Template:Short description {{#invoke:other uses|otheruses}} Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates {{safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst-infobox||$params=italic_title,name,type,longtype,artist,cover,border,alt,caption,released,recorded,venue,studio,genre,length,language,label,director,producer,compiler,chronology,prev_title,prev_year,year,next_title,next_year,misc|$extra=italic_title,longtype,border,caption,language,director,compiler,chronology,year,misc|$aliases=italic title>italic_title,Italic title>italic_title,Name>name,Type>type,image>cover,Cover>cover,Border>border,Alt>alt,Caption>caption,Longtype>longtype,Artist>artist,Released>released,Recorded>recorded,Venue>venue,Studio>studio,Genre>genre,Length>length,Language>language,Label>label,Director>director,Producer>producer,Compiler>compiler,Chronology>chronology,Misc>misc|$flags=override|$B={{#ifeq:{{#invoke:Is infobox in lead|main|[Ii]nfobox [Aa]lbum}}|true|{{#if:Template:Has short description | |Template:Short description|noreplace}}}}{{#invoke:Infobox|infobox}}Template:Template otherTemplate:Category handlerTemplate:Main other{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Infobox album with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y|italic_title |type |name |image |cover |border |alt |caption |longtype |artist |released |recorded |venue |studio |genre |length |language |label |director |producer |compiler |prev_title|prev_year|next_title|next_year|chronology|year|misc}}{{#if:{{#invoke:String|match|error_category=Music infoboxes with Module:String errors|A|1=Beach Boys' Party!1965Best of the Beach Boys1966studioPet SoundsPetSoundsCover.jpgyesThe Beach Boys at the zoo feeding apples to goats. The header displays "The Beach Boys Pet Sounds" followed by the album's track list.the Beach BoysTemplate:Start dateJuly 12, 1965 – Template:Circa, 1966Template:HlistTemplate:HlistTemplate:DurationCapitolBrian WilsonThe Beach Boysx|2=</?t[drh][ >]|nomatch=}}|Template:Main other}}Template:Main other}}

Pet Sounds is the eleventh studio album by the American rock band the Beach Boys, released on May 16, 1966, by Capitol Records. It was produced, arranged, and primarily composed by Brian Wilson with guest lyricist Tony Asher. Recorded largely between January and April 1966, it furthered the progressive sound introduced in The Beach Boys Today! (1965). Initially promoted as "the most progressive pop album ever", Pet Sounds is recognized for its ambitious production, sophisticated harmonic structures, and coming of age themes. It is widely regarded as among the greatest and most influential albums in music history.Template:Sfn

Wilson viewed Pet Sounds as a solo album and attributed its inspiration partly to marijuana use and an LSD–rooted spiritual awakening. Galvanized by the work of his rivals, he aimed to create "the greatest rock album ever made", surpassing the Beatles' Rubber Soul (1965) and extending Phil Spector's Wall of Sound innovations. His orchestrations blended pop, jazz, exotica, classical, and avant-garde elements, combining rock instrumentation with layered vocal harmonies, found sounds, and instruments not normally associated with rock, such as French horn, flutes, Electro-Theremin, bass harmonica, bicycle bells, and string ensembles. Featuring the most complex and challenging instrumental and vocal parts of any Beach Boys album, it was their first in which studio musicians, such as the Wrecking Crew, largely replaced the band on their instruments, and the first time any group had departed from their usual small-ensemble pop/rock band format to create a full-length album that could not be replicated live. Its unprecedented total production cost exceeded $70,000 (equivalent to $Template:Inflation in Template:Inflation-year).

An early rock concept album, it explored introspective themes through songs like "You Still Believe in Me", about self-awareness of personal flaws; "I Know There's an Answer", a critique of escapist LSD culture; and "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times", addressing social alienation. Lead single "Caroline, No" was issued as Wilson's official solo debut, followed by the group's "Sloop John B" and "Wouldn't It Be Nice" (B-side "God Only Knows"). The album received a lukewarm critical response in the U.S. but peaked at number 10 on the Billboard Top LPs chart. Bolstered by band publicist Derek Taylor's promotional efforts, it was lauded by critics and musicians in the UK, reaching number 2 on the Record Retailer chart, and remaining in the top ten for six months. A planned follow-up album, Smile, extended Wilson's ambitions, propelled by the Pet Sounds outtake "Good Vibrations", but was abandoned and substituted with Smiley Smile in 1967.

Pet Sounds revolutionized music production and the role of producers, especially through its level of detail and Wilson's use of the studio as compositional tool. It elevated popular music as an art form, heightened public regard for albums as cohesive works, and influenced genres like orchestral pop, psychedelia, soft rock/sunshine pop, and progressive rock/pop, as well as synthesizer adoption. The album also introduced novel orchestration techniques, chord voicings, and structural harmonies, such as avoiding definite key signatures. Originally mastered in mono and Duophonic, the 1997 expanded reissue, The Pet Sounds Sessions, debuted its first true stereo mix. Long overshadowed by the Beatles' contemporaneous output, Pet Sounds initially gained limited mainstream recognition until 1990s reissues revived its prominence, leading to top placements on all-time greatest album lists by publications such as NME, Mojo, Uncut, and The Times. Wilson toured performing the album in the early 2000s and late 2010s. Since 2003, it has consistently ranked second in Rolling Stone's "The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time". Inducted into the Library of Congress's National Recording Registry in 2004 for its cultural and artistic significance, Pet Sounds is certified platinum in the U.S. for over one million sales.Template:Toclimit

BackgroundEdit

The Beach Boys' sixth album, All Summer Long (July 1964), concluded their beach-themed period, after which their music shifted toward an increasingly divergent stylistic and lyrical direction.Template:Sfn In January 1965, 22-year-old Brian Wilson, leader of the band, declared his withdrawal from touring to concentrate on songwriting and studio production.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The rest of the group—Brian's brothers Carl and Dennis, cousin Mike Love, and friend Al Jardine—continued touring without him; session musician Glen Campbell initially filled his role, followed by Bruce Johnston, who, alongside Terry Melcher, had been a Columbia Records staff producer and member of the Ripchords and Bruce & Terry.Template:Sfn

Through 1965, Wilson showcased great advances in his musical development with the albums The Beach Boys Today! and Summer Days (And Summer Nights!!).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Released in March, Today! departed from the group's earlier sound through orchestral arrangements, introspective themes, and a move away from surfing, car, and simplistic love motifs.Template:Sfn Its lyrics adopted an autobiographical tone, portraying narrators as vulnerable, neurotic, and insecure,Template:Sfn while the second half of the record contained five songs with a unified theme.<ref name="Guriel2016">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Summer Days, issued three months later, bridged Wilson's progressive style with the band's pre-1965 approach.Template:Sfn

On July 12, Wilson began recording "Sloop John B" but temporarily shelved the track to focus on Beach Boys' Party!, an informal studio album created to meet Capitol Records' demand for a Christmas release.Template:Sfn That October, he and his wife, 17-year-old Marilyn Rovell, moved from West Hollywood to a home on Laurel Way in Beverly Hills,Template:Sfn where he later stated he spent subsequent months contemplating "the new direction of the group".Template:Sfn Between October and December, he refined "Sloop John B" and recorded six new compositions, including "The Little Girl I Once Knew", which was released as a single in November.Template:Sfn In December, Capitol issued "Barbara Ann" from Party! as a single without consulting the band; Wilson publicly dismissed it as unrepresentative of their upcoming work.Template:Sfn From January 7 to 29, 1966, the bandmates toured Japan and Hawaii.Template:Sfn

Writing sessionsEdit

File:At the pet sounds studio 1966.jpg
From left: Johnston, Melcher, Asher, and Brian at a Pet Sounds recording session in early 1966.

In 1965, Wilson met Tony Asher, a 26-year-old lyricist and advertising jingle writer, at a Los Angeles recording studio.<ref name="Tony Asher interview" />Template:Refn After exchanging song ideas, Wilson learned of Asher's abilities through mutual acquaintance Loren Schwartz.<ref name="Tony Asher interview">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> That December, Wilson proposed a lyric collaboration to Asher, seeking a new creative partnership "completely different" from his prior work.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Asher accepted, and their writing sessions began within ten days, starting with "You Still Believe in Me".<ref name="Tony Asher interview" />

Wilson and Asher collaborated over a two-to-three week period in early 1966, likely January through February, writing at Wilson's home.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Sessions typically started with Wilson introducing musical fragments—such as chord patterns or melodic ideas he had developed over time—discussing records for their distinctive feel, or proposing a lyrical theme.<ref name="Tony Asher interview" /> Their preliminary sketches, which they referred to as "feels",Template:Sfn were developed with occasional marijuana use.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Lyrics were typically completed prior to recording sessions, which often commenced immediately after composition,Template:Sfn though studio booking times were never planned in advance.Template:Sfn

Template:Quote box

Asher maintained that his primary role was to provide feedback on Wilson's developing melodies and chord progressions, though they exchanged ideas throughout the process.<ref name="Tony Asher interview" /> Regarding their lyrical collaboration, he explained, "The general tenor of the lyrics was always his [...] and the actual choice of words was usually mine. I was really just his interpreter."Template:Sfn Asher later cited significant musical contributions to "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times", "Caroline, No", and "That's Not Me"Template:Sfn and claimed conceptual input on three songs.Template:Sfn He agreed to receive 25% of publishing royalties, a share he considered disproportionate to his contributions.Template:Sfn

In Marilyn's recollection, Brian worked on Pet Sounds virtually nonstop, and that when he was home, "he was either at the piano, arranging, or eating."Template:Sfn Asher recalled, "I wish I could say Brian was totally committed [to writing the songs]. Let's say he wasTemplate:Nbsp... um, very concerned."Template:Sfn After their songs were completed, Asher observed a few recording sessions, mostly those involving string overdubs.Template:Sfn

Wilson collaborated on two additional tracks. "I Know There's an Answer", written before working with Asher, was co-written with Beach Boys road manager Terry Sachen.Template:Sfn In 1994, Mike Love received retroactive co-writing credits for "Wouldn't It Be Nice" and "I Know There's an Answer",Template:Sfn though his contributions—aside from "I'm Waiting for the Day"—are generally regarded as minimal.<ref name="tracks">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The remaining two instrumental tracks, "Let's Go Away for Awhile" and "Pet Sounds", were composed by Wilson alone. They were originally recorded as backing tracks for existing songs, but by the time the album neared completion, he decided that the tracks were more effective without vocals.<ref name="BrianPopGenius">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Concept, inspiration, and lyricsEdit

Wall of Sound and Rubber SoulEdit

Commentators frequently cite Pet Sounds as a concept album, with some considering it the first such work in rock music.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Wilson had sought to create "a complete statement" with Pet Sounds, inspired by the Beatles' Rubber Soul, released in December 1965.Template:Sfn The American edition of Rubber Soul, reconfigured by Capitol to emphasize a cohesive folk rock sound,Template:Sfn struck Wilson as a unified work free of filler tracks—uncommon at a time when albums primarily served to promote singles.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Contrasting the Beach Boys' earlier albums, which sometimes included lighter material,Template:Sfn Wilson viewed Rubber Soul as a challenge to elevate his approach,Template:Sfn declaring to his wife, "I'm gonna make the greatest album! The greatest rock album ever made!"Template:Sfn

File:Phil Spector with MFQ 1965.png
Phil Spector (center) at Gold Star Studios, where he developed his Wall of Sound method (1965)

Carl highlighted his brother's greater admiration for Phil Spector over the Beatles,<ref name=HimesSurf/> with Brian frequently crediting Spector's methods as foundational to his own production style.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Brian identified Pet Sounds as an "interpretation" of Spector's Wall of Sound formula,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web

}}</ref> with the production informing the album's intended "concept".Template:Sfn He stated: <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

If you take the Pet Sounds album as a collection of art pieces, each designed to stand alone, yet which belong together, you'll see what I was aiming at. [...] It wasn't really a song concept album, or lyrically a concept album; it was really a production concept album.Template:Sfn{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Musicologist Michael Zager contrasted Pet Sounds with Rubber Soul, writing that the former more closely aligns with Spector's Wall of Sound through its incorporation of the technique's hallmarks.Template:Sfn Wilson said that he was especially fascinated with combining color tones to create new textures, aiming to emulate those aspects of Spector's productions.Template:Sfn In a 1988 interview, he framed the Beach Boys via Pet Sounds as "messengers" of Spector's work, stating his goal was to expand upon Spector's innovations.Template:Sfn

Wilson later credited Rubber Soul as his "main motivator" for Pet Sounds.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn He explained that while inspired to create music "on the same level" as Rubber Soul, he was not interested in replicating the Beatles' sound.<ref name=HimesSurf>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> In 2009, Wilson said that although "Rubber Soul didn't clarify my ideas for Pet Sounds", the Beatles' use of sitar had inspired his choice of instrumentation for the album.<ref name="rubber09">Template:Cite newsTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore</ref> In a 1966 interview, he contrasted their approaches, suggesting his arrangements would have expanded tracks like "Norwegian Wood" with orchestration, "background voices", and "a thousand [other] things".Template:Sfn

