Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Frontal assault
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|All-out full-force military attack}} A '''frontal assault''' is a [[military tactic]] which involves a direct, full-force attack on the front line of an enemy force, rather than to the [[flanking maneuver|flanks]] or rear of the enemy. It allows for a quick and decisive victory, but at the cost of subjecting the attackers to the maximum defensive power of the enemy; this can make frontal assaults costly even if successful, and often disastrously costly if unsuccessful. It may be used as a last resort when time, terrain, limited command control, or low troop quality do not allow for any battlefield flexibility. The risks of a frontal assault can be mitigated by the use of heavy supporting fire, diversionary attacks, the use of cover (such as smokescreens or the darkness of night), or [[infiltration tactics]]. Frontal assaults were common in [[ancient warfare]], where [[heavy infantry]] made up the core of armies such as the Greek [[phalanx]] and the [[Roman legion]]. These dense formations, many ranks deep, would utilize their weight in numbers to press forward and break enemy lines. In [[medieval warfare]], [[heavy cavalry]] such as mounted [[knight]]s relied on frontal assaults for easy victories against infantry levies. These tactics waned as the defensive quality of infantry increased, especially with the introduction of [[firearms]]. Both heavy infantry and heavy cavalry were replaced with lighter, more maneuverable troops. Yet even in [[Napoleonic warfare]], a frontal assault by [[cavalry]] against a thin line could be effective when conditions were right, or even by infantry if the enemy was shaken or weakened by preceding attacks. But as firepower increased, as with the introduction of the [[rifle]], successful frontal assaults against a prepared enemy became rare. They continued to be attempted, however, as alternative tactics that could achieve a decisive victory for the attacker were not developed. During the [[American Civil War]], it took some time for generals on both sides to understand that a frontal assault against an enemy who was well entrenched or otherwise held a strong defensive position was unlikely to succeed and was wasteful of manpower. During [[World War I]], advances in [[machine gun]]s and [[artillery]] greatly increased defensive firepower, while [[trench warfare]] removed almost all options for battlefield maneuver. This resulted in repeated frontal assaults with horrific casualties. Only at the end of the war, with the introduction of [[tank]]s, [[infiltration tactics]], and [[combined arms]], were the beginnings of modern [[maneuver warfare]] found as a way to avoid the necessity of frontal assaults.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)