Ornithorhynchidae

The Ornithorhynchidae Template:IPAc-en are one of the two extant families in the order Monotremata, and contain the platypus and its extinct relatives. The other family is the Tachyglossidae, or echidnas.

Within the Ornithorhynchidae are the main Cenozoic genera Ornithorhynchus and Obdurodon, and several potential stem-genera dating back to the Late Cretaceous, of which the oldest is possibly Dharragarra. Although fossil evidence suggests the presence of ornithorhynchids in the Cretaceous, phylogenetic evidence has largely found that they and the Tachyglossidae only diverged during the Cenozoic, although this varies based on the specific constraints used.<ref name="Flannery-2024">Template:Cite journal</ref>

Taxonomy

The following species are known:<ref name="Flannery-2024" />

• Family Ornithorhynchidae
  • Genus Ornithorhynchus (Pliocene to present)
    • Ornithorhynchus anatinus (the modern platypus)
  • Genus †Obdurodon (Oligocene to Miocene)
    • †Obdurodon dicksoni
    • †Obdurodon insignis
    • †Obdurodon tharalkooschild
  • Genus ?†Dharragarra (Late Cretaceous; Cenomanian)
    • ?†Dharragarra aurora
  • Genus ?†Monotrematum (Early Paleocene)
    • ?†Monotrematum sudamericanum
  • Genus ?†Patagorhynchus (Late Cretaceous; Maastrichtian)
    • ?†Patagorhynchus pascuali

Although extant ornithorhynchids and most fossil genera are known from Australia, at least two potential genera (Monotrematum and Patagorhynchus) inhabited the southern tip of South America during the Maastrichtian and Paleocene, having presumably dispersed across Antarctica from Australia.<ref name="Flannery-2024" />

Another two genera, Steropodon and Teinolophos, were originally thought to belong to the Ornithorhynchidae. However, they were both placed into a new family, the Steropodontidae.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> This decision was made based on differences in the dentary recovered from the Griman Creek Formation, Lightning Ridge, New South Wales, Australia. This dentary is the holotype for the genus Steropodon, thus the lack of information led to the original misclassification. Further research on Teinolophos has indeed shown it to be an animal much different from ornithochrynchids, lacking a beak, possessing a more complete mammalian dentition, and retaining primitive ears connected to the jaw as in more basal mammals.<ref>Thomas H. Rich, James A. Hopson, Pamela G. Gill, Peter Trusler, Sally Rogers-Davidson, Steve Morton, Richard L. Cifelli, David Pickering, Lesley Kool, Karen Siu, Flame A. Burgmann, Tim Senden, Alistair R. Evans, Barbara E. Wagstaff, Doris Seegets-Villiers, Ian J. Corfe, Timothy F. Flannery, Ken Walker, Anne M. Musser, Michael Archer, Rebecca Pian and Patricia Vickers-Rich (2016). "The mandible and dentition of the Early Cretaceous monotreme Teinolophos trusleri". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. in press. {{#invoke:doi|main}}.</ref> In 2022 it was proposed to move Teinolophos into its own family, Teinolophidae.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

The extinct Ornithorhynchus maximus has been included in Ornithorhynchus, but later placed with the echidna family Tachyglossidae as Zaglossus robustus.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Evolution

Most extinct ornithorhynchids, including the close platypus relative Obdurodon, appear to have had teeth in their jaws. This contrasts with the modern platypus, where adults are entirely toothless. It has been theorized that the loss of teeth in the platypus was a geologically recent event, occurring only in the Pleistocene (after over 95 million years of tooth presence in the ornithorhynchid lineage) after the migration of the rakali (Hydromys chrysogaster), a large semiaquatic rodent, to Australia. Competition between the rakali and platypus for hard-shelled prey may have led to trophic displacement of the platypus to instead rely on softer-bodied prey, losing its teeth in the process.<ref name="Flannery-2024" />

References

• Template:MSW3 Groves