Thylacoleo
Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox
Thylacoleo ("pouch lion") is an extinct genus of carnivorous marsupials that lived in Australia from the late Pliocene to the Late Pleistocene (until around 40,000 years ago), often known as marsupial lions. They were the largest and last members of the family Thylacoleonidae, occupying the position of apex predator within Australian ecosystems. The largest and last species, Thylacoleo carnifex, approached the weight of a lioness. The estimated average weight for the species ranges from Template:Convert.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
TaxonomyEdit
The first Thylacoleo fossil findings, discovered by Thomas Mitchell were found in the 1830s in the Wellington Valley of New South Wales, though not recognised as such at the time. The generic holotype, consisting of broken teeth, jaws, and a skull was discovered by a pastoralist, William Avery, near Lake Colungolac from which the species Thylacoleo carnifex was described by Richard Owen.<ref name="Owen1859XVI">Template:Cite journal</ref> It was not until 1966 that the first nearly-complete skeleton was found. The only pieces missing were a foot and the tail. Currently, the Nullarbor Plain of West Australia remains to be the greatest finding site. These fossils now reside at the Australian Museum.<ref name=":4">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="Owen1883XV" />
The genus was first published in 1859, erected to describe the type species Thylacoleo carnifex. The new taxon was established in examination of fossil specimens provided to Richard Owen. The familial alliance takes its name from this description, the so-called marsupial lions of Thylacoleonidae.
The colloquial name "marsupial lion" alludes to the genus name, which was named after its superficial resemblance to the placental lion and its ecological niche as a large predator.
Genus: Thylacoleo (Thylacopardus) – Australia's marsupial lions, that lived from about 2 million years ago, during the Late Pliocene Epoch and became extinct about 40,000 years ago, during the Late Pleistocene Epoch. Three species are known:
- Thylacoleo carnifex The holotype cranium was collected from Lake Colongulac in 1843 by pastoralist William Adeney. A partial rostrum collected by Adeney in 1876 from the same locality would later be found to belong to the same individual.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> It was not until 1966 that the first nearly-complete skeleton was found.<ref name=":4" /><ref name="Owen1883XV" />
- Thylacoleo crassidentatus lived during the Pliocene, around 5 million years ago, and was about the size of a large dog. Its fossils have been found in southeastern Queensland.<ref name="Woods1956">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Bartholomai1962">Template:Cite journal</ref>
- Thylacoleo hilli lived during the Pliocene and was half the size of T. crassidentatus. It is the oldest member of the genus.<ref name="Pledge1977"/>
Fossils of other representatives of Thylacoleonidae, such as Microleo and Wakaleo, date back to the Late Oligocene Epoch, some 24 million years ago.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
T. hilli was described by Neville Pledge in a study published in the records of the South Australia Museum in 1977. The holotype is a third premolar, discovered at a cave in Curramulka in South Australia, exhibiting the carnivorous characteristics of the genus and around half the size of T. carnifex. This tooth was collected by Alan Hill, a speleologist and founding member of the Cave Exploration Group of South Australia, while examining a site known as the "Town Cave" in 1956; the specific epithet hilli honours the collector of the first specimen.<ref name="Pledge1977">Template:Cite journal</ref> Material found amidst the fauna at Bow River in New South Wales, dated to the early Pliocene, was also referred to the species in 1982.<ref name="Flannery1984">Template:Cite journal</ref> A fragment of an incisor, unworn and only diagnosable to the genus, was located at a site in Curramulka, close to the Town Cave site, and referred to the species for the apparent correlation in size when compared to the better known T. carnifex.<ref name="Pledge1992">Template:Cite journal</ref>
The marsupial lion is classified in the order Diprotodontia along with many other well-known marsupials such as kangaroos, possums, and the koala. It is further classified in its own family, the Thylacoleonidae, of which three genera and 11 species are recognised, all extinct. The term marsupial lion (lower case) is often applied to other members of this family. Distinct possum-like characteristics led Thylacoleo to be regarded as members of Phalangeroidea for a few decades. Though a few authors continued to hint at phalangeroid affinities for thylacoleonids as recently as the 1990s, cranial and other characters have generally led to their inclusion within vombatiformes, and as stem-members of the wombat lineage.<ref name="Scientific American">Template:Cite journal</ref> Marsupial lions and other ecologically and morphologically diverse vombatiforms were once represented by over 60 species of carnivorous, herbivorous, terrestrial and arboreal forms ranging in size from 3 kg to 2.5 tonnes. Only two families represented by four herbivorous species (koalas and three species of wombat) have survived into modern times and are considered the marsupial lion's closest living relatives.<ref name="Black et al 2014">Template:Cite journal</ref>
EvolutionEdit
