Tunnel boring machine
Template:Short description Template:Multiple issues
A tunnel boring machine (TBM), also known as a "mole" or a "worm",Template:Citation needed lead is a machine used to excavate tunnels. TBMs are an alternative to drilling and blasting methods and "hand mining", allowing more rapid excavation through hard rock, wet or dry soil, or sand (although each requires specialized TBM technologies).Template:Citation needed lead TBM-bored tunnel cross-sections extend up to Template:Convert (through June 2023).Template:Sfn TBM tunnels are typically circular in cross-section, but may also be square or rectangular,Template:Cn or U- or horseshoe-shaped.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Full</ref>Template:Full<ref>Commercial websites that reference the same types of material include:
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Better source needed Much narrower tunnelsTemplate:What are typically bored using trenchless construction methods or horizontal directional drilling rather than by TBMs.Template:Citation needed lead
TBMs limit disturbance to the surrounding ground and produce a smooth tunnel wall, which reduces the cost of lining the tunnel;Template:Citation needed lead it also allows for tunneling in urban areas.Template:Citation needed lead Large TBMs are expensive and challenging to construct and transport,Template:Citation needed lead fixed costs which become less significant for longer tunnels.Template:Citation needed lead Tunneling speeds generally decline as tunnel size increases,Template:Request quotation but tunneling speeds using TBMs have nevertheless have increased over time;Template:Cn the first TBM peaked at 4 meters per week,Template:When which increased to 16 meters per week within four decades.Template:Request quotation By the end of the 19th century, speeds had reached over 30 meters per week.Template:Request quotation TBM speeds excavating through rock can, in the 21st century, reach over 700 meters per week, while soil tunneling machines can exceed 200 meters per week.Template:Sfn Template:TOCLimit
HistoryEdit
1800sEdit
The first successful tunnelling shield was developed by Sir Marc Isambard Brunel to excavate the Thames Tunnel in 1825. However, this was only the invention of the shield concept and did not involve the construction of a complete tunnel boring machine, the digging still having to be accomplished by the then standard excavation methods.Template:Sfn
The first boring machine reported to have been built was Henri Maus' Mountain Slicer.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Page neededTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Commissioned by the King of Sardinia in 1845 to dig the Fréjus Rail Tunnel between France and Italy through the Alps, Maus had it built in 1846 in an arms factory near Turin. It consisted of more than 100 percussion drills mounted in the front of a locomotive-sized machine, mechanically power-driven from the entrance of the tunnel. The Revolutions of 1848 affected the funding, and the tunnel was not completed until 10 years later, by using less innovative and less expensive methods such as pneumatic drills.<ref name="Ref_">Hapgood, Fred, "The Underground Cutting Edge: The innovators who made digging tunnels high-tech",Invention & Technology Vol.20, #2, Fall 2004 Template:Webarchive</ref>
In the United States, the first boring machine to have been built was used in 1853 during the construction of the Hoosac Tunnel in northwest Massachusetts.Template:Sfn Made of cast iron, it was known as Wilson's Patented Stone-Cutting Machine, after inventor Charles Wilson.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web
}}</ref> It drilled Template:Convert into the rock before breaking down (the tunnel was eventually completed more than 20 years later, and as with the Fréjus Rail Tunnel, by using less ambitious methods).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web
}}</ref> Wilson's machine anticipated modern TBMs in the sense that it employed cutting discs, like those of a disc harrow, which were attached to the rotating head of the machine.<ref name=Bancroft65>Bancroft 1908, p. 65</ref><ref>Wilson, Charles. "Dressing stone," {{#if:5,012
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:5012 }}|5012}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|5,012}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: March 13, 1847).</ref><ref>Wilson, Charles. "Machine for tunneling rocks, etc.," {{#if:14,483
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:14483 }}|14483}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|14,483}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: March 18, 1856).</ref> In contrast to traditional chiseling or drilling and blasting, this innovative method of removing rock relied on simple metal wheels to apply a transient high pressure that fractured the rock.Template:Cn
In 1853, the American Ebenezer Talbot also patented a TBM that employed Wilson's cutting discs, although they were mounted on rotating arms, which in turn were mounted on a rotating plate.<ref>Talbot, Ebenezer. "Machine for tunnelling or boring rock," {{#if:9,774
