Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mit brennender Sorge
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|1937 papal encyclical condemning fascism and antisemitism in Germany}} {{Infobox encyclical | name = Mit brennender Sorge | language = German | translation = With deep [lit. "burning"] anxiety | argument = On the Church and the German Reich | date = {{Start date|1937|03|14|df=y}} |type=e | pope = Pius XI | papal_coat_of_arms = C o a Pio XI.svg | number = 28 of 31 | before = [[Vigilanti cura]] | after = Divini Redemptoris | web_en =https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html }} {{Use dmy dates|date=March 2017}} [[File:Mit brennender Sorge Speyer JS.jpg|thumb|The encyclical ''Mit brennender Sorge'' issued by Pope Pius XI was the first papal encyclical written in German.]] {{Social teachings of the popes}} {{Italic title}} {{Modern persecutions of the Catholic Church}} '''''Mit brennender Sorge''''' ({{Audio|GT Mit brennender Sorge.ogg|listen}} {{IPA|de|mɪt ˈbʀɛnəndɐ ˈzɔʁɡə}}, in English "With deep [lit. 'burning'] anxiety") is an [[encyclical]] of [[Pope Pius XI]], issued during the [[Nazi Germany|Nazi era]] on 10 March 1937 (but bearing a date of [[Passion Sunday]], 14 March).<ref name="cs">"Church and state through the centuries", Sidney Z. Ehler & John B Morrall, pp. 518–519, org pub 1954, reissued 1988, Biblo & Tannen, 1988, {{ISBN|0-8196-0189-6}}</ref> Written in [[German language|German]], not the usual [[Latin]], it was smuggled into Germany for fear of censorship and was read from the pulpits of all German Catholic churches on one of the Church's busiest Sundays, [[Palm Sunday]] (21 March that year).<ref name="Anton Gill p.58">Anton Gill; An Honourable Defeat; A History of the German Resistance to Hitler; Heinemann; London; 1994; p.58</ref><ref>"Before 1931 all such messages [encyclicals] were written in Latin. The encyclical ''Non abbiamo bisogno'' of June 29, 1931, which condemned certain theories and practices of Italian Fascism, particularly in the realm of education, and denounced certain treaty violations of Signor Mussolini's Government, was the first document of that kind that appeared in a language other than Latin." The Catholic Herald, "First Encyclical in German", PAGE 3, 9 April 1937 [http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk/article/9th-april-1937/3/first-encyclical-in-german] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140527215918/http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk/article/9th-april-1937/3/first-encyclical-in-german|date=27 May 2014}}</ref> The encyclical condemned breaches of the 1933 ''[[Reichskonkordat]]'' agreement signed between the [[German Reich]] and the [[Holy See]].<ref>Robert A. Ventresca – p.iv of photos, ''Soldier of Christ''</ref> It condemned "[[pantheistic]] confusion", "[[Modern paganism|neopaganism]]", "the so-called myth of race and blood", and the idolizing of the State. It contained a vigorous defense of the [[Old Testament]] with the belief that it prepares the way for the [[New Testament|New]].<ref name="Paul O p.156-157">Paul O'Shea, A Cross too Heavy, p.156-157</ref> The encyclical states that race is a fundamental value of the human community, which is necessary and honorable but condemns the exaltation of race, or the people, or the state, above their standard value to an idolatrous level.<ref>Martin Rhonheimer, The Holocaust: What Was Not Said, First Things 137 (November 2003): 18–28</ref> The encyclical declares "that man as a person possesses rights he holds from God, and which any collectivity must protect against denial, suppression or neglect."<ref>''Mit brennnder Sorge'', § 30 in [https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html English version]</ref> [[National Socialism]], [[Adolf Hitler]] and the [[Nazi Party]] are not named in the document. The term ''Reichsregierung'' (government of the Reich) is used to refer to the Nazi regime.<ref>Mit brennender Sorge Para 3</ref> The effort to produce and distribute over 300,000 copies of the letter was entirely secret, allowing priests across Germany to read the letter without interference.