Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Observer bias
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Cognitive bias}} '''Observer bias''' is one of the types of [[detection bias]] and is defined as any kind of systematic divergence from accurate facts during observation and the recording of data and information in studies.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Mahtani |first1=Kamal |last2=Spencer |first2=Elizabeth A. |author-link2=Elizabeth A. Spencer |last3=Brassey |first3=Jon |last4=Heneghan |first4=Carl |date=2018-02-01 |title=Catalogue of bias: observer bias |url=https://ebm.bmj.com/content/23/1/23 |journal=BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine |language=en |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=23–24 |doi=10.1136/ebmed-2017-110884 |issn=2515-446X |pmid=29367322 |s2cid=46794082|url-access=subscription }}</ref> The definition can be further expanded upon to include the systematic difference between what is observed due to variation in observers, and what the true value is.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Miettinen |first=Olli S. |date=2008-11-01 |title=M. Porta, S. Greenland & J. M. Last (eds): A Dictionary of Epidemiology. A Handbook Sponsored by the I.E.A. |journal=European Journal of Epidemiology |volume=23 |issue=12 |pages=813–817 |doi=10.1007/s10654-008-9296-5 |s2cid=41169767 |issn=0393-2990}}</ref> Observer bias is the tendency of observers to not see what is there, but instead to see what they expect or want to see. This is a common occurrence in the everyday lives of many and is a significant problem that is sometimes encountered in scientific research and studies.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pronin |first=Emily |date=2007-01-01 |title=Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment |url=https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613(06)00299-3 |journal=Trends in Cognitive Sciences |language=English |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=37–43 |doi=10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001 |issn=1364-6613 |pmid=17129749|s2cid=2754235 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Observation is critical to scientific research and activity, and as such, observer bias may be as well.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hróbjartsson |first1=Asbjørn |last2=Thomsen |first2=Ann Sofia Skou |last3=Emanuelsson |first3=Frida |last4=Tendal |first4=Britta |last5=Hilden |first5=Jørgen |last6=Boutron |first6=Isabelle |last7=Ravaud |first7=Philippe |last8=Brorson |first8=Stig |date=2012-02-27 |title=Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors |url=https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e1119 |journal=BMJ |language=en |volume=344 |pages=e1119 |doi=10.1136/bmj.e1119 |issn=0959-8138 |pmid=22371859|s2cid=23296493 |doi-access=free }}</ref> When such biases exist, scientific studies can result in an over- or underestimation of what is true and accurate, which compromises the validity of the findings and results of the study, even if all other designs and procedures in the study were appropriate.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last1=Tripepi |first1=Giovanni |last2=Jager |first2=Kitty J. |last3=Dekker |first3=Friedo W. |last4=Zoccali |first4=Carmine |date=2010 |title=Selection Bias and Information Bias in Clinical Research |url=https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/312871 |journal=Nephron Clinical Practice |language=english |volume=115 |issue=2 |pages=c94–c99 |doi=10.1159/000312871 |issn=1660-2110 |pmid=20407272|s2cid=18856450 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Observational data forms the foundation of a significant body of knowledge. Observation is a method of data collection and falls into the category of qualitative research techniques. There are a number of benefits of observation, including its simplicity as a data collection method and its usefulness for hypotheses. Simultaneously, there are many limitations and disadvantages in the observation process, including the potential lack of reliability, poor validity, and faulty perception. Participants' observations are widely used in sociological and anthropological studies, while systematic observation is used where researchers need to collect data without participants direct interactions. The most common observation method is naturalistic observation, where subjects are observed in their natural environments with the goal to assess the behaviour in an intervention free and natural setting. Observer bias is especially probable when the investigator or researcher has vested interests in the outcome of the research or has strong preconceptions. Coupled with ambiguous underlying data and a subjective scoring method, these three factors contribute heavily to the incidence of observer bias.<ref name="Tuyttens 273–280">{{Cite journal |last1=Tuyttens |first1=F. A. M. |last2=de Graaf |first2=S. |last3=Heerkens |first3=J. L. T. |last4=Jacobs |first4=L. |last5=Nalon |first5=E. |last6=Ott |first6=S. |last7=Stadig |first7=L. |last8=Van Laer |first8=E. |last9=Ampe |first9=B. |date=2014-04-01 |title=Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334721400092X |journal=Animal Behaviour |language=en |volume=90 |pages=273–280 |doi=10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.007 |s2cid=53195951 |issn=0003-3472|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)