Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Nectocaris
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Extinct animal genus}} {{Speciesbox | genus = Nectocaris | species = pteryx | fossil_range = {{Fossil range|Cambrian Stage 3|Wuliuan}} {{Distinguish| Nectocotis}} | image = Nectocaris pteryx (ROM 60079).jpg | image_caption = Specimen ROM 60079 | parent_authority = Conway Morris, 1976 | authority = [[Simon Conway Morris|Conway Morris]], 1976 }} '''''Nectocaris''''' is a genus of squid-like animal of controversial affinities known from the [[Cambrian]] period. The initial fossils were described from the [[Burgess Shale]] of Canada. Other similar remains possibly referrable to the genus are known from the [[Emu Bay Shale]] of Australia and [[Chengjiang Biota]] of China. ''Nectocaris'' was a free-swimming, predatory or scavenging organism. This lifestyle is reflected in its binomial name: ''Nectocaris'' means "swimming shrimp" (from the [[Ancient Greek]] {{lang|el|νηκτόν}}, ''{{lang|el|[[:wikt:nekton|nekton]]}}'', meaning "swimmer" and {{lang|el|καρίς}}, ''{{lang|el|karis}}'', "shrimp"). Two morphs are known: a small morph, about an inch long, and a large morph, anatomically identical but around four times longer.<ref name="Smith2013c">{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=M.R. |year=2013 |title=Nectocaridid ecology, diversity and affinity: Early origin of a cephalopod-like body plan |journal=Paleobiology |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=291–321 |doi=10.1666/12029 |bibcode=2013Pbio...39..297S |s2cid=85744624}}</ref> Nectocaridids have controversial affinities. Some authors have suggested that they represent the earliest known [[Cephalopod|cephalopods]]. However, their morphology is strongly dissimilar to confirmed early cephalopods, and thus their affinities to cephalopods and even to [[Mollusca|molluscs]] more broadly are rejected by most authors.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Pohle |first1=Alexander |last2=Kröger |first2=Björn |last3=Warnock |first3=Rachel C. M. |last4=King |first4=Andy H. |last5=Evans |first5=David H. |last6=Aubrechtová |first6=Martina |last7=Cichowolski |first7=Marcela |last8=Fang |first8=Xiang |last9=Klug |first9=Christian |date=December 2022 |title=Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference |journal=BMC Biology |language=en |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=88 |doi=10.1186/s12915-022-01284-5 |issn=1741-7007 |pmc=9008929 |pmid=35421982 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Their affinities to any animal group beyond [[Bilateria]] are uncertain, though they have been suggested to be members of [[Lophotrochozoa]].<ref name=":1" /> The closely related Ordovician taxon ''[[Nectocotis]]'' is a second genus, closely resembling ''Nectocaris'', but suggested to have had an internal skeletal element.<ref name=Smith2019>{{cite journal |last=Smith |first=Martin R. |year=2019 |title=An Ordovician nectocaridid hints at an endocochleate origin of Cephalopoda |journal=Journal of Paleontology |pages=64–69 |volume=94 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2019.57 |s2cid=201208912 |url=http://dro.dur.ac.uk/28457/1/28457.pdf}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)