Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates A total institution or residential institution is a residential facility where a great number of similarly situated people, cut off from the wider community for a considerable time, together lead an enclosed, formally administered, and regimented round of life.<ref name="Frank">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp<ref name="Lammers">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp<ref name="Extracts">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> Privacy and civil liberties are limited or non-existent in total institutions, as all aspects of life including sleep, play, and work, are conducted in the same place.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The concept is mostly associated with the work of sociologist Erving Goffman.<ref name="Goffman">Template:Cite book</ref>

EtymologyEdit

Template:Anchor The term is sometimes credited as having been coined and defined by Canadian sociologist Erving Goffman in his paper "On the Characteristics of Total Institutions", presented in April 1957 at the Walter Reed Institute's Symposium on Preventive and Social Psychiatry.<ref name="Goffman"/>Template:Rp An expanded version appeared in Donald Cressey's collection, The Prison,<ref name="Cressey">Template:Cite book</ref> and was reprinted in Goffman's 1961 collection, Asylums.<ref name="Frank"/><ref name="Extracts"/><ref name="Goffman"/>Template:Rp Fine and Manning, however, note that Goffman heard the term in lectures by Everett Hughes (likely during the late-1940s seminar, "Work and Occupations").<ref name="fm36">Template:Cite book</ref> Regardless of whether Goffman coined the term, he can be credited with popularizing it.<ref name="Tonry2011">Template:Cite book</ref> The totality of total institutions varies according to the type of institution, guiding ideology, etc.

TypologyEdit

Template:Anchor Total institutions are divided by Goffman into five different types:<ref name="Extracts"/><ref name="Goldstein">Template:Cite book</ref>

  1. institutions established to care for people felt to be both harmless and incapable: orphanages, poor houses, most types of group homes and nursing homes.
  2. places established to care for people felt to be incapable of looking after themselves and a threat to the community, albeit an unintended one: leprosariums, mental hospitals, certain types of group homes, and tuberculosis sanitariums.
  3. institutions organised to protect the community against what are felt to be intentional dangers to it, with the welfare of the people thus sequestered not the immediate issue: concentration camps, P.O.W. camps, penitentiaries, and jails.
  4. institutions purportedly established to better pursue some worklike tasks and justifying themselves only on these instrumental grounds: colonial compounds, work camps, boarding schools, ships, army barracks, and large mansions from the point of view of those who live in the servants' quarters.
  5. establishments designed as retreats from the world even while often serving also as training stations for the religious; examples are convents, abbeys, monasteries, and other cloisters.

Template:Anchor David Rothman states that "historians have confirmed the validity of Goffman's concept of 'total institutions' which minimizes the differences in formal mission to establish a unity of design and structure."<ref name="Rothman">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp<ref name="Chriss">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp

In Discipline and Punish, Michel Foucault discussed total institutions in the language of complete and austere institutions.<ref name="Foucault">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp

Nursing homesEdit

Template:Anchor According to S. Lammers and A. Verhey, some 80 percent of Americans will ultimately die not in their home, but in a total institution.<ref name="Lammers"/>Template:Rp

Template:Cquote

TourismEdit

Template:Anchor Sociologists have pointed out that tourist venues, such as cruise ships, are acquiring many of the characteristics of total institutions. Tourists may not be aware that they are being controlled, even constrained, but the environment has been designed to subtly manipulate the behavior of patrons. These examples differ from the traditional examples in that the influence is short term.<ref>George Ritzer and Allan Liska, "'McDisneyization' and 'Post-tourism:' Complementary Perspectives on Contemporary Tourism," Tourism: The Experience of Tourism, ed. Stephen Williams, vol. 4, New Directions and Alternative Tourism (London: Routledge, 2004), 65-82.</ref><ref name="Rojek">Template:Cite book</ref>Template:Rp

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further readingEdit

Template:Sister project

Template:Authority control