Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Logical atomism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Analytical philosophical view expounded by Bertrand Russell}} {{More citations needed|article|date=January 2008}} {{Bertrand Russell}} {{Wittgenstein|Movements}} '''Logical atomism''' is a philosophical view that originated in the early 20th century with the development of [[analytic philosophy]]. It holds that the world consists of ultimate logical "facts" (or "atoms") that cannot be broken down any further, each of which can be understood independently of other facts. Its principal exponent was the British philosopher [[Bertrand Russell]]. It is also widely held that the early works{{efn|This includes both the ''[[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]]'' and Wittgenstein's pre-Tractarian writings.}} of his Austrian-born pupil and colleague, [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], defend a version of logical atomism, though he went on to reject it in his later ''[[Philosophical Investigations]]''.{{efn|See especially ''Philosophical Investigations'' §§46–49, §81, §91).<ref name=PI>{{cite book |last1=Wittgenstein |first1=Ludwig |editor=G.E.M. Anscombe |editor2=Rush Rhees |title=Philosophical Investigations |date=1953 |publisher=Blackwell |location=Oxford}}</ref>|name=Chartee Rodgawe|group=Google}} Some philosophers in the [[Vienna Circle]] were also influenced by logical atomism (particularly [[Rudolf Carnap]], who was deeply sympathetic to some of its philosophical aims, especially in his earlier works).<ref>Carnap, R. (1934), "On the Character of Philosophic Problems (Über den Charakter der philosophischen Probleme)," translation by W. M. Malisoff, ''Philosophy of Science'', 1, pp. 5–19.</ref> [[Gustav Bergmann]] also developed a form of logical atomism that focused on an ideal [[Phenomenalism|phenomenalistic]] language, particularly in his discussions of [[J.O. Urmson]]'s work on analysis.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bergmann|first=Gustav|date=1957|title=The Revolt Against Logical Atomism--I|journal=The Philosophical Quarterly|volume=7|issue=29|pages=323–339|doi=10.2307/2217296|jstor=2217296}}</ref> The name for this kind of theory was coined in March 1911 by Russell, in a work published in French titled "Le Réalisme analytique" (published in translation as "Analytic Realism" in Volume 6 of ''The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell'').<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SSd9Iu1uXHoC&q=logical+atomism|title=Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909-13|last1=Russell|first1=Bertrand|last2=Slater|first2=John Greer|last3=Frohmann|first3=Bernd|date=1992|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=9780415084468|language=en}}</ref> Russell was developing and responding to what he called "[[logical holism]]"—i.e., the belief that the world operates in such a way that no part can be known without the whole being known first.<ref name="SEP">{{cite SEP |url-id=logical-atomism |title=Russell's Logical Atomism}}</ref> This belief is related to [[monism]], and is associated with the [[absolute idealism]] which was dominant in Britain at the time. The criticism of monism seen in the works of Russell and his colleague [[G. E. Moore]] can therefore be seen as an extension of their criticism of absolute idealism, particularly as it appeared in the works of [[F. H. Bradley]] and [[J. M. E. McTaggart]].<ref name="SEP" /> Logical atomism can thus be understood as a developed alternative to logical holism, or the "monistic logic" of the absolute idealists.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)