Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Entrapment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Legal doctrine}} {{for|the film|Entrapment (film){{!}}''Entrapment'' (film)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2018}} '''Entrapment''' is a practice in which a law enforcement agent or an agent of the state induces a person to commit a crime that the person would have otherwise been unlikely or unwilling to commit.<ref name="Sloane">''Sloane'' (1990) 49 A Crim R 270. See also [[agent provocateur]]</ref> In US law, it is defined as "the conception and planning of an offense by an officer or agent, and the procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer or state agent".<ref name="Sorrells"/> Police conduct rising to the level of entrapment is broadly discouraged and thus, in many jurisdictions, is available as a defense against [[criminal liability]]. [[Sting operations]], through which police officers or agents engage in deception to try to catch persons who are committing crimes, raise concerns about possible entrapment.<ref>Missouri Law Review, Volume 70, Issue 2, Spring 2005: Sting Operations, Undercover Agents and Entrapment: by Bruce Hay http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3652&context=mlr</ref> Depending on the law in the jurisdiction, the prosecution may be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not entrapped or the defendant may be required to prove that they were entrapped as an [[affirmative defense]]. In the practice of journalism and whistle-blowing ''entrapment'' means "deceptive and trust-breaking techniques ... applied to trick someone to commit a legal or moral transgression."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kampf |first=Zohar |url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781351173001-25 |title=Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal |chapter=To bark or to bite? Journalism and entrapment |date=2019-04-17 |pages=245β253 |publisher=Routledge Handbooks Online |isbn=978-0-8153-8759-6 |language=en |doi=10.4324/9781351173001-25|s2cid=191717797 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Liebes |first1=Tamar |last2=Blum-Kulka |first2=Shoshana |date=May 2004 |title=It Takes Two to Blow the Whistle: Do Journalists Control the Outbreak of Scandal? |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764203262341 |journal=American Behavioral Scientist |language=en |volume=47 |issue=9 |pages=1153β1170 |doi=10.1177/0002764203262341 |s2cid=143852103 |issn=0002-7642|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)