Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Kissing number
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Geometric concept}} {{unsolved|mathematics|What is the maximum possible kissing number for [[n-sphere|''n''-dimensional spheres]] in (''n'' + 1)-dimensional [[Euclidean space]]?}} In [[geometry]], the '''kissing number''' of a [[mathematical space]] is defined as the greatest number of non-overlapping unit [[sphere]]s that can be arranged in that space such that they each touch a common unit sphere. For a given [[sphere packing]] (arrangement of spheres) in a given space, a kissing number can also be defined for each individual sphere as the number of spheres it touches. For a [[Lattice (group)|lattice]] packing the kissing number is the same for every sphere, but for an arbitrary sphere packing the kissing number may vary from one sphere to another. Other names for kissing number that have been used are '''Newton number''' (after the originator of the problem), and '''contact number'''. In general, the '''kissing number problem''' seeks the maximum possible kissing number for [[n-sphere|''n''-dimensional spheres]] in (''n'' + 1)-dimensional [[Euclidean space]]. Ordinary spheres correspond to two-dimensional closed surfaces in three-dimensional space. Finding the kissing number when centers of spheres are confined to a line (the one-dimensional case) or a plane (two-dimensional case) is trivial. Proving a solution to the three-dimensional case, despite being easy to conceptualise and model in the physical world, eluded mathematicians until the mid-20th century.<ref name=Conway/><ref name=Brass/> Solutions in higher dimensions are considerably more challenging, and only a handful of cases have been solved exactly. For others, investigations have determined upper and lower bounds, but not exact solutions.<ref name=Mittlemann>{{cite journal|last1=Mittelmann|first1=Hans D.|last2=Vallentin|first2=Frank|title=High accuracy semidefinite programming bounds for kissing numbers|year=2010|pages=174β178|volume=19|journal=[[Experimental Mathematics (journal)|Experimental Mathematics]]|issue=2|doi=10.1080/10586458.2010.10129070|arxiv=0902.1105|bibcode=2009arXiv0902.1105M|s2cid=218279}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)