Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Irrelevant conclusion
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Type of informal fallacy}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}} An '''irrelevant conclusion''',<ref>Bishop Whately, cited by [[John Stuart Mill]]: ''A System of Logic''. London Colchester 1959 (first: 1843), pp. 542.</ref> also known as {{langnf|la|'''ignoratio elenchi'''|ignoring refutation}} or '''missing the point''', is the [[informal fallacy]] of presenting an [[argument]] whose conclusion fails to address the issue in question. It falls into the broad class of [[relevance]] fallacies.<ref name="Hurley2011"/> The irrelevant conclusion should not be confused with [[formal fallacy]], an argument whose conclusion does not follow from its [[premise]]s; instead, it is that despite its formal [[consistency]] it is not relevant to the subject being talked about.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)