Incubator escapee wiki

Luke the Evangelist

Article Discussion
(Redirected from St Luke)

Template:Short description Template:Redirect Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox saint Template:Infobox writer

Luke the EvangelistTemplate:Efn was one of the Four Evangelists—the four traditionally ascribed authors of the canonical gospels. The Early Church Fathers ascribed to him authorship of both the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles. Prominent figures in early Christianity such as Jerome and Eusebius later reaffirmed his authorship, although a lack of conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of the works has led to discussion in scholarly circles, both secular and religious.

The New Testament mentions Luke briefly a few times, and the Epistle to the Colossians<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> refers to him as a physician (from Greek for 'one who heals'); thus he is thought to have been both a physician and a disciple of Paul.

Since the early years of the faith, Christians have regarded him as a saint. He is believed to have been a martyr, reportedly having been hanged from an olive tree, though some believe otherwise.Template:Efn The Eastern Orthodox Church, the Roman Catholic church and other major denominations venerate him as Saint Luke the Evangelist and as a patron saint of artists, physicians, bachelors, notaries, butchers, brewers, and others; his feast day is 18 October.<ref name="Catholic News Agency"/><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

LifeEdit

File:Evangelist Lucas.jpg
Print of Luke the Evangelist<ref name=ugent.be />

Many scholars believe that Luke was a physician who lived in the Hellenistic city of Antioch in Ancient Syria,Template:Efn born of a Greek family,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> although some scholars and theologians think Luke was a Hellenic Jew.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn While it has been widely accepted that the theology of Luke–Acts points to a gentile Christian writing for a gentile audience, some have concluded that it is more plausible that Luke–Acts is directed to a community made up of both Jewish and gentile Christians since there is stress on the scriptural roots of the gentile mission (see the use of Isaiah 49:6 in Luke–Acts).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn DNA testing on what some Christian tradition holds to be his body has revealed it to be of Syrian ancestry.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Whether Luke was a Jew or gentile, or something in between, it is clear from the quality of the Greek language used in Luke-Acts that the author, held in Christian tradition to be Luke, was one of the most highly educated of the authors of the New Testament. The author's conscious and intentional allusions and references to, and quotations of, ancient Classical and Hellenistic Greek authors, such as Homer, Aesop, Epimenides, Euripides, Plato, and Aratus indicate that he was familiar with actual Greek literary texts. This familiarity most likely derived from his experiences as a youth of the very homogeneous Hellenistic educational curriculum (Template:Langx) that had been, and would continue to be, used for centuries throughout the eastern Mediterranean.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Luke's earliest mention is in the Epistle to Philemon, chapter 1, verse 24.<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> He is also mentioned in Colossians 4:14<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> and 2 Timothy 4:11,<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> both traditionally held to be Pauline epistles (see Authorship of the Pauline epistles).Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn

File:Brooklyn Museum - Saint Luke (Saint Luc) - James Tissot.jpg
James Tissot, Saint Luke, Brooklyn Museum

Epiphanius states that Luke was one of the Seventy Apostles (Panarion 51.11), and John Chrysostom indicates at one point that the "brother" that Paul mentions in the Second Epistle to the Corinthians 8:18<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> is either Luke or Barnabas (Homily 18 on Second Corinthians on 2 Corinthians 8:18).

If one accepts that Luke was indeed the author of the Gospel bearing his name and the Acts of the Apostles, certain details of his personal life can be reasonably assumed. While he does exclude himself from those who were eyewitnesses to Jesus' ministry, he repeatedly uses the word we in describing the Pauline missions in Acts of the Apostles, indicating that he was personally there at those times.Template:Sfn

File:Bodleian Library MS. Arm. d.13. Armenian Gospels-0043-0.jpg
Saint Luke as depicted in the head-piece of an Armenian Gospel manuscript from 1609, held at the Bodleian Library

The composition of the writings, as well as the range of vocabulary used, indicate that the author was an educated man. A quote in the Epistle to the Colossians differentiates between Luke and other colleagues "of the circumcision."

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

10My fellow prisoner Aristarchus sends you his greetings, as does Mark, the cousin of Barnabas. 11Jesus, who is called Justus, also sends greetings. These are the only Jews among my co-workers for the kingdom of God, and they have proved a comfort to me.Template:Nbsp[...] 14Our dear friend Luke, the doctor, and Demas send greetings.{{#if:Colossians 4:10–11, 14<ref>Template:Bibleverse, Template:Bibleverse</ref>|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

This comment has traditionally caused commentators to conclude that Luke was a gentile. If this were true, it would make Luke the only writer of the New Testament who can clearly be identified as not being Jewish. However, that is not the only possibility. Although Luke is considered likely to have been a gentile Christian, some scholars believe him to have been a Hellenized Jew.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The phrase could just as easily be used to differentiate between those Christians who strictly observed the rituals of Judaism and those who did not.Template:Sfn

Luke's presence in Rome with the Apostle Paul near the end of Paul's life was attested by 2 Timothy 4:11: "Only Luke is with me". In the last chapter of the Book of Acts, widely attributed to Luke, there are several accounts in the first person also affirming Luke's presence in Rome, including Acts 28:16:<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> "And when we came to Rome..." According to some accounts, Luke also contributed to the authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews.Template:Sfn

