Sun Tzu

Template:Short description Template:Hatgrp Template:Use dmy dates Template:Good article Template:Infobox writer

Sun Tzu (Template:IPAc-en;Template:Lang-zh) may have been a Chinese military general, strategist, philosopher, and writer who lived during the Eastern Zhou period (771–256 BC). Sun Tzu is traditionally credited as the author of The Art of War, a Classical Chinese text on military strategy from the Warring States period, though the earliest parts of the work probably date to at least a century after his purported death.Template:Sfnp

Sun Tzu is revered in Chinese and East Asian culture as a legendary historical and military figure, however, his historical existence is uncertain. The Han dynasty historian Sima Qian and other traditional Chinese historians placed him as a minister to King Helü of Wu and dated his lifetime to 544–496 BC. The name Sun TzuTemplate:Mdashby which he is more popularly knownTemplate:Mdashis an honorific which means "Master Sun". His birth name was said to be Sun Wu (Template:Lang-zh) and he is posthumously known by his courtesy name Changqing (Template:Lang-zh).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Traditional accounts state that the general's descendant Sun Bin wrote a treatise on military tactics, also titled The Art of War. Since both Sun Wu and Sun Bin were referred to as "Sun Tzu" in classical Chinese texts, some historians believed them identical, prior to the rediscovery of Sun Bin's treatise in 1972.

LifeEdit

File:Battle of Boju.png

Situation during the Battle of Boju, which Sima Qian credits Sun Tzu with having participated in.

The earliest account of Sun Tzu's life is a short biography written around 97 BC by Sima Qian as part of his Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji).Template:Sfn Sima Qian states that Sun Tzu was born in Qi near the end of the Spring and Autumn period (776–471 BC), and that his courtesy name was "Wu." The rest of the biography consists of an account of how King Helü of Wu, having heard of Sun Wu's Art of War, summoned him to the palace and asked him to demonstrate his ability to train soldiers by training the king's harem of 180 concubines into soldiers. Sun Tzu was said to have divided them into two companies, appointing the two concubines most favored by the king as the company commanders, and proceeded to give them orders, which they ignored, instead breaking out into laughter. Over the king's protestations, Sun Tzu then had the two concubines executed, at which the rest of the "soldiers" began to behave at once, and the king appointed Sun Wu as a general, where he went on to lead the state of Wu to victory against the much larger state of Chu during the Battle of Boju in 506 BC.Template:Sfn Later accounts also associate Sun Tzu with Wu Zixu, who was credited with the authorship of the Wuzi, another ancient Chinese military text, who was said to have a have been a refugee from Chu, and introduced Sun Wu to King Helu.Template:Sfn

Beginning in the 12th century AD, some Chinese scholars began to doubt the historical existence of Sun Tzu.Template:Sfnp During the Song dynasty, Ye Shi (1150–1223) noticed that the Zuo Zhuan, which mentions most of the notable figures from the Spring and Autumn period, does not mention Sun Tzu at all: despite the fact that Sima Qian had claimed in the Records of the Grand Historian that Sun Tzu had proved on the battlefield that his theories were effective at the Battle of Boju, the Zuo Zhuan, which was written centuries earlier than the Records of the Grand Historian and provides a much more detailed account of the Battle of Boju, does not mention Sun Tzu at all.<ref name="Zuo Zhuan">Template:Citation</ref><ref name="Daryl">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} 13 March 2015</ref>

The name "Sun Wu" ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}) does not appear in any text prior to the Records of the Grand Historian,Template:Sfnp and may have been a made-up descriptive cognomen meaning "the fugitive warrior"Template:Sndthe surname "Sun" can be glossed as the related term "fugitive" (Template:Transliteration {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), while "Wu" is the ancient Chinese virtue of "martial, valiant" (wǔ {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), or as a Jianghuai dialectal synonym of Template:Zhi "knight".<ref>Liu An (original compiler), Xu Shen (annotator). Huainan Honglie (Annotated), "Survey Obscurities". Main text: 「夫死生同域，不可脅陵，勇武一人，為三軍雄。」; Major et al.'s (2010) translation: "One for whom death and life are the same territory, who cannot be threatened, such a single brave warrior is the hero of the Three Armies."; Siku Quanshu version. vols. 4-7, p. 96 of 160 Template:Webarchive; Annotation: 「武士也；江淮間謂士曰武。」</ref><ref>Liu An (2010) The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China. Translated and edited by John S. Major, Sarah A. Queen, Aandrew Seth Meyer, and Harold D. Roth. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. p. 215</ref> which corresponds to Sunzi's role as the hero's doppelgänger in the story of Wu Zixu.Template:Sfnp

