Template:Short description Template:Pp-semi-indef Template:More footnotes Template:Use dmy dates Template:Forms of government A puppet state, puppet régime, puppet government or dummy government<ref name="Shuster"/> is a state that is de jure independent but de facto completely dependent upon an outside power and subject to its orders.<ref name="Marek">Compare: Template:Cite book</ref> Puppet states have nominal sovereignty, except that a foreign power effectively exercises control through economic or military support.<ref name="McNeely1995">Template:Cite book</ref> By leaving a local government in existence the outside power evades all responsibility, while at the same time successfully paralysing the local government they tolerate.<ref name="Shuster">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:How

Puppet states differ from allies, who choose their actions of their own initiative or in accordance with treaties they have voluntarily entered. Puppet states are forced into legally endorsing actions already taken by a foreign power.

CharacteristicsEdit

Puppet states are "endowed with the outward symbols of authority",<ref>Puppet government, Merriam-Webster</ref> such as a name, flag, anthem, constitution, law codes, motto, and government, but in reality, are appendages of another state which creates,<ref name="Raic2002">Template:Cite book</ref> sponsors or otherwise controls the puppet government. International law does not recognise occupied puppet states as legitimate.<ref name="Lemkin2008"> Template:Cite book </ref>

Puppet states can cease to be puppets through:

  • military defeat of the "master" state (as in Europe and Asia in 1945),
  • absorption into the master state (as in the early Soviet Union),
  • achievement of independence

TerminologyEdit

The term is a metaphor which compares a state or government to a puppet controlled by a puppeteer with strings.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The first recorded use of the term "puppet government" was in 1884, in reference to the Khedivate of Egypt.<ref name="etymoline">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Unreliable source?

In the Middle Ages, vassal states existed based on delegation of the rule of a country by a king to noble men of lower rank. Since the Peace of Westphalia of 1648, the concept of a nation came into existence where sovereignty was connected more to the people who inhabited the land than to the nobility who owned the land.

An earlier similar concept is suzerainty, the control of the external affairs of one state by another.Template:Citation needed

Nineteenth-century examplesEdit

French revolutionary and Napoleonic clientsEdit

File:Europe 1812 map en.png
The First French Empire and its satellite states in 1812

The Batavian Republic was established in the Netherlands under French revolutionary protection.

In Italy, the French First Republic encouraged a proliferation of small republics in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, known as sister republics.

In Eastern Europe, Napoleon's First French Empire established the Polish client state of the Duchy of Warsaw.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

British EmpireEdit

In 1896, Britain established a state in Zanzibar.

Early twentieth-century examplesEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

Established by the German EmpireEdit

By othersEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> was founded by Joseph Stalin's close friend Fyodor Sergeyev.<ref name="rbth">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> However, the DKRR was disliked by Vladimir Lenin. The capital of the republic was soon overthrown by the Germans again, and after the Soviet Red Army regained control of the territory, the country was dissolved at Lenin's request.

World War IIEdit

Imperial JapanEdit

Template:Further During Japan's imperial period, and particularly during the Pacific War (parts of which are considered the Pacific theatre of World War II), the Imperial Japanese government established a number of dependent states.

Nominally sovereign statesEdit

In ChinaEdit

Nazi Germany and Fascist ItalyEdit

Template:Further

File:World War II in Europe, 1942.svg
German-occupied Europe at the height of the Axis conquests in 1942

Several European governments under the domination of Germany and Italy during World War II have been described as "puppet régimes". The formal means of control in occupied Europe varied greatly. These states fall into several categories.

