Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Internalism and externalism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Philosophical terms}} '''Internalism''' and '''externalism''' are two opposite ways of integrating and explaining various subjects in several areas of [[philosophy]]. These include human motivation, knowledge, justification, meaning, and truth. The distinction arises in many areas of debate with similar but distinct meanings. [[Internal–external distinction]] is a distinction used in philosophy to divide an ontology into two parts: an internal part concerning [[observation]] related to philosophy, and an external part concerning [[question]] related to philosophy. Internalism is the thesis that no fact about the world can provide reasons for action independently of desires and beliefs.<ref name="D'Oro">Giuseppina D'Oro, [https://www.academia.edu/241389/Collingwood_Psychologism_and_Internalism "Collingwood, psychologism and internalism,"] ''European Journal of Philosophy'' '''12'''(2):163–177 (2004).</ref> Externalism is the thesis that reasons are to be identified with objective features of the world.<ref name="D'Oro" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)