Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Morality
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Differentiation between right and wrong}} {{hatnote group| {{redirect-several|dab=off|Morality (disambiguation)|Morals (film){{!}}''Morals'' (film)|The Immoralist{{!}}''The Immoralist''}} {{distinguish|Morale|Molarity|Molality}} }} [[File:Tintoretto Allegory.jpg|thumb|''Allegory with a portrait of a Venetian senator (Allegory of the morality of earthly things)'', attributed to [[Tintoretto]], 1585]] '''Morality''' ({{etymology|la|{{wikt-lang|la|moralitas}}|manner, [[moral character|character]], proper behavior}}) is the categorization of [[intention]]s, [[Decision-making|decisions]] and [[Social actions|actions]] into those that are ''proper'', or ''right'', and those that are ''improper'', or ''wrong''.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Hellenistic Philosophers: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AfemGeG8SysC|volume=1|first1=A. A.|last1=Long|first2=D. N.|last2=Sedley|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|year=1987|pages=366β67|isbn=978-0521275569}}</ref> Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a [[code of conduct]] from a particular [[philosophy]], [[religion]] or [[culture]], or it can derive from a standard that is [[Universal morality|understood to be universal]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url= http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/|title= The Definition of Morality|author= Stanford University|date= 2011|encyclopedia= Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|publisher= Stanford University|access-date= 22 March 2014}}</ref> Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "[[good]]ness", "appropriateness" or "rightness". [[Moral philosophy]] includes [[meta-ethics]], which studies abstract issues such as moral [[ontology]] and moral [[epistemology]], and [[normative ethics]], which studies more concrete systems of moral decision-making such as [[deontological ethics]] and [[consequentialism]]. An example of normative [[Ethics|ethical philosophy]] is the [[Golden Rule]], which states: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself."<ref name = "Flew">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=golden rule|editor =[[Antony Flew]] | encyclopedia=A Dictionary of Philosophy | publisher = [[Pan Books]] in association with [[Macmillan Publishers|The MacMillan Press]] | year = 1979 | location = London | page = 134 | isbn = 978-0333262047|quote=The maxim 'Treat others how you wish to be treated'. Various expressions of this fundamental moral rule are to be found in tenets of most religions and creeds through the ages, testifying to its universal applicability. }}</ref><ref>[[Walter Terence Stace]] argued that the Golden Rule is much more than simply an [[ethical code]]. He posits that it "express[es] the essence of a universal morality." The rationale for this distinction occupies much of his book ''The Concept of Morals'' (1937). {{cite book | last = Stace | first = Walter T. | title = The Concept of Morals | url = https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.213305 | publisher = The MacMillan Company; reprinted by Peter Smith Publisher Inc, January 1990 | year= 1937 | location = New York | page = [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.213305/page/n152 136] | isbn = 978-0-8446-2990-2}}</ref> [[Immorality]] is the active opposition to morality (i.e., opposition to that which is good or right), while [[amorality]] is variously defined as an unawareness of, indifference toward, or disbelief in any particular set of moral standards or principles.<ref> {{Cite book| last = Johnstone | first = Megan-Jane | title = Bioethics: A Nursing Perspective | journal = Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses Journal | publisher = Elsevier Health Sciences | year = 2008 | volume = 3 | issue = 4 | pages = 102β03 | pmid = 2129925 | isbn = 978-0-7295-3873-2}}</ref><ref> {{Cite book| last = Superson | first = Anita | title = The Moral Skeptic | publisher = Oxford University Press | year = 2009 | pages = 127β59 | isbn = 978-0-19-537662-3}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/amorality | title = Amorality | access-date = 2010-06-18 | work = Dictionary.com}} "having no moral standards, restraints, or principles; unaware of or indifferent to questions of right or wrong"</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)