Existing states in alliance with Germany and ItalyEdit

Existing states under German or Italian ruleEdit

New states formed to reflect national aspirationsEdit

States and governments under the control of Germany and ItalyEdit

Italian Social RepublicEdit

  • Template:Flagicon Italian Social Republic (1943–1945, known also as the Republic of Salò) – General Pietro Badoglio and King Victor Emmanuel III withdrew Italy from the Axis powers and moved the government to Southern Italy, already controlled by the Allies. In response, the Germans occupied Northern Italy and founded the Italian Social Republic (Repubblica Sociale Italiana or RSI) with Benito Mussolini as its "Head of State" and "Minister of Foreign Affairs". While the RSI government had some trappings of an independent state, it was completely dependent both economically and politically on Germany.

British examples during and after World War IIEdit

Template:Further The Axis demand for oil and the concern of the Allies that Germany would look to the oil-rich Middle East for a solution, caused the invasion of Iraq by the United Kingdom and the invasion of Iran by the UK and the Soviet Union. Pro-Axis governments in both Iraq and Iran were removed and replaced with Allied-dominated governments.

  • Template:Flagicon Kingdom of Iraq (1941–1947) – Iraq was important to the United Kingdom because of its position on the route to India. Iraq also could provide strategic oil reserves. But due to the UK's weakness early in the war, Iraq backed away from the pre-war Anglo-Iraqi Alliance. On 1 April 1941, the Hashemite monarchy in Iraq was overthrown by a pro-German coup d'état under Rashid Ali. The Rashid Ali regime began negotiations with the Axis powers and military aid was quickly sent to Mosul via Vichy French-controlled Syria. The Germans provided a squadron of twin-engine fighters and a squadron of medium bombers. The Italians provided a squadron of biplane fighters. In mid-April 1941, a brigade of the 10th Indian Infantry Division landed at Basra (Operation Sabine). On 30 April, British forces at RAF Habbaniya were besieged by a numerically inferior Iraqi force. On 2 May, the British launched pre-emptive airstrikes against the Iraqis and the Anglo-Iraqi War began. By the end of May, the siege of RAF Habbaniya was lifted, Fallujah was taken, Baghdad was surrounded by British forces, and the pro-German government of Rashid Ali collapsed. Rashid Ali and his supporters fled the country. The Hashemite monarchy under King Faisal II was restored, and declared war on the Axis powers in January 1942. British and Commonwealth forces remained in Iraq until 26 October 1947.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
  • Template:Flagicon image Imperial State of Iran (1941–1943) – German workers in Iran caused both the UK and the Soviet Union to question Iran's neutrality. In addition, Iran's geographical position was important to the Allies. As a result, the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran (Operation Countenance) was launched in August 1941. The following month, Reza Shah Pahlavi was forced to abdicate his throne and went into exile. He was replaced by his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was willing to declare war on the Axis powers. By January 1942, the UK and the Soviet Union agreed to end their occupation of Iran six months after the end of the war.

Soviet examples after 1939Edit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

Puppet states later absorbed into the Soviet UnionEdit

File:Suomen-kansantasavalta.png
Map of the Finnish Democratic Republic (1939–40), a short-lived puppet state of the Soviet Union. Green indicates the area that the Soviet Union planned to cede to the Finnish Democratic Republic, and red the areas ceded to the Soviets.

Soviet puppet states in Central AsiaEdit

Other states under Soviet influenceEdit

Yugoslavia was a communist state closely linked to the Soviet Union, but Yugoslavia retained autonomy within its own borders. After the Tito–Stalin split in 1948, the relationship between the two countries deteriorated significantly. Yugoslavia was expelled from the international organisations of the Eastern Bloc. After Stalin's death and a period of de-Stalinization by Nikita Khrushchev, peace was restored, but the relationship between the two countries was never completely mended. Yugoslavia continued to pursue independent policies and became the founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement.Template:Cn

The Soviet Union continued to exert some influence over the People's Republic of China before the Sino-Soviet split in 1961.

