Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Antiprocess
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{More references|date=April 2008}} '''Antiprocess''' is the preemptive recognition and marginalization of undesired information by the interplay of mental [[defense mechanism]]s: the [[subconscious]] compromises information that would cause [[cognitive dissonance]]. It is often used to describe a difficulty encountered when people with sharply contrasting viewpoints are attempting (and failing) to discuss a topic.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2004-06-29|title=Introduction to Antiprocess|url=http://members.aol.com/intwg/antiprocess.htm|access-date=2020-10-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040629083126/http://members.aol.com/intwg/antiprocess.htm|archive-date=2004-06-29}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Cassidy |first=Captain |date=2023-03-25 |title=Antiprocess shields: How they work and why people use them |url=https://rolltodisbelieve.com/antiprocess-shields-how-they-work-and-why-people-use-them/ |access-date=2023-08-10 |website=Roll to Disbelieve |language=en-US}}</ref> In other words, when one is [[debate|debating]] with another, there may be a baffling disconnect despite one's apparent understanding of the argument. Despite the apparently sufficient understanding to formulate counter-arguments, the mind of the debater does not allow him to be swayed by that knowledge. There are many instances on the [[Internet]] where antiprocess can be observed, but the prime location to see it is in [[Usenet]] discussion groups, where discussions tend to be highly polarized. In such debates, both sides appear to have a highly sophisticated understanding of the other position, yet neither side is swayed. As a result, the debate can continue for years without any progress being made.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)