Onan

File:Facial Chronicle - b.01, p.254 - Story of Onan.jpg

Story of Onan

Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}}

OnanTemplate:Efn was a figure detailed in the Book of Genesis chapter 38,<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> as the second son of Judah who married the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite. Onan had an older brother Er and a younger brother, Shelah as well.

Onan was commanded by his father, Judah, to perform his duty as a husband's brother according to the custom of levirate marriage with Er's widow Tamar. Onan refused to perform his duty as a levirate and instead "spilled his seed on the ground whenever he went in" because "the offspring would not be his", and was thus put to death by Yahweh.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> This act is detailed as retribution for being "displeasing in the sight of Lord".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":0">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Onan's crime is often misinterpreted as being masturbation, but it is universally agreed among biblical scholars that Onan's death is attributed to his refusal to fulfill his obligation of levirate marriage with Tamar by committing coitus interruptus.<ref name=":3">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=":4">Template:Cite book</ref>

Biblical account

After Yahweh slew Onan's oldest brother Er, Onan's father Judah told him to fulfill his duty<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":1">Template:Cite book</ref> as a brother-in-law by entering into a levirate marriage<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":1" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> with his brother's widow Tamar to give her offspring. Religion professor Tikva Frymer-Kensky has pointed out the economic repercussions of a levirate marriage: any son born to Tamar would be deemed the heir of the deceased Er and could claim the firstborn's double share of an inheritance. However, if Er were childless or only had daughters, Onan would have inherited as the oldest surviving son.<ref name="Frymer">Frymer-Kensky, Tikva. "Tamar: Bible", Jewish Women: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia. 20 March 2009. Jewish Women's Archive. (Viewed on August 6, 2014)</ref>

When Onan had sex with Tamar, he withdrew before he ejaculated<ref>Freedman, Myers & Beck. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (Template:ISBN, Template:ISBN), 2000, p. 1273</ref><ref name=":2">Template:Cite book</ref> and "spilled his seed on the ground" thus committing coitus interuptus,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> since any child born would not legally be considered his heir.<ref>Dershowitz. The Genesis of Justice (Template:ISBN, Template:ISBN), 2000, ch. 9</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The next statement in the Bible says that Onan displeased Yahweh, so the Lord slew him.<ref>Template:Bibleref</ref> Onan's crime is often misinterpreted to be masturbation but it is universally agreed among biblical scholars that Onan's death is attributed to his refusal to fulfill his obligation of levirate marriage with Tamar by committing coitus interruptus.<ref name=":3"/><ref name=":4"/>

However, Onan‘s reluctance to give a child to his sister-in-law may reflect a rejection of this custom already present in society. The regulation of levirate marriage in Deut 25:5–10 shows that the custom had encountered some opposition. The law in Deuteronomy allowing a man to refuse<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> his duty was a concession to the reluctance to comply with the custom. Because of Onan's unwillingness to bear a child for his deceased brother, Yahweh was displeased with Onan and slew him also (Gen 38:10).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":0" />

Interpretation

The implication from the narrative is that Onan's act as described is what gave rise to divine displeasure.

Early Jewish views

One opinion expressed in the Talmud argues that this was where the death penalty's imposition originated.<ref name="niddah13a">Niddah 13a.</ref>Template:Not in source The Talmud also likens emitting semen in vain to shedding blood.<ref name="niddah13a"/>

However, the regulations concerning ejaculation in the book of Leviticus, whether as a result of sexual intercourse or not,<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref><ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> merely prescribe a ritual washing and becoming ritually impure until the following evening.

Classical Christian views

Early Christian writers have sometimes focused on the spilling seed, and the sexual act being used for non-procreational purposes. This interpretation was held by several early Christian apologists. Jerome, for example, argued:

But I wonder why he the heretic Jovinianus set Judah and Tamar before us for an example, unless perchance even harlots give him pleasure; or Onan, who was slain because he begrudged his brother his seed. Does he imagine that we approve of any sexual intercourse except for the procreation of children?{{#if:Jerome, Against Jovinian 1:19 (AD 393)|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Epiphanius of Salamis wrote against heretics who used coitus interruptus, calling it the sin of Οnan:<ref>United States Congress Senate Committee on Government Operations Subcommittee on Foreign Aid Expenditures. Population Crisis: Hearings, Eighty-ninth Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966, p. 403–404</ref>

They soil their bodies, minds and souls with unchastity. Some of them masquerade as monastics, and their woman companions as female monastics. And they are physically corrupted because they satisfy their appetite but, to put it politely, by the act of Onan the son of Judah. For as Onan coupled with Tamar and satisfied his appetite but did not complete the act by planting his seed for the God-given [purpose of] procreation and did himself harm instead, thus, as [he] did the vile thing, so these people have used their supposed [female monastics], committing this infamy. For purity is not their concern, but a hypocritical purity in name. Their concern is limited to ensuring that the woman the seeming [ascetic] has seduced does not get pregnant—either so as not to cause child-bearing, or to escape detection, since they want to be honored for their supposed celibacy. In any case, this is what they do, but others endeavor to get this same filthy satisfaction not with women but by other means, and pollute themselves with their own hands. They too imitate the son of Judah, soil the ground with their forbidden practices and drops of filthy fluid and rub their emissions into the earth with their feet{{#if:Epiphanius of Salamis, Boston, 2010, p. 131|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Clement of Alexandria, while not making explicit reference to Onan, similarly reflects an early Christian view of the abhorrence of spilling seed:

