Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Object (grammar)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Grammatical concept}} {{Grammatical categories}} {{linguistics}} In [[linguistics]], an '''object''' is any of several types of [[Argument (linguistics)|arguments]].<ref>For descriptions of the traditional distinction between subject and object, see for instance Freeborn (1995:31) and Kesner Bland (1996:415).</ref> In subject-prominent, [[nominative-accusative]] languages such as [[English language|English]], a [[transitive verb]] typically distinguishes between its [[Subject (linguistics)|subject]] and any of its objects, which can include but are not limited to direct objects,<ref>{{cite news |title=What is a Direct Object? |newspaper=Glossary of Linguistic Terms |date=3 December 2015 |url=https://glossary.sil.org/term/direct-object |publisher=Summer Institute of Linguistics |access-date=14 March 2020}}</ref> indirect objects,<ref>{{cite web |title=What is an Indirect Object? |date=3 December 2015 |url=https://glossary.sil.org/term/indirect-object |publisher=Summer Institute of Linguistics |access-date=14 March 2020}}</ref> and arguments of adpositions ([[Preposition and postposition|prepositions or postpositions]]); the latter are more accurately termed ''oblique arguments'', thus including other arguments not covered by core grammatical roles, such as those governed by [[Grammatical case|case morphology]] (as in languages such as [[Latin]]) or [[relational noun]]s (as is typical for members of the [[Mesoamerican Linguistic Area]]). In [[ergative-absolutive]] languages, for example most [[Australian Aboriginal languages]], the term "subject" is ambiguous, and thus the term "[[Agent (linguistics)|agent]]" is often used instead to contrast with "object", such that basic word order is often spoken of in terms such as Agent-Object-Verb (AOV) instead of [[Subject-Object-Verb]] (SOV).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Deal |first1=Amy Rose |title=Syntactic Ergativity: Analysis and Identification |journal=Annual Review of Linguistics |date=2016 |volume=2 |pages=165–185 |doi=10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040642|doi-access=free }}</ref> [[Topic-prominent language]]s, such as [[Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]], focus their grammars less on the subject-object or agent-object dichotomies but rather on the [[Pragmatics|pragmatic]] dichotomy of [[topic and comment]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dikken |first1=Marcel den |title=A comment on the topic of topic–comment |journal=Lingua |date=2003-12-29 |volume=115 |issue=5 |pages=691–710 |doi=10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.005}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)