Examples before and during decolonisationEdit

Template:See also In some cases, the process of decolonisation has been managed by the decolonising power to create a neo-colony, that is a nominally independent state whose economy and politics permits continued foreign domination. Neo-colonies are not normally considered puppet states.Template:Cn

Dutch East IndiesEdit

The Netherlands formed several puppet states in the former Dutch East Indies as part of its effort to quell the Indonesian National Revolution.Template:Cn

Congo crisisEdit

Template:See also Following the Belgian Congo's independence as Congo-Leopoldville in 1960, Belgian interests supported the short-lived breakaway State of Katanga (1960–1963).<ref>Mockler, Antony (1987). The New Mercenaries: The History of the Hired Soldier from the Congo to the Seychelles. New York: Paragon House Publishers. pp. 37–55. Template:ISBN.</ref>

East TimorEdit

Indonesia established a Provisional Government of East Timor following its invasion of East Timor in December 1975.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

South Africa's BantustansEdit

File:Namibia homelands 78.jpeg
Map of Bantustans in South West Africa (present-day Namibia) as of 1978

During the 1970s and 1980s, four ethnic Bantustans - some of which were extremely fragmented - called "homelands" by the government of the time, were carved out of South Africa and given nominal sovereignty. Mostly Xhosa people resided in the Ciskei and Transkei, Tswana people in Bophuthatswana, and Venda people in the Venda.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>Template:Rs?

The principal purpose of these states was to remove South African citizenship from the Xhosa, Tswana, and Venda peoples, and so provide grounds for denying them their democratic rights. All four Bantustans were reincorporated into a democratic South Africa on 27 April 1994, under a new constitution.Template:Fact

The South African authorities established ten Bantustans in South West Africa (present-day Namibia), then illegally occupied by South Africa, in the late 1960s and early 1970s in accordance with the Odendaal Commission. Three of them were granted self-rule. These Bantustans were replaced with separate ethnicity-based governments in 1980.Template:Cn

Post-Cold War examplesEdit

Republic of KuwaitEdit

The Republic of Kuwait was a short-lived pro-Iraqi state in the Persian Gulf that only existed three weeks before it was annexed by Iraq in 1990.

Republic of Serbian KrajinaEdit

The Republic of Serbian Krajina was a self-proclaimed territory ethnically cleansedTemplate:What by Serbian forces during the Croatian War (1991–95). It was completely dependent on the Serbian regime of Slobodan Milošević,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> and was not recognised internationally.

Recent and current examplesEdit

United StatesEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> This criticism was also extended to politicians active within the Interim Government, with the media suggesting that Ayad Allawi, was Washington's puppet.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The CPA's economy was dominated by American influence. The CPA began to dismantle Iraq's centrally planned economy. Paul Bremer, chief executive of the CPA, planned to restructure Iraq's state owned economy with free market thinking. Bremer dropped the corporate tax rate from around 45% to a flat tax rate of 15% and allowed foreign corporations to repatriate all profits earned in Iraq. Opposition from senior Iraqi officials, together with the poor security situation, meant that Bremer's privatisation plan was not implemented during his tenure,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> though his orders remained in place. CPA Order 39 laid out the framework for full privatisation in Iraq and permitted 100% foreign ownership of Iraqi assets and strengthened the positions of foreign businesses and investors. Critics like Naomi Klein argued that CPA Order 39 was designed to create as favourable an environment for foreign investors as possible, which would allow U.S. corporations to dominate Iraq's economy.<ref name="shock">The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein</ref> Also controversial was CPA Order 17 which granted all foreign contractors operating in Iraq immunity from "Iraqi legal process," effectively granting immunity from any kind of suit, civil or criminal, for actions the contractors engaged in within Iraq.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> CPA Order 49 also provided significant tax cuts for corporations operating within Iraq by reducing the rate from a maximum of 40% to a maximum of just 15% on income. Furthermore, corporations who collaborated with the CPA were exempted from having to pay any tax.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

ArmeniaEdit

  • Template:Flag – A former self-declared independent state heavily populated by Armenians, it was internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan. Russian peacekeepers controlled the Lachin corridor that allowed traffic to reach Armenia, on which it was heavily dependent.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

