Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Language family
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Group of languages related through a common ancestor}} {{pp-pc|small=yes}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2017}} [[File:Primary Human Languages Improved Version.png|upright=1.8|thumb|2005 map of the contemporary distribution of the world's primary language families]] A '''language family''' is a group of [[language]]s related through descent from a common ancestor, called the [[proto-language]] of that family. The term ''family'' is a metaphor borrowed from biology, with the [[tree model]] used in [[historical linguistics]] analogous to a [[family tree]], or to [[phylogenetic tree]]s of taxa used in evolutionary [[taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy]]. Linguists thus describe the ''daughter languages'' within a language family as being ''genetically related''.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Bruce M. |last1=Rowe |first2=Diane P. |last2=Levine |title=A Concise Introduction to Linguistics |year=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-34928-0 |pages=340–341 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ePQ5CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA340 |access-date=26 January 2017}}</ref> The divergence of a proto-language into daughter languages typically occurs through geographical separation, with different [[regional dialect]]s of the proto-language undergoing different [[language change]]s and thus becoming distinct languages over time.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Dimmendaal |first1=Gerrit J. |title=Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages |year=2011 |publisher=John Benjamins |isbn=978-9-027-28722-9 |page=336 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e-PxyCpnnzEC&pg=PA336 |access-date=26 January 2017}}</ref> One well-known example of a language family is the [[Romance languages]], including [[Spanish language|Spanish]], [[French language|French]], [[Italian language|Italian]], [[Portuguese language|Portuguese]], [[Romanian language|Romanian]], [[Catalan language|Catalan]], and many others, all of which are descended from [[Vulgar Latin]].{{refn|group=note|[[Vernacular]] [[Latin]], as opposed to the [[Classical Latin]] used as a literary language.}}<ref name="ethnologue">Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). [http://www.ethnologue.com ''Ethnologue: Languages of the World''], Seventeenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International, 2013.</ref> The Romance family itself is part of the larger [[Indo-European]] family, which includes many other languages native to [[Europe]] and [[South Asia]], all believed to have descended from a common ancestor known as [[Proto-Indo-European]]. A language family is usually said to contain at least two languages, although [[language isolate]]s — languages that are not related to any other language — are occasionally referred to as families that contain one language. Inversely, there is no upper bound to the number of languages a family can contain. Some families, such as the [[Austronesian languages]], contain over 1000.<ref>{{cite web |title=Family: Austronesian|url=https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/aust1307 |website=Glottolog 5.0 |access-date=3 August 2024}}</ref> Language families can be identified from shared characteristics amongst languages. [[Sound change]]s are one of the strongest pieces of evidence that can be used to identify a genetic relationship because of their predictable and consistent nature, and through the [[comparative method]] can be used to reconstruct proto-languages. However, languages can also change through [[language contact]] which can falsely suggest genetic relationships. For example, the [[Mongolic languages|Mongolic]], [[Tungusic languages|Tungusic]], and [[Turkic languages]] share a great deal of similarities that have led several scholars to believe [[Altaic languages|they were related]]. These supposed relationships were later discovered (in the view of most scholars) to be derived through language contact and thus they are not truly related.<ref>{{cite journal |last=De la Fuente |first=José Andrés Alonso |year=2016 |title=Review of Robbeets, Martine (2015): Diachrony of verb morphology. Japanese and the Transeurasian languages |url=https://www.academia.edu/30240029 |journal=Diachronica |volume=33 |issue=4 |pages=530–537 |doi=10.1075/dia.33.4.04alo}}</ref> Eventually though, high amounts of language contact and inconsistent changes will render it essentially impossible to derive any more relationships; even the oldest demonstrable language family, [[Afroasiatic languages|Afroasiatic]], is far younger than language itself.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Boë |first1=Louis-Jean |display-authors=etal |title=Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science |journal=Science |date=11 December 2019 |volume=5 |issue=12 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aaw3916 |pmc=7000245 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)