The ancestors of thylacoleonids are believed to have been herbivores, something unusual for carnivores. They are members of the Vombatiformes, an almost entirely herbivorous order of marsupials, the only extant representatives of which are koalas and wombats, as well as extinct members such as the diprotodontids and palorchestids.<ref name="Black2012">Template:Cite book</ref> The group first appeared in the Late Oligocene. The earliest thylacoleonids like Microleo were small possum-like animals,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> with the group increasing in size during the Miocene, with representatives like the leopard-sized Wakaleo. The genus Thylacoleo first appeared during the Pliocene, and represented the only extant genus of the family from that time until the end of the Pleistocene. The youngest representative of Thylacoleo and the thylacoleonids, T. carnifex, is the largest known member of the family.<ref name="Black2012" /> The earliest thylacoleonids are thought to have been arboreal (tree dwelling) animals,<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> while Thylacoleo is thought to be terrestrial with some climbing capabilities.<ref name=":2">Template:Cite journal</ref>
DescriptionEdit
T. carnifex is the largest carnivorous mammal known to have ever existed in Australia, and one of the largest metatherian carnivores known (comparable to Thylacosmilus and Borhyaena species, but smaller than Proborhyaena gigantea). Individuals ranged up to around Template:Convert high at the shoulder and about Template:Convert from head to tail. Measurements taken from a number of specimens show they averaged Template:Convert in weight, although individuals as large as Template:Convert might not have been uncommon, and the largest weight was of Template:Convert. This would make it comparable to female lions and female tigers in general size.<ref name=":2" /> Estimates of the size of T. carnifex based on dental remains are typically dubious, in contrast to estimates based on proximal limb bone circumference.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
SkullEdit
Like other thylacoleonids, Thylacoleo had blade-like third premolar teeth in the upper and lower jaws, that functioned as the carnassial teeth, with these teeth being present much further forwards in the jaw than in other mammals.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org" /> Compared to earlier thyacoleonids, the third premolars were considerably enlarged.<ref name=":3">Template:Cite journal</ref> Thylacoleo also had a proportionally large pair of first incisors in the upper and lower jaws, which functioned analogously to other carnivores' canine teeth.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> They also had true canines but they served little purpose as they were stubby and not very sharp.<ref name=":1">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Compared to earlier thylacoleonids, the number of molar teeth was reduced.<ref name=":3" />
Pound for pound, T. carnifex had the strongest bite of any mammal species, living or extinct; a T. carnifex weighing Template:Convert had a bite comparable to that of a 250 kg African lion, and research suggests that Thylacoleo could hunt and take prey much larger than itself.<ref name="rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org">Template:Cite journal</ref> Larger animals that were likely prey include Diprotodon spp. and giant kangaroos. It seems improbable that Thylacoleo could achieve as high a bite force as a modern-day lion; however, this might have been possible when taking into consideration the size of its brain and skull. Carnivores usually have rather large brains when compared to herbivorous marsupials, which lessens the amount of bone that can be devoted to enhancing bite force. Thylacoleo however, is thought to have had substantially stronger muscle attachments and therefore a smaller brain.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Some later studies questioned the ability of the canine teeth to deliver a killing bite.<ref name="figu2016">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Using 3D modeling based on X-ray computed tomography scans, marsupial lions were found to be unable to use the prolonged, suffocating bite typical of living big cats. They instead had an extremely efficient and unique bite; the incisors would have been used to stab at and pierce the flesh of their prey while the more specialised carnassials crushed the windpipe, severed the spinal cord, and lacerated the major blood vessels such as the carotid artery and jugular vein. Compared to an African lion which may take 15 minutes to kill a large catch, the marsupial lion could kill a large animal in less than a minute.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= Template:Fix }} The skull was so specialized for big game that it was very inefficient at catching smaller animals, which possibly contributed to its extinction.<ref>"Extinct Marsupial Lion Tops African Lion In Fight To Death", Science Daily, 17 January 2008.</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
PostcraniumEdit
.jpg){kind=link}
Thylacoleo had highly mobile and powerful forelimbs used to grapple prey, with each manus having a single very large retractable hooked claw set on large semi-opposable thumbs, which are suggested to have been used deal a killing blow.<ref name="figu2016" />
The hind feet had four functional toes, the first digit being much reduced in size, but possessing a roughened pad similar to that of possums, which may have assisted with climbing. The discovery in 2005 of a specimen which included complete hind feet provided evidence that the marsupial lion exhibited syndactyly (fused second and third toes) like other diprotodonts.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Its strong forelimbs and retracting claws mean that Thylacoleo possibly climbed trees and perhaps carried carcasses to keep the kill for itself (similar to the leopard today).<ref name="Claw">Template:Cite journal</ref> The climbing ability would have also helped them climb out of caves, which could therefore have been used as dens to rear their young.<ref name="Evans2018">Template:Cite journal</ref> Specialised tail bones called chevrons strengthened the tail, likely allowing the animal to use it to prop itself up while rearing on its hind legs, which may have been done when climbing or attacking prey.<ref name="Evans2018" />
