Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Popularity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Concept in sociology}} {{for|the 2006 indie album|Popularity (album)}} {{redirect|Likable|the song by Toshinori Yonekura|Likable (song)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2014}} {{Sociology}} In [[sociology]], '''popularity''' is how much a person, idea, place, item or other concept is either liked or accorded status<ref>{{Cite report|pages=101|author=Massachusetts Dept. of Corporations and Taxation|date=1932|title=Annual Report of the Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation|publisher=University of Michigan}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=S |first=Waisbord |date=2004 |title=McTV: Understanding the Global Popularity of Television Formats. |url=https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476404268922 |journal=Television & New Media |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=359β383|doi=10.1177/1527476404268922 |s2cid=220732538 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blaikie |first=William Garden |date=1882 |title=The Catholic Presbyterian, ed. by W.G. Blaikie |journal=The Catholic Presbyterian, ed. By W.G. Blaikie |publisher=The Oxford University |volume=7 |pages=127}}</ref> by other people. Liking can be due to [[reciprocal liking]], [[interpersonal attraction]], and similar factors. [[Social status]] can be due to [[Dominance (ethology)|dominance]], superiority, and similar factors. For example, a kind person may be considered likable and therefore more popular than another person, and a wealthy person may be considered [[superior (hierarchy)|superior]] and therefore more popular than another person. There are two primary types of interpersonal popularity: perceived and sociometric. '''Perceived popularity''' is measured by asking people who the most popular or socially important people in their [[social group]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ellison|first1=Nicole B.|last2=Steinfield|first2=Charles|last3=Lampe|first3=Cliff|date= July 2007|title=The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites|journal=Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication|language=en|volume=12|issue=4|pages=1143β1168|doi=10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x|doi-access=free}}</ref> are. '''Sociometric popularity''' is measured by objectively measuring the number of connections a person has to others in the group.<ref>{{Cite journal|first1=E.W.|first2= J.T.|last1=Zuckerman|last2= Jost|date=2001|title=What Makes You Think You're so Popular? Self-Evaluation Maintenance and the Subjective Side of the "Friendship Paradox"|url=https://doi.org/10.2307/3090112|journal=Social Psychology Quarterly|volume=64|issue=3|pages=207β223|doi=10.2307/3090112|jstor=3090112}}</ref> A person can have high perceived popularity without having high sociometric popularity, and ''vice versa''. According to psychologist Tessa Lansu at the [[Radboud University Nijmegen]], "Popularity [has] to do with being the middle point of a [[Social group|group]] and having [[Social influence|influence]] on it."<ref name=":0">{{Cite web | url=http://www.ru.nl/sociology/@877216/popularity/ | title=Popularity an unconscious deterrent }}{{Dead link|date=May 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)