Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Liberal conservatism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Political ideology within conservatism}} {{About|the political philosophy of conservatism as influenced by liberalism|the conservative wing of the liberal movement|Conservative liberalism}} {{Distinguish|Libertarian conservatism}} {{Conservatism sidebar|variants}} {{Liberalism sidebar|related}} '''Liberal conservatism''' is a [[Ideology|political ideology]] combining [[Conservatism|conservative]] policies with [[Liberalism|liberal]] stances, especially on [[Economic liberalism|economic]] issues but also on [[social liberalism|social]] and [[Ethics|ethical]] matters,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parties-and-elections.eu/content.html|date=2020|title=Content|website=Parties and Elections in Europe|first=Wolfram|last=Nordsieck}}</ref> representing a brand of political conservatism strongly influenced by liberalism. The ideology incorporates the [[Classical liberalism|classical liberal]] view of minimal [[economic interventionism|government intervention]] in the economy, according to which individuals should be free to participate in the [[Market (economics)|market]] and [[Wealth creation|generate wealth]] without government interference.{{sfn|McAnulla|2006|p=71}} However, liberal conservatives also hold that individuals cannot be thoroughly depended on to act responsibly in other spheres of life; therefore, they believe that a strong state is necessary to ensure [[law and order (politics)|law and order]] and that social [[institution]]s are needed to nurture a sense of duty and responsibility to the nation.{{sfn|McAnulla|2006|p=71}} Liberal conservatives also support [[civil liberties]], along with some [[Social conservatism|socially conservative]] positions. They differ on [[Social issue|social issues]], with some being socially conservative and others socially liberal, though all liberal conservatives broadly support the [[rule of law]] regarding [[civil rights]], [[social equality]] and [[environmental issues|the environment]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gibbon |first=Gary |date=7 October 2015 |title=David Cameron tries to return to his liberal Conservatism mission |url=https://www.channel4.com/news/by/gary-gibbon/blogs/david-cameron-return-liberal-conservatism-mission |website=Channel 4 News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=What was David Cameron's Conservatism? (overview) |url=https://www.britpolitics.co.uk/a-level-uk-political-parties-david-cameron-conservatism/ |website=Britpolitics}}</ref> This is equated with the creation of a [[Group cohesiveness|cohesive]] and [[Toleration|tolerant]] society with increased levels of [[Moral responsibility|individual responsibility]] and less [[Social inequality|inequality]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Redford |first=Pete |title=Cameron and Welfare: Questioning the liberal Conservatism project |url=https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48440/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-Cameron_and_Welfare_Questioning_the_liberal_Conservatism_project.pdf |publisher=LSE Research Online}}</ref> Liberal conservatism shares the classical liberal tenets of a commitment to [[individualism]], belief in [[negative liberty|negative freedom]], a lightly regulated free market, and a minimal [[rule of law]] state.{{sfn|Vincent|2009|p=335}} A number of commentators have stated that many conservative currents in the 1980s, such as [[Thatcherism]],{{sfn|McAnulla|2006|p=71}} were rejuvenated classical liberals in all but name.{{sfn|Vincent|2009|p=335}} However, in contrast to classical liberalism, there is a stronger social agenda and support for a greater degree of state intervention, especially in those areas of social life which liberal conservatives believe should not be subject to market forces.{{sfn|Vincent|2009|p=335}} Particularly in regards to the family, sexuality, health and education, these should either always be periodically regulated or minimally protected by the state.{{sfn|Vincent|2009|p=335}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)