Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Free speech zone
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Area set aside in public places for the purpose of political protesting}} {{Use mdy dates|date=January 2021}} '''Free speech zones''' (also known as '''First Amendment zones''', '''free speech cages''', and '''protest zones''') are areas set aside in [[public space|public places]] for the purpose of political protesting. The [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution]] states that "[[United States Congress|Congress]] shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The existence of free speech zones is based on U.S. court decisions stipulating that the government may reasonably regulate the [[Freedom of speech in the United States#Time.2C place.2C and manner restrictions|time, place, and manner]] β but not content β of expression.<ref>{{cite web | last=O'Neill | first=Kevin Francis | title=Time, Place and Manner Restrictions | website=Middle Tennessee State University | Middle Tennessee State University | date=November 6, 2012 | url=https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1023/time-place-and-manner-restrictions | access-date=February 16, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=Linder | first=Doug | title=Time, Place and Manner Regulations and the First Amendment | website=UMKC School of Law | Powered by Experience | url=http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/timeplacemanner.htm | access-date=February 16, 2020}}</ref> The Supreme Court has developed a [[Freedom of speech in the United States#Time.2C place.2C and manner restrictions|four-part analysis]] to evaluate the constitutionality of time, place and manner (TPM) restrictions. To pass muster under the First Amendment, TPM restrictions must be neutral with respect to content, be narrowly drawn, serve a significant government interest, and leave open alternative channels of communication. Application of this four-part analysis varies with the circumstances of each case, and typically requires lower standards for the restriction of [[obscenity]] and [[fighting words]].{{citation needed|reason=Needs a supporting ref!|date=July 2015}} Free speech zones have been used at a variety of political gatherings. The stated purpose of free speech zones is to protect the safety of those attending the political gathering, or for the safety of the protesters themselves. Critics, however, suggest that such zones are "[[Orwellian]]",<ref>Bailey, Ronald. [http://www.reason.com/news/show/33381.html Orwellian "Free Speech Zones" violate the constitution]. [[Reason (magazine)|''Reason'']], February 4, 2004. Retrieved on January 3, 2007.</ref><ref>McNulty, Rebecca. [http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/5835.html Fla. College Student Successfully Fights Campus 'Free Speech Zone']. [[Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]] Student Press Law Center, June 28, 2005. Retrieved January 3, 2007.</ref> and that authorities use them in a heavy-handed manner to censor protesters by putting them literally out of sight of the mass media, hence the public, as well as visiting dignitaries. Though authorities generally deny specifically targeting protesters, on a number of occasions, these denials have been contradicted by subsequent court testimony. The [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU) has filed, with various degrees of success and failure, a number of lawsuits on the issue. Although free speech zones existed prior to the [[presidency of George W. Bush]], it was during Bush's presidency that their scope was greatly expanded.<ref name="freedomunderfire">[https://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/dissent_report.pdf Freedom Under Fire: Dissent in Post-9/11 America]. March 28, 2003.</ref> These zones continued through the presidency of [[Barack Obama]], who signed a bill in 2012 that expanded the power of the Secret Service to restrict speech and make arrests.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aclu.org/blog/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill|website=ACLU|access-date=June 13, 2015|title=How Big a Deal is H.R. 347, That "Criminalizing Protest" Bill?|date=March 8, 2012 }}</ref> Many colleges and universities earlier instituted free-speech-zone rules during the [[Opposition to the Vietnam War|Vietnam-era protests]] of the 1960s and 1970s. In recent years, a number of them have revised or removed these restrictions following student protests and lawsuits.{{citation needed|reason=BOTH sentences definitely need refs!|date=July 2015}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)