Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Casuistry
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Reasoning by extrapolation}} {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}} [[File:Le grand docteur sophiste, maistre Thubal Holoferne.jpg|thumb|''Le grand docteur sophiste'', 1886 illustration of [[Gargantua]] by [[Albert Robida]], expressing mockery of his casuist education]] '''Casuistry''' ({{IPAc-en|Λ|k|Γ¦|zj|u|α΅»|s|t|r|i}} {{respell|KAZ|ew|iss|tree}}) is a process of [[reasoning]] that seeks to resolve [[Ethical dilemma|moral problem]]s by extracting or extending abstract rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances.<ref>{{cite web|title=Philosophy-Dictionary.org|url=http://www.philosophy-dictionary.org/casuistry|work=casuistry|access-date=7 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118123139/http://www.philosophy-dictionary.org/casuistry|archive-date=18 January 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref> This method occurs in [[applied ethics]] and [[jurisprudence]]. The term is also used [[pejorative]]ly to criticise the use of clever but [[Soundness|unsound]] reasoning, especially in relation to [[ethical]] questions (as in [[sophistry]]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-35 |title=Casuistry |website=Dictionary of the History of Ideas |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060618095059/http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-35 |archive-date=18 June 2006 |publisher=[[University of Virginia Library]]}}</ref> It has been defined as follows: <blockquote>Study of cases of conscience and a method of solving conflicts of obligations by applying general principles of ethics, [[religion]], and [[moral theology]] to particular and concrete cases of human conduct. This frequently demands an extensive knowledge of [[natural law]] and [[Equity (law)|equity]], [[Civil law (legal system)|civil law]], ecclesiastical precepts, and an exceptional skill in interpreting these various norms of conduct....<ref>{{cite book | first = J. J. | last = Rolbiecki | editor-last = Runes | editor-first = Dagobert D. | chapter = Casuistry | title = Dictionary of Philosophy | url = http://www.ditext.com/runes/c.html | date = 1942 | access-date = 26 October 2023 }}</ref> </blockquote> It remains a common method in [[applied ethics]].<ref>{{cite web | first = Garth | last = Kemerling | work = Philosophy Pages | url = http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/c.htm#casu | title = Casuistry | date = 10 December 2011 | access-date = 26 October 2023}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)