The lumbar region is relatively rigid and straight, and suggests that the lower back was relatively inflexible.<ref name="Evans2018" />
EcologyEdit
.png){kind=link}
When Thylacoleo was first described by Richard Owen, he considered it to be a carnivore, based on the morphology of its skull and teeth.<ref name="Owen1859XVI" /> However other anatomists, such as William Henry Flower disagreed. Flower was the first to place Thylacoleo with the Diprotodonts, noting its skull and teeth to be laid out more like those of the koala and the wombat, and suggested that it was more likely a herbivore. Owen did not disagree with Flower's placement of Thylacoleo with the Diprotodonts, but still maintained that it was a carnivore, despite its herbivorous ancestry.<ref name="wired2009">Template:Cite magazine</ref> Owen found little support in his lifetime, despite the pointing out of Thylacoleo's retractable claws, something only found in mammalian carnivores,<ref name="Owen1883XV">Template:Cite journal</ref> and its lack of any ability to chew plant material.<ref name="wired2009" /> In 1911, a study by Spencer and Walcott claimed that certain marks on the bones of megafauna had been made by Thylacoleo, but according to Horton (1979) they were not sufficiently rigorous, resulting in their arguments being strongly challenged by later scholars, such as Anderson (1929), and later Gill (1951, 1952, 1954), thereby leaving the issue unresolved.<ref name="bite">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Besides the most common hypothesis that it was an active predator, a variety of other theories existed in the late 19th to early 20th centuries as to the diet and feeding of Thylacoleo, with hypotheses of it being a scavenger filling the ecological niche of hyenas,<ref name="scavenger">Template:Cite journal</ref> being a specialist of crocodile eggs,<ref name="Claw" /> or even a melon-eater.<ref name="melons">Template:Cite journal</ref> As late as 1954, doubts were still being raised as to whether it was actually a hypercarnivore.<ref name="figu2016" />
In 1981, another paper was published arguing that certain cuts to bones of large marsupials had been caused by Thylacoleo. This paper by Horton and Wright was able to counter earlier arguments that such marks were the result of humans, largely by pointing out the presence of similar marks on the opposite side of many bones. They concluded that humans were extremely unlikely to have made the marks in question, but that if so "they had set out to produce only marks consistent with what Thylacoleo would produce".<ref name="bite" /> Since then, the academic consensus has emerged that Thylacoleo was a predator and a hypercarnivore.<ref name="figu2016" />
The marsupial lion's limb proportions and muscle mass distribution indicate that, although it was a powerful animal, it was not a particularly fast runner. Paleontologists conjecture that it was an ambush predator, possibly using leaping.<ref name="Evans2018" /> Incisions on bones of the extinct large kangaroo Macropus titan, and the general morphology of Thylacoleo suggests that it fed in a similar manner to modern cheetahs, by using their sharp teeth to slice open the ribcage of their prey, thereby accessing the internal organs. They may have killed by using their front claws as either stabbing weapons or as a way to grab their prey with strangulation or suffocation.<ref name="bite" />
Like many predators, it was probably also an opportunistic scavenger, feeding on carrion and driving off less powerful predators from their kills. It also may have shared behaviours exhibited by recent diprotodont marsupials such as kangaroos, like digging shallow holes under trees to reduce body temperature during the day.<ref>Template:Cite bookTemplate:Page needed</ref>
Trace fossils in the form of claw marks and bones from caves in Western Australia analyzed by Gavin Prideaux et al. indicate marsupial lions could also climb rock faces, and likely reared their young in such caves as a way of protecting them from potential predators.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
Analysis of finds on the Nullabor Plain suggests that Thylacoleo carnifex inhabited open, arid environments similar to those found across much of Australia today.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
A 1985 study suggested that Thylacoleo carnifex was an apex predator that primarily fed on large bodied prey, which may have included the large kangaroos Sthenurus, Procoptodon, Protemnodon, Macropus and Osphranter as well as possibly the largest Australian marsupial, the rhinoceros-sized vombatoid Diprotodon.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
ExtinctionEdit
{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Thylacoleo is thought to have become extinct around 40,000 years ago as part of the Late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions, essentially simultanteously with the vast majority of Australian megafauna. It has been contested as to the relative importance of climatic change vs the impact of recently arrived Indigenous Australians (who arrived in Australia around 50-60,000 years ago) in the extinctions. There is limited evidence of human interaction with extinct megafauna in Australia.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>