ChinaEdit

RussiaEdit

File:Евгений Шевчук и Александр Анкваб.jpg
Abkhazian President Alexander Ankvab with Transnistrian President Yevgeny Shevchuk in 2013. Both Abkhazia and Transnistria have been described as puppet states of Russia.
  • Template:Flag is considered a puppet state that is dependent on Russia.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Francis2011">Template:Cite book</ref> The economy of Abkhazia is heavily integrated with Russia and uses the Russian ruble as its currency. About half of Abkhazia's state budget is financed with aid money from Russia.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Most Abkhazians have Russian passports.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Russia maintains a 3,500-strong force in Abkhazia with its headquarters in Gudauta, a former Soviet military base on the Black Sea coast<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and the borders of Abkhazia are protected by Russian paratroopers.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

  • Template:Flag has declared independence but its ability to maintain independence is solely based on Russian troops deployed on its territory. As South Ossetia is landlocked between Russia and Georgia, from which it seceded, it has relied on Russia for economic and logistical support, as all of its exports and imports and air and road traffic is only with Russia. Former President of South Ossetia Eduard Kokoity claimed he would like South Ossetia eventually to become a part of the Russian Federation through reunification with North Ossetia.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
  • The Template:Flag (DPR) and the Template:Flag (LPR) were self-proclaimed republics in eastern Ukraine following the fallout from the Euromaidan protests and widely considered to be Russian puppet states.<ref name="twickel">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="korotkyi">Template:Cite book</ref> Russia annexed the DPR and LPR on September 30, 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

IsraelEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Disputed examplesEdit

In YemenEdit

File:Yemeni Civil War.svg
Map of territorial control in Yemen

Template:Smalldiv

IranEdit

Saudi ArabiaEdit

United Arab EmiratesEdit

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

TurkeyEdit

  • Template:Flag – According to the European Court of Human Rights, the Republic of Cyprus remains the sole legitimate government in Cyprus, and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus should be considered as a puppet state under Turkish control.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Its isolation, Turkish military presence, and heavy dependence on Turkish support mean that Turkey has a high level of control over the country's decision-making processes. That has led to some experts stating that it runs as an effective puppet state of Turkey.<ref>James, A. Sovereign statehood: The basis of international society. p. 142 [1]. Taylor and Francis, 1986, 288 pages. Template:ISBN.</ref><ref>Kurtulus, E. State sovereignty: concept, phenomenon and ramifications. p. 136 [2]. Macmillan, 2005, 232 pages. Template:ISBN.</ref><ref name="Kaczorowska">Kaczorowska, A. Public International Law. p. 190 [3]. Taylor and Francis, 2010, 944 pages. Template:ISBN.</ref> Other experts, however, have pointed out the independent nature of elections and appointments in Northern Cyprus and disputes between the Turkish Cypriot and Turkish governments and concluded that "puppet state" is not an accurate description for Northern Cyprus.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
  • Template:Flagicon Syrian Interim Government – Originally founded in 2013, before the Turkish occupation of northern Syria, SIG became more dependent of Turkey in recent years and accused of being a puppet government<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> with their Syrian National Army being described as "Turkish-backed",<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> as "funded by Turkey"<ref name=GuardianSNA/> or as "mercenaries".<ref name=SpiegelSNA/> The SNA was also reported to have being used to support the GNA in the Second Libyan Civil War<ref name=GuardianSNA>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> and to support Azerbaijan in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War by the Turkish government.<ref name=SpiegelSNA>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

United StatesEdit

  • Template:Flag – Many, including the Taliban who now comprise the country's current government,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> considered the former Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to have been a U.S. puppet state.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal Template:Columns-list

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further readingEdit

  • Crawford, James (1979). The Creation of States in International Law. Template:Isbn

Template:Autonomous types of first-tier administration