Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Appeal to emotion
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Informal logical fallacy}} '''Appeal to emotion''' or '''''argumentum ad passiones''''' (meaning the same in Latin) is an [[informal fallacy]] characterized by the [[psychological manipulation|manipulation]] of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of [[fact]]ual [[evidence]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-emotion.html | title=Fallacy: Appeal to Emotion | publisher=[[Nizkor Project]] | access-date=6 November 2014 | author=Labossiere, Michael C. | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018014822/http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-emotion.html | archive-date=18 October 2014 | url-status=dead }}</ref> This kind of appeal to emotion is irrelevant to or distracting from the facts of the argument (a so-called "[[red herring]]") and encompasses several logical fallacies, including [[appeal to consequences]], [[appeal to fear]], [[appeal to flattery]], [[appeal to pity]], [[appeal to ridicule]], [[appeal to spite]], and [[wishful thinking]]. Appeal to emotion is an application of [[social psychology]]. It is only fallacious when the emotions that are elicited are irrelevant to evaluating the truth of the conclusion and serve to distract from rational consideration of relevant premises or information. For instance, if a student says "If I get a failing grade for this paper I will lose my scholarship. It's not plagiarized." the emotions elicited by the first statement are not relevant to establishing whether the paper was plagiarized. Also, the statement "Look at the suffering children. We must do more for refugees." is fallacious, because the suffering of the children and our emotional perception of the badness of suffering is not relevant to the conclusion (to be sure, the proper role, if any, for emotion in moral reasoning is a contested issue in ethics). Appeals to emotion are intended to cause the recipient of the information to experience feelings such as fear, pity, or joy, with the end goal of convincing the person that the statements being presented by the [[fallacious]] argument are true or false, respectively.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)