Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bogdanov affair
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|2002 French academic dispute}} [[File:Présentation équipe DMBC, 10 septembre 2016 - 6.jpg|thumb|Igor Bogdanov (left) and Grichka Bogdanov (right) in 2016]] The '''Bogdanov affair''' was an academic dispute over the legitimacy of the [[doctorate|doctoral]] degrees obtained by French twins [[Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff|Igor and Grichka Bogdanov]]<ref name="overbye"/> (usually spelled ''Bogdanoff'' in French language publications) and a series of [[theoretical physics]] papers written by them in order to obtain degrees. The papers were published in reputable [[scientific journal]]s, and were alleged by their authors to culminate in a theory for describing what occurred before and at the [[Big Bang]]. The controversy began in 2002, with an allegation that the twins, popular celebrities in France for hosting science-themed TV shows, had obtained PhDs with nonsensical work. Rumors spread on [[Usenet]] newsgroups that their work was a deliberate hoax intended to target weaknesses in the [[peer review]] system that physics journals use to select papers for publication. While the Bogdanov brothers continued to defend the legitimacy of their work, the debate over whether it represented a contribution to physics spread from Usenet to many other internet forums, eventually receiving coverage in the mainstream media. A [[Centre national de la recherche scientifique]] (CNRS) internal report later concluded that their theses had no scientific value. The incident prompted criticism of the Bogdanovs' approach to [[science popularization]], led to a number of lawsuits, and provoked reflection among physicists as to how and why the peer review system can fail.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)