Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Kalam cosmological argument
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Philosophical argument for the existence of God}} {{For|the book on the topic by William Lane Craig|The Kalām Cosmological Argument}} {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2023}} [[File:William Lane Craig.jpg|thumb|[[William Lane Craig]] (born 1949), who revived the Kalam cosmological argument during the 20th and 21st centuries]] The '''Kalam cosmological argument''' is a modern formulation of the [[cosmological argument]] for the [[existence of God]]. It is named after the ''[[Kalam]]'' (medieval [[Islam]]ic [[scholasticism]]) from which many of its key ideas originated.<ref name=craig7>{{cite web | url=https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/popular-writings/existence-nature-of-god/the-kalam-cosmological-argument | title=The Kalam Cosmological Argument | author=William Lane Craig | website=Reasonable Faith }}</ref> [[Philosopher]] and [[theologian]] [[William Lane Craig]] was principally responsible for revitalising these ideas for modern academic discourse through his book ''[[The Kalām Cosmological Argument]]'' (1979), as well as other publications. The argument's central thesis is the [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] impossibility of a [[temporality|temporally]] past-infinite [[universe]] and of [[Actual infinity|actual infinities]] existing in the [[reality|real world]], traced by Craig to 11th-century Persian Muslim scholastic philosopher [[Al-Ghazali]]. This feature distinguishes it from other cosmological arguments, such as [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas's]] [[Five Ways (Aquinas)#Second way: The Argument of the First Cause|Second Way]], which rests on the impossibility of a [[causality|causally]] ordered [[infinite regress]], and those of [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz|Leibniz]] and [[Samuel Clarke]], which refer to the [[principle of sufficient reason]].<ref name="auto1">[[#SEP|Reichenbach, 2004]]</ref> Since Craig's original publication, the Kalam cosmological argument has elicited public debate between Craig and [[Graham Oppy]], [[Adolf Grünbaum]], [[J. L. Mackie]] and [[Quentin Smith]], and has been used in [[Christian apologetics]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Graham |date=2002 |title=Arguing about the Kalam Cosmological Argument |url= https://philarchive.org/rec/OPPAAT|journal=Philo |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=34–61 |doi= 10.5840/philo2002513|access-date=}}</ref><ref name="auto1"/> According to [[Michael Martin (philosopher)|Michael Martin]], the cosmological arguments presented by Craig, Bruce Reichenbach, and [[Richard Swinburne]] are "among the most sophisticated and well-argued in [[Contemporary philosophy|contemporary]] [[Theology|theological]] philosophy".<ref>[[#Mart|Martin, 1990]]: 101</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)