Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Clustering illusion
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Erroneously seeing patterns in randomness}} [[File:Plot of random points.gif|right|thumb|upright=1.5|1,000 points randomly distributed inside a square, showing apparent clusters and empty spaces]] The '''clustering illusion''' is the tendency to erroneously consider the inevitable "streaks" or "clusters" arising in small samples from random distributions to be non-random. The illusion is caused by a human tendency to underpredict the amount of [[Statistical dispersion|variability]] likely to appear in a small sample of random or [[pseudorandom]] data.<ref name="gilovich">{{cite book|last=Gilovich|first=Thomas|title=How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life|url=https://archive.org/details/howweknowwhatisn00gilorich|url-access=registration|year=1991|publisher=The Free Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-02-911706-4}}</ref> [[File:Air Raid Damage Map - East Marylebone.jpg|thumb|upright|Map of air raid damage in [[Marylebone]], London]] [[Thomas Gilovich]], an early author on the subject, argued that the effect occurs for different types of random dispersions. Some might perceive patterns in [[stock market]] price fluctuations over time, or clusters in two-dimensional data such as the locations of impact of [[World War II]] [[V-1 flying bomb]]s on maps of London.<ref name="gilovich" /><ref name="kv">{{cite journal|last=Kahneman|first=Daniel|author2=Amos Tversky|title=Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness|journal=Cognitive Psychology|year=1972|volume=3|issue=3|pages=430β454|doi=10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3}}</ref> Although Londoners developed specific theories about the pattern of impacts within London, a statistical analysis by R. D. Clarke originally published in 1946 showed that the impacts of [[V-2 rocket]]s on London were a close fit to a random distribution.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Clarke|first=R. D.|title=An application of the Poisson distribution|journal=Journal of the Institute of Actuaries|year=1946|volume=72|issue=3|page=481|url=https://www.actuaries.org.uk/documents/application-poisson-distribution|doi=10.1017/S0020268100035435|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>Gilovich, 1991 p. 19</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Mori|first=Kentaro|title=Seeing patterns|url=http://forgetomori.com/2009/skepticism/seeing-patterns/|access-date=3 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Bombing London|url=http://www.dur.ac.uk/stat.web/bomb.htm|access-date=3 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221221013/http://www.dur.ac.uk/stat.web/bomb.htm|archive-date=2012-02-21|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="tierney">{{cite news|last=Tierney|first=John|title=See a pattern on Wall Street?|url=http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/see-a-pattern-here/|publisher=New York Times|work=TierneyLab|access-date=3 March 2012|format=October 3, 2008|authorlink=John Tierney (journalist)|date=3 October 2008}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)