Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hidden-variable theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Type of quantum mechanics theory}} {{about|a class of quantum mechanics theories|other uses|Hidden variable (disambiguation){{!}}Hidden variable}} {{Quantum mechanics |interpretations}} In [[physics]], a '''hidden-variable theory''' is a [[Determinism|deterministic]] model which seeks to explain the probabilistic nature of [[quantum mechanics]] by introducing additional, possibly inaccessible, variables. The [[mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics]] assumes that the state of a system prior to measurement is [[quantum indeterminacy|indeterminate]]; quantitative bounds on this indeterminacy are expressed by the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]]. Most hidden-variable theories are attempts to avoid this indeterminacy, but possibly at the expense of requiring that [[Quantum nonlocality|nonlocal interactions]] be allowed. One notable hidden-variable theory is the [[de Broglie–Bohm theory]]. In their 1935 [[Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox|EPR paper]], [[Albert Einstein]], [[Boris Podolsky]], and [[Nathan Rosen]] argued that [[quantum entanglement]] might imply that quantum mechanics is an incomplete description of reality.<ref name="EPR">{{cite journal |last1=Einstein |first1=A. |last2=Podolsky |first2=B. |last3=Rosen |first3=N. |year=1935 |title=Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=47 |issue=10 |pages=777–780 |bibcode=1935PhRv...47..777E |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Genovese |first1=M. |date=2005 |title=Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses |journal=Physics Reports |volume=413 |issue=6 |pages=319–396 |arxiv=quant-ph/0701071v1 |bibcode=2005PhR...413..319G |doi=10.1016/j.physrep.2005.03.003 |s2cid=14833712 |quote=The debate whether Quantum Mechanics is a complete theory and probabilities have a non-epistemic character (i.e. nature is intrinsically probabilistic) or whether it is a statistical approximation of a deterministic theory and probabilities are due to our ignorance of some parameters (i.e. they are epistemic) dates to the beginning of the theory itself}}</ref> [[John Stewart Bell]] in 1964, in his [[Bell's theorem|eponymous theorem]] proved that correlations between particles under any [[Local hidden-variable theory|local hidden variable theory]] must obey certain constraints. Subsequently, [[Bell test]] experiments have demonstrated broad violation of these constraints, ruling out such theories.<ref name=":0">{{cite news |last=Markoff |first=Jack |date=21 October 2015 |title=Sorry, Einstein. Quantum Study Suggests 'Spooky Action' Is Real. |work=[[New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/science/quantum-theory-experiment-said-to-prove-spooky-interactions.html |accessdate=21 October 2015}}</ref> Bell's theorem, however, does not rule out the possibility of nonlocal theories or [[superdeterminism]]; these therefore cannot be falsified by Bell tests.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)