• Manichaean Writings Template:Webarchive
• Manicheism. Complete bibliography and selection of Manichaean source texts in PDF format:
  • A thorough bibliography and outline of Manichaean Studies
  • A number of key Manichaean texts in English translation Template:Webarchive
• The Book of the Giants Template:Webarchive by W.B. Henning, 1943
• Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies Template:Webarchive (NHMS) series from Brill (various volumes containing English translations of Manichaean texts)

Secondary Manichaean sources in English translation

• St. Augustine Against the Fundamental Epistle of Manichaeus
• Acta Archelai

Manichaean sources in their original languages

• Photos of the Entire Koeln Mani-Kodex Template:Webarchive (Greek).
• The Syriac Manichaean work quoted by Theodor bar Khonai
• Photos of the Original Middle Persian Manichaean Writings/Fragments Discovered at Turpan (The index of this German site can be searched for additional Manichaean material, including photos of the original Chinese Manichaean writings)
• "Sermon of the Soul", in Parthian and Sogdian Template:Webarchive
• Middle Persian and Parthian Texts Template:Webarchive
• D. N. MacKenzie, Mani's Šābuhragān, pt. 1 (text and translation), BSOAS 42/3, 1979, pp. 500–34,Template:Usurped pt. 2 (glossary and plates), BSOAS 43/2, 1980, pp. 288–310 Template:Usurped.
• Chinese Manichaean Scriptures: 摩尼教殘經一 Template:Webarchive ("Incomplete Sutra one of Manichaeism") & 摩尼光佛教法儀略 Template:Webarchive("The Mani Bright Buddha teaching plan") & 下部讚 Template:Webarchive("The Lower Part Praises")

Secondary Manichaean sources in their original languages

• Augustine's Contra Epistolam Manichaei (Latin)