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:9774 }}|9774}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|9,774}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: June 7, 1853).</ref> In the 1870s, John D. Brunton of England built a machine employing cutting discs that were mounted eccentrically on rotating plates, which in turn were mounted eccentrically on a rotating plate, so that the cutting discs would travel over almost all of the rock face that was to be removed.Template:Sfn<ref>Brunton, John D. "Improved machine for sinking shafts," {{#if:80,056
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:80056 }}|80056}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|80,056}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: July 21, 1868).</ref>
The first TBM that tunneled a substantial distance was invented in 1863 and improved in 1875 by British Army officer Major Frederick Edward Blackett Beaumont (1833–1895); Beaumont's machine was further improved in 1880 by British Army officer Major Thomas English (1843–1935).Template:Sfn<ref>David William Brunton and John Allen Davis, Modern Tunneling: With Special Reference to Mine and Water-supply Tunnels (New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1914), p. 182.</ref><ref>Frederick Edward Blackett Beaumont, U.K. Patent no. 1,904 (issued: July 30, 1864). (See: Patents for Inventions. Abridgments of Specifications relating to Mining, Quarrying, Tunnelling, and Well-sinking (London, England: Office of the Commissioners of Patents for Inventions, 1874), p. 247. Template:Webarchive)</ref><ref>F.E.B. Beaumont, U.K. Patent no. 4,166 (issued: Dec. 2, 1875). (See: Patents for Inventions. Abridgments of Specifications. Class 85, Mining, Quarrying, Tunnelling, and Well-sinking (London, England: Patent Office, 1904), p. 169. Template:Webarchive)</ref><ref>Thomas English, U.K. Patent no.s 4,347 (issued: October 25, 1880) and 5,317 (issued: December 5, 1881); "Tunneling-machine," {{#if:307,278
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:307278 }}|307278}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|307,278}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: June 4, 1884 ; issued: October 28, 1884).</ref> In 1875, the French National Assembly approved the construction of a tunnel under the English Channel and the British Parliament supported a trial run using English's TBM. Its cutting head consisted of a conical drill bit behind which were a pair of opposing arms on which were mounted cutting discs. From June 1882 to March 1883, the machine tunneled, through chalk, a total of 1,840 m (6,036 ft).Template:Sfn A French engineer, Alexandre Lavalley, who was also a Suez Canal contractor, used a similar machine to drill 1,669 m (5,476 ft) from Sangatte on the French side.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> However, despite this success, the cross-Channel tunnel project was abandoned in 1883 after the British military raised fears that the tunnel might be used as an invasion route.Template:Sfn<ref>Terry Gourvish, The Official History of Britain and the Channel Tunnel (Abington, England: Routledge, 2006), Chapter 1, § 2: The commercial possibilities: Lord Richard Grosvenor, Sir Edward Watkin and the 'Manchester to Paris Railroad'.</ref> Nevertheless, in 1883, this TBM was used to bore a railway ventilation tunnel — Template:Cvt in diameter and Template:Cvt long — between Birkenhead and Liverpool, England, through sandstone under the Mersey River.Template:Sfn
The Hudson River Tunnel was constructed from 1889 to 1904 using a Greathead shield TBM. The project used air compressed to Template:Cvt to reduce cave-ins. However, there were many workers that died via cave-in or decompression sickness.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>Template:Sfn
1900sEdit
During the late 19th and early 20th century, inventors continued to design, build, and test TBMs for tunnels for railroads, subways, sewers, water supplies, etc. TBMs employing rotating arrays of drills or hammers were patented.<ref>See:
- Bancroft 1908, pp. 66, 125, 127, 146.
- Thales Lindsey, "Improved machine for tunneling rock," {{#if:55,514
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:55514 }}|55514}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|55,514}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: June 12, 1866).
- Pedro Unanue, "Tunneling machine," {{#if:732,326
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:732326 }}|732326}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|732,326}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: December 23, 1901; issued: June 30, 1903).
- Russell B. Sigafoos, "Rotary tunneling machine," {{#if:901,392
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:901392 }}|901392}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|901,392}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: May 18, 1907; issued: October 20, 1908).
- George A. Fowler, "Tunnel driving machine," {{#if:891,473
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:891473 }}|891473}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|891,473}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: July 30, 1907 ; issued: June 23, 1908).</ref> TBMs that resembled giant hole saws were proposed.<ref>See:
- Bancroft 1908, pp. 66, 85, 106.
- Wilson, Charles. Machine for excavating tunnels," {{#if:17,650
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:17650 }}|17650}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|17,650}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (issued: June 23, 1857).
- Stanley, Reginald. U.K. Patent no. 1,449 (issued: February 1, 1886); "Tunneling-machine" (issued: August 7, 1894).
