Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Binary opposition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Pair of related terms or concepts that are opposite in meaning}} A '''binary opposition''' (also '''binary system''') is a pair of related terms or concepts that are opposite in meaning. Binary opposition is the system of language and/or thought by which two theoretical opposites are strictly defined and set off against one another.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=G. |year=1996 |title=Binary opposition and sexual power in Paradise Lost |journal=Midwest Quarterly |volume=27 |issue=4 |page=383 }}</ref> It is the contrast between two mutually exclusive terms, such as on and off, up and down, left and right.<ref name="Baldick"/> Binary opposition is an important concept of [[structuralism]], which sees such distinctions as fundamental to all language and thought.<ref name="Baldick">Baldick, C 2004. The concise Oxford Dictionary of literary terms, </ref> In [[structuralism]], a binary opposition is seen as a fundamental organizer of human philosophy, culture, and language. Binary opposition originated in Saussurean structuralist theory.<ref name="Fogarty">Fogarty, S 2005, The literary encyclopedia, viewed 12 October 2024, https://www.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?rec=true&UID=122</ref> According to [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], the binary opposition is the means by which the units of language have value or meaning; each unit is defined in reciprocal determination with another term, as in binary code. For instance, 'hot' gains meaning because of its relation to 'cold,' and ''[[vice versa]]''. It is not a contradictory relation but a structural, complementary one.<ref name="Fogarty"/> Saussure demonstrated that a sign's meaning is derived from its context ([[Syntagma (linguistics)|syntagmatic]] dimension) and the group ([[paradigm]]) to which it belongs.<ref>Lacey, N 2000, Narrative and Genre, p.64, Palgrave, New York.</ref> An example of this is that one cannot conceive of 'good' if we do not understand 'evil'.<ref>Lacey, N 2000, Narrative and Genre, p. 65, Palgrave, New York</ref> Typically, one of the two opposites assumes a role of dominance over the other. The categorization of binary oppositions is "often value-laden and ethnocentric", with an illusory order and superficial meaning.<ref>{{Harvnb|Goody|1977|p=36}}</ref> Furthermore, Pieter Fourie discovered that binary oppositions have a deeper or second level of binaries that help to reinforce meaning. As an example, the concepts ''hero'' and ''villain'' involve secondary binaries: good/bad, handsome/ugly, liked/disliked, and so on.<ref>{{cite book|last=Fourie|first=Pieter|title=Media Studies Volume 2: Content, Audiences and Production|year=2001|publisher=Juta Education|location=Lansdowne}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)