Other contemporary influences, jazz, and pre-rock 'n' roll popEdit

File:Rodgers and Hammerstein and Berlin and Tamiris NYWTS.jpg
Asher and Wilson modeled Pet Sounds after Tin Pan Alley's songwriting craftmanship (pictured in 1948; Rodgers and Hammerstein with Irving Berlin)

Asher disputed the notion that he and Wilson had followed templates set by the Beatles or rock in general, recalling Wilson aimed to craft "classical American love songs" akin to Cole Porter or Rodgers and Hammerstein.Template:Sfn During their collaboration, they exchanged musical influences, with Asher introducing Wilson to jazz recordings, being promptly "blown away" by records such as Duke Ellington's "Sophisticated Lady" (1932) and Hampton Hawes' "All the Things You Are" (1955).Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Asher remembered Wilson's limited familiarity with Tin Pan Alley songs and orchestral jazz structures: "He didn't know much about jazz or jazz standards, but he knew the Four Freshmen."Template:Sfn Drawing from his own studio experience, Asher advocated for incorporating classical instruments like violins, cellos, and bass flutes into the arrangements.Template:Sfn

In 1966, Wilson likened his work to that of the Burt Bacharach and Hal David songwriting team.Template:Sfn Nelson Riddle's orchestral arrangements also influenced Wilson's approach,Template:Sfn and biographer Jon Stebbins felt Riddle's impact was more pronounced than Spector's on the album.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Reflecting in 1996, Wilson characterized his collaboration with Asher as operating on a "little wavelength", emphasizing artistic integrity over competition with contemporaries like Spector or Motown: "It was [...] to do it the way you really want it to be."<ref name="BrianWilson1997" />Template:Refn

Spirituality and coming of age themesEdit

Template:Quote box During his first LSD trip in April 1965, Wilson had what he considered to be "a very religious experience" and claimed to have perceived God.Template:Sfn Spirituality subsequently formed a core inspiration for the album.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> He frequently emphasized the album's spiritual qualities in interviews,Template:Sfn later explaining that he and his brother Carl conducted prayer sessions, aimed at global healing,Template:Sfn that transformed the studio atmosphere into "a religious ceremony."Template:Sfn During these sessions, Carl proposed "a special album" following their spiritual practices.Template:Sfn Brian explained in 1994, "We prayed for an album that would be a rival to Rubber Soul. It was like a prayer, but there was some ego there."<ref name="IJWMFTT">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref>

Pet Sounds contrasted with the group's earlier celebrations of adolescence, exemplified through lyrics wishing to be older rather than younger ("Wouldn't It Be Nice").Template:Sfn<ref name="WBUR2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Asher stated that Wilson sought to create songs relatable to adolescents: "Even though he was dealing in the most advanced score-charts and arrangements, he was still incredibly conscious of this commercial thing. This absolute need to relate."Template:Sfn Carl reflected that the album recurrently explores themes of disillusionment and lost innocence associated with the realization that "everything's not Hollywood" in adulthood.<ref name=HimesSurf /> Critics Richard Goldstein and Nik Cohn found that the album's melancholic lyrics sometimes jarred with its music,Template:Sfn with Cohn describing it as "sad songs about loneliness and heartache; sad songs even about happiness."Template:Sfn<ref name="ABoysOwnStory" />Template:Refn Template:Quote box

Much of the album's pessimistic and dejected lyric content stemmed from Wilson's marital struggles,Template:Sfn exacerbated by his drug use.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn According to Asher, he and Wilson drew from extensive discussions about their experiences and feelings concerning women and relationship dynamics to inspire their songs.<ref name="Tony Asher interview" />Template:Refn Asher later clarified that their songwriting conversations remained "theoretical" rather than explicitly autobiographical, focusing on hypothetical scenarios such as "a kid who doesn't fit in".Template:Sfn

Perceived storylineEdit

Pet Sounds is sometimes suggested to be a song cycleTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn portraying the unraveling of a romantic relationship.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Author Scott Schinder argued that Wilson and Asher had crafted a song cycle about "the emotional challenges accompanying the transition from youth to adulthood", paired with "a series of intimate, hymn-like love songs".Template:Sfn Music historian Larry Star traced a thematic progression from "youthful optimism [...] to philosophical and emotional disillusionment" across its track sequencing.Template:Sfn

While Pet Sounds exhibits unified emotional themes, no deliberate narrative was planned.Template:Sfn Asher stated that he and Wilson never discussed a specific concept, though he acknowledged Wilson's potential to unconsciously shape one.<ref name="Tony Asher interview" />Template:Refn Musicologist Philip Lambert argued that Wilson likely intended a narrative framework, influenced by his familiarity with similar "theme albums" by Frank Sinatra and the Four Freshmen.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Style and precursorsEdit

Differences from prior workEdit

Building on the foundations of The Beach Boys Today!, Pet Sounds advanced Wilson's exploration of intricate arrangements and thematic cohesion.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Musicologist Marshall Heiser identified key distinctions in the album's sonic approach compared to the group's earlier output: a heightened spatial and textural dimensionality; "more inventive" chord progressions and voicings; rhythmic frameworks emphasizing percussion over conventional backbeats; and orchestrations drawing from Les Baxter's exotica "quirkiness" and Bacharach's "cool" pop sensibilities rather than Spector's "teen fanfares".<ref name="ARP">Template:Cite journal</ref> Wilson seldom used string ensembles prior to Pet Sounds;Template:Sfn the first documented instance was "The Surfer Moon" (1963).Template:Sfn

Musicologist Daniel Harrison contends that Wilson's development as a composer and arranger on Pet Sounds was incremental relative to his earlier work, maintaining that the album's unconventional harmonic progressions and hypermetric disruptions had extended techniques already demonstrated in songs such as "The Warmth of the Sun" and "Don't Back Down", both from 1964.Template:Sfn Granata describes the album as a culmination of Wilson's songwriting artistry, although he had transitioned "from writing car and surf songs to writing studious ones" by 1965.Template:Sfn Writers often refer to the second side of Today! as a precursor to Pet Sounds.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Musicologist John Covach identifies the "California Girls" single as anticipating "the more intensely experimental" approach of Pet Sounds,Template:Sfn while Carl, Dennis, and Jardine later traced its B-side "Let Him Run Wild" as marking their recognition of Wilson's evolving production style leading into Pet Sounds.<ref name="Carl1997"/><ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref><ref name="Jardine97">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref>

Genre, debate over categorization and psychedeliaEdit

Template:Quote box Pet Sounds blends elements of pop, jazz, classical, exotica, and avant-garde music, according to Stebbins, who argues that the album defies singular categorization: "There isn't much rocking here, and even less rolling. Pet Sounds is at times futuristic, progressive, and experimental. [...] and the only blues are in the themes and in Brian's voice."Template:Sfn Johnston heard persistent doo-wop and R&B influences.Template:Sfn Further to the album's R&B heritage, music journalist Noah Berlatsky stated that several characteristics of the Beach Boys' sound "which seem coded white", such as "the fussy arrangements", "pure harmonies", and "childish vulnerability", had originated from a "pop R&B" tradition.<ref name="Berlatsky"/>Template:Refn

The album's classification as rock music has been challenged. Journalist D. Strauss argued that its quality and subversion of rock traditions was what contributed to its significance in rock history. He proposed that categorizing it as easy listening (or "elevator music") reveals the album as "historically grounded, if incredibly ambitious".<ref name="Strauss1997"/> Wilson drew from older popular music styles, as did Spector, and some of his innovations had precedents in incidental music and Muzak arrangements from the previous decade; Strauss added, "Teenagers were so busy sneering at their parent's music that they neglected to notice".<ref name="Strauss1997">Template:Cite news</ref> Wilson's orchestrations also drew stylistic parallels to exotica producers such as Baxter, Martin Denny, and Esquivel, particularly through the incorporation of culturally diverse timbres.<ref name="Pitchfork2006">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn

{{#invoke:Listen|main}} Commentators have variously categorized the album as progressive pop,<ref name="progpopguide"/><ref>Template:Multiref2</ref> the descriptor used in its initial marketing,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn as well as chamber pop,<ref>Template:Multiref2</ref> psychedelic pop,<ref>Template:Multiref2</ref><ref name="GoldminePsyche">Template:Cite news</ref> and art rock.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> "Baroque pop"<ref name="avclub">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="APviaHuffPost">Template:Cite news</ref> was absent from early critical discussions about Pet Sounds and emerged later in 1990s critiques of artists it influenced.Template:Sfn The contemporary music press avoided the label, favoring "progressive" instead.Template:Sfn Academic John Howland argued in 2021 that the album's "baroque-pop" traits were almost exclusive to "God Only Knows".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Pet Sounds is typically categorized among other pioneering psychedelic rock albums,<ref name="SixDegrees">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> although many commentators have been reluctant to name the Beach Boys in discussions of psychedelic music.<ref name=GoldminePsyche />Template:Refn Stebbins writes that the album is "slightly psychedelic—or at least impressionistic."Template:Sfn Wilson himself felt that while some songs contain psychedelic elements, the album overall was "not psychedelic".<ref name="Ruskin2016" /> Academics Paul Hegarty and Martin Halliwell attribute the psychedelic sound to Wilson's production approach—eclectic instrumentation, echo, reverb, and Spector-inspired techniques—which created layered soundscapes where "voice and music interweave tightly".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Cultural historian Dale Carter cites dense sonic textures, structural complexity, novel instrument combinations, shifting tonal centers, and hypnotic rhythms as psychedelic qualities present in the Beach Boys' mid-1960s output.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Musical architectureEdit

Orchestrations and arrangementsEdit

Pet Sounds incorporates tempo changes, metrical ambiguity, and uncommon tone colors that, according to musicologist James Perone, distinguish it from virtually "anything else [...] in 1966 pop music".Template:Sfn His analysis highlights the closing track "Caroline, No" for its wide tessitura shifts, expansive melodic intervals, and choice of instruments, alongside Wilson's structural and textural innovations in composition and orchestration.Template:Sfn Wilson combined standard rock instrumentation with intricate layers of vocal harmoniesTemplate:Sfn and many instruments which had rarely, if ever been used in rock.Template:Sfn This included ukulele, sleigh bells, accordion, French and English horns, timpani, vibraphone, and tack piano<ref name="PS2016"/>—all of which had appeared on Today!<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>—in addition to bass harmonica, güiro, bass clarinet, bongos, glockenspiel, banjo, bicycle horn, Coca-Cola cans, and Electro-Theremin.<ref name="PS2016"/>

{{#invoke:Listen|main}} Arranger Paul Mertens, who later worked with Wilson on live renditions of the album, observed that Wilson's approach to orchestration involved adapting classical instrumentation to rock sensibilities rather than superimposing classical elements onto rock frameworks: "Brian was [not] trying to introduce classical music into rock & roll. Rather, he was trying to get classical musicians to play like rock musicians."<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>Template:Refn

Tracks on Pet Sounds typically featured around a dozen unique instruments, ranging from the comparatively sparse "That's Not Me" (six instruments) to the expansive "God Only Knows" (over 15).<ref name="PS2016"/> Wilson frequently employed doubling—a technique where two instruments play the same melody—to reinforce structural clarity, enhance depth, and achieve a spacious sonic quality. Though it had been used for centuries in orchestral and classical arrangements, its use in contemporary rock was predominantly restricted to electric bass. He expanded the practice across diverse instruments, including violins and accordions.Template:Sfn In Pet Sounds, electric and acoustic basses were also frequently doubled, and played with a hard plectrum.Template:Sfn Drums were employed less for steady rhythm than for textural and tonal effects.Template:Sfn

Vocal harmoniesEdit

File:Brian Wilson Pet Sounds.jpg
Brian's vocals dominate Pet SoundsTemplate:Sfn

Compared to earlier Beach Boys albums, Pet Sounds contains fewer vocal harmonies, but greater complexity and variety.Template:Sfn Instead of simple "oo" harmonies, the band shifted toward intricate vocal counterpoint and used doo-wop-style nonsense syllables more frequently than on previous releases.Template:Sfn Wilson's signature falsetto appears seven times, his highest count on a Beach Boys album since Surfer Girl (1963), excluding Today!.Template:Sfn His vocals dominate the album, with lead roles on five tracks, shared leads on two, and chorus contributions on two others.Template:Sfn Wilson's voice occupies 16 minutes of the 36-minute runtime, three minutes more than the combined total of other members.Template:Sfn

Key ambiguity and formsEdit

Wilson employed a vertical compositional approach using block chords rather than horizontal classical structures and often juxtaposed contrasting chords between hands, incorporating clashing notes that resulted in polytonality.Template:Sfn The album predominantly features chords that are slashed, diminished, major seventh, sixths, ninths, augmented, or suspended,Template:Sfn with augmented and ninth chords appearing less frequently.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Every track is in a major key,Template:Sfn some of which are unusual choices; for instance, "You Still Believe in Me" uses B—a key with numerous sharps and flats that keyboardists typically avoid—while "That's Not Me" is in FTemplate:Music, the key farthest from C.Template:Sfn

File:God Only Knows diagram.png
The Pet Sounds compositions are distinguished for avoiding definite key signatures.Template:Sfn Pictured is a visual representation of the harmonic structures present in the verse and chorus of "God Only Knows".

