Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intellect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Faculty of the human mind}} {{Other uses}} [[File:Paris - Playing chess at the Jardins du Luxembourg - 2966.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The intellect comprises the [[rational]] and the [[logical]] aspects of the human mind.]]<!-- NOTE TO EDITORS: See talk page: this mini-article is an attempt to provide a suitable target for the many current and future article text links to "Intellect". It is not appropriate to leave them as "links to disambiguation page". It may be non-standard, but seems appropriate in this case where experts in the field cannot agree which article is really "Intellect". --> '''Intellect''' is a [[Cognitive skill|faculty]] of the [[human mind]] that enables [[reasoning]], [[abstraction]], [[conceptualization]], and [[judgment]].{{sfnp|Corsini|2016|p=494}} It enables the discernment of [[truth]] and [[falsehood]], as well as higher-order thinking beyond immediate perception.{{sfnp|Aquinas|1947}} Intellect is distinct from ''[[intelligence]]'', which refers to the general ability to learn, adapt, and solve problems, whereas ''intellect'' concerns the application of reason to abstract or philosophical thought.{{sfnmp|1a1=Honderich|1y=2005|2a1=Colman|2y=2008}} In philosophy, intellect ({{langx|grc|dianoia}}) has often been contrasted with {{lang|grc|[[nous]]}}, a term referring to the faculty of direct intuitive knowledge.{{sfnp|Hendrix|2015|p=114}} While intellect engages in [[discursive reasoning]], breaking down concepts into logical sequences, ''nous'' is considered a higher cognitive faculty that allows for direct perception of truth,{{sfnp|Hendrix|2015|p=114}} especially in [[Platonism]] and [[Neoplatonism]].{{sfnp|Plotinus|1991}} Aristotle{{sfnp|Aristotle|1907}} distinguished between the [[active intellect]] ({{lang|la|intellectus agens}}), which abstracts universal concepts, and the [[passive intellect]], which receives sensory input.{{sfnmp|1a1=Davidson|1y=1992|1p=6|2a1=Gutas|2y=2001}} During [[late antiquity]] and the [[Middle Ages]], the intellect was considered the bridge between the [[human soul]] and [[Divine illumination|divine knowledge]], particularly in religious and metaphysical contexts.{{sfnmp|1a1=Davidson|1y=1992|1p=6|2a1=Gutas|2y=2001}} Thinkers such as [[Thomas Aquinas]] and [[Averroes]] explored intellect as the means by which humans engage in higher reasoning and theological contemplation. This intellectual tradition influenced both Christian [[Scholasticism]] and [[Islamic philosophy]], where intellect was linked to the understanding of divine truth.{{sfnp|Davidson|1992}} In modern [[psychology]] and [[neuroscience]], the term "intellect" is sometimes used to describe higher cognitive functions related to abstract thought and logical reasoning. However, contemporary research primarily focuses on [[general intelligence]] (g-factor) and [[cognitive abilities]] rather than intellect as a separate faculty.{{sfnp|Deary|2020}} While theories such as [[Howard Gardner]]'s [[theory of multiple intelligences]] address diverse ways of processing information, they do not equate directly to historical or philosophical notions of intellect.{{sfnmp|1a1=Gardner|1y=1999|2a1=Collier|2y=2012}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)