<ref>The Roman Catholic periodical ''The Tablet'' reported at the time "The Encyclical, which took the Nazi Government completely unawares, had been introduced into Germany by the diplomatic bag to the Nunciature, and Monsignor Orsenigo, Apostolic Nuncio in Berlin had arranged for its secret distribution all over the country so that it was read in every Catholic church of the Reich last Sunday, before the Government had time to confiscate and suppress it.", The Tablet, 3 April 1937, p.10 [http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/issue/3rd-april-1937/10/27913/rome-letter] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180426011950/http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/issue/3rd-april-1937/10/27913/rome-letter|date=26 April 2018}}</ref> The [[Gestapo]] raided the churches the next day to confiscate all the copies they could find, and the presses that had printed the letter were closed. According to historian [[Ian Kershaw]], an intensification of the general anti-[[kirchenkampf|church struggle]] began around April in response to the encyclical.<ref name="Ian Kershaw p.381-382">Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; WW Norton & Company; London; p. 381–382</ref> [[Klaus Scholder]] wrote: "state officials and the Party reacted with anger and disapproval. Nevertheless the great reprisal that was feared did not come. The concordat remained in force and despite everything the intensification of the battle against the two churches which then began remained within ordinary limits."<ref name="Scholder, p. 154-155">Scholder, p. 154-155</ref> The regime further constrained the actions of the Church and harassed monks with staged prosecutions for alleged immorality and phony abuse trials.<ref>The Catholic periodical ''The Tablet'' reported shortly after the issuing of the encyclical "The case in the Berlin court against three priests and five Catholic laymen is, in public opinion, the Reich's answer to the Pope's ''Mit brennender Sorge'' encyclical, as the prisoners have been in concentration camps for over a year. Chaplain Rossaint of Dusseldorf is, however, known as a pacifist and an opponent of the National Socialist regime, and it is not denied that he was indiscreet; but he is, moreover, accused of having tried to form a Catholic-Communist front on the plea that he baptized a Jewish Communist. This the accused denies, and his defence has been supported by Communist witnesses", The Tablet, p. 13, 24 April 1937 [http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/issue/24th-april-1937/13/27979/the-church-abroad] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220154146/http://archive.thetablet.co.uk/issue/24th-april-1937/13/27979/the-church-abroad|date=20 December 2016}}</ref> Though Hitler is not named in the encyclical, the German text does refer to a "''Wahnprophet''", which some have interpreted as meaning "mad prophet" and as <!--*** PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE SECTION "CLAIMED ATTACKS ON HITLER" BEFORE CHANGING THIS TEXT***--> referring to Hitler himself.<ref name="McGonigle172">McGonigle, p. 172: "the encyclical ''Mit brennender Sorge'' was read in Catholic Churches in Germany. In effect it taught that the racial ideas of the leader ''(Führer)'' and totalitarianism stood in opposition to the Catholic faith; Bokenkotter, pp. 389–392; Historian [[Michael Phayer]] wrote that the encyclical doesn't condemn Hitler or National Socialism, "as some have erroneously asserted" (Phayer, 2002), p. 2; "His encyclical ''Mit brennender Sorge'' was the 'first great official public document to dare to confront and criticize Nazism' and even described the Führer himself as a 'mad prophet possessed of repulsive arrogance.'"; Rhodes, pp. 204–205: "''Mit brennender Sorge'' did not prevaricate … Nor was the Führer himself spared, for his 'aspirations to divinity', 'placing himself on the same level as Christ': 'a mad prophet possessed of repulsive arrogance' (widerliche Hochmut)."; "It was not the case that Pius failed to "spare the Führer," or called him a "mad prophet possessed of repulsive arrogance." The text limits its critique of arrogance to unnamed Nazi "reformers" (John Connelly, Harvard University Press, 2012, "From Enemy to Brother: The Revolution in Catholic Teaching on the Jews, 1933–1965", p. 315, fn 52)</ref> It was reported at the time that the encyclical was paired and somewhat overshadowed by the anti-communist encyclical ''[[Divini Redemptoris]]'' of 19 March, in order to avoid the charge that the Pope was indirectly favoring communism.<ref>The Church And Germany, The Catholic Herald, ''"The Church And Germany"'', Page 8, 16 April 1937 [http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk/article/16th-april-1937/8/the-church-and-germany]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)