Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Doctrine of equivalents
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Concept in patent law}} {{about|the patent doctrine|the trademark doctrine|Doctrine of foreign equivalents}} The '''doctrine of equivalents''' is a legal rule in many (but not all) of the world's [[patent]] systems that allows a [[court]] to hold a party liable for [[patent infringement]] if the infringing device or process does not fall within the literal scope of a [[claim (patent)|patent claim]] but is nevertheless equivalent to the claimed [[invention]]. In the [[United States]], Judge [[Learned Hand]] has described its purpose as being "to temper unsparing logic and prevent an infringer from stealing the benefit of the invention."<ref>''Royal Typewriter Co. v. [[Remington Rand]], Inc.'', 168 F.2d 691, 692 (2d Cir. 1948).</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)