The album's harmonic structure features four tracks maintaining a single strongly established key: "You Still Believe in Me" (B), "I'm Waiting for the Day" (E), "Sloop John B" (ATemplate:Music), and "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" (BTemplate:Music).Template:Sfn Most other songs shift between primary and secondary keys or lack a definitive tonal center.Template:Sfn Two tracks—"That's Not Me" and "Let's Go Away for Awhile"—begin and end in distinct keys; others integrate secondary key areas for phrases and sections—"Wouldn't It Be Nice" and "God Only Knows"—or momentary tonicizations ("Here Today", "Pet Sounds", and "Caroline, No").Template:Sfn

Song structures largely adhere to conventional forms: three tracks follow the AABA quatrain format, while eight use verse-chorus frameworks.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Exceptions include "That's Not Me", structured as a binary form with developmental repetition, and "Let's Go Away for Awhile", comprising two contrasting sections without reprise.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Three tracks—"You Still Believe in Me", "Let's Go Away for Awhile", and "Pet Sounds"—feature two distinct, non-repeating sections.Template:Sfn

Structural unityEdit

Lambert posits that the album's "overall unity" is reinforced by shared musical elements that had evolved from Wilson's approaches on Today!,Template:Sfn and that these elements, while subtle, were deliberate on Wilson's part, aligning with his aspiration for an album that "felt like it all belonged together".Template:Sfn Techniques in Today!, such as recurring scale motifs that permeate arrangements and vocal lines, reached fuller realization in Pet Sounds tracks like "Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Shoulder)", where ascending stepwise vocal phrases (GTemplate:Music to CTemplate:Music) receive mirrored instrumental responses.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn According to Lambert, this arch-shaped motif serves as a unifying thread throughout the album, appearing in the concluding organ phrase in "I Know There's an Answer" and the vibraphone progression during the second half of "Let's Go Away for Awhile", among other tracks.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

{{#invoke:Listen|main}}

Tertian modulations (by thirds) are frequent.Template:Sfn Perone argued that the album's musical continuity stemmed from "Wilsonian" traits, such as a descending third interval concluding verses in "You Still Believe in Me" and a "madrigal sigh" motif in "That's Not Me" (where the motif punctuates each verse line), "Don't Talk", and "Caroline, No".Template:Sfn Bass lines, often chromatic,Template:Sfn prioritized melodic movement over tonic emphasis.Template:Sfn Descending 1–5 patterns are a recurring device, one that Wilson had applied before, but not in work leading to Pet Sounds.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Recorded early in the sessions, the album's title track features a prominent bass descent from BTemplate:Music to F (through ATemplate:Music, G, and GTemplate:Music), which served as a foundational motivic element, becoming a structural inspiration for subsequent tracks.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

The use of major and minor submediants, which establish tonic–submediant (I–vi/VI) relationships in all key-shifting tracks except "God Only Knows", is cited by Lambert as another "important source of overall unity".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Author Jim Fusilli observes that Wilson frequently departs from and returns to the composition's "logic" to cement "emotional intent", but never "unbridled joy", as he had with "The Little Girl I Once Knew".Template:Sfn Lambert locates this technique in Wilson's use of diminished seventh chords, "almost always [appearing] at a dramatic moment", such as in "Don't Talk" (on the word "eyes" in "I can see so much in your eyes") and "God Only Knows" (on the words "sure about it" and "livin' do me").Template:Sfn

ProductionEdit

Backing tracksEdit

Recording for Pet Sounds primarily occurred between January 18 and April 13, 1966, across 27 sessions.Template:Sfn Three tracks—"You Still Believe in Me", "Pet Sounds", and "Sloop John B"—were initiated earlier, with the latter partially recorded in July and December 1965.Template:Sfn Most instrumental tracks were recorded at Western Studio 3 of United Western Recorders, while Gold Star Studios hosted sessions for "Good Vibrations" and the backing tracks of "Wouldn't It Be Nice" and "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times".Template:Sfn Sunset Sound Recorders was used for the instrumental of "Here Today".Template:Sfn Wilson produced the album largely with his usual engineer, Chuck Britz, a staff member at Western.Template:Sfn

Since the 1963 Surfer Girl sessions,Template:Sfn Wilson had gradually integrated Spector's choice of studio musicians, a group later known as "the Wrecking Crew", into Beach Boys records.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Regular participants included Hal Blaine (drums), Glen Campbell and Billy Strange (guitar), Al de Lory (piano), Steve Douglas (saxophone) Carol Kaye (Fender bass), Larry Knechtel (Hammond organ), Don Randi (piano), Lyle Ritz (upright bass), Ray Pohlman (bass and guitar), and Julius Wechter (percussion).Template:Sfn He relied on studio musicians to execute his increasingly complex arrangements, particularly as the band members were frequently touring,Template:Sfn with Pet Sounds marking the first Beach Boys project in which he almost exclusively used these musicians for the backing tracks.<ref name="instrumentmyth">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Carl, who sporadically contributed guitar parts during sessions, later reflected that the technical demands of the recordings had exceeded the group's collective abilities: "It really wasn't appropriate for us to play on those [Pet Sounds] dates—the tracking just got beyond us."Template:Sfn

File:Brian Wilson Pet Sounds 2.jpg
Wilson conducting a Pet Sounds session behind the mixing desk at Western

Backing track sessions typically lasted at least three hours, with Britz recalling that most time was spent refining sounds, as Wilson knew "exactly" which instruments he wanted and insisted on assembling all musicians simultaneously, despite the financial impracticality.<ref name="InTheStudio">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> By layering combinations of instruments (such as multiple types of keyboards) playing in unison, slight tuning discrepancies between them produced a chorusing effect, a phasing texture unattainable through electronic means.Template:Sfn

Wilson characterized himself as "sort of a square" around these musicians, starting with each instrument's sound individually, typically beginning with keyboards and drums, followed by violins if not overdubbed.<ref name="BrianWilson1997"/> Sessions lacked pre-rehearsals, and he usually arrived with only rudimentary musical drafts.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn He typically composed full arrangements mentally but conveyed them through shorthand notation prepared by session musicians, with separate charts for different instrumental groups.<ref name="BrianWilson1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> His approach relied on the musicians' improvisational skills; instead of detailed written scores, he hummed or vocalized parts during recording.Template:Sfn Blaine recalled using basic chord charts handwritten on standard paper, which Wilson photocopied for the group; they would adjust parts based on his feedback during takes.Template:Sfn While maintaining creative control, he welcomed additional input from these musicians and occasionally retained their mistakes if he felt they enhanced the recording.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

File:Scully 280 4-track tape recorder, Ardent Studios (cropped).jpg
A Scully four-track 280 tape deck, identical to the model used for Pet SoundsTemplate:Sfn

Compared to Spector's Wall of Sound, Wilson's productions achieved greater technical complexity through his use of four-track and eight-track recording.<ref name="Linett1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> While Spector recorded live ensemble takes in mono on three-track machines,<ref name="Buskin2007">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Wilson employed a Scully four-track 288 tape recorder for initial backing tracks,<ref name="Stromoff1996" /> later transferring them to eight-track.Template:Sfn Instruments were grouped across three tracks: drums, percussion, and keyboards; horns; and bass with additional percussion and guitar. A fourth track held temporary reference mixes, later replaced by overdubs like strings.<ref name=Linett1997 /> Once Wilson was satisfied with a track, Britz provided a 7½ IPS tape copy for him to take home for further evaluation.<ref name="Britz1997" />

Principal recording commenced on January 18 with the basic track for "Let's Go Away for Awhile" at Western Studio 3. Sessions for "Wouldn't It Be Nice" began at Gold Star Studio A on January 22, while "Caroline, No" was tracked at Western Studio 3 on January 31. February saw more activity: "I Know There's an Answer" (February 9), "Don't Talk" (February 11), "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" (February 14 at Gold Star), and "That's Not Me" (February 15) were all recorded at Western Studio 3. March sessions included "I'm Waiting for the Day" (March 6) and "God Only Knows" (March 10) at Western, alongside "Here Today" (March 10 or 11 at Sunset Sound).<ref name="PS2016"/>

Reactions from bandmatesEdit

Template:Quote box

Pet Sounds is sometimes considered a Brian Wilson solo album,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn including by Wilson himself, who later called it his "first solo album" and "a chance to step outside the group and shine".Template:Sfn Except for Mike Love, who received phone previews of tracks from Wilson, other band members were not consulted during production,Template:Sfn though Brian had played excerpts to Dennis and Carl during their time in Japan.Template:Sfn Upon returning to the studio on February 9,Template:Sfn the bandmates were presented with recordings that jarred with their expectations.Template:Sfn

File:Mike Love Pet Sounds.jpg
CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Critiques among the band members focused on lyrics rather than music,Template:Sfn with additional concerns about replicating the complex arrangements in live performances.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> In his 2016 memoir, Brian claimed Carl embraced the album while Love and Dennis initially did not.Template:Sfn Dennis, in 1976, dismissed rumors of dissent as "interesting", insisting no member matched Brian's talent or opposed his vision.<ref>Template:Cite interview; Template:YouTube</ref> Carl rejected such reports as "bullshit", declaring universal affection for the project during its creation<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> and later stating in 1996, "We knew that this was really good music."<ref name="Carl1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Love stated his sole objection targeted the original lyrics of "I Know There's an Answer".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Brian, in 1976, remembered arguments about the project being "too arty",Template:Sfn while Marilyn later said that his bandmates had struggled "to understand what he was going through emotionally and what he wanted to create [...] they didn't feel what he was going through and what direction he was trying to go in."<ref name="Marilyn1997" /> Asher stated the bandmates—"certainly Al, Dennis, and Mike"—frequently voiced objections such as "What the fuck do these words mean?" and "This isn't our kind of shit!", recalling "those were tense sessions."Template:Sfn Notwithstanding such remarks, he added that the bandmates never "really challenged Brian" on his direction for the group because they had felt "they weren't talented enough" to make such judgments.Template:Sfn He said Love's objections centered on the album's suitability for the Beach Boys' brand—reservations which Jardine sharedTemplate:Sfn—rather than its artistic quality.<ref name="BDW">Template:Cite AV media</ref> Jardine recalled initial hesitance toward the stylistic shift, saying the material required adjustmentTemplate:Sfn but that he "grew to really appreciate it as soon as we started to work on it".<ref name="Goldmine2000">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

According to Brian, his bandmates were concerned that he might depart for a solo career, as he dominated the album's artistic direction.<ref name="Lunch76">Template:Cite magazine</ref> He acknowledged their resistance to his vocal prominence, stating he "wanted people to know it was more of a Brian Wilson album than a Beach Boys album."Template:Sfn Love later wrote that he had desired "a greater hand in some of the songs and been able to incorporate more often my 'lead voice,' which we'd had so much success with."Template:Sfn Brian conceded that tensions eased when the group accepted the project "was still the Beach Boys" despite being "a showcase" for himself: "In other words, they gave in. They let me have my little stint."<ref name="Lunch76" />Template:Sfn

Vocal overdubsEdit

File:Carl Brian Al.jpg
The Beach Boys recording vocals for Pet Sounds. From left: Carl, Brian, Jardine, and Johnston (obscured)

Vocal overdubs occurred at Western and CBS Columbia SquareTemplate:Sfn from February to April.<ref name="PS2016"/> The bandmates often arrived unprepared, with Britz recalling minimal rehearsal as they typically began singing immediately.<ref name="Britz1997" /> Jardine explained that Brian individually coached each member on their vocal parts at a piano. Following nightly playback sessions, members occasionally opted to re-record sections they deemed improvable.<ref name="Sharp2013">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> {{#invoke:Listen|main}} The vocal sessions demanded unprecedented precision for the group,Template:Sfn with Love recalling Brian's meticulous scrutiny of harmonies, often requiring multiple retakes for minor pitch deviations.<ref name="ElliotLinerNotes1999" /> Love affectionately nicknamed Brian "dog ears" at the sessions due to his acute auditory sensitivity<ref name="Love1997" /> and insisting on exacting tonal and rhythmic accuracy, sometimes discarding completed tracks the following day to re-record them.<ref name="ElliotLinerNotes1999">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref>

Recording employed Neumann U-47 (for Dennis, Carl, and Jardine) and Shure 545 microphones (for Brian's leads),<ref name="Britz1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> with Love requiring an additional microphone for his lower register.<ref name="Love1997" /> Brian allocated six tracks for individual vocals to refine balance during mixing. Mono overdubs utilized eight-track recorders,<ref name="Linett1997" /> reserving one channel for supplementary layers.<ref name="tracks" /> Columbia Studios hosted five songs, being the sole Los Angeles facility equipped with eight-track technology during the sessions: "God Only Knows", "Here Today", "Wouldn't It Be Nice", "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times", and "I'm Waiting for the Day".Template:Sfn

Mixdown, studio effects, and anomaliesEdit

Tape effects were limited to slapback echo and reverb. Mark Linett, who engineered Wilson's recordings after the 1980s, states that the reverb resembles plate reverb units more than echo chambers, explaining that the album's distinctive sound stems from reverb being applied during live recording sessions rather than added afterward, as is common in modern music production.<ref name="Stromoff1996">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Wilson often isolated reverb on the timpani, a technique audible in "Wouldn't It Be Nice", "You Still Believe in Me", and "Don't Talk".Template:Sfn

