Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Critical discourse analysis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Interdisciplinary approach to study discourse}} {{Technical|date=July 2012}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} '''Critical discourse analysis''' ('''CDA''') uncovers the hidden meanings embedded in texts and conversations. It analyses the way the language used reinforces power relationships, social hierarchies, and ideologies. <ref>https://researchmethod.net/discourse-analysis/ {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref> CDA is an approach to the study of [[discourse]] that views language as a form of [[Social practice theory|social practice]]. CDA combines critique of discourse and explanation of how it figures within and contributes to the existing social reality, as a basis for action to change that existing reality in particular respects. [[Scholar]]s working in the tradition of CDA generally argue that (non-linguistic) social practice and linguistic practice constitute one another and focus on investigating how societal power relations are established and reinforced through language use.<ref name=Fairclough1>{{Cite book |title=Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language |last=Fairclough |first=Norman |author-link=Norman Fairclough |publisher=Longman |year=1995 |isbn=978-0582219847|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3djbAAAAQBAJ}}</ref> In this sense, it differs from [[discourse analysis]] in that it highlights issues of power asymmetries, manipulation, exploitation, and structural inequities in domains such as education, media, and politics.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Critical Discourse Analysis |journal=Annual Review of Anthropology |volume= 29|issue=1 |pages=447β466 |author1=Jan Blommaert |author2=Chris Bucean|date=2000|doi=10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)