Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Christological argument
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Argument for the existence of God}} {{Original research|date=November 2014}} The '''Christological argument''' is the argument for the [[existence of God]], which holds that if certain claims about [[Jesus]] are valid, then one should accept that God exists.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Habermas |first=Gary |date=2012-07-01 |title=The Minimal Facts Approach to the Resurrection of Jesus: The Role of Methodology as a Crucial Component in Establishing Historicity |url=https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sod_fac_pubs/14/ |journal=Faculty Publications and Presentations}}</ref> Notable proponents of this argument include [[Gary Habermas]]<ref name="auto">{{Cite book |last=Habermas |first=Gary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZcvsEAAAQBAJ |title=On the Resurrection, Volume 1: Evidences |date=2024-01-15 |publisher=B&H Publishing Group |isbn=978-1-0877-7861-7 |language=es}}</ref> and [[William Lane Craig]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=An Objection to the Minimal Facts Argument {{!}} Reasonable Faith |url=https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/reasonable-faith-podcast/an-objection-to-the-minimal-facts-argument |access-date=2025-02-23 |website=www.reasonablefaith.org |language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)