File:Inscribed bamboo-slips of Art of War.jpg

The Yinqueshan Han Slips unearthed in 1972 include Sun Tzu's Art of War, collection of Shandong Museum

Furthermore, the earliest parts of the The Art of War, the work he is traditionally credited with, probably date to at least a century after his death.Template:Sfnp Anachronisms in The Art of War include terms, technology (such as anachronistic crossbows), philosophical ideas, events, and military techniques that should not have been available to Sun Wu.<ref>Yang, Sang. The Art of War. Wordsworth Editions Ltd (1999). pp. 14–15. Template:ISBN</ref><ref name="Asian History">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} 4 February 2015</ref> Additionally, there are no records of professional generals during the Spring and Autumn period; these are only extant from the Warring States period, so there is doubt as to Sun Tzu's rank and generalship.<ref name="Asian History"/> This caused much confusion as to when The Art of War was actually written; since the 12th century, most scholars from the Song and Qing Dynasty along with modern Chinese, Japanese and Western scholars follow Ye Shi in assigning the text to the beginning of the Warring States period.Template:Sfnp This later dating has been bolstered by the discovery of the text on bamboo slips accidentally unearthed by construction workers at Yinque Shan in Shandong in 1972,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name=shandong>Template:Citation</ref><ref name="Clements">Template:Citation</ref> which had been sealed between 134 and 118 BC.Template:Sfnp The content of the earlier text is about one-third of the chapters of the modern The Art of War, and their text matches very closely.Template:Sfnp

Another text discovered in the same collection was Sun Bin's Military Methods,<ref name="Clements"/> a previously lost work that had been attributed to one of Sun Wu's descendants by Han dynasty bibliographies, which, due to its close relationship with the Art of War, provides important context on the body of military thought in Chinese late antiquity.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In the early 20th century, the Chinese writer and reformer Liang Qichao had theorized that the text of the Art of War was actually written in the 4th century BC by this purported descendant of Sun Tzu.Template:Sfnp Although this hypothesis is no longer tenable, the Sun Bin text's material overlaps with much of the "Sun Tzu" text, and the two may be "a single, continuously developing intellectual tradition united under the Sun name".<ref>Mark Edward Lewis (2005), quoted in Mair (2007), p. 18.</ref> Unlike Sun Wu, Sun Bin appears to have been an actual person who was a genuine authority on military matters, and may have been the inspiration for the creation of the historical figure "Sun Tzu" through a form of euhemerism.Template:Sfnp This discovery also showed that much of the historical confusion about anecdotes attributed to Sun Tzu could have been due to the fact that there were two authors that could have been referred to as "Master Sun."Template:Sfnp Template:Sfnp

The Art of WarEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:Asian philosophy sidebar The Art of War, which is traditionally ascribed to Sun Tzu, is a Classical Chinese text dating from the Warring States period. The work is composed of 13 chapters, each which is devoted to a different set of skills or art related to warfare and how it applies to military strategy and tactics, that outlines theories of battle, but also advocates diplomacy and the cultivation of relationships with other nations as essential to the health of a state.Template:Sfn

Taoist rhetoric is a component incorporated in the Art of War. According to Steven C. Combs in "Sun-zi and the Art of War: The Rhetoric of Parsimony",<ref name="Combs 276–294">Template:Cite journal</ref> warfare is "used as a metaphor for rhetoric, and that both are philosophically based arts."<ref name="Combs 276–294" /> Combs writes: "Warfare is analogous to persuasion, as a battle for hearts and minds."<ref name="Combs 276–294" /> Combs compares Taoist and Aristotelian rhetoric, notably for the differences in persuasion. Daoist rhetoric in The Art of War warfare strategies is described as "peaceful and passive, favoring silence over speech".<ref name="Combs 276–294" /> This form of communication is parsimonious. Parsimonious behavior, which is highly emphasized in The Art of War as avoiding confrontation and being spiritual in nature, shapes basic principles in Taoism.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

LegacyEdit

File:Bamboo book - binding - UCR.jpg

A copy of The Art of War written on bamboo

Sun Tzu's Art of War has influenced many notable figures, and is accepted as a masterpiece on strategy and has been frequently cited and referred to by generals and theorists since it was first published, translated, and distributed internationally.Template:Sfn