Template:Quote box

Late overdubs, such as strings for "Don't Talk" (April 3) and a final adjustment for "I Know There's an Answer" (around April 17), completed the album's principal recording.<ref name="PS2016"/> Mixing occurred within days in a single nine-hour session,Template:Sfn initially planned for vocal overdubs on "Let's Go Away for Awhile" before Capitol redirected it to mixing.Template:Sfn Most time was spent blending vocals with the pre-mixed mono instrumental track.Template:Sfn

The original mono mix featured numerous technical flaws that contrasted with its refined arrangements and performances,Template:Sfn alongside countertextural aspects emphasizing its recorded nature.Template:Sfn Among the most prominent examples: an audible tape splice occurs in "Wouldn't It Be Nice" between the chorus and Love's bridge vocal entrance, while a distant conversation was accidentally captured during the instrumental break of "Here Today" amid a vocal overdub.Template:Sfn Biographer David Leaf characterized these imperfections as "not sloppy recording, [but] part of the music".Template:Sfn Wilson's mixing process faced technical constraints, such as simultaneously recording overdubs while mixing existing tracks and combining multiple recordings into a single mono channel in real time, which risked unintended artifacts like noise or oversights due to limited monitoring. Granata posits Wilson "felt that performance and feeling outweighed technical perfection", akin to Spector's production ethos, and may have overlooked minor anomalies that were less noticeable on 1960s playback systems.Template:Sfn

A true stereo mix of Pet Sounds was not pursued in 1966 due to logistical constraints. Wilson deliberately mixed in mono, as Spector often did, believing it offered greater control over sound reproduction, unaffected by variables in speaker placement or playback systems. At the time, most consumer audio equipment and broadcasts were monophonic.Template:Sfn<ref name="Linett1997" /> Another factor was Wilson's near-total deafness in his right ear.Template:Sfn The unprecedented production costs totaled $70,000 (equivalent to $Template:Inflation in Template:Inflation-year).Template:Sfn

Songs and instrumentalsEdit

Side oneEdit

{{#invoke:Listen|main}}

"Wouldn't It Be Nice" portrays a young couple longing for adult independence.Template:Sfn Asher cited it as the sole track for which he wrote lyrics to match Wilson's fully composed melody.Template:Sfn Recording the band's vocals required more studio time than any other song, as the group struggled to meet Wilson's standards for their performance.Template:Sfn

"You Still Believe in Me" introduces introspective themes later echoed throughout the album,Template:Sfn exploring self-awareness of personal shortcomings amid his partner's enduring devotion.Template:Sfn Wilson characterized the song as depicting a man's emotional vulnerability through an effeminate perspective.Template:Sfn He and Asher crafted its ethereal introduction by plucking piano strings with a bobby pin.Template:Sfn

File:Dennis Wilson 1966.jpg
Dennis, whose drumming on the album was limited to "That's Not Me",<ref name="PS2016"/> contributed jazz patterns to the track<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

"That's Not Me" features multiple key modulations and mood shifts,Template:Sfn and is the track that most closely resembles a conventional rock song.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Its lyrics depict a young man's journey toward self-realization, concluding that companionship outweighs solitary ambition.Template:Sfn The track is distinguished as the only one on the album with most instrumental parts performed by the band members themselves.<ref name="PS2016" />

"Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Shoulder)" is among the most harmonically complex songs that Wilson ever wrote,Template:Sfn centering on non-verbal communication between lovers.Template:Sfn Granata highlights the track's "exquisite use" of word painting, exemplified by a bassline mimicking a heartbeat on the lyric "Listen to my heart beat", reinforced by timpani accents.Template:Sfn Departing from his earlier work, Wilson incorporated a string sextet (violins, viola, and cello) to achieve a "dark, expressive" tone that Granata likens to the style of Johannes Brahms.Template:Sfn

"I'm Waiting for the Day" follows a protagonist attempting to comfort a guarded, emotionally wounded love interest.Template:Sfn It blends jazz chords with doo-wop progressions alongside orchestral instrumentation featuring timpani, English horn, flutes, and a string section interlude.Template:Sfn Carl praised the arrangement's dramatic shifts between minimalist verses and harmonically rich choruses, calling it "perhaps one of the most dynamic moments in the album."Template:Sfn Originally registered as Brian's solo composition in 1964, it was co-credited to Love, who made a minor adjustment to Brian's lyrics.Template:Sfn

File:Burt Bacharach 1972.JPG
Wilson said he may have subconsciously based "Let's Go Away for Awhile" on the work of Burt Bacharach (pictured).Template:Sfn

"Let's Go Away for Awhile" is the first instrumental, featuring 12 violins, piano, four saxophones, oboe, vibraphones, and a Coca-Cola bottle used as a guitar slide.Template:Sfn In 1966, Wilson considered the track to be "the finest piece of art" he had made up to that point, adding that every component of its production had "worked perfectly".<ref name="BrianPopGenius"/> Musicologist Larry Starr highlights the piece's unusual AABCC structure as an example of the album's occasional formal experimentation.Template:Sfn

File:SpongeFleetNassauBahamas-c1900.jpg
"Sloop John B" is a traditional folk song about a boat from Nassau (pictured circa 1900)

Jardine proposed adapting the traditional Caribbean folk song "Sloop John B", which he knew from the Kingston Trio.Template:Sfn Wilson's arrangement blended rock with marching band instrumentation, incorporating flutes, glockenspiel, bass saxophone, bass, guitar, and drums.Template:Sfn Jardine likened the result to John Philip Sousa's marches.Template:Sfn Wilson modified the original lyric from "this is the worst trip since I've been born" to "I've ever been on", a revision possibly alluding to psychedelic experiences.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>Template:Sfn

Wilson included "Sloop John B" at Capitol's insistence, anticipating its commercial success following its single release.Template:Sfn Commentators often refer to the track as diverging thematically from the album's introspective love songs and personal reflections, being the only composition not written by Wilson. Fusilli contends that its textural elements—including "chiming" guitars, doubled basses, and staccato rhythms—align with the album's sonic palette.Template:Sfn Perone and music historian Jim DeRogatis highlight its thematic consistency with the album's exploration of emotional displacement, particularly through lyrics expressing a longing to escape difficult circumstances.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The refrain "I want to go home" echoes motifs present in the title of "Let's Go Away for Awhile" and lyrics of the later track "Caroline, No".Template:Sfn

Side twoEdit

{{#invoke:Listen|main}}

"God Only Knows" depicts a narrator contemplating the end of a romantic relationship, asserting that life without their partner could only be fathomed by God.Template:Sfn It challenged pop music conventions of the mid-1960s by explicitly referencing "God" in its title and lyrics—an action then considered taboo, with at least one recent prior instance of a radio ban due to a song containing words such as "hell" and "damn".Template:Sfn Wilson and Asher debated the risks of limited airplay, as well as the deceptive opening line, "I may not always love you".Template:Sfn Wilson credited Asher with ultimately broadening his songwriting approach, inspiring the song through discussions of standards like "Stella by Starlight".<ref name="BrianWilson1997" /> Its harmonic structure features an ambiguous tonal center,Template:Sfn an element cited by musicologist Stephen Downes as contributing to its innovation within pop music and the Baroque style it emulates.Template:Sfn

File:Al Jardine Pet Sounds.jpg
"I Know There's an Answer" featured a lead vocal from Jardine

"I Know There's an Answer", initially titled "Let Go Your Ego" and "Hang On to Your Ego",Template:Sfn portrays an individual reluctant to advise others on improving their lifestyle.Template:Sfn Its lyrics sparked internal controversy over perceived allusions to drug culture.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Wilson later stated that the original chorus contained "an inappropriate lyric" which he dedicated "a lot of thought" before revising,<ref name=Bittersweet1999>Template:Cite magazine</ref> resulting in a song he later described as rejecting escapist LSD culture.Template:Sfn The track feature a bass harmonica solo performed by session musician Tommy Morgan.Template:Sfn According to Lambert, "More so than any other song on the album, this one celebrates instruments and instrumental colours."Template:Sfn

"Here Today" is narrated from an ex-boyfriend's perspectiveTemplate:Sfn warning of inevitable heartbreak in new relationships.Template:Sfn Wilson described the track as an experiment in basslines, aiming to feature a bass guitar played an octave higher as the lead instrument.Template:Sfn It was the last song written for the album.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Perone suggested that the high-register bass echoes elements of "God Only Knows", interpreting the narrator as cautioning the latter's protagonist about the impermanence of romantic promises.Template:Sfn

"I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" addresses social alienation.Template:Sfn Wilson described the song as depicting someone like himself "crying because he thought he was too advanced" and might "leave people behind".Template:Sfn The instrumentation incorporates harpsichord, tack piano, flutes, temple blocks, timpani, and an Electro-Theremin performed by its inventor Paul Tanner.Template:Sfn Lambert called the chorus vocals, constructed through repeat overdubbing, emblematic of his "progressive vision for the album".Template:Sfn

"Run, James, Run" served as the working title for the second instrumental track, "Pet Sounds", initially intended for use in a James Bond film.<ref name=BrianWilson1997 /> Its percussion involved Coca-Cola cans and a güiro.<ref name=tracks /> Perone observes that while the piece emphasizes lead guitar—aligning with the Beach Boys' surf music background—its "elaborate arrangement", featuring layered "auxiliary percussion", "abruptly changing textures", and minimal use of traditional rock drumming, distinguishes it from a surf composition.Template:Sfn Lambert interprets the track as a "musical synopsis" of the album's key themes and a reflective pause for the narrator following the emotional climax of "Here Today".Template:Sfn

File:SP 6461 Above Caliente PRS SPec Apr71x4.jpg
The Owl, otherwise known as the train heard after "Caroline, No"

"Caroline, No" grapples with lost innocence.Template:Sfn Asher conceived the title as "Carol, I Know", which Wilson misheard as "Caroline, No"—a revision Asher deemed more impactful.Template:Sfn Wilson considered the song "probably the best I've ever written", framing it as a melancholic reflection on irretrievable love.Template:Sfn The track opens with the sound of a struck Sparkletts water cooler jugTemplate:Sfn and concludes with a fade-out featuring Wilson's dogs barking alongside sounds of passing trains sampled from the 1963 sound effects album Mister D's Machine.<ref name="Runtagh2016">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Leftover tracks and outtakesEdit

"The Little Girl I Once Knew", which may be considered part of the Pet Sounds sessions, was not included on the album. Writer Neal Umphred speculated that the song might have been considered for the LP and would have probably been included had the single been more commercially successful.Template:Sfn

On October 15, 1965, Wilson recorded an instrumental titled "Three Blind Mice" with a 43-piece orchestra; the piece was unrelated to the nursery rhyme of the same name and later debuted on the Beach Boys' 2011 compilation The Smile Sessions.<ref name="Runtagh2016" /> That day, he also recorded instrumental renditions of "How Deep Is the Ocean?" and "Stella by Starlight".Template:Sfn Leaf states the latter song was reportedly a coincidence, as it was a favorite of Asher.<ref name="LeafPerspective">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Biographer Mark Dillon surmised these recordings were experimental exercises in capturing orchestral sounds, possibly preparing for the string ensemble used in "Don't Talk (Put Your Head on My Shoulder)", and likely never intended for release.Template:Sfn Another instrumental, "Trombone Dixie", was recorded on November 1.Template:Sfn According to Wilson, "I was just foolin' around one day, fuckin' around with the musicians, and I took that arrangement out of my briefcase and we did it in 20 minutes. It was nothing, there was really nothing in it."<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> It was released as a bonus track on the album's 1990 CD reissue.Template:Sfn

During late 1965, portions of the Pet Sounds sessions were dedicated to experimental endeavors, including an extended a cappella rendition of "Row, Row, Row Your Boat" that highlighted its round structure.<ref name="Runtagh2016"/> Granata described the track as "very low-key and relatively simple", praising its "effectively lavish layer of recorded vocal harmonies".Template:Sfn As part of his experiments, Wilson recorded humorous skits and sound effects for a proposed psychedelic comedy album.<ref name="Runtagh2016"/>Template:Sfn At least two of these sketches—"Dick" and "Fuzz"—survive, featuring Wilson, a woman named Carol, and the Honeys. The recordings remain officially unreleased.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

File:Good Vibrations Single Advertisement - October 1966.jpg
Advertisement for the band's October 1966 single "Good Vibrations", initially an outtake from the Pet Sounds sessions

Between February and March 1966, Wilson recorded "Good Vibrations", initially a co-authorship with Asher, who recalled the song originated from Capitol's demand for a new single.Template:Sfn Wilson ultimately delivered "Sloop John B" to the label instead and excluded "Good Vibrations" from the album, despite objections from the band.Template:Sfn Its replacement by the title track was documented in a March 3 Capitol memo.Template:Sfn

Sleeve designEdit

The front cover depicts the band members—Carl, Brian, and Dennis, Love, and Jardine (left to right)—feeding apples to goats at the San Diego Zoo while wearing coats and sweaters.Template:Sfn A green band header displays the artist name, album title, and track list,Template:Sfn partially using the Cooper Black typeface.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Johnston, who had joined the band unofficially, is absent due to contractual restraints with Columbia Records.Template:Sfn The back cover includes a monochrome montage of the touring band performing onstage, posing in samurai attire during their Japan tour, and two images of Brian.Template:Sfn

