Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
List of language regulators
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Bodies that are official authorities on standard varieties of a language}} {{Contains special characters}} {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}} This is a list of bodies that consider themselves to be authorities on standard languages, often called '''language academies'''. Language academies are motivated by, or closely associated with, [[linguistic purism]] and [[Prestige (sociolinguistics)|prestige]], and typically publish [[Linguistic prescription|prescriptive]] [[dictionaries]],<ref>Thomas, George (1991) [https://books.google.com/books?id=G18NAQAAMAAJ ''Linguistic purism''] p.108, quotation: {{quotation|Whereas a number of the puristically motivated language societies have assumed ''de facto'' responsibility for language cultivation, the decisions of the academies have often had the force of law. ... Since academies are so closely associated with the notion of purism, a brief word on their history may not be out of place. The first academy to deal expressly and exclusively with language matters was the ''Accademia della Crusca'' ... Its orientation was essentially conservative, favouring a return to the Tuscan language as cultivated in the fourteenth century over the innovations of contemporary renaissance poets such as Torquato Tasso. ... One of its first tasks -- as with so many academies to follow -- was to produce a large-scale prescriptive dictionary of Italian}}</ref> which purport to officiate and prescribe the meaning of words and pronunciations. A language regulator may also have a more [[Linguistic description|descriptive approach]], however, while maintaining and promoting (but not imposing) a standard spelling. Many language academies are private institutions, although some are governmental bodies in different states, or enjoy some form of government-sanctioned status in one or more countries. There may also be multiple language academies attempting to regulate and [[codification (linguistics)|codify]] the same language, sometimes based in different countries and sometimes influenced by political factors. Many [[world language]]s have one or more language academies or official language bodies. However, the degree of control that the academies exert over these languages does not render the latter [[controlled natural language]]s in the sense that the various kinds of "[[Simple English (disambiguation)|simple English]]" (e.g., [[Basic English]], [[Simplified Technical English]]) or [[George Orwell]]'s fictional [[Newspeak]] are. They instead remain [[natural language]]s to a considerable extent and are thus not [[formal language]]s such as [[Attempto Controlled English]]. They have a degree of [[standardization]] that allows them to function as [[standard language]]s (e.g., [[standard French]]). The English language has never had a formal regulator in any country.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)