Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Boole's syllogistic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Mathematical argument}} {{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} [[File:Square of opposition, set diagrams.svg|thumb|Square of opposition<br>In the [[Venn diagram]]s black areas are [[empty set|empty]] and red areas are nonempty.<br>The faded arrows and faded red areas apply in traditional logic.]] '''[[Boolean logic]]''' is a system of [[syllogism|syllogistic]] [[logic]] invented by 19th-century British mathematician [[George Boole]], which attempts to incorporate the "empty set", that is, a class of non-existent entities, such as round squares, without resorting to uncertain [[truth value]]s. In Boolean logic, the universal statements "all S is P" and "no S is P" (contraries in the traditional Aristotelian schema) are compossible provided that the set of "S" is the empty set. "All S is P" is construed to mean that "there is nothing that is both S and not-P"; "no S is P", that "there is nothing that is both S and P". For example, since there is nothing that is a round square, it is true both that nothing is a round square and purple, and that nothing is a round square and ''not''-purple. Therefore, both universal statements, that "all round squares are purple" and "no round squares are purple" are true. Similarly, the [[subcontrary]] relationship is dissolved between the existential statements "some S is P" and "some S is not P". The former is interpreted as "there is some S such that S is P" and the latter, "there is some S such that S is not P", both of which are clearly false where S is nonexistent. Thus, the subaltern relationship between universal and existential also does not hold, since for a nonexistent S, "All S is P" is true but does not entail "Some S is P", which is false. Of the Aristotelian [[square of opposition]], only the contradictory relationships remain intact.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)