Jardine expressed disappointment with the zoo photo, stating he had wanted something "more sensitive and enlightening".<ref name="legends">Template:Cite news</ref> Johnston dubbed it the "worst cover in the history of the record business",<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> while biographer Peter Ames Carlin deemed the back cover's design "even worse" than the front.Template:Sfn Author Peter Doggett contrasted its aesthetic with mid-1960s sophisticated cover art by contemporaries like the Beatles, Bob Dylan, and the Rolling Stones, calling it "a warning of what could happen when music and image parted company: songs of high romanticism, an album cover of stark banality."Template:Sfn

Title and cover photoEdit

In his memoir, Love wrote that Capitol organized the cover shoot after proposing the album title Our Freaky Friends, with the animals representing the "freaky friends".Template:Sfn When asked about the cover's origin in 2016, Wilson could not remember who suggested the zoo.<ref name="Goats2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Jardine recalled that Pet Sounds had already been selected as the title prior to the shoot, initially misunderstanding "pet" as slang for romantic encounters, and attributed the final concept to Capitol's art department.<ref name="legends"/> Though some sources cite Remember the Zoo as a working title,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> this originated as a 1990s fan-created hoax.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Template:External media

The cover photo was taken on February 10, 1966, by photographer George Jerman.Template:Sfn Local KFMB-TV reporters filmed the shoot; their footage was lost until 2021.<ref name="diego2021">Template:Cite news</ref> A San Diego Union report stated the group visited the zoo for their album Our Freaky Friends, with zoo staff initially objecting to the title but relenting when told animals were popular with teenagers. The Beach Boys had aimed to capitalize on this trend before the rock band the Animals,Template:Sfn who had released an album titled Animal Tracks months earlier.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> The zoo banned the group, accusing them of mishandling animals,<ref name="Varga2016" /> though the ban was later lifted.<ref name="diego2021"/>

During the March 1966 dog barking studio session for "Caroline, No", Brian proposed photographing Carl's horse at Western Studio, an exchange that was documented on tape.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Brian later told biographer Byron Preiss the album was named "after the dogs ... That was the whole idea".Template:Sfn Love credited himself with coining the title Pet Sounds,Template:Sfn a claim Wilson and Jardine endorsed in 2016.<ref name="Goats2016" /> Love recalled suggesting the title in a studio hallway, inspired by the zoo photos and animal sounds on the record."<ref name="Love1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Wilson consulted Asher, who disapproved, feeling that the title had "trivialized what we had accomplished".Template:Sfn

Carl stated in 1996 that he was uncertain who devised the title, but recalled that it originated from Brian's concept of compiling his favorite musical "pet sounds", remarking, "It was hard to think of a name for the album, because you sure couldn't call it Shut Down Vol. 3.<ref name=Carl1997 />Template:Refn Brian also suggested the name paid homage to Phil Spector through shared initials (PS).<ref name="ABoysOwnStory">Template:Cite news</ref> Wilson's 1991 memoir claims the title was inspired by Love dismissively asking, "Who's gonna hear this shit? The ears of a dog?"Template:Sfn—a statement Love denied in 2016.<ref name="BalladofML">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Release, promotion, and commercial performanceEdit

United States Capitol releaseEdit

On March 7, Wilson's first solo record, the "Caroline No" single (B-side "Summer Means New Love" from Summer Days) was released,Template:Sfn igniting speculation about his departure from the Beach Boys.Template:Sfn It charted at number 32 during a seven-week stay.Template:Sfn The Beach Boys' "Sloop John B" (B-side "You're So Good to Me" from Summer Days), issued March 21, reached number 3.Template:Sfn

After completing Pet Sounds, Wilson played the album for his wife, who later described the experience as profoundly moving and "spiritual", recalling they both cried, while he worried its complexity might alienate listeners.<ref name="Marilyn1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Capitol staff reacted with confusion to the album's unconventional style. Producer Nik Venet believed Wilson "was screwing up", claiming he was "no longer looking to make records" but seeking industry attention and antagonizing his father with unrelatable songs and melodies.Template:Sfn Capitol A&R director Karl Engemann supported Wilson, later recalling that while he recognized the album's departure from the Beach Boys' earlier surf-themed hits, he was swayed by Wilson's enthusiasm. During a sales meeting, marketing personnel reportedly expressed disappointment.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The executives initially debated rejecting the album but approved it after several meetings, including one where Wilson used a tape recorder with pre-recorded answers to address their concerns.Template:Sfn

Pet Sounds was released on May 16, debuting at number 106 on the Billboard charts.<ref name=BillboardMay1966 /> It had initial sales of 200,000 copies.Template:Sfn In the U.S., it peaked at number 10 on July 2 and remained on the chart for ten months, a moderate commercial performance compared to the band's earlier albums.Template:Sfn Total sales were estimated at 500,000 units,Template:Sfn but the RIAA did not grant it immediate gold certification—the first Beach Boys album since 1963 to lack this designation upon release.Template:Sfn

File:Cashbox27unse 40 0013.jpg
Advertisement for Pet Sounds, published in Cashbox magazine in May 1966. Dennis, Johnston, Melcher, Asher and Britz can also be seen.

Granata described the promotional campaign as "halfhearted" and "self-serving",Template:Sfn while journalist Peter Doggett disputed claims of deliberate sabotage, which he called "a pop myth", asserting Pet Sounds was promoted as heavily as the Beach Boys' prior releases.Template:Sfn Capitol's campaign for the album included full-page Billboard ads and radio spots that maintained the group's established image without acknowledging the album's new direction. The radio spots featured comedy skits by the band that omitted musical excerpts, depending solely on their name recognition.Template:Sfn Johnston and Carl<ref name="Carl1997" /> later criticized Capitol's efforts, alleging insufficient promotion compared to past releases.<ref name="Johnston1997">Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Carl suggested the label relied on existing airplay instead.<ref name="Carl1997" /> Some observers surmised Capitol viewed the album as commercially risky, targeting older general audiences over the band's core younger female demographic.Template:Sfn

Two months after the album's release, Capitol issued the compilation Best of the Beach Boys, which earned rapid RIAA gold certificationTemplate:Sfn and further hindered Pet SoundsTemplate:' commercial performanceTemplate:Sfn According to Engemann, the label's marketing team had doubted Pet SoundsTemplate:' commercial potential and sought to bolster quarterly sales.<ref>Template:Cite AV media notes</ref> Contemporary reports state some stores received the compilation instead of Pet Sounds when ordered.Template:Sfn On July 18, the single "Wouldn't It Be Nice" (B-side "God Only Knows") was released, peaking at number 8.Template:Sfn Billboard later ranked the album at number 43 on its "Top Pop Albums of 1966" chart.Template:Sfn

In 2000, Pet Sounds was certified gold and platinum by the RIAA based on verifiable sales data, though Capitol estimated total sales exceeding two million copies.<ref name="Boehlert2000"/>Template:Refn Certification required documented shipment records, which Capitol struggled to provide due to lost or scattered paperwork from 1966 to 1985.<ref name="Boehlert2000"/>Template:Refn

United Kingdom EMI releaseEdit

Template:Quote box Carl stated that while the Beach Boys recognized shifting music industry trends, Capitol had maintained a fixed perception of the group that conflicted with their desired artistic presentation.<ref name="Carl1997"/> In March, the band hired Nick Grillo as their manager after switching management firmsTemplate:Sfn and recruited Derek Taylor, the Beatles' former press officer, as their publicist.Template:Sfn Taylor's reputation helped provide a credible external perspective on the band's evolving image and activities.Template:Sfn Responding to Brian's complaints regarding public perception of his talents,Template:Sfn Taylor championed him as "a genius" as part of an effort to rebrand and legitimize the group.Template:Sfn

In the UK, the band experienced limited commercial success until March 1966, when "Barbara Ann" and Beach Boys Party! both reached number 2 on the Record Retailer charts.Template:Sfn Two singles were issued in April: "Sloop John B" peaked at number 2, while "Caroline, No" did not chart.Template:Sfn Capitalizing on their rising British popularity, the group filmed two music videos for Top of the Pops—one for "Sloop John B" and another for "God Only Knows"—with Taylor as director.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Though intended to incorporate excerpts from "Wouldn't It Be Nice" and "Here Today", the BBC slightly edited the "God Only Knows" video to reduce runtime. The "Sloop John B" video debuted on April 28.Template:Sfn

The band's British distributor EMI initially had no plans to release Pet Sounds in the UK as of late May but later scheduled its November release to coincide with the band's British tour.Template:Sfn From May 16 to 21, Johnston and Taylor stayed at London's Waldorf Hotel to promote the album locally.Template:Sfn Through London-based producer Kim Fowley's connections, musicians, journalists, and guests including Beatles John Lennon and Paul McCartney and Who drummer Keith Moon attended repeated album playbacks in their suite.Template:Sfn Fowley likened the event to the Beatles' 1964 arrival at LaGuardia Airport, describing Johnston as "Jesus Christ in tennis shoes" and the album as "the Ten Commandments".Template:Sfn Moon facilitated Johnston's exposure on British television and introduced him to Lennon and McCartney.<ref name="Johnston1997"/>

File:Petsoundsadtext.jpg
Text from a UK advertisement of the album. Public demand had led to Pet Sounds being issued several months earlier than scheduled.Template:Sfn

EMI rush-released Pet Sounds in the UK on June 27 due to popular demand,Template:Sfn where it peaked at number 2, behind the soundtrack album for The Sound of Music (1965),Template:Sfn and remained in the top ten for six months.Template:Sfn Taylor is widely recognized as having been instrumental in this success, due to his longstanding connections with the Beatles and other industry figures in the UK.Template:Sfn The music press there carried advertisements saying that Pet Sounds was "The Most Progressive Pop Album Ever!"Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn while Rolling Stones manager Andrew Loog Oldham—also the Beach Boys' UK publisherTemplate:Sfn—purchased a full-page Melody Maker advertisement declaring it "the greatest album ever made".Template:Sfn The third UK single, "God Only Knows" (B-side "Wouldn't It Be Nice"), was released on July 22 and reached number 2.Template:Sfn

Pet Sounds became one of the five bestselling UK albums of 1966.Template:Sfn Capitalizing on the success of Beach Boys singles like "Barbara Ann", "Sloop John B", and "God Only Knows", EMI issued multiple existing Beach Boys albums in the UK market, including Party!, Today!, and Summer Days.Template:Sfn Best of the Beach Boys spent five weeks at number 2 through year's end.<ref name="Mawer/OCC">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> By the final quarter of 1966, the Beach Boys surpassed British acts like the Beatles as the UK's top-selling album artists.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Initial reactionsEdit

In the U.S., early reviews of Pet Sounds varied from negative to cautiously favorable, according to Carlin.Template:Sfn Billboard called the album an "exciting, well-produced LP" with "two superb instrumental cuts" and highlighted the "strong single potential" of "Wouldn't It Be Nice"<ref name="BillboardMay1966">Template:Cite magazine</ref> in a belated review.Template:Sfn Leaf, writing in 1978, said that while American critics had offered sporadic praise for the album, some fans spread word to avoid the "weird" new Beach Boys release.Template:Sfn

Conversely, British music journalists had an overwhelmingly favorable response,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn a reception partly attributed to promotional efforts by Taylor, Johnston, and Fowley.Template:Sfn Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner later recalled that British fans viewed the Beach Boys as "years ahead" of the Beatles and hailed Wilson as a "genius".<ref name="Gilliand" /> Disc and Music Echo critic Penny Valentine praised the album as "Thirteen tracks of Brian Wilson genius", describing it as "far more romantic" than the group's typical upbeat fare: "sad little wistful songs about lost love and found love and all-around love."Template:Sfn Norman Jopling of Record Mirror reported that the LP had been "widely praised" and subjected to "no criticism". He prefaced his review as "unbiased", writing that his only "real complaint" with the album was the "terribly complicated and cluttered" arrangements,<ref name="Jopling">Template:Cite magazine</ref> and speculated it would primarily appeal to existing fans.Template:Sfn A contrasting review in Disc and Music Echo argued the album's "ambitious" instrumentation and contemporary relevance would attract "thousands of new fans", declaring it a "superb, important, and really exciting collection" that elevated the group's previously uneven output.Template:Sfn

Melody Maker surveyed musicians on whether Pet Sounds was revolutionary or "as sickly as peanut butter", concluding the album had a "considerable" impact on artists and industry figures.Template:Sfn Three of nine respondents—Keith Moon, Manfred Mann's Mike d'Abo, and Scott Walker of the Walker Brothers—disagreed that the album was revolutionary. D'Abo and Walker preferred the Beach Boys' earlier work, as did journalist and television presenter Barry Fantoni, who favored Today! and said Pet Sounds was "probably revolutionary, but I'm not sure that everything that's revolutionary is necessarily good".<ref name="MelodyMakerProgPop">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Moon's bandmate Pete Townshend criticized the album as "too remote and way out" and tailored for "feminine" audiences,Template:Sfn though he later praised "God Only Knows" as "simple", "elegant", and "stunning when it first appeared; it still sounds perfect".<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

File:Scheherazade (Rimsky-Korsakov) 01 by L. Bakst.jpg
Record producer Andrew Loog Oldham lauded Pet Sounds in 1966 as "the pop equivalent" of Rimsky-Korsakov's 1888 symphony Scheherazade.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

By contrast, Spencer Davis of the Spencer Davis Group stated he became "a fan" of the Beach Boys after repeated listens of the album, calling Wilson "a great record producer."Template:Sfn Eric Clapton, then with Cream, said his band "loved the album" and deemed Wilson "without doubt a pop genius."Template:Sfn Andrew Loog Oldham told the magazine: "I think that Pet Sounds is the most progressive album of the year in as much as Rimsky-Korsakov's Scheherazade was. It's the pop equivalent of that, a complete exercise in pop music."Template:Sfn In separate Melody Maker coverage, Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones voiced his dislike of the album's songwriting, despite enjoying the record and its harmonies, while John Lennon acknowledged that Wilson was "doing some very great things".<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> By late 1966, the magazine declared Pet Sounds and the Beatles' Revolver joint recipients of its "Pop Album of the Year" honor, explaining that its panel had deadlocked in debate before compromising on the dual selection.Template:Sfn

Aftermath, Smile, and spiritual successorsEdit

File:Brian Wilson,1960s.jpg
Wilson (pictured in late 1966) was devastated by the album's commercial failure and aspired to top himself with Smile.