Because of its divine institution for the propagation of man, the seed is not to be vainly ejaculated, nor is it to be damaged, nor is it to be wasted.{{#if:Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor of Children 2:10:91:2 (AD 191)|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

To have coitus other than to procreate children is to do injury to nature.{{#if:Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor of Children 2:10:95:3|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Roman Catholic views

Template:Expand section The papal encyclical Casti connubii (1930) invokes this Biblical text in support of the teaching of the Catholic Church against contracepted sex by quoting St. Augustine, "Intercourse even with one's legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of the offspring is prevented. Onan, the son of Juda [sic], did this and the Lord killed him for it."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Early Protestant views

Making reference to Onan's offense to identify masturbation as sinful, in his Commentary on Genesis, John Calvin wrote that "the voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between a man and a woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is double monstrous."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Methodism founder John Wesley, according to Bryan C. Hodge, "believed that any waste of the semen in an unproductive sexual act, whether that should be in the form of masturbation or coitus interruptus, as in the case of Onan, destroyed the souls of the individuals who practice it".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> He wrote his Thoughts on the Sin of Onan (1767), which was reproduced as A Word to Whom it May Concern on 1779, as an attempt to censor a work by Samuel-Auguste Tissot.<ref name="Numbers">Template:Cite book</ref> In that writing, Wesley warned about "the dangers of self pollution", the bad physical and mental effects of masturbation,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Numbers"/> writes many such cases along with the treatment recommendations.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Disputes

According to some Bible critics who contextually read this passage, the description of Onan is an origin myth concerning fluctuations in the constituency of the tribe of Judah, with the death of Onan reflecting the dying out of a clan;<ref name="J. A. Emerton, Judah And Tamar">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name= "ReferenceA">Cheyne and Black, Encyclopedia Biblica</ref> Er and Onan are hence viewed as each being representative of a clan, with Onan possibly representing an Edomite clan named Onam,<ref name="ReferenceA"/> mentioned by an Edomite genealogy in Genesis.<ref>Genesis 36:23</ref>

Biblical scholars universally agree that the biblical story of Onan is not about masturbation nor about contraception per se or the "wasting of semen" but his refusal to fulfill his obligation of levirate-marriage with Tamar by committing coitus interruptus.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":4" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=":1" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":5" />

The text emphasizes the social and legal situation, with Judah explaining what Onan must do and why. A plain reading of the text is that Onan was killed because he refused to follow instructions. Scholars have argued that the secondary purpose of the narrative about Onan and Tamar, of which the description of Onan is a part, was to either assert the institution of levirate marriage or present a myth for its origin;<ref name="J. A. Emerton, Judah And Tamar"/> Onan's role in the narrative is, thus, as the brother abusing his obligations by agreeing to sexual intercourse with his dead brother's wife, but refusing to allow her to become pregnant as a result. Emerton regards the evidence for this to be inconclusive, although classical rabbinical writers argued that this narrative describes the origin of levirate marriage.<ref>Genesis Rabbah 85:6</ref>

John M. Riddle argues that "Epiphanius (fourth century) construed the sin of Onan as coitus interruptus".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> John T. Noonan Jr. says that "St. Epiphanius gave a plain interpretation of the text as a condemnation of contraception, and he did so only in the context of his anti-Gnostic polemic".<ref name="Noonan">Template:Cite book</ref>

Bible scholars maintained that the story does not refer to masturbation, but to coitus interruptus.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Dancy, 92">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Bible scholars even maintain that the Bible does not claim that masturbation would be sinful.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="jonesandjones">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="tjwray">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="lech">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="vern">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name= vines>Template:Cite book</ref>

Although the story of Onan does not involve masturbation, according to Peter Lewis Allen, some theologians found "a common element" in both coitus interruptus (also known as onanism) and masturbation, as well as anal intercourse and other forms of nonmarital and nonvaginal sexual acts, which are considered wrongful acts.<ref name="Allen">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp

Onanism

The term onanism has come to refer to "masturbation" in many modern languages – for example Hebrew (אוננות, onanút), German (Onanie), Greek (αυνανισμός, avnanismós), Japanese (オナニー, onanī), and Swedish (onani) – based on an interpretation of the Onan story.

The word onanism is not based on the biblical story of Onan itself but on an interpretation of that biblical story, nor is the word onanism found in any form in the biblical texts. Thus the etymological connection of onanism (in the sense of masturbation) with Onan's name is misleading.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":5" />

The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines onanism as:

1. masturbation
2. coitus interruptus
3. self-gratification