Marcion of Sinope
Template:Short description Template:Redirect Template:Redirect-distinguish Template:Infobox theologian Marcion of Sinope (Template:IPAc-en; Template:Langx<ref>First Apology of Justin Martyr, XXVI.5</ref>Template:NoteTag {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}; Template:C.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>) was a theologian<ref name="Ehrman 2005">Template:Cite book</ref> in early Christianity.<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/><ref name="Dunn 2016">Template:Cite book</ref> Marcion preached that God had sent Jesus Christ, who was distinct from the "vengeful" God (Demiurge) who had created the world.<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/><ref name="Dunn 2016"/>Template:Sfn He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ; his doctrine is called Marcionism.<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/><ref name="Dunn 2016"/>Template:Sfn Marcion published the earliest record of a canon of New Testament books.<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Early Church writers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic or antichrist,<ref name="Kaatz 2012 p. 44">Template:Cite book</ref> and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144.Template:Sfn He published his own canon of Christian sacred scriptures,<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/><ref name="bruce-134">Bruce 1988, p. 134.</ref>Template:Sfn which contained ten Pauline epistles (including the Epistle to the Laodiceans, while excluding the Pastoral epistles) and the Gospel of Marcion which historically is claimed to be an edited version of the Gospel of Luke.<ref name="Ehrman 2005"/>Template:Sfn Some modern scholars, such as Matthias Klinghardt,<ref>Matthias Klinghardt (2015) Das älteste Evangelium und die Entstehung der kanonischen Evangelien, Francke Verlag; Translated as Template:Cite book</ref> have theorized that Marcion's Gospel was the oldest, although this has been contested.
This made Marcionism a catalyst in the process of the development of the New Testament canon by forcing the proto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon.<ref name="Ehrman 2005" />Template:Sfn
LifeEdit
Template:Gnosticism Epiphanius records in his Template:Transliteration (c. 375) that Marcion was born the son of a bishop in Pontus (modern-day Turkey), likely Philologus of Sinope.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Rhodo and Tertullian, young men in Marcion's old age, described him as a "mariner" and a "ship-master" respectively. Some time in the late 130s, Marcion traveled to Rome, joined the Roman church, and made a large donation of 200,000 sesterces to the congregation there.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Conflicts with the church of Rome arose and he was eventually excommunicated in 144, his donation being returned to him.Template:Sfn
Irenaeus writes that "a certain Cerdo, originating from the Simonians, came to Rome under Hyginus [...] and taught that the one who was proclaimed as God by the Law and the Prophets is not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Against Heresies, 1, 27, 1). Also, according to them, Marcion and the Gnostic Valentinus were companions in Rome.<ref>Bernard Green, Christianity in Ancient Rome: The First Three Centuries</ref>
In 394, Epiphanius claimed that after beginnings as an ascetic, Marcion seduced a virgin and was accordingly excommunicated by his father, prompting him to leave his home town.<ref>Refutation of All Heresies, XLII, ii.</ref> Some scholars have taken this "seduction of a virgin" as a metaphor for Marcion's corruption of the Christian Church, with the Church portrayed as the undefiled virgin,<ref>Bart D. Ehrman, Lost Christianities Conf. Beyschlag, Karlmann. "Herkunft und Eigenart der Papiasfragmente." Pages 268–80 in Studia Patristica 4: Papers Presented to the 3rd International Conference on Patristic Studies at Christ Church, Oxford, 21–26 September 1959. Edited by Frank L. Cross. TU 79. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1961, p. 276</ref> and that Marcion apparently has become "the victim of the historicisation of such a metaphor, even though it contradicts the otherwise firm tradition of his strict sexual probity".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp Doubtful is Tertullian's claim in The Prescription Against Heretics (written Template:C.) that Marcion professed repentance, and agreed to the conditions granted to him—that he should receive reconciliation if he restored to the Church those whom he had led astray—but that he was prevented from doing so by his death.<ref>The Prescription Against Heretics 30:3. Tertullian.org.</ref>
Marcionite ChurchEdit
Template:Distinguish The Marcionite church expanded greatly within Marcion's lifetime, becoming a major rival to the other emerging church. After his death, it retained its following and survived Christian controversy and imperial disapproval for several centuries.<ref>Evans 1972 p. ix</ref> Several theologians have viewed him as a proto-protestant.<ref name="Welchman 2014 p. 21">Template:Cite book</ref>
TeachingsEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:See also
Study of the Hebrew Bible, along with received writings circulating in the nascent Church, led Marcion to conclude that many of the teachings of Jesus were incompatible with the actions of Yahweh, characterized as the belligerent god of the Hebrew Bible. Marcion responded by developing a ditheistic system of belief around the year 144.Template:NoteTag This notion of two gods—a higher transcendent one and a lower world-creator and ruler—allowed Marcion to reconcile his perceived contradictions between Christian Covenant theology and the gospel proclaimed by the New Testament.
In contrast to other leaders of the nascent Christian Church, however, Marcion declared that Christianity was in complete discontinuity with Judaism and entirely opposed to the scriptures of Judaism. Marcion did not claim that these were false. Instead, he asserted that they were entirely true, but were to be read in an absolutely literalistic manner, one which led him to develop an understanding that Yahweh was not the same God spoken of by Jesus. For example, Marcion argued that the Genesis account of Yahweh walking through the Garden of Eden asking where Adam was, proved that Yahweh inhabited a physical body and was without universal knowledge, attributes wholly incompatible with the Heavenly Father professed by Jesus.