Luke died at age 84 in Boeotia, according to a "fairly early and widespread tradition".Template:Sfn According to Nikephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos, Greek historian of the 14th century (and others), Luke's tomb was located in Thebes, whence his relics were transferred to Constantinople in the year 357.Template:Sfn

Authorship of Luke and ActsEdit

Template:See also The Gospel of Luke does not name its author.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The Gospel was not, nor does it claim to be, written by direct witnesses to the reported events, unlike Acts beginning in the sixteenth chapter.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn However, in most translations the author suggests that they have investigated the book's events and notes the name (Theophilus) of that to whom they are writing.

The earliest manuscript of the Gospel (Papyrus 75 = Papyrus Bodmer XIV-XV), dated Template:C. AD 200, ascribes the work to Luke; as did Irenaeus writing Template:C. AD 180, and the Muratorian fragment, a 7th-century Latin manuscript thought to be copied and translated from a Greek manuscript as old as AD 170.Template:Sfn

The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles make up a two-volume work which scholars call Luke–Acts. Together they account for 27.5% of the New Testament, the largest contribution by a single author.Template:Sfn

File:De heilige Lucas schildert de Madonna - Maarten van Heemskerck-1532.JPG
St. Luke painting the Virgin, by Maarten van Heemskerck, 1532

As a historianEdit

Template:See also

File:St Luke.JPG
Detail from a window in the parish church of SS Mary and Lambert, Stonham Aspal, Suffolk, with stained glass representing St Luke the Evangelist

Most scholars understand Luke's works (Luke–Acts) in the tradition of Greek historiography.Template:Sfn Luke 1:1–4, drawing on historical investigation, identified the work to the readers as belonging to the genre of history.Template:Sfn There is disagreement about how best to treat Luke's writings, with some historians regarding Luke as highly accurate,Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn and others taking a more critical approach.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Efn

Based on his accurate description of towns, cities and islands, as well as correctly naming various official titles, archaeologist William Mitchell Ramsay wrote that "Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy. …[He] should be placed along with the very greatest of historians."Template:Sfn Professor of Classics at Auckland University, Edward Musgrave Blaiklock, wrote: "For accuracy of detail, and for evocation of atmosphere, Luke stands, in fact, with Thucydides. The Acts of the Apostles is not shoddy product of pious imagining, but a trustworthy record. …It was the spadework of archaeology which first revealed the truth."Template:Sfn New Testament scholar Colin Hemer has made a number of advancements in understanding the historical nature and accuracy of Luke's writings.Template:Sfn

On the purpose of Acts, New Testament scholar Luke Timothy Johnson has noted that "Luke's account is selected and shaped to suit his apologetic interests, not in defiance of but in conformity to ancient standards of historiography."Template:Sfn Such a position is shared by Richard Heard, who sees historical deficiencies as arising from "special objects in writing and to the limitations of his sources of information."Template:Sfn

In modern times, Luke's competence as a historian is questioned, depending upon one's a priori view of the supernatural.Template:Sfn Since post-Enlightenment historians work with methodological naturalism,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:EfnTemplate:Efn such historians would see a narrative that relates supernatural, fantastic things like angels, demons etc., as problematic as a historical source. Mark Powell claims that "it is doubtful whether the writing of history was ever Luke's intent. Luke wrote to proclaim, to persuade, and to interpret; he did not write to preserve records for posterity. An awareness of this, has been, for many, the final nail in Luke the historian's coffin."Template:Sfn

Robert M. Grant has noted that although Luke saw himself within the historical tradition, his work contains a number of statistical improbabilities, such as the sizable crowd addressed by Peter in Acts 4:4. He has also noted chronological difficulties whereby Luke "has Gamaliel refer to Theudas and Judas in the wrong order, and Theudas actually rebelled about a decade after Gamaliel spoke (5:36–7)",Template:Sfn though this report's status as a chronological difficulty is hotly disputed.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Brent Landau writes:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

As an artistEdit

File:Evangelist Luka pishustchiy ikonu.jpg
Luke the Evangelist painting the first icon of the Virgin Mary

Christian tradition, starting from the 8th century, states that Luke was the first icon painter. He is said to have painted pictures of the Virgin Mary and Child, in particular the Hodegetria image in Constantinople (now lost). Starting from the 11th century, a number of painted images were venerated as his autograph works, including the Black Madonna of Częstochowa, Our Lady of Vladimir, and Madonna del Rosario. He was also said to have painted Saints Peter and Paul, and to have illustrated a gospel book with a full cycle of miniatures.Template:SfnTemplate:Efn

The late medieval Guilds of Saint Luke gathered together and protected painters in many cities of Europe, especially Flanders. The Academy of Saint Luke, in Rome, was imitated in many other European cities during the 16th century. The tradition that Luke painted icons of Mary and Jesus has been common, particularly in Eastern Orthodoxy. The tradition also has support from the Saint Thomas Christians of India who claim to still have one of the Theotokos icons that Saint Luke painted and which Saint Thomas brought to India.Template:EfnTemplate:Failed verification