Wilson later stated that while Pet Sounds was well-received in Britain, he viewed its commercial underperformance in the U.S. as the collective public rejection of his artistry.<ref name=BrianWilson1997 /> His wife recalled that the tepid response "destroyed Brian", causing him to lose faith in music and others: "then when people would talk about it later, tell him how great it was, even if it was just a year later, he didn't want to hear about it. It reminded him of failing. And then he was more tortured."<ref name="Marilyn1997" /> Reflecting on his brother's disappointment, Carl called the album "like going to church, a labor of love", and lamented that Brian missed experiencing its British success firsthand during the band's late 1966 UK tour, where its "full impact" became evident.<ref name="Carl1997" />

Asher recalled that neither he nor Brian initially regarded Pet Sounds as a "masterpiece", stating he was primarily impressed by its production and viewed it as a way to demonstrate rock's potential as a mature art form to figures like his parents and advertising colleagues.Template:Sfn In 1975, Taylor stated that Wilson remained unfazed by the album's commercial performance, instead focusing on surpassing contemporaries such as the Beatles and the Rolling Stones.Template:Sfn

File:The Beach Boys September 16 1967 Billboard.png
The Beach Boys accepting a gold record sales certification for "Good Vibrations" at the Capitol Tower (December 1966)

Through the remainder of 1966, Wilson collaborated with lyricist Van Dyke Parks on Smile, an unfinished album Wilson described as "a teenage symphony to God" intended to surpass Pet Sounds.Template:Sfn During its production, he revisited earlier psychedelic comedy concepts explored during Pet Sounds session outtakes.<ref name="Runtagh2016"/> Released in October, the single "Good Vibrations" became a global hit.Template:Sfn Murray suggested the single's success helped clarify Wilson's artistic ambitions for listeners initially perplexed by the "un-hip orchestrations and pervasive sadness" in Pet Sounds.<ref name=AVPrimer>Template:Cite news</ref>

As Wilson's mental health declined, his participation in the Beach Boys diminished, prompting the group to release subsequent albums that were less ambitious and received little critical attention.Template:Sfn Wilson, in 1976, cited the band's 1968 release Friends as his second "solo album" after Pet Sounds.<ref name="Oui76">Template:Cite magazine</ref> The album was a commercial failure, leading the group's fanbase to abandon "any hope that [he] would deliver a true successor", according to a Mojo contributor.Template:Sfn

Wilson attempted several professional comebacks in subsequent years, including the 1977 album The Beach Boys Love You,<ref name="Guriel2016"/> which marked his brief return as the group's primary songwriter and vocalist.Template:Sfn He regarded Love You as a spiritual successor to Pet Sounds, citing its autobiographical lyrics,Template:Sfn and his feeling of creative fulfillment regarding the work.Template:Sfn In 1988, he released his debut solo album Brian Wilson, aiming to revisit the sensibilities of Pet Sounds. Co-producer Russ Titelman promoted it as "Pet Sounds '88".Template:Sfn It included "Baby Let Your Hair Grow Long", a thematic follow-up to "Caroline, No".Template:Sfn

The Beach Boys rerecorded "Caroline, No" with Timothy B. Schmit, featuring a new multi-part vocal arrangement, for their 1996 album Stars and Stripes Vol. 1.Template:Sfn Following the album's release, tentative plans emerged for a project biographer Mark Dillon dubbed Pet Sounds, Vol. 2, which would have involved the band collaborating with Sean O'Hagan of the High Llamas.Template:Sfn Despite interest from record companies, the project remained unrealized.Template:Sfn Later in the 1990s, Wilson and Asher resumed their songwriting partnership, composing at least four songs; only "This Isn't Love" and "Everything I Need" were released.Template:Sfn

Live performancesEdit

Template:See also

File:Brian Wilson 20160328 185747 Byron Bay (26182663245).jpg
Wilson performing Pet Sounds as a solo artist at Byron Bay Bluesfest, 2016

In the late 1990s, Carl Wilson vetoed an offer for the Beach Boys to perform Pet Sounds in full for ten shows, citing the complexity of replicating the album's arrangements onstage and Brian's degraded vocal range.Template:Sfn Brian ultimately performed the album live as a solo artist in 2000 with a different orchestra in each venue, and on three occasions without orchestra on his 2002 tour<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> to a favorable critical reception.Template:Sfn Recordings from Wilson's 2002 concert tour were released as Brian Wilson Presents Pet Sounds Live.Template:Sfn

In 2013, Wilson performed Pet Sounds at two shows, unannounced, also with Jardine as well as original Beach Boys guitarist David Marks.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> From 2016 through 2020, Wilson toured Pet Sounds across Australia, Japan, Europe, Canada and the U.S., planned as his final performances of the album.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> Writing in 2016, Rolling StoneTemplate:'s Dorian Lynskey credited Wilson's Pet Sounds performances with establishing a precedent for other artists to play "classic albums" in their entirety.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Cultural impact and influenceEdit

Record production, popular music, and auteur perspectiveEdit

Template:Further Template:Quote box Pet Sounds is widely regarded as among the greatest and most influential albums in music history.Template:Sfn Critical recognition typically emphasizes its ambition, innovative studio production techniques, and high compositional standards,Template:Sfn solidifying Wilson's reputation for pioneering studio craftsmanship with its unprecedented attention to detail.Template:Sfn Philip Lambert, a university music professor who had authored book-length analyses on Wilson and Charles Ives,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> later described the album as "an extraordinary achievement – for any musician, but especially for the 23-year-old Wilson".Template:Sfn Larry Starr, in American Popular Music: From Minstrelsy to MP3 (2006), writes that Pet Sounds epitomized "state-of-the-art pop music in every sense", systematically crafted to challenge conventional creative limits through its "diverse and unusual instrumentation", "virtuosic vocal arrangements", "advanced harmonies", and "occasional formal experiments".Template:Sfn

File:Pet Sounds Mixing.jpg
Wilson usurped standard studio protocols of the era that limited console use to assigned engineers.Template:Sfn

Wilson wrote, arranged, and produced the album with meticulous control over every phase of its creation, an approach that Charles Granata—in his 2003 book covering the album's making—credits as redefining the role of record producers. While artists such as Les Paul, Sinatra, and Bob Dylan had previously functioned as their own producers, Wilson became the first major pop artist to comprehensively oversee all aspects of an album's production.Template:Sfn Virgil Moorefield, in The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music (2010), wrote that Wilson, building on the work of Leiber and Stoller, had sought to realize the full potential of the recording studio, effectively "composing at the mixing board" and using the studio itself as a musical instrument; as both songwriter and producer, he was involved in every detail of the sound production, making on-the-spot decisions about notes, articulation, and timbre, thereby merging the roles of composer, arranger, and producer—a model later adopted industry-wide.Template:Sfn

Despite limited initial commercial success, its impact was immediate and far-reaching,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn later influencing artists across rock, pop, hip hop, jazz, electronic, experimental, and punk.<ref name="Pitchfork50">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Lenny Waronker, then a staff producer at Warner Bros. Records, said that Pet Sounds elevated studio artistry among West Coast artists: "Creative record-making took a giant step and it affected everybody who was caught up in it. It was a landmark record".<ref name="HereToday96">Template:Cite magazine</ref> In the UK, where it became a focal point in music circles, it signaled to songwriters that pop had ascended to a new level of creative ambitionTemplate:Sfn while numerous groups furthered their exploration of experimental recording techniques.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Historian John Robert Greene, in his 2010 book America in the Sixties, credits "God Only Knows" with redefining the popular love song;Template:Sfn it is frequently praised as one of the greatest songs ever written.Template:Sfn

The album's production techniques remained foundational in modern music production through the 2010s.Template:Sfn Composer Philip Glass, comparing its legacy to that of the Beatles' and Pink Floyd's recordings, felt that the album's "structural innovation", incorporation of classical elements in arrangements, and novel "production concepts", with hindsight, clarified its status as a defining work of its era.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Atlantic contributor Jason Guriel wrote in a 2016 editorial—headlined "how Pet Sounds invented the modern pop album"—that Wilson's approach had anticipated contemporary methods reliant on digital tools and prefigured artists like Michael Jackson, Prince, and Radiohead, whose expansive studio projects echoed the album's ambition.<ref name="Guriel2016"/>

Guriel argued that Wilson served as a precursor to modern producer-centric pop through Pet Sounds, marking popular music's first extended exploration of auteurism, from which Wilson "patented" the archetype of the reclusive studio-bound genius.<ref name="Guriel2016"/>Template:Refn Wilson's delivery of a masterwork album, together with his subsequent decline and aborted follow-up, later served as the object of comparisons between Syd Barrett, original frontman of Pink Floyd, and Kevin Shields, frontman of My Bloody Valentine,<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> whose 1991 album Loveless was described by journalist Paul Lester as "the Pet Sounds of UK avant-rock".<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Historical context and influence on Sgt. PepperEdit

Template:Further

Discussions of the greatest albums of all time frequently cite Pet Sounds alongside the Beatles' Revolver and Bob Dylan's Blonde on Blonde, all released within four months in 1966. Liel Leibovitz described Pet Sounds and Blonde on Blonde as "two strands in the same conversation" that briefly transformed American popular music into "a religious movement".<ref name="Lebo2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Geoffrey Himes argued that Wilson's innovative harmonies and timbres were as impactful as Dylan's incorporation of irony into rock lyrics.<ref name=HimesSurf /> Velvet Underground co-founder John Cale commented, "What Brian came to mean was an ideal of naïveté and innocence [...] Pet Sounds was adult and childlike at the same time."Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Rock historians also frequently link Pet Sounds to the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, released in May 1967.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Paul McCartney often cited Pet Sounds as his all-time favorite albumTemplate:Sfn and "God Only Knows" as "the greatest song ever written",Template:Sfn declaring in 1990 that "no one is educated musically 'til they've heard that album."Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn He credited Pet Sounds as an influence on his increasingly melodic bass-playing style, his Revolver composition "Here, There and Everywhere", and Sgt. Pepper.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn

Template:Quote box

Shared musical features adopted from Pet Sounds included upper-register bass lines, a larger emphasis on floor toms, and more eclectic and unorthodox combinations of instruments (including bass harmonica).Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn George Martin stated that Wilson "gave the Beatles and myself quite a good deal to think about in trying to keep up with him",Template:Sfn adding that "Without Pet Sounds [...] Sgt. Pepper wouldn't have happened."Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Rock music, power pop, R&B, and synthesizer adoptionEdit

Pet Sounds established a new benchmark for production and musical sophistication in the rock genre, according to Covach.Template:Sfn Greene identifies "Sloop John B" and the "psychedelic" title track as departures from rock's "casual" lyrics and melodies, pushing the genre into "uncharted territory" as part of the album's "astounding" level of "studio artistry"; he also positions Pet Sounds, alongside the Beatles' Rubber Soul and Revolver and the 1960s folk movement, as foundational to most trends in rock music after 1965.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Cue magazine reflected in 1971 that Pet Sounds made "the Beach Boys among the vanguard" and anticipated trends that were not widespread in rock music "until 1969–1970".<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>Template:Refn

Wilson's pioneering use of doubling for virtually every instrument—a technique previously limited to classical music—marked its first occasion in rock music within Pet Sounds.Template:Sfn Rock critic Ben Edmonds wrote in 1971 that the album's "most impressive" feature had been "the fully integrated use of orchestration, an area glossed over all too lightly in those days."<ref name="Edmonds"/> "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" was the first piece in popular music to incorporate the Electro-Theremin as well as the first in rock music to feature theremin-like sounds.Template:Sfn The album is also cited as a precursor to synthesizer adoption; music writer Jeff Nordstedt contends that Wilson's layered instrumental combinations, achieved without electronic tools, foreshadowed and "fueled the drive toward" the synthesizer's capacity to unify organic tones into novel timbres: "Wilson maniacally synthesized sounds on Pet Sounds before such a device was available."Template:Sfn