According to Marcion, the god of the Old Testament, whom he called the Demiurge, the creator of the material universe, is a jealous tribal deity of the Jews, whose law represents legalistic reciprocal justice and who punishes mankind for its sins through suffering and death. In contrast, the God that Jesus professed is an altogether different being, a universal God of compassion and love who looks upon humanity with benevolence and mercy. Marcion also produced a book titled Antitheses, which is no longer extant,<ref name=":0">Template:Cite book</ref> contrasting the Demiurge of the Old Testament with the Heavenly Father of the New Testament.
Marcion held Jesus to be the son of the Heavenly Father but understood the incarnation in a docetic manner, i.e. that Jesus' body was only an imitation of a material body, and consequently denied Jesus' physical and bodily birth, death, and resurrection.
Marcion was the first to codify a Christian canon. His canon consisted of only eleven books, grouped into two sections: the Template:Transliteration, a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke, and the Template:Transliteration, a selection of ten epistles of Paul the Apostle, which were also slightly shorter than the canonical text. Early Christians such as Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Epiphanius claimed that Marcion's editions of Luke and the Pauline epistles were intentionally edited by Marcion to match his theological views, and many modern scholars agree.<ref name="Wilkinson2015">Template:Cite book</ref> However, some scholars argue that Marcion's texts were not substantially edited by him, and may in some respects represent an earlier version of these texts than the canonical versions.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Like the Gospel of Mark, the gospel used by Marcion did not contain elements relating to Jesus's birth and childhood. Interestingly, it did contain some Jewish elements, and material that challenged Marcion's ditheism—a fact that was exploited by early Christians in their polemics against Marcion.Template:Sfn
The centrality of the Pauline epistles in Marcion's canon reflects the fact that Marcion considered Paul to be the correct interpreter and transmitter of Jesus' teachings, in contrast to the Twelve Disciples and the early Jerusalem church.Template:Sfn In Marcion's view, the other apostles were under the auspices of the Demiurge.<ref name=":0" />
GnosticismEdit
Marcion is sometimes described as a Gnostic philosopher. In some essential respects, Marcion proposed ideas which aligned well with Gnostic thought. Like the Gnostics, he believed that Jesus was essentially a divine spirit who appeared to human beings in human form, but did not actually take on a fleshly human body.Template:Sfn
However, Marcionism conceptualizes God in a way which cannot be reconciled with broader Gnostic thought. For Gnostics, some human beings are born with a small piece of God's soul lodged within their spirit (akin to the notion of a Divine Spark).Template:Sfn God is thus intimately connected to and part of his creation. Salvation lies in turning away from the physical world (which Gnostics regard as an illusion) and embracing the godlike qualities within oneself. Marcion, by contrast, held that the Heavenly Father (the father of Jesus Christ) was an utterly alien God; he had no part in making the world, nor any connection with it.Template:Sfn According to Bart Ehrman: "Marcion himself should not be thought of as a Gnostic; he held that there were only two gods, not many; he did not think of this world as a cosmic disaster, but as the creation of the Old Testament God; and he did not think divine sparks resided in human bodies that could be set free by understanding the true 'gnosis.' Moreover, his docetic view does not appear to have been the typical view of Gnostics."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
See alsoEdit
NotesEdit
ReferencesEdit
SourcesEdit
- Template:Cite journal
- Blackman, E.C. Marcion and His Influence [1948] 2004. Template:ISBN.
- Bruce, F. F. (1988). The Canon of Scripture. InterVarsity Press. Template:ISBN.
- Clabeaux, John James. The Lost Edition of the Letters of Paul: A Reassessment of the Text of Pauline Corpus Attested by Marcion (Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series No. 21) 1989 Template:ISBN.
- Dahl, Nils Alstrup. "The Origin of the Earliest Prologues to the Pauline Letters", Semeia 12 (1978), pp. 233–277.
- Epiphanius of Salamis. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Book 1 (Sects 1-46) Frank Williams translator, 1987. Template:ISBN.
- Evans, Ernest (comments and translation): Tertullian, Against Marcion (Oxford University Press, 1972). E-text of Adversus Marcionem and Evan's introduction "Marcion : His Doctrine and Influence"
- Grant, Robert M. Marcion and the Critical Method Peter Richardson & John Collidge Hurd, eds., From Jesus to Paul. Studies in Honour of Francis Wright Beare. Waterloo, ON, 1984. pp. 207–215.
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book.
- Template:Cite journal
- Livingstone, E. A. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd ed.), pp. 1033–34, 1997 Template:ISBN.
- Francis Legge, Forerunners and Rivals of Christianity, From 330 B.C. to 330 A.D. (1914), reprinted in two volumes bound as one, University Books New York, 1964. Template:LCCN.
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Moll, Sebastian, The Arch-Heretic Marcion, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 250, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2010 (Spanish translation: Marción. El primer hereje, Biblioteca de Estudios Bíblicos 145, Ediciones Sígueme, Salamanca 2014)
- Riparelli, Enrico, Il volto del Cristo dualista. Da Marcione ai catari, Peter Lang, Bern 2008, 368 pp. Template:ISBN.
- Sproul, R.C., How Then Shall We Worship?. Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 2013. Template:ISBN p. 16.
- Williams, David Salter. "Reconsidering Marcion's Gospel", Journal of Biblical Literature 108 (1989), pp. 477–96
- Wilson, R. S. Marcion: A Study of a Second-Century Heretic (London: Clarke) 1933.
Further readingEdit
- Joseph B. Tyson, Marcion and Luke-Acts: A defining struggle, University of South Carolina Press, 2006, Template:ISBN
- Marcion: Portrait of a Heretic by Rob Bradshaw
- Joseph B. Tyson, Anti-Judaism in Marcion and his Opponents
- Template:Cite Catholic Encyclopedia
- Template:Cite EB1911
External linksEdit
- Marcion's Writings (at the Gnosis Archive): Marcion: Gospel of the Lord and Other Writings
- Marcionite Research Library
- The Marcionite Prologues to the Pauline Epistles