Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Copenhagen Consensus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Welfare economics project}} {{about|a project by economists|the UN climate change document|Copenhagen Accord|the scientific consensus on climate change|scientific consensus on climate change}} {{Primary sources|date=January 2021}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2023}} '''Copenhagen Consensus''' is a project that seeks to establish priorities for advancing global welfare using methodologies based on the theory of [[welfare economics]], using [[cost–benefit analysis]]. It was conceived and organized around 2004 by [[Bjørn Lomborg]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Our story {{!}} Copenhagen Consensus Center|url=https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/our-story|access-date=2021-01-02|website=www.copenhagenconsensus.com}}</ref> the author of ''[[The Skeptical Environmentalist]]'' and the then director of the Danish government's [[Environmental Assessment Institute]]. The project is run by the [[Copenhagen Consensus Center]],<ref>http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com Copenhagen Consensus Center – CCC Home Page</ref> which is directed by Lomborg and was part of the [[Copenhagen Business School]], but it is now an independent [[501(c) organization|501(c)(3) non-profit organisation]] registered in the USA. The project considers possible solutions to a wide range of problems, presented by experts in each field. These are evaluated and ranked by a panel of economists. The emphasis is on rational prioritization by economic analysis. The panel is given an arbitrary budget constraint and instructed to use cost–benefit analysis to focus on a bottom line approach in solving/ranking presented problems. The approach is justified as a corrective to standard practice in [[international development]], where, it is alleged, media attention and the "court of public opinion" results in priorities that are often far from optimal.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)