Pet Sounds marked the first instance of a rock group abandoning the conventional small-ensemble electric band format for an entire album. Music journalist Tim Sommer suggests that while other artists had occasionally diverged from this format for individual songs, the Beach Boys' work was unprecedented in creating a full-length album that could not be replicated by a typical four- or five-member amplified group.<ref name="Sommer2016"/> Strauss posits that the Beach Boys were also the first major rock act to challenge prevailing musical trends "and declare that rock really didn't matter" by prioritizing introspective themes over conventional rock subject matter, exemplified in "I Know There's an Answer", and combining youth culture with a "pathological innocence and yearning".<ref name="Strauss1997" />

The juxtaposition of upbeat music with underlying moods of melancholy and longing, exemplified by "Wouldn't It Be Nice", became foundational to the power pop genre.<ref name="Chabon">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Chicago ReaderTemplate:'s Noah Berlatsky posited that the Beach Boys, together with "Wilson's brand of vulnerable genius", helped bridge a gap between the polished pop harmonizing and "melancholy" of the Drifters and the "psychedelic" experimentation of the Chi-Lites, influencing the development of smooth soul.<ref name="Berlatsky">Template:Cite news</ref>

Psychedelic music, orchestral pop, and soft rock/sunshine popEdit

Template:Further

File:The Mamas and the Papas Ed Sullivan Show 1968.JPG
Pet Sounds shaped soft rock and orchestral pop, including such acts as the Mamas and the Papas (pictured), the Association, and the 5th Dimension

The Beach Boys' rivalry with the Beatles played a significant role in advancing psychedelic music, as both groups pushed the boundaries of rock's stylistic and compositional range, inspiring later artists.Template:Sfn Scholar Philip Auslander supports that, although psychedelic music is not typically associated with the Beach Boys, the album's "odd directions" and "experiments" were instrumental in creating opportunities for acts like Jefferson Airplane to achieve broader recognition.<ref name="Longman2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> DeRogatis places the album among the earliest psychedelic masterpieces, alongside Revolver and The Psychedelic Sounds of the 13th Floor Elevators (October 1966).Template:Sfn Psychedelic albums sometimes regarded as "the British Pet Sounds" include the Zombies' Odessey and Oracle (1968)Template:Sfn and Billy Nicholls' Would You Believe (1968).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Template:Quote box

Pet Sounds influenced numerous artists and producers in Los Angeles' orchestral pop scene. According to music writer Noel Murray, while the Beach Boys' music diverged from the subsequent sunshine pop movement—a retrospective label for music originally categorized as "soft pop"Template:Sfn or "soft rock"Template:Sfn—the record's orchestration techniques were widely emulated by producers.<ref name="MurraySunshine">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Music historian and Saint Etienne founder Bob Stanley identifies Pet Sounds and Sgt. Pepper as foundational to soft rock, citing their use of instrumentation, found sounds, and avoidance of traditional rock dynamics. He writes that acts like Harpers Bizarre, the Association, and the Mamas and the Papas expanded this approach; their styles informed subsequent groups such as the 5th Dimension and Free Design, whose music was later termed "sunshine pop".Template:Sfn Jimmy Webb, who penned songs for several of these groups, cited Pet Sounds as a benchmark work for musicians, engineers, and songwriters, declaring, "There's no way I can overemphasize its importance to us, in terms of inspiration and our development."Template:Sfn

Love's 1967 album Forever Changes, according to Hoskyns, is an "interesting" example within an "orchestral LA pop" lineage spanning "Spector through Pet Sounds to Jimmy Webb", characterizing Love's work as "acid punk with strings" that extended the "ornate style" to its zenith.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Collaborating with former Beach Boys lyricist Gary Usher, Association producer Curt Boettcher applied the Pet Sounds aesthetic to Sagittarius' 1968 release Present Tense, whose recording also involved Bruce Johnston, Terry Melcher, and Glen Campbell.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

The album's impact extended to the mid-1970s soft rock subgenre later dubbed "yacht rock", a term retroactively applied to music characterized by jazz-influenced arrangements, introspective lyrics, and apolitical themes; in particular, the track "Sloop John B" is frequently cited as a precursor to the genre's occasionally nautical-themed lyrics.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Progressive music, art rock, and album formatEdit

Template:Further Template:See also

File:Queen News Of The World (1977 Press Kit Photo 02).jpg
Pet Sounds anticipated the progressive pop of bands like the Beatles, Queen (pictured), the Alan Parsons Project, and Supertramp

Pet Sounds is recognized for its role in the emergence of progressive pop, a genre that preceded progressive rock.<ref name="progpopguide">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> It is also cited as a pivotal work in establishing the album as a primary format for rock music.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Though Rubber Soul had recently popularized the idea of cohesive albums over collections of singles, it largely maintained fidelity to the live ensemble sound. Wilson expanded its "album-centered" approach by crafting music that wholly transcended traditional rock instrumentation.<ref name="Sommer2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn Doggett, in his 2016 book Electric Shock, called Pet Sounds "teenage pop's first viable rival to the thematic records of Jean Shepard and Frank Sinatra",Template:Sfn while Howard identified it as pop's first true song-cycle.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The Los Angeles Times reported in 1968 that Wilson had become a leading figure in "art rock" following the album's release.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn Journalist Troy Smith later referred to "Wouldn't It Be Nice" as "the first taste of progressive pop" subsequently elaborated upon by bands such as the Beatles, Queen, and Supertramp.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Ryan Reed, writing for Tidal, highlighted the album's incorporation of non-rock instruments, alongside intricate key changes and vocal harmonies, as foundational to progressive pop.<ref name="progpopguide"/>Template:Refn Bill Martin, an author of books about progressive rock, described the album as a turning point in rock's evolution from dance-oriented music to a more complex listening experience, marked by innovations in harmony, instrumentation, and studio technology.Template:Sfn Covach observed that Pet Sounds and subsequent recordings by the Beach Boys and the Beatles legitimized rock as a serious art form, prompting record labels to enable more experimental approaches among other artists: "Because these bands were so successful, Capitol and EMI gave them a certain freedom to experiment. When these experiments produced hit singles and albums, other groups were given greater license as well."Template:Sfn Its influence extended to Pink Floyd bassist Roger Waters,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> producer Tony Clarke's orchestral-rock fusion on the Moody Blues' Days of Future Passed (1967),Template:Sfn and Nick Drake's Bryter Layter (1971).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Template:Quote box

By the early 1970s, the LP had become rock's primary medium, a shift Starr attributes partly to Pet Sounds.Template:Sfn This coincided with a growing cultural preference for self-contained artists over collaborative processes, as orchestration became increasingly associated with older generations.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn By the mid-1970s, more melody-focused songwriters adapted the progressive rock genre for mainstream radio, leading to a progressive pop resurgence.<ref name="progpopguide"/> Musician and journalist Andy Gill suggested that Pet Sounds ultimately inspired rock bands to "get clever" and experiment with orchestration and time signatures, remarking: "Before you know it, you've got Queen."<ref name="CoSJune2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Eric Woolfson of the Alan Parsons Project remarked that the Beach Boys became "the classic example of a band moving [...] to phenomenally progressive stuff."Template:Sfn Composer and journalist Frank Oteri recognized the album as a "clear precedent" to the birth of album-oriented rock and progressive rock.<ref name="Oteri2011">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> By 2010, Pet Sounds was listed in Classic Rock's "50 Albums That Built Prog Rock".<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref><ref name="ProgRockRoots">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Indie pop, chamber pop, emo, and continued impactEdit

File:Stereolab (1994).jpg
Stereolab (pictured 1994) were among many bands of the 1990s indebted to Pet SoundsTemplate:' influence

By the 1990s, Pet Sounds had become a seminal influence on indie pop,<ref name="flopped"/> with Wilson recognized as a "godfather" to a generation of indie musicians influenced by his melodic sensibilities, studio experimentation, and chamber-pop orchestrations.<ref name="Leas2016">Template:Cite journal</ref> "Chamber pop" also emerged as a distinct genre modeled on the musical template established by Pet Sounds.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>Template:Refn

Template:Quote box During the mid-1990s, underground artists including Cardinal, the High Llamas, Yum-Yum, and members of the Elephant 6 collective drew inspiration from the album's arrangements, spurring a movement termed "ork-pop".Template:Sfn Sean O'Hagan of the High Llamas, characterized by DeRogatis as "the most Pet Sounds-obsessed" of these musicians,Template:Sfn channeled its orchestrated approach in works such as Gideon Gaye (1994) and Hawaii (1995).<ref name="HereToday96"/> Robert Schneider of the Apples in Stereo and Jim McIntyre of Von Hemmling founded Pet Sounds Studio, which served as the venue for numerous Elephant 6 projects by Neutral Milk Hotel<ref name="encyclopedia.com">Template:Cite encyclopedia</ref> and the Olivia Tremor Control.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="encyclopedia.com" />

File:Thom Yorke 1998.jpg
Radiohead referenced the initially startling quality of Pet Sounds when recording their 1997 album OK Computer (Thom Yorke pictured)

Radiohead's OK Computer (1997) was intended to evoke an initially "shocking" quality similar to that of Pet Sounds, according to Thom Yorke, who praised the Beach Boys' work as "an incredibly amazing pop record, but [...] also an album."<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Collaborating with O'Hagan and Elephant 6 members, Cornelius' Fantasma, released a few months later, was created as an explicit homage to Pet Sounds.Template:Sfn By 1998, Lester reported that the album had experienced a resurgence in popularity, writing that "today's most interesting acts – The High Llamas, Air, Kid Loco, Saint Etienne, Stereolab, Lewis Taylor – are using the Brian Wilson songbook as a resource for their forays into the realms of electronic pop."<ref name="Lester98">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Pet Sounds has been cited as a precursor to emo music, with writer Sean Cureton identifying parallels in the introspective themes of Weezer's Pinkerton (1996) and Death Cab for Cutie's Transatlanticism (2003).<ref name="Cureton">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Music critic Ernest Simpson and Wild Nothing's Jack Tatum have called Pet Sounds "the first emo album",<ref name="Pitchfork50" /> with Simpson proposing Wilson as "the godfather of emo", highlighting "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" in particular.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn Weezer frontman Rivers Cuomo recalled being immersed in Pet Sounds during the early 1990s; it later served as the direct inspiration for his band's OK Human (2021), recorded with a 39-piece orchestra.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

One of the earliest tribute albums dedicated to Pet Sounds is the Japanese release Smiling Pets (1998), including contributions from Seagull Screaming Kiss Her Kiss Her and Melt Banana.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In 2007, producer Bullion created a J Dilla mashup of the album, Pet Sounds: In the Key of Dee.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn By 2007, there had been at least three books dedicated to Pet Sounds.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In Japan, Jim Fusilli's book was translated by the novelist Haruki Murakami.Template:Sfn In 2014, the biopic film Love & Mercy included a substantial depiction of the album's making, with Wilson portrayed by Paul Dano.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

To honor the album's 50th anniversary, 26 artists contributed to a Pitchfork retrospective on its enduring influence, including comments from members of Talking Heads, Yo La Tengo, Chairlift, and Deftones, among others.<ref name="Pitchfork50"/> That year, PopMatters contributor Danilo Castro acknowledged the album had "restructured the landscape of modern music in its image", with its influence extending to David Bowie, the Flaming Lips, Frank Ocean, Fleet Foxes, Bruce Springsteen, and Kanye West.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Refn

Retrospective assessments and legacyEdit

Before the 1990sEdit

Template:Quote box

The initial acclaim for Pet Sounds was immediately diverted by the Beatles' successive releases.<ref name="Gilliand"/><ref name="Williams71"/> John Gilliland, in his 1969 Pop Chronicles series, stated that the album was almost overshadowed by Revolver, released August 1966, and that "a lot people failed to realize that Brian Wilson's production was as unique in its own way as the Beatles'".<ref name="Gilliand">Template:Cite journal</ref> Melody Maker journalist Richard Williams, in a 1971 reappraisal, wrote that although the album had "defied criticism" and briefly "dwarfed all the rest of pop music", its critical attention was redirected when the Beatles released Sgt. Pepper twelve months later.<ref name="Williams71">Template:Cite magazine</ref>

Pet Sounds received no 1967 Grammy Award nomination.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Geoffrey Cannon wrote in his late 1967 column for Listener that the Beach Boys were "lesser than the Beatles" due to the album's "juvenile or specious" ballads and lack of cohesive artistic vision, though his critique was withheld from publication by The ListenerTemplate:'s editor.<ref name="Listener">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Williams later echoed this sentiment, attributing the album's muted reception, relative to the Beatles, to a perceived narrower range of influences.<ref name="Williams71"/> Gene Sculatti, writing in Jazz & Pop magazine in 1968, recognized the album's debt to Rubber Soul and called it "revolutionary only within the confines of the Beach Boys' music" despite also serving as a "final statement of an era and a prophecy that sweeping changes lay ahead."<ref name="Sculatti">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

From the late 1960s onward, Pet Sounds underwent critical reevaluation, with a 1976 NME feature, cited by author Johnny Morgan, as particularly impactful.Template:Sfn Ben Edmonds of Circus observed in 1971 that the album's "beauty" had endured amid "the turbulence of the past few years", adding that "many consider it not only the Beach Boys' finest achievement, but a milestone in the progression of contemporary rock as well."<ref name="Edmonds">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Stephen Davis wrote in a 1972 Rolling Stone review that the album represented Wilson's pinnacle as an artist, likening the emotional resonance of its "trenchant cycle of love songs" to "a shatteringly evocative novel". He argued that the album had changed "the course of popular music" and "a few lives in the bargain".<ref name="Davis1972">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Melody Maker critic Josh Ingham wrote in 1973 that while initially "ignored by the public", Pet Sounds had inspired many critics to label Wilson a genius, "not least for being a year ahead of Sgt Pepper in thinking." Ingham concluded that, "With hindsight, of course, Pet Sounds has become the classic album."<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