- Mitchell, Jonas L. "Tunneling-machine," {{#if:537,899
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:537899 }}|537899}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|537,899}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: April 3, 1893 ; issued: April 23, 1895).</ref> Other TBMs consisted of a rotating drum with metal tines on its outer surface,<ref>See:
- William F. Cooke and George Hunter, U.K. patent no. 433 (issued: August 10, 1866). Available online at: AditNow Template:Webarchive.
- Patents for Inventions. bridgments of Specifications relating to Mining, Quarrying, Tunnelling, and Well-sinking (London, England: Office of the Commissioners of Patents for Inventions, 1874), p. 275. Template:Webarchive
- Template:Harvnb</ref> or a rotating circular plate covered with teeth,<ref>See:
- Bancroft 1908, pp. 146, 165.
- John P. Karns, "Tunneling-machine," {{#if:848,107
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:848107 }}|848107}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|848,107}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: November 29, 1905; issued: March 26, 1907).
- Olin S. Proctor, "Tunneling-machine," {{#if:900,951
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:900951 }}|900951}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|900,951}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: February 17, 1908; issued: October 13, 1908).</ref> or revolving belts covered with metal teeth.<ref>See:
- Bancroft 1908, p. 145.
- William A. Lathrop, "Machine for cutting headings," {{#if:816,923
|[{{#ifeq:|uspto|http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=%7Chttps://patents.google.com/patent/US}}{{#iferror:{{#expr:816923 }}|816923}} U.S. patent {{#ifeq:Template:Replace|Template:Digits|Template:Replace|816,923}}]
|{{US patent|123456|link text}}}} (filed: August 31, 1903; issued: April 3, 1906).</ref> However, these TBMs proved expensive, cumbersome, and unable to excavate hard rock; interest in TBMs therefore declined. Nevertheless, TBM development continued in potash and coal mines, where the rock was softer.<ref>For example:
- In Germany, the Eisener Bergmann (iron miner) was developed in 1916 by Schmidt, Kranz & Co. for potash mines; its boring head consisted of a large rotating roller that was fitted with cutters See: Template:Harvnb
- In the U.S., the McKinlay Entry Driver, a track-mounted TBM or "continuous miner", was invented in 1918 for use in coal mines. Its boring head consisted of metal tines on two, side-by-side rotating arms. See: Thomas W. Garges (November 13, 2003) William N. Poundstone lecture: "Underground Mining Technology Evolution", p. 8. Available online at: Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University Template:Webarchive</ref>
A TBM with a bore diameter of Template:Convert was manufactured by The Robbins Company for Canada's Niagara Tunnel Project. The machine was used to bore a hydroelectric tunnel beneath Niagara Falls. The machine was named "Big Becky" in reference to the Sir Adam Beck hydroelectric dams to which it tunnelled to provide an additional hydroelectric tunnel.
2000sEdit
The TBM known as Bertha, reportedly the largest earth pressure balance machine and second largest TBM in general (as of June 2023), has a bore diameter of Template:Convert, and was produced by Hitachi Zosen Corporation in 2013.Template:Sfn<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:FullTemplate:Third party inline</ref>Template:Better source It was delivered to Seattle, Washington, for its Highway 99 tunnel project.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Full</ref>Template:Full The machine began operating in July 2013, but stalled in December 2013 and required substantial repairs that halted the machine until January 2016.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref> Bertha completed boring the tunnel on April 4, 2017.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Full</ref>Template:Full
Two TBMs supplied after the 2013 acquisition of Germany's Aker Wirth (Aker Solutions) TBM and shaft-boring technology by China Railway Tunnelling Equipment (CRTE), now CREG (China Railway Engineering Equipment Group)-Germany,<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} Note, the acquisition was sans Wirth's newer Mobile Tunnel Miner technology developed with Codelco and Rio Tinto, see article.</ref><ref name=CREGWirthTBM2017>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}Template:Third party inline</ref>Template:Better source CREG-Wirth units with boring diameter of Template:Cvt, were used to bore two tunnels for Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia's Metro system.<ref name=CREGWirthTBM2017/>Template:Better source The medium excavated was water "saturated sandy mudstone, schistose mudstone, highly weathered mudstone as well as alluvium".<ref name=CREGWirthTBM2017/>Template:Better source By the company's commercial description, its products achieved an advance rate of "more than 345 meters [1,130 feet] per month".<ref name=CREGWirthTBM2017/>Template:Better source