The art critic A. I. Uspensky writes that the icons attributed to the brush of the Evangelist Luke have a completely Byzantine character that was fully established only in the 5th-6th centuries.<ref>Александр Иванович Успенский. О художественной деятельности евангелиста Луки : I, II. Ев. Лука как иконописец. Ев. Лука как резчик : Реф., чит. 8 нояб. 1900 г. в заседании Церк.-археол. отд. при Общ. люб. духов. просвещения тов. пред. Отд. А.И. Успенским. - Москва : типо-лит. И. Ефимова, 1901. - 12 с.; 27.</ref>

SymbolEdit

File:Hermen Rode 001.jpg
Winged altar of the Guild of Saint Luke, by Hermen Rode, Lübeck (1484)

In traditional depictions, such as paintings, evangelist portraits, and church mosaics, Saint Luke is often accompanied by an ox or bull, usually having wings. The ox is mentioned in both Ezechiel 1:10 and Revelation 4:7. Sometimes only the symbol is shown, especially when in a combination of those of all Four Evangelists.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn "St Luke is suggested by the ox, a sacrificial animal, because his Gospel stresses the sacrificial nature of Christ's ministry and opens with Zechariah performing his priestly duties."<ref>"The Symbols of the Evangelists", The Fitzwilliam Museum</ref>

VenerationEdit

Template:More citations needed section

Eastern OrthodoxyEdit

The Eastern Orthodox Church commemorated Saint Luke,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Apostle of the Seventy, Evangelist, companion (coworker) of the holy Apostle Paul, hieromartyr, physician, first icon painter with several feast days. The following are fixed feast days:

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

|CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> This feast is held also on 10 September.

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • 10 September - Feast of Apostles of the Seventy: Nathaniel (Nathanael), Luke the Evangelist, Clement of Sardice or Clement of Rome and Apelles of Heraklion (Greek sources say that Saint Luke (Loukias) was someone other than the Evangelist Luke). The commemoration is held again on 22 April.
  • 18 October - Feast of the Apostle and Evangelist Luke.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref> There are also moveable feasts in which Luke is commemorated:

  • Synaxis of All Saints of Achaia - Moveable holiday the Sunday before the feast of Saint Andrew (30 November).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • Synaxis of All Saints of Boeotia - Moveable holiday on the last Saturday of May.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Roman CatholicismEdit

The Roman Catholic Church commemorates Luke the Evangelist on 18 October.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Oriental OrthodoxyEdit

The Coptic Orthodox Church commemorates the martyrdom of Luke on Paopi 22.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

AnglicanismEdit

The Church of England commemorates Luke the Evangelist on 18 October.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

RelicsEdit

Despot George of Serbia purportedly bought the relics from the Ottoman sultan Murad II for 30,000 gold coins. After the Ottoman conquest of Bosnia, the kingdom's last queen, George's granddaughter Mary, who had brought the relics with her from Serbia as her dowry, sold them to the Venetian Republic.Template:Sfn

File:Santa Giustina (Padua) - Chapel of Saint Luke - Tomb of Luke the Evangelist (front).jpg
Reliquary of St. Luke the Evangelist in Padua

In 1992, the then Greek Orthodox Metropolitan Ieronymos of Thebes and Livadeia (who subsequently became Archbishop Ieronymos II of Athens and All Greece) requested from Bishop Antonio Mattiazzo of Padua the return of "a significant fragment of the relics of St. Luke to be placed on the site where the holy tomb of the Evangelist is located and venerated today". This prompted a scientific investigation of the relics in Padua, and by numerous lines of empirical evidence (archeological analyses of the Tomb in Thebes and the Reliquary of Padua, anatomical analyses of the remains, carbon-14 dating, comparison with the purported skull of the Evangelist located in Prague) confirmed that these were the remains of an individual of Syrian descent who died between AD 72 and AD 416.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The Bishop of Padua then delivered to Metropolitan Ieronymos the rib of Saint Luke that was closest to his heart to be kept at his tomb in Thebes.<ref name=Tornielli />Template:Sfn

Thus, the relics of Saint Luke are divided as follows:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Genetic characterization of the body attributed to the evangelist Luke{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

GalleryEdit

  • Luke the Evangelist in art
  • Luke writing.jpg
  • 142082810-612x612.jpg
  • Luke the Evangelist.jpg
  • Saint luke.jpg
  • Nuremberg chronicles f 108r 1.png
  • Icon of the blessed Virgin Mary by Luke the Evangelist.jpg

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

NotesEdit

Template:Notelist

CitationsEdit

Template:Reflist

SourcesEdit

Template:Refbegin

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Refend

Further readingEdit

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:AmCyc Poster

Template:Gospel of Luke Template:Acts of the Apostles Template:Apostles Template:New Testament people Template:Catholic saints Template:Authority control

Retrieved from "https://zalansite.site/mediawiki/index.php?title=Luke_the_Evangelist&oldid=12050"