After going out of print in 1974, Pet Sounds entered a period of obscurity with prolonged placement in discount bins.Template:Sfn Sociomusicologist Simon Frith wrote in 1981 that the album remained widely perceived as "a 'weird' record" within music circles.<ref name="Frith/HistoryOfRock">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Dave Marsh's 1979 review in The Rolling Stone Record Guide (1979) awarded four stars (out of a possible five), characterizing it as a "powerful, but spotty" collection where the least experimental songs proved to be the best.Template:Sfn By 1985, he wrote that the album was now considered a "classic" while contrasting its perceived disconnect from listeners with the Beatles' contemporaneous work.Template:Sfn Granata wrote that upon its 1990 CD reissue, the album remained a "quasi-cult classic" primarily embraced by devoted fans.Template:Sfn

Ascendance to universal acclaimEdit

Template:Music ratings

Pet Sounds has since been widely ranked among the greatest albums of all time and extensively analyzed for its musical and production innovations.Template:Sfn By the 1990s, three British critics' polls placed it at or near the top of their rankings.Template:Sfn Publications such as NME, The Times, and Uncut have each ranked it as the greatest album of all time.<ref name="NME1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="TheTimes1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name=UncutGreatest2016>Template:Cite magazine</ref> In 1994, Colin Larkin's All Time Top 1000 Albums, which surveyed the public and a wide range of critics, musicians and industry figures, listed Pet Sounds at number 3;Template:Sfn a revised 2000 edition of the book repositioned it at number 18.Template:Sfn

In 1998, Pet Sounds was inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame by the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Historian Michael Roberts suggested that the album's canonical status solidified following the 1997 release of its expanded reissue, The Pet Sounds Sessions.Template:Sfn Crawdaddy founder Paul Williams, writing in 1998, declared Pet Sounds a 20th-century classic comparable to James Joyce's Ulysses, Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, and Pablo Picasso's Guernica.Template:Sfn In Music USA: The Rough Guide (1999), Richie Unterberger and Samb Hicks deemed the album a "quantum leap" from the Beach Boys' earlier work and highlighted its arrangements as among "the most gorgeous" in rock history.Template:Sfn

In 2004, the Library of Congress preserved Pet Sounds in the National Recording Registry for its being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant."<ref name="Congress">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> By 2006, over 100 domestic and international publications had recognized the album as one of the greatest ever recorded.<ref name="EMIssions" /> Chris Smith's 2009 book 101 Albums That Changed Popular Music characterized it as "one of the most innovative recordings in rock" and a work that transformed Wilson from "talented bandleader to studio genius."Template:Sfn

Luis Sanchez, in his 2014-published 33⅓ book about Smile, described Pet Sounds as "the score to a film about what rock music doesn't have to be", praising its "inward-looking sentimentalism" and Wilson's "sui generis" vision.Template:Sfn Music critic Tim Sommer considered it the greatest album of all time, "probably by about 20 or 30 lengths", and distinguished it as the only one among frequently cited masterpieces like Jethro Tull's Thick as a Brick (1972), Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon (1973), and OK Computer written from a teenage or adolescent perspective.<ref name="Sommer2016" />

Totemic status and criticismEdit

Template:Quote box Prominent public figures continued to frequently commend Pet Sounds as a work of significant artistic merit through the 2000s.<ref name="Pitchfork2006" /> In 2000, Pitchfork founder Ryan Schreiber rated the album's latest reissue 7.5/10 and decreed that Pet Sounds had been "groundbreaking enough to Template:Sic alter the course of music", its "straight-forward pop music" had become "passe and cliched" compared to albums like The Dark Side of the Moon, Loveless, and OK Computer.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> For the 2006 40th Anniversary edition, Pitchfork contributor Dominique Leone awarded the album 9.4, affirming its enduring acclaim but expressing a preference for the Beach Boys' post-Pet Sounds recordings. Leone highlighted its "hymnal" qualities and themes as having retained their emotional potency, observing that generations of listeners treat admiration for the album as a litmus test for musical sincerity.<ref name="Pitchfork2006" />

In a 2004 essay, Robert Christgau described Pet Sounds as a "good record, but a totem".<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> Jeff Nordstedt's essay in the 2004 book Kill Your Idols critiqued the album's legacy, arguing that discussions often prioritized its influence over substantive analysis of its music. Nordstedt considered the album's hit songs to be "disjointed" and the remaining tracks "downright insane", criticizing its perceived role in fostering overproduced exemplified in 1980s popular music, and questioned its artistic authenticity, citing its "inoffensive aesthetics", absence of "visceral charge", and collaborative origins with a commercial jingle writer: "it offends every notion of truth that I hold dear about rock 'n' roll"Template:Sfn Stereogum writer Ryan Leas observed in 2016 that Pet Sounds had grown to be "arguably even more of a totemic presence than Revolver".<ref name="Leas2016"/>

Template:Quote box

The television series Portlandia (2011–2018) featured a character, portrayed by comedian Fred Armisen, based on his observations of recording engineers fixated on Pet Sounds and vintage studio equipment, whom he likened to 1950s car enthusiasts in their technical obsession.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Musician Atticus Ross, who composed the score to Love & Mercy, acknowledged "an element of cliché that's grown around" the album, exemplified in Portlandia: "your classic hipster musicians [...] are building a studio and everything is like 'this is the mike they used in Pet Sounds.' This is exactly the same as Pet Sounds.'"<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

Reissues and expanded editionsEdit

Template:See also

Pet Sounds has had many different reissues since its release in 1966, including remastered mono and remixed stereo versions.

  • In 1966, Capitol issued a Duophonic (fake stereo) version of the album that was created through equalization and phasing.Template:Sfn
  • In 1967, Capitol issued Pet Sounds as part of a three-LP set with Today! and Summer Days, called "The Beach Boys Deluxe Set".Template:Sfn
  • In 1972, Reprise packaged Pet Sounds as a bonus LP with the Beach Boys' latest album Carl and the Passions – "So Tough".Template:Sfn
  • In 1974, Reprise issued Pet Sounds as a single disc, which became the album's last reissue until 1990.Template:Sfn
  • In 1990, Pet Sounds debuted on CD with the addition of three previously unreleased bonus tracks: "Unreleased Backgrounds" (an a cappella demo section of "Don't Talk" sung by Wilson), "Hang On to Your Ego", and "Trombone Dixie".<ref name="LAtimes2">Template:Cite news</ref> The edition was prepared from the original 1966 mono master, by Mark Linett, who used Sonic Solutions' No Noise processing to mitigate damage that the physical master had accrued.Template:Sfn It became one of the first CDs to sell more than a million copies.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
  • In 1995, DCC issued a 20-bit audiophile version that was mastered by engineer Steve Hoffman. It was created from a safety copy of the original master.Template:Sfn According to Granata, this version "garnered numerous accolades, and some feel it comes closest to capturing the spirit and punch of Brian's original 1966 mix."Template:Sfn
  • In 1997, The Pet Sounds Sessions was released as a four-disc box set. It included the original mono release of Pet Sounds, the album's first stereo mix (created by Linett and Wilson), backing tracks, isolated vocals, and session highlights. It was received with controversy among audiophiles who felt that a stereo mix of Pet Sounds was sacrilege against the original mono recording.Template:Sfn
  • In 2001, Pet Sounds was issued with mono and "improved" stereo versions, plus "Hang On to Your Ego" as a bonus track, all on one disc.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • On August 29, 2006, Capitol released a 40th Anniversary edition, containing a new 2006 remaster of the original mono mix, DVD mixes (stereo and Surround Sound), and a "making of" documentary.<ref name="EMIssions">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> The discs were released in a regular jewel box and a deluxe edition was released in a green fuzzy box. A two-disc colored gatefold vinyl set was released with green (stereo) and yellow (mono) discs.<ref name="EMIssions" />

  • In 2016, a 50th anniversary edition box set presented the remastered album in both stereo and mono forms alongside studio sessions outtakes, alternate mixes, and live recordings. Of the 104 tracks, only 14 were previously unreleased.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • In 2023, a Dolby Atmos remix was created by Giles Martin, who closely followed Linett's 1996 stereo mix.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Track listingEdit

Template:Track listing Template:Track listing

Notes

  • Mike Love was not originally credited for "Wouldn't It Be Nice" and "I Know There's an Answer". His credits were awarded after a 1994 court case.Template:Sfn
  • Al Jardine's contribution to the arrangement of "Sloop John B" remains uncredited.Template:Sfn
  • Vocal credits sourced from Alan Boyd and Craig Slowinski.<ref name="PS2016" />

PersonnelEdit

Per band archivist Craig Slowinski.<ref name="PS2016">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The Beach Boys

Guests

  • Tony Asher – plucked piano strings on "You Still Believe in Me"
  • Steve Korthof – tambourine on "That's Not Me"
  • Terry Melcher – tambourine on "That's Not Me" and "God Only Knows"
  • Marilyn Wilson – additional vocals on "You Still Believe in Me" introduction (uncertain)
  • Tony (surname unknown) – tambourine on "Sloop John B"

Session musicians (also known as "the Wrecking Crew") Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

The Sid Sharp Strings Template:Div col

  • Arnold Belnick – violin
  • Norman Botnick – viola
  • Joseph DiFiore – viola
  • Justin DiTullio – cello
  • Jesse Erlich – cello
  • James Getzoff – violin
  • Harry Hyams – viola
  • William Kurasch – violin
  • Leonard Malarsky – violin
  • Jerome Reisler – violin
  • Joseph Saxon – cello
  • Ralph Schaeffer – violin
  • Sid Sharp – violin
  • Darrel Terwilliger – viola
  • Tibor Zelig – violin

Template:Div col end

Engineers

ChartsEdit

Template:Col-begin Template:Col-2

1966 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
UK Record Retailer LPs Chart<ref name=":1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

2
US Billboard Top LPsTemplate:Sfn 10
West German Musikmarkt LP Hit-Parade<ref name=":0">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

16
1972 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
Australian Kent Music ReportTemplate:Sfn 42
Canadian RPM 100 Albums<ref name=":4">Template:Cite magazine</ref> 40
US Billboard Top LPs & Tape<ref name=":5">Template:Cite magazine</ref> 50
1990 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
US Billboard 200<ref name="Pet Sounds Billboard charts">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

162
1995 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
UK Albums Chart<ref name="UKTop40">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

17
2001 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
US Billboard Top Pop Catalog Albums<ref name="Cat1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

41
2006 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
Japanese Oricon Albums Chart<ref name=":6">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

95

Template:Col-2

2008 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
US Billboard Catalog Albums<ref name="US Catalog">Template:Cite magazine</ref> 8
2015 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
US Billboard 200<ref name="ChartsBellagio">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

182
2016 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
Belgian Albums (Ultratop Flanders)<ref name=":7">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

50
Belgian Albums (Ultratop Wallonia)<ref name=":8">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

100
Dutch Albums (Album Top 100)<ref name=":9">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

72
French Albums (SNEP)<ref name=":10">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

185
German Albums (GfK Entertainment)<ref name=":11">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

58
Japanese Albums (Oricon)<ref name=":12">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

56
Scottish Albums (OCC)<ref name=":13">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

19
South Korean Albums (Gaon)<ref name=":14">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

96
Swiss Albums (Schweizer Hitparade)<ref name=":15">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

41
UK Albums (OCC)<ref name=":16">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>Template:Refn

26
US Billboard Catalog Albums<ref name="US Catalog"/> 49
2021 weekly chart performance for Pet Sounds
Chart Peak
position
Greek Albums (IFPI)<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> 5

Template:Col-end

CertificationsEdit

Template:Certification Table Top Template:Certification Table Entry Template:Certification Table Entry Template:Certification Table Bottom

AccoladesEdit

Rankings for Pet Sounds
Year Organization Accolade Rank
1993 The Times The 100 Best Albums of All Time<ref name="TheTimes1"/> 1
New Musical Express New Musical Express Writers Top 100 Albums<ref name="NME1" /> 1
1995 Mojo citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

1
1997 The Guardian citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

6
Channel 4 citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

33
2000 Virgin The Virgin Top 100 Albums<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> 18
2001 VH1 citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

3
2002 BBC citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

11
2003 Rolling Stone The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time 2
2006 Q citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

12
The Observer The 50 Albums That Changed Music<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> 10
2012 Rolling Stone The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> 2
2015 Platendraaier citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

7
2016 Uncut 200 Greatest Albums of All Time<ref name=UncutGreatest2016 /> 1
2017 Pitchfork citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

2
2020 Rolling Stone The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> 2
2023 Rolling Stone The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> 2
2024 Paste citation CitationClass=web

}}</ref>

10

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

BibliographyEdit

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

External linksEdit

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Pet Sounds Template:The Beach Boys main

Template:Authority control