Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mesosaur
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Extinct family of reptiles}} {{distinguish|text=[[mosasaur]]s, marine reptiles of the Late Cretaceous}} {{Automatic taxobox | taxon = Mesosauridae | name = moasasaurus | image= Mesosaurus BW.jpg | image_caption = ''[[Mesosaurus]]'' | fossil_range = [[Cisuralian]], {{Fossil range|299|270.6}} | display_parents = 3 | parent_authority = [[Harry Govier Seeley|Seeley]], [[1892 in paleontology|1892]] | authority = Baur, [[1889 in paleontology|1889]] | subdivision_ranks = Genera | subdivision = * †''[[Brazilosaurus]]'' * †''[[Mesosaurus]]'' * †''[[Stereosternum]]'' }} '''Mesosaurs''' ("middle lizards") were a group of small aquatic reptiles that lived during the early [[Permian]] period ([[Cisuralian]]), roughly [[Geologic time scale|299 to 270 million years ago]]. Mesosaurs were the first known aquatic [[reptile]]s, having apparently returned to an aquatic lifestyle from more terrestrial ancestors. It is uncertain which and how many terrestrial traits these ancestors displayed; recent research cannot establish with confidence if the first [[amniotes]] were fully terrestrial, or only amphibious.<ref name=AC&ML10/> Most authors consider mesosaurs to have been aquatic,<ref name=AC&ML10/><ref name=SM06/> although adult animals may have been amphibious, rather than completely aquatic, as indicated by their moderate skeletal adaptations to a semiaquatic lifestyle.<ref name=GP08/><ref name="Pablo Nuñez Demarco 2018">Pablo Nuñez Demarco et al. Was Mesosaurus a Fully Aquatic Reptile? Front. Ecol. Evol, published online July 27, 2018; doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00109</ref> Similarly, their affinities are uncertain; they may have been among the most basal [[sauropsids]]<ref name=ML&RR95/><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.3389/feart.2017.00088|title = A Reassessment of the Taxonomic Position of Mesosaurs, and a Surprising Phylogeny of Early Amniotes| journal=Frontiers in Earth Science| volume=5|year = 2017|last1 = Laurin|first1 = Michel| last2=Piñeiro| first2=Graciela H.|page = 88|bibcode = 2017FrEaS...5...88L| doi-access=free|hdl=20.500.12008/33548|hdl-access=free}}</ref> or among the most basal [[parareptile]]s (in the case of which parareptiles were basal sauropsids).<ref name=MSP99/><ref>MacDougall, M.J.; Modesto, S.P.; Brocklehurst,N.; Verriere, A.; Reisz, R.R.; Fröbisch, J. (2018). "Response: A Reassessment of the Taxonomic Position of Mesosaurs, and a Surprising Phylogeny of Early Amniotes". ''Front. Earth Sci.'' 6:99 doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00099</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)