The Art of War was one of the most widely read military treatises in the subsequent Warring States period, a time of constant war among seven ancient Chinese states—Zhao, Qi, Qin, Chu, Han, Wei, and Yan—who fought to control the vast expanse of fertile territory in Eastern China.Template:Sfn For almost 1,500 years, it was the lead text in an anthology that was formalized as the Seven Military Classics by Emperor Shenzong of Song in 1080. The Art of War remains the most influential strategy text in East Asian warfareTemplate:Sfnp

The Art of War appears throughout the bibliographical catalogs of the Chinese dynastic histories, but listings of its divisions and size varied widely.Template:Sfnp The strategist and warlord Cao Cao in the early 3rd century AD authored the earliest known commentary to the Art of War.Template:Sfnp Cao's preface makes clear that he edited the text and removed certain passages, but the extent of his changes were unclear historically.Template:Sfnp In the 12th century, Jian Tianbao compiled a collection of commentaries on The Art of War which included Cao Cao's commentary along with several later ones that are frequently cited, including Meng Shi (502-557), Li Quan (Template:Circa), Jia Lin (Template:Circa), Du You (735-812), Du Mu (803-852), Chen Hao (Template:Circa), Mei Yaochen (1002 - 1060), Wang Xi (Template:Circa), He Yanxi (Template:Circa), and Zhang Yu (Template:Circa).Template:Sfn Although most of these later commentaries have little value for philology or historical analysis of the original text, they attest to the continued interest in the text throughout Chinese history.Template:Sfn

File:Enchoen27n3200.jpg

Statue of Sun Tzu in Yurihama, Tottori, in Japan

The Art of War was introduced into Nara Japan in Template:Circa and the book quickly became popular among Japanese military generals. Through its later influence on the Sengoku period "Great Unifiers" of Japan, Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, and Tokugawa Ieyasu,Template:Sfn it significantly affected the unification of Japan in the early modern era. After the Meiji Restoration, it remained popular among the Imperial Japanese armed forces. Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō, who led Japan's forces to victory in the Russo-Japanese War, was an avid reader of Sun Tzu.<ref>Template:Harvnb.</ref>

The book was translated into French and published in 1772 by the French priest Jesuit Jean Joseph Marie Amiot; it was re-published in 1782. A partial translation into English was attempted by British officer Everard Ferguson Calthrop in 1905 under the title The Book of War. The first annotated English translation was completed and published by Lionel Giles in 1910.<ref name="Lionel Giles 2007. p. 62">Giles, Lionel The Art of War by Sun Tzu – Special Edition. Special Edition Books. 2007. p. 62.</ref>

In the twentieth century, military and political leaders such as the Chinese communist revolutionary Mao Zedong, Japanese Template:Tlit Takeda Shingen, and Vietnamese general Võ Nguyên Giáp are cited along with American military generals Douglas MacArthur and Norman Schwarzkopf Jr. as having drawn inspiration from the book.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Mao Zedong partially credited his 1949 victory over Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang to The Art of War. The work strongly influenced writings about warfare in Mao's Little Red Book, which further influenced communist insurgencies around the world.Template:Sfn Ho Chi Minh translated the work for his Vietnamese officers to study. His general Võ Nguyên Giáp was likewise an avid student and practitioner of Sun Tzu's ideas.<ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Citation</ref>

In Sun Tzu and the Art of Modern Warfare, Mark McNeilly writes that a modern interpretation of Sun and his importance throughout Chinese history is critical in understanding China's push to become a superpower in the twenty-first century. Modern Chinese scholars explicitly rely on historical strategic lessons and The Art of War in developing their theories, seeing a direct relationship between their modern struggles and those of China in Sun Tzu's time. There is a great perceived value in Sun Tzu's teachings and other traditional Chinese writers, which are used regularly in developing the strategies of the Chinese state and its leaders.Template:Sfn

Some admirers of Sun Tzu's work claim that it has relevance in competitive endeavors across the modern world beyond military strategy and warfare, including espionage, culture, governance, business, and sports.<ref name=wp>Template:Citation</ref><ref name=UPI>Template:Citation</ref><ref name="Business">Template:Citation</ref><ref name=Football>Template:Citation</ref>Template:Sfn

Sun Tzu has been mentioned in pop culture. In the 1987 film Wall Street, the protagonist Gordon Gekko frequently cites passages from The Art of War as guiding principles for his aggressive trading techniques.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>