Reportedly the largest hard rock machine and fourth largest TBM overall (as of June 2023), a machine known as Martina, was built by Herrenknecht AG.Template:Sfn Its excavation diameter is Template:Convert, and total length Template:Convert; excavation area of Template:Convert, and thrust value 39,485 t,Template:What total weight 4,500 tons, and total installed capacity 18 MW.Template:Sfn Its yearly energy consumption was about 62 GWh.Template:Sfn Martina was used by the Italian Toto Group construction company (Toto S.p.A Costruczioni General) to bore a 2.4 km tunnel of the Variante di Valico project near Florence, Italy, in 2013. This project created the Sparvo gallery of the Italian Motorway Pass A1 ("Variante di Valico A1"), near Florence.Template:Cn As of this date,Template:When Martina was still owned and operated by the Toto Group.Template:Cn
Herrenknecht also built the world's largest-diameter slurry TBM and as of June 2023, per Guinness World Records, also the largest TBM overall; called the "Qin Liangyu" or Mixshield S-880, it has an excavation diameter of Template:Convert.Template:Sfn Owned and operated by a subsidiary of the French construction company Bouygues (Dragages Hong Kong), it was used to bore the Chek Lap Kok to Tuen Mun road tunnel, undersea, to Hong Kong, China, clearing the first section of the tunnel at the large diameter, then being converted to 14 m, and working alongside 3 other TBMs (including another Herrenknect borer) to complete the tunnels, 30 m undersea, in 2019.Template:Sfn
Template:Anchor TypesEdit
.jpg){kind=link}
TBMs typically consist of a rotating cutting wheel in front, called a cutter head, followed by a main bearing, a thrust system, a system to remove excavated material (muck), and support mechanisms. Machines vary with site geology, amount of ground water present, and other factors.
Rock boring machines differ from earth boring machines in the way they cut the tunnel, the way they provide traction to support the boring activity, and in the way they support the newly formed tunnels walls.
Tunnel wall typesEdit
Concrete liningEdit
Shielded TBMs are typically used to excavate tunnels in soil. They erect concrete segments behind the TBM to support the tunnel walls.Template:SfnTemplate:Page needed
The machine stabilizes itself in the tunnel with hydraulic cylinders that press against the shield, allowing the TBM to apply pressure at the tunnel face.
Main BeamEdit
Main Beam machines do not install concrete segments behind the cutter head. Instead, the rock is held up using ground support methods such as ring beams, rock bolts, shotcrete, steel straps, ring steel and wire mesh.Template:SfnTemplate:Page needed
Shield typesEdit
Depending on the stability of the local geology, the newly formed walls of the tunnel often need to be supported immediately after being dug to avoid collapse, before any permanent support or lining has been constructed. Many TBMs are equipped with one or more cylindrical shields following behind the cutter head to support the walls until permanent tunnel support is constructed further along the machine. The stability of the walls also influences the method by which the TBM anchors itself in place so that it can apply force to the cutting head. This in turn determines whether the machine can bore and advance simultaneously, or whether these are done in alternating modes.
Open/GripperEdit
Gripper TBMs are used in rock tunnels. They forgo the use of a shield and instead push directly against the unreinforced sides of the tunnel.Template:Sfn
Machines such as a Wirth machine can be moved only while ungripped. Other machines can move continuously. At the end of a Wirth boring cycle, legs drop to the ground, the grippers are retracted, and the machine advances. The grippers then reengage and the rear legs lift for the next cycle.
Single shieldEdit
A single-shield TBM has a single cylindrical shield after the cutting head. A permanent concrete lining is constructed immediately after the shield, and the TBM pushes off the lining to apply force to the cutter head. Because this pushing cannot be done while a next ring of lining is being constructed, the single-shield TBM operates in alternating cutting and lining modes.
Double shieldEdit
Double Shield (or telescopic shield) TBMs have a leading shield that advances with the cutting head and a trailing shield that acts as a gripper. The two shields can move axially relative to each other (i.e., telescopically) over a limited distance. The gripper shield anchors the TBM so that pressure can be applied to the cutter head while simultaneously the concrete lining is being constructed.
Tunnel-face support methodsEdit
In hard rock with minimal ground water, the area around the cutter head of a TBM can be unpressurized, as the exposed rock face can support itself. In weaker soil, or when there is significant ground water, pressure must be applied to the face of the tunnel to prevent collapse and/or the infiltration of ground water into the machine.
Template:AnchorEarth Pressure BalanceEdit
Earth pressure balance (EPB) machines are used in soft ground with less than Template:Cvt of pressure. It uses muck to maintain pressure at the tunnel face. The muck (or spoil) is admitted into the TBM via a screw conveyor. By adjusting the rate of extraction of muck and the advance rate of the TBM, the pressure at the face of the TBM can be controlled without the use of slurry. Additives such as bentonite, polymers and foam can be injected ahead of the face to stabilize the ground. Such additives can separately be injected in the cutter head and extraction screw to ensure that the muck is sufficiently cohesive to maintain pressure and restrict water flow.
Like some other TBM types, EPB's use thrust cylinders to advance by pushing against concrete segments. The cutter head uses a combination of tungsten carbide cutting bits, carbide disc cutters, drag picks and/or hard rock disc cutters.
EPB has allowed soft, wet, or unstable ground to be tunneled with a speed and safety not previously possible. The Channel Tunnel, the Thames Water Ring Main, sections of the London Underground, and most new metro tunnels completed in the last 20 years worldwide were excavated using this method. EPB has historically competed with the slurry shield method (see below), where the slurry is used to stabilize the tunnel face and transport spoil to the surface. EPB TBMs are mostly used in finer ground (such as clay) while slurry TBMs are mostly used for coarser ground (such as gravel).<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
Slurry shieldEdit
Slurry shield machines can be used in soft ground with high water pressure or where granular ground conditions (sands and gravels) do not allow a plug to form in the screw. The cutter head is filled with pressurised slurry, typically made of bentonite clay that applies hydrostatic pressure to the face. The slurry mixes with the muck before it is pumped to a slurry separation plant, usually outside the tunnel.
Slurry separation plants use multi-stage filtration systems that separate spoil from slurry to allow reuse. The degree to which slurry can be 'cleaned' depends on the relative particle sizes of the muck. Slurry TBMs are not suitable for silts and clays as the particle sizes of the spoil are less than that of the bentonite. In this case, water is removed from the slurry leaving a clay cake, which may be polluted.
A caisson system is sometimes placed at the cutting head to allow workers to operate the machine,<ref name="Descend">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name="spums">Template:Cite journal</ref> although air pressure may reach elevated levels in the caisson, requiring workers to be medically cleared as "fit to dive" and able to operate pressure locks.<ref name="Descend" /><ref name="spums" />
Open face soft groundEdit
Open face soft ground TBMs rely on the excavated ground to briefly stand without support. They are suitable for use in ground with a strength of up to about Template:Cvt with low water inflows. They can bore tunnels with cross-section in excess of Template:Cvt. A backactor arm or cutter head bore to within Template:Cvt of the edge of the shield. After a boring cycle, the shield is jacked forward to begin a new cycle. Ground support is provided by precast concrete, or occasionally spheroidal graphite iron (SGI) segments that are bolted or supported until a support ring has been added. The final segment, called the key, is wedge-shaped, and expands the ring until it is tight against the ground.
Tunnel sizeEdit
TBMs range diameter from Template:Convert. Micro tunnel shield TBMs are used to construct small tunnels, and is a smaller equivalent to a general tunnelling shield and generally bore tunnels of Template:Convert, too small for operators to walk in.
Backup systemsEdit
{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= {{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= Template:Ambox }} }} Behind all types of tunnel boring machines, in the finished part of the tunnel, are trailing support decks known as the backup system, whose mechanisms can include conveyors or other systems for muck removal; slurry pipelines (if applicable); control rooms; electrical, dust-removal and ventilation systems; and mechanisms for transport of pre-cast segments.
Urban tunnelling and near-surface tunnellingEdit
{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= {{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= Template:Ambox }} }}
Urban tunnelling has the special requirement that the surface remain undisturbed, and that ground subsidence be avoided. The normal method of doing this in soft ground is to maintain soil pressures during and after construction.
TBMs with positive face control, such as earth pressure balance (EPB) and slurry shield (SS), are used in such situations. Both types (EPB and SS) are capable of reducing the risk of surface subsidence and voids if ground conditions are well documented. When tunnelling in urban environments, other tunnels, existing utility lines and deep foundations must be considered, and the project must accommodate measures to mitigate any detrimental effects to other infrastructure.Template:Citation needed
See alsoEdit
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
NotesEdit
ReferencesEdit
- * Template:Cite journal
- * Template:Cite journal
- * Template:Cite journal
- * Template:Cite journal
- * Template:Cite journal
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
- Template:Wikicite
- Template:Wikicite
- Template:Cite book
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}
Further readingEdit
External linksEdit
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=web }}