Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Conjunction fallacy
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Formal fallacy, aka Linda Problem}}{{Distinguish|False conjunction}} A '''conjunction effect''' or '''Linda problem''' is a [[Cognitive bias|bias]] or [[Logical fallacy|mistake in reasoning]] where adding extra details (an "and" statement or [[logical conjunction]]; [[Mathematical notation|mathematical shorthand]]: <math>\land</math>) to a sentence makes it appear more [[Probability|likely]].<ref name="tk83" /> Logically, this is not possible, because adding more claims can make a true statement false, but cannot make false statements true: If ''A'' is true, then ''<math>A \land B</math>'' might be false (if ''B'' is false). However, if ''A'' is false, then ''<math>A \land B</math>'' will always be false, regardless of what ''B'' is. Therefore, ''<math>A \land B</math>'' cannot be more likely than ''A''.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)