Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Immortal Game
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Chess game played in London in 1851}}{{Distinguish|The Immortal (video game){{!}}''The Immortal'' (video game)}} {{Refimprove|date=May 2020}} [[File:Immortal Game, 1851.gif|thumb|upright=1.3|Immortal Game animation. Anderssen shown playing as White.]] The '''Immortal Game''' was a [[chess]] game played in 1851 between [[Adolf Anderssen]] and [[Lionel Kieseritzky]] during the [[London 1851 chess tournament]], an event in which both players participated. It was itself a {{chessgloss|friendly game|casual}} game, however, not played as part of the tournament. Anderssen won the game by [[Sacrifice (chess)|sacrificing]] all of his {{chessgloss|major pieces}} while developing a [[checkmate|mating]] attack with his remaining {{chessgloss|minor pieces}}. Despite losing the game, Kieseritzky was impressed with Anderssen's performance. Kieseritzky published the game shortly thereafer in {{Lang|fr|La Régence}}, a French chess journal which he helped to edit. [[Ernst Falkbeer]] published an analysis of the game in 1855, describing it for the first time with its sobriquet "immortal". The Immortal Game is among the [[List of chess games|most famous chess games]] ever played. As a {{chessgloss|miniature}} game, it is frequently reproduced in chess literature to teach simple themes of gameplay. Although Kieseritzsky himself indicated that the game ended before checkmate, the Immortal Game is frequently reproduced with a brief {{chessgloss|variation|continuation}} involving a [[queen sacrifice]]—a further loss of material—leading to checkmate. This continuation is commonly presented as part of the complete game, as if the final moves were actually played as part of the real historical game. Some authors also [[Permutation|permute]] certain moves, deviating from Kieseritzky's report, although such permutations typically [[Transposition (chess)|transpose]] to distinct lines of play that eventually return to the moves and positions reported by Kieseritzky. Although both players made moves that are regarded as {{chessgloss|sound|unsound}} by modern players, the game is appreciated as an example of the [[romantic chess|Romantic]] school of chess, a style of play that prized bold attacks and sacrifices over deep strategy. The game—especially its mating continuation—is also appreciated for its [[chess aesthetics|aesthetic]] value, as a plausible example of how a player with a significant material deficit but having an advantageous position can give mate. The continuation's mating position is a [[model mate]], a strong form of [[pure mate]] (i.e. all of the attacker's remaining pieces contribute to the checkmate, while the mated king is prevented from moving to any other square for exactly one reason per square). In 1996, [[Bill Hartston]] called the game an achievement "perhaps unparalleled in chess literature".<ref>{{cite book |title=Teach Yourself Chess |last=Hartston |first=Bill |author-link=William Hartston |publisher=Hodder & Stoughton |isbn=0-340-67039-8 |year=1996 |page=[https://archive.org/details/chess0000hart_g7f1/page/150 150] |url=https://archive.org/details/chess0000hart_g7f1/page/150 }}</ref> {{AN chess|pos=toc}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)