Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Complexity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Properties of systems that cannot be simply described or modeled}} {{About||the use in computer science|Computational complexity|other uses|Complexity (disambiguation)}} '''Complexity''' characterizes the behavior of a [[system]] or [[model]] whose components interact in multiple ways and follow local rules, leading to [[Nonlinear system|non-linearity]], [[randomness]], [[Dynamical system|collective dynamics]], [[hierarchy]], and [[emergence]].<ref name="steven">{{cite book | last = Johnson | first = Steven | title = Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities | publisher = Scribner | year = 2001 | location = New York | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Au_tLkCwExQC | page = 19 | isbn = 978-3411040742}} </ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=What is complex systems science? {{!}} Santa Fe Institute |url=https://www.santafe.edu//what-is-complex-systems-science |access-date=2022-04-17 |website=www.santafe.edu |language=en |archive-date=2022-04-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220414202627/https://santafe.edu/what-is-complex-systems-science |url-status=dead }}</ref> The term is generally used to characterize something with many parts where those parts interact with each other in multiple ways, culminating in a higher order of emergence greater than the sum of its parts. The study of these complex linkages at various scales is the main goal of [[complex systems theory]]. The intuitive criterion of complexity can be formulated as follows: a system would be more complex if more parts could be distinguished, and if more connections between them existed.<ref>Heylighen, Francis (1999). ''The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution'', in; F. Heylighen, J. Bollen & A. Riegler (Eds.) The Evolution of Complexity. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht): 17β44.</ref> {{As of|2010}}, a number of approaches to characterizing complexity have been used in [[science]]; Zayed ''et al.''<ref> J. M. Zayed, N. Nouvel, U. Rauwald, O. A. Scherman. ''Chemical Complexity β supramolecular self-assembly of synthetic and biological building blocks in water''. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39, 2806β2816 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2010/CS/b922348g </ref> reflect many of these. [[Neil F. Johnson|Neil Johnson]] states that "even among scientists, there is no unique definition of complexity β and the scientific notion has traditionally been conveyed using particular examples..." Ultimately Johnson adopts the definition of "complexity science" as "the study of the phenomena which emerge from a collection of interacting objects".<ref name="Neil Johnson">{{cite book |last = Johnson |first = Neil F. |title = Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory |publisher = Oneworld Publications |year = 2009 |chapter = Chapter 1: Two's company, three is complexity |page = 3 |chapter-url = http://www.uvm.edu/rsenr/nr385se/readings/complexity.pdf |isbn = 978-1780740492 |access-date = 2013-06-29 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151211064454/http://www.uvm.edu/rsenr/nr385se/readings/complexity.pdf |archive-date = 2015-12-11 |url-status = dead }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)