Editing Abstract structure (section)

{{Short description|Type of abstraction in science, mathematics, and philosophy}}
{{About|a type of abstraction in science, mathematics, and philosophy|the structure of an abstract (summary)|Abstract (summary)#Structure}}In [[mathematics]] and related fields, an '''abstract structure''' is a way of describing a set of mathematical objects and the relationships between them, focusing on the essential rules and properties rather than any specific meaning or example.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bourbaki and the Foundations of Modern Mathematics |url=https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/bourbaki-and-the-foundations-of-modern-mathematics |access-date=2025-01-26 |website=CNRS News |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Mac Lane |first=Saunders |title=Categories for the working mathematician |date=2010 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4419-3123-8 |edition=2nd. ed., Softcover version of original hardcover edition 1998 |series=Graduate texts in mathematics |location=New York, NY}}</ref>

For example, in a game such as [[chess]], the rules of how the pieces move and interact define the structure of the game, regardless of whether the pieces are made of wood or plastic. Similarly, an abstract structure defines a framework of objects, operations, and relationships. These structures are studied in their own right, revealing fundamental mathematical principles. While a real-world object or computer program might ''represent, instantiate,'' or ''implement'' an abstract structure, the structure itself exists as an abstract concept, independent of any particular representation. 

This abstraction allows to see common patterns across seemingly different areas of mathematics and to apply the same reasoning and tools to analyze them. Abstract structures are studied not only in [[logic]] and [[mathematics]] but in the fields that apply them, as [[computer science]] and [[computer graphics]], and in the studies that reflect on them, such as [[philosophy]] (especially the [[philosophy of mathematics]]).

An abstract structure has a richer structure than a [[concept]] or an [[idea]]. An abstract structure must include precise rules of behaviour which can be used to determine whether a candidate implementation actually matches the abstract structure in question, and it must be free from [[contradiction]]s. Thus we may debate how well a particular government fits the concept of [[democracy]], but there is no room for debate over whether a given sequence of moves is or is not a valid game of chess (for example